Premature InfantsNCT06965842
The Video System to Provide a Developmental Training Guide for Preterm Infants
A study testing Parent-centered developmental training in people with Premature Infants and Very Low Birth Weight Infants, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
This study aimed to establish a systematic developmental training guide protocol for parent-centered early intervention and verify the concept and feasibility of a video system for parent-centered in-home developmental therapy under the monitoring of a therapist. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 1 month
- Conditions the study is for
- Premature Infants, Very Low Birth Weight Infants
- What is being tested?
- Parent-centered developmental training
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- 24 Jun 2025to 30 Jan 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 1 month
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Premature infants less than 32 weeks of gestation or extremely low birth weight infants less than 1500 g
- Premature infants with a corrected age of less than 1 month
- Brain damage through brain imaging (e.g. cranial USG, brain MRI)
Who cannot join
- Multiple malformations or genetic abnormalities
- Severe visual or hearing impairment
- Loss of consciousness
- Tracheostomy
- Medically unstable condition
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
South Korea1 site
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Jongno-gu, 03080
About this study
Official title: The Video System to Provide a Developmental Training Guide for In-home, Parent-centered, Early Intervention in Preterm Infants: A Proof of Concept and Feasibility Study
This study aimed to establish a systematic developmental training guide protocol for parent-centered early intervention and verify the concept and feasibility of a video system for parent-centered in-home developmental therapy under the monitoring of a therapist. The target group is premature infants under 32 weeks of gestation or very low birth weight infants under 1500 g with brain damage. A single-arm intervention group of 10 people was recruited, and considering a dropout rate of 20%, the total number of participants was calculated to be 12. 1:1 monitoring to provide parent-centered early intervention at home after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit is conducted twice a week for 30 minutes per session using a video platform (Zoom) until the corrected age of 6 months. Parents record the developmental training process using a smartphone and transmit it to the therapist, who analyzes the video data to provide new treatment goals and guidelines. Feasibility assessment included: 1) Exercise diary: Number of total and average sessions performed (N) and percentage (%), number of total and average sessions completed (N) and percentage (%) 2) Parent questionnaire 3) Video analysis: Periodic video education and developmental training video acquisition and analysis 4) Heart rate analysis: Analysis of average heart rate during and after rest and developmental training 5) Safety analysis: Number of times (N) and reasons for exercise interruption during developmental training 6) Developmental assessment: Implementation of developmental assessments such as GMOS, MOS-R, HINE, GMFM, and BSID. For safety assessment, if the following symptoms appear during development training, stop exercising and rest until stable. If oxygen saturation drops by more than 10% compared to resting, causing cyanosis and dyspnea, or if heart rate increases by more than 150 beats/min.
- Conditions
- Premature Infants, Very Low Birth Weight Infants
- Being tested
- Parent-centered developmental training
- Keywords
- developmental training, premature infants, very low birth weight infants, early intervention
- Medical subject headings
- Premature Birth
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Parent-centered developmental trainingOther
After discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit, 1:1 monitoring is conducted at home for 30 minutes twice a week using a video conferencing platform (Zoom) until the corrected age of 6 months to provide parent-centered early intervention. Parents film the developmental training process using a smartphone and send the video to the therapist, who analyzes the video data to provide new treatment goals and guidelines.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| intervention | Experimental | Not described Receives: Other: Parent-centered developmental training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of total and average sessions performed (N)
Measured: up to corrected age 6 months
Percentage of total and average sessions performed (%)
Measured: up to corrected age 6 months
Number of total and average sessions completed (N)
Measured: up to corrected age 6 months
Percentage of total and average sessions completed (%)
Measured: up to corrected age 6 months
Parent questionnaire
Measured: at corrected age 6 months
General Movement Optimality Score
Minimum score: 5 Maximum score: 42 Assessing the quality of writhing movements in infants (typically from term age to 6-9 weeks post-term). Higher scores reflect more optimal general movements - smooth, variable, and age-appropriate. Lower scores may suggest abnormal or poor-quality movements, which are associated with neurological risk.
Measured: corrected age 0, 1.5months
Motor Optimality Score-Revised
Minimum score: 5 Maximum score: 28
Evaluating fidgety movements and other spontaneous motor patterns in infants (typically from 9 to 20 weeks post-term). Higher scores indicate better motor repertoire and neurological function, and are associated with typical development. Lower scores are often seen in infants at risk for motor disorders, such as cerebral palsy.
Measured: corrected age 4months
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination
Total Score Range:
Minimum: 0 Maximum: 78
The total score is the sum of scores across 26 items, each scored from 0 to 3:
0 = severely abnormal
- = moderately abnormal
- = mildly abnormal
- = normal Higher HINE scores (closer to 78) indicate better neurological function. Lower scores may suggest neurological impairment or risk for conditions such as cerebral palsy.
Measured: corrected age 4, 6, 9 months
Gross Motor Function Measure
GMFM-88
Items: 88 items across 5 dimensions:
Lying and Rolling Sitting Crawling and Kneeling Standing Walking, Running, and Jumping Scoring per item: 0 to 3
Total Score Range:
Minimum: 0% Maximum: 100% (Expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score) Higher scores represent better gross motor function.
Measured: corrected age 6, 9 months
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development
- Scaled Scores (for subtests like Fine Motor, Expressive Language, etc.): Range: Minimum: 1 Maximum: 19 Mean: 10 Standard Deviation (SD): 3
- Composite Scores (for broader domains like Cognitive, Motor, etc.):
Range:
Minimum: 40 Maximum: 160 Mean: 100 Standard Deviation (SD): 15 130 and above Very Superior 120-129 Superior 110-119 High Average 90-109 Average 80-89 Low Average 70-79 Borderline Below 70 Extremely Low / Delayed
Measured: corrected age 9 months
Number of exercise interruption (N)
Measured: up to corrected age 6 months
Number of adverse event (N)
Measured: up to corrected age 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 May 2025
- Study start24 Jun 2025
- Primary completion30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jan 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Premature InfantsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Woo Hyung Lee, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06965842
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0420222050
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 17 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Video System to Provide a Developmental Training Guide for In-home, Parent-centered, Early Intervention in Preterm Infants: A Proof of Concept and Feasibility Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06965842
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 0420222050
- Conditions
- Premature Infants, Very Low Birth Weight Infants
- Keywords
- developmental training, premature infants, very low birth weight infants, early intervention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 24 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jan 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aimed to establish a systematic developmental training guide protocol for parent-centered early intervention and verify the concept and feasibility of a video system for parent-centered in-home developmental therapy under the monitoring of a therapist. The target group is premature infants under 32 weeks of gestation or very low birth weight infants under 1500 g with brain damage. A single-arm intervention group of 10 people was recruited, and considering a dropout rate of 20%, the total number of participants was calculated to be 12. 1:1 monitoring to provide parent-centered early intervention at home after discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit is conducted twice a week for 30 minutes per session using a video platform (Zoom) until the corrected age of 6 months. Parents record the developmental training process using a smartphone and transmit it to the therapist, who analyzes the video data to provide new treatment goals and guidelines. Feasibility assessment included: 1) Exercise diary: Number of total and average sessions performed (N) and percentage (%), number of total and average sessions completed (N) and percentage (%) 2) Parent questionnaire 3) Video analysis: Periodic video education and developmental training video acquisition and analysis 4) Heart rate analysis: Analysis of average heart rate during and after rest and developmental training 5) Safety analysis: Number of times (N) and reasons for exercise interruption during developmental training 6) Developmental assessment: Implementation of developmental assessments such as GMOS, MOS-R, HINE, GMFM, and BSID. For safety assessment, if the following symptoms appear during development training, stop exercising and rest until stable. If oxygen saturation drops by more than 10% compared to resting, causing cyanosis and dyspnea, or if heart rate increases by more than 150 beats/min.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| intervention | Experimental | Other: Parent-centered developmental training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 1 month
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Premature infants less than 32 weeks of gestation or extremely low birth weight infants less than 1500 g
- Premature infants with a corrected age of less than 1 month
- Brain damage through brain imaging (e.g. cranial USG, brain MRI)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Multiple malformations or genetic abnormalities
- Severe visual or hearing impairment
- Loss of consciousness
- Tracheostomy
- Medically unstable condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Parent-centered developmental trainingAfter discharge from the neonatal intensive care unit, 1:1 monitoring is conducted at home for 30 minutes twice a week using a video conferencing platform (Zoom) until the corrected age of 6 months to provide parent-centered early intervention. Parents film the developmental training process using a smartphone and send the video to the therapist, who analyzes the video data to provide new treatment goals and guidelines. | Other | intervention |
Primary outcome
Number of total and average sessions performed (N)
Time frame: up to corrected age 6 months
Percentage of total and average sessions performed (%)
Time frame: up to corrected age 6 months
Number of total and average sessions completed (N)
Time frame: up to corrected age 6 months
Percentage of total and average sessions completed (%)
Time frame: up to corrected age 6 months
Parent questionnaire
Time frame: at corrected age 6 months
General Movement Optimality Score
Time frame: corrected age 0, 1.5months
Minimum score: 5 Maximum score: 42 Assessing the quality of writhing movements in infants (typically from term age to 6-9 weeks post-term). Higher scores reflect more optimal general movements - smooth, variable, and age-appropriate. Lower scores may suggest abnormal or poor-quality movements, which are associated with neurological risk.
Motor Optimality Score-Revised
Time frame: corrected age 4months
Minimum score: 5 Maximum score: 28 Evaluating fidgety movements and other spontaneous motor patterns in infants (typically from 9 to 20 weeks post-term). Higher scores indicate better motor repertoire and neurological function, and are associated with typical development. Lower scores are often seen in infants at risk for motor disorders, such as cerebral palsy.
Hammersmith Infant Neurological Examination
Time frame: corrected age 4, 6, 9 months
Total Score Range: Minimum: 0 Maximum: 78 The total score is the sum of scores across 26 items, each scored from 0 to 3: 0 = severely abnormal 1. = moderately abnormal 2. = mildly abnormal 3. = normal Higher HINE scores (closer to 78) indicate better neurological function. Lower scores may suggest neurological impairment or risk for conditions such as cerebral palsy.
Gross Motor Function Measure
Time frame: corrected age 6, 9 months
GMFM-88 Items: 88 items across 5 dimensions: Lying and Rolling Sitting Crawling and Kneeling Standing Walking, Running, and Jumping Scoring per item: 0 to 3 Total Score Range: Minimum: 0% Maximum: 100% (Expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score) Higher scores represent better gross motor function.
Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development
Time frame: corrected age 9 months
1. Scaled Scores (for subtests like Fine Motor, Expressive Language, etc.): Range: Minimum: 1 Maximum: 19 Mean: 10 Standard Deviation (SD): 3 2. Composite Scores (for broader domains like Cognitive, Motor, etc.): Range: Minimum: 40 Maximum: 160 Mean: 100 Standard Deviation (SD): 15 130 and above Very Superior 120-129 Superior 110-119 High Average 90-109 Average 80-89 Low Average 70-79 Borderline Below 70 Extremely Low / Delayed
Number of exercise interruption (N)
Time frame: up to corrected age 6 months
Number of adverse event (N)
Time frame: up to corrected age 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Sep 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Premature Infants
Recruiting
Effects of Enteral Feeding Regimens on NEC, Mortality, and Neurodevelopment in Very Preterm Infants
Very Preterm Infant, Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC)
Recruiting
Nutritional Maturity in Preterm Newborns (Premature Infant Oral Motor Intervention, PIOMI)
Preterm, Preterm Infant Development
RecruitingPhase 4
Impact of Higher Zinc Supplementation on Neonatal Weight Velocity
Extreme Prematurity,Extremely Low Birthweight, BPD - Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia
Not yet recruiting
Strap To Reduce Apnea in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Crossover Trial
Apnea of Prematurity, Intermittent Hypoxemia
Recruiting
Ventilator Pressure and Optimization of Compliance and Hemodynamics
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia, Pulmonary Hypertension Due to Lung Diseases and Hypoxia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Parent-centered developmental training in people with Premature Infants and Very Low Birth Weight Infants, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of total and average sessions performed (N) (time frame: up to corrected age 6 months). The study lists 12 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Sep 2025.