AzTrials
AzTrials

Community-acquired PneumoniaPRONECAPNCT06966310

Awake Prone Positioning of Patients Suffering Community Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Nasal High Flow Therapy

A study testing Prone position in people with Community-acquired Pneumonia, run by University Hospital, Tours at 38 sites in France.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Community acquired pneumonia, in particular when requiring oxygen therapy because of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and meeting acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) criteria frequently leads to tracheal intubation and poor outcome. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Community-acquired Pneumonia
What is being tested?
Prone position
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
1,078 participants
Where
38 sitesFrance
Study dates
30 Nov 2025to Oct 2034
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients admitted to an intensive care unit or intermediate care unit
  • Suspicion of community acquired pneumonia (at least one of the 3 criteria): fever, cough, purulent expectoration
  • And abnormalities suggestive of pneumonia by chest X-ray or CT-scan
  • PaO2/FiO2 ratio <300 mmHg (or equivalent SpO2/FiO2 i.e. < 315 mmHg) under a minimum gas flow of 30 L/min.
  • Person affiliated to a French social security system or equivalent
  • Informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Positive SARS-COV2 test within the last 30 days
  • Indication for immediate intubation
  • Patients for whom a "do not intubate" decision has been made
  • Chest trauma or other contraindication to prone position
  • Patients with formal indication for non-invasive ventilation: exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Subjects who are under legal protection measure
  • More than 8h awake prone positioning prior to inclusion
  • More than 48h since intensive care unit or intermediate care unit admission.

Trial locations and contacts

38 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

38 sites in 1 country

France38 sites, 38 recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Amiens

    Amiens

    Clément BRAULT

    Clément BRAULT

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Angers

    Angers

    Pierre ASFAR

    Pierre ASFAR

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Argenteuil

    Argenteuil

    Gaëtan PLANTEFEVE

    Gaëtan PLANTEFEVE

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Belfort

    Belfort

    Julio BADIE

    Julio BADIE

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Besancon

    Besançon

    Thibault VIEILLE

    Thibault VIEILLE

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Bethune

    Béthune

    Ghada SBOUI

    Ghada SBOUI

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Blois

    Blois

    Julien GROUILLE

    Julien GROUILLE

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Bordeaux

    Bordeaux

    Alexandre BOYER

    Alexandre BOYER

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Bourg en Bresse

    Bourg-en-Bresse

    Nicholas SEDILLOT

    Nicholas SEDILLOT

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Bourges

    Bourges

    Anna BOURREAU

    Anna BOURREAU

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Brest

    Brest

    Gwénaël PRAT

    Gwénaël PRAT

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Colombes

    Colombes

    Damien ROUX

    Damien ROUX Damien

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Dieppe

    Dieppe

    Pierre-Louis DECLERCQ

    Pierre-Louis DECLERCQ

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Dijon

    Dijon

    Jean-Pierre QUENOT

    Jean-Pierre QUENOT

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Dreux

    Dreux

    Florent BAVOZET

    Florent BAVOZET

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Garches

    Garche

    Djillali ANNANE

    Djillali ANNANE

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Grenoble

    Grenoble

    Guilhem WATTECAMPS

    Guilhem WATTECAMPS

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, La Roche sur Yon

    La Roche-sur-Yon

    Jean-Claude LACHERADE

    Jean-Claude LACHERADE

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Le Mans

    Le Mans

    Mickael LANDAIS

    Mickael LANDAIS

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Lens

    Lens

    Camille PROUTEAU

    Camille PROUTEAU

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Lille

    Lille

    Saadalla NSEIR

    Saadalla NSEIR

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Lorient

    Lorient

    Guillaume GRILLET

    Guillaume GRILLET

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Lyon

    Lyon

    Hodane YONIS

    Hodane YONIS

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Lyon

    Lyon

    Laurent ARGAUD

    Laurent ARGAUD

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Morlaix

    Morlaix

    Pierre-Yves EGRETEAU

    Pierre-Yves EGRETEAU

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Nantes

    Nantes

    Jean REIGNIER

    Jean REIGNIER

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Nice

    Nice

    Clément SACCHERI

    Clément SACCHERI

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Nice

    Nice

    Robert ALEXANDRE

    Robert ALEXANDRE

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Orléans

    Orléans

    François BARBIER

    François BARBIER

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Cochin

    Paris

    Jean-Paul MIRA

    Jean-Paul MIRA

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Tenon

    Paris

    Muriel FARTOUKH

    Muriel FARTOUKH

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Poitiers

    Poitiers

    Arnaud THILLE

    Arnaud THILLE

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Rouen

    Rouen

    Grégoire JOLLY

    Grégoire JOLLY

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Saint Brieuc

    Saint-Brieuc

    François LEGAY

    François LEGAY

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Saint Nazaire

    Saint-Nazaire

    Patricia COUROUBLE

    Patricia COUROUBLE

    Recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Strasbourg

    Strasbourg

    Julien DEMISELLE

    Julien DEMISELLE

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Strasbourg

    Strasbourg

    Jean-Etienne HERBRECHT

    Jean-Etienne HERBRECHT

    Not yet recruiting
  • Intensive care, University Hospital, Tours

    Tours

    Stephan EHRMANN

    Stephan EHRMANN

    Recruiting

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Awake Prone Positioning of Patients Suffering Community Acquired Pneumonia Requiring Nasal High Flow Therapy, Excluding COVID-19

Community acquired pneumonia, in particular when requiring oxygen therapy because of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure and meeting acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) criteria frequently leads to tracheal intubation and poor outcome.

Among invasively mechanically ventilated patients with ARDS and presenting a PaO2/FiO2 ratio (arterial partial pressure of oxygen to inspired fraction of oxygen) of less than 150 mmHg, the prone position significantly reduces mortality and represents standard care (Guérin 2013). Among non-intubated COVID-19 patients, a subtype of viral community acquired pneumonia, a recent study showed that awake prone positioning reduces the composite outcome of intubation or death among patients requiring nasal high flow therapy. Furthermore, it favored weaning of nasal high flow therapy.

Read more

Prone position in patients with non-COVID ARDS treated with high nasal flow was evaluated in 20 patients with predominantly viral pneumonia (Ding 2020) and was associated with improved oxygenation.

Coordinating investigator hypothesize that prone positioning of patients suffering non-COVID community acquired pneumonia and undergoing nasal high flow therapy can significantly improve outcome by reducing the need for intubation and associated therapies such as sedation and muscle relaxation.

Being tested
Prone position
Medical subject headings
Community-Acquired Pneumonia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Prone positionOther

    depending on tolerance, the objective is to spend as much time as possible, up to 16h and beyond, in prone position per period of 24 hours. For each session the patients will be encouraged to stay as long as possible in the prone position (i.e. ideally 4-8 hours each session).

Study groups in NCT06966310
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Prone position groupExperimentalpatients will be invited and assisted to prone as long as possible every day. The goal is to achieve at least 8h in the prone position per 24h period, with 3-6 prone sessions.
Receives: Other: Prone position
Control groupNo interventionUsual care including nasal high flow therapy adapted for a SpO2 of 92-95%. No prone positioning.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Intubation within 28 days of randomization

    Analyzed in a competing risk framework with death and intensive care unit discharge taken into account as competing events.

    Measured: From randomization to day 28

Secondary outcomes (17)
  1. Patient comfort before the first prone session, using a visual analogue scale.

    A scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means total discomfort and 10 means optimal comfort.

    Measured: From randomization to 6 hours

  2. Patient comfort during the first prone session, using a visual analogue scale.

    A scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means total discomfort and 10 means optimal comfort.

    Measured: From randomization to day 1

  3. Patient comfort after the first prone session, using a visual analogue scale.

    A scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means total discomfort and 10 means optimal comfort.

    Measured: From randomization to day 1

  4. Oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index [ratio of SpO2/FiO2 to respiratory rate, Roca 2019]) before the first prone session for patients in the intervention group.

    Measured: From randomization to 6 hours

  5. Oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index [ratio of SpO2/FiO2 to respiratory rate, Roca 2019]) during the first prone session for patients in the intervention group.

    Measured: From randomization to day 1

  6. Oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index [ratio of SpO2/FiO2 to respiratory rate, Roca 2019]) after the first prone session for patients in the intervention group.

    Measured: From randomization to day 1

  7. Daily patient comfort comparison between groups from day 1 to day 3, using a visual analogue scale.

    Measured: From day 1 to day 3

  8. Oxygenation (PaO2/FiO2 ratio and ROX index) daily comparison between groups from day 1 to day 3.

    Measured: From day 1 to day 3

  9. Time to treatment escalation to non-invasive ventilation or continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) with intubation or death as competing events (up to day 28 or intensive care unit discharge whichever occurs first).

    Measured: From randomization to day 28 or intensive care unit discharge whichever occurs first

  10. Time to successful weaning of nasal high flow with intubation or death as competing events (up to day 28 or intensive care unit discharge whichever occurs first).

    Measured: From randomization to day 28 or intensive care unit discharge whichever occurs first

  11. Time to intensive care unit discharge and time to hospital discharge (up to day 28).

    Measured: From randomization to day 28

  12. Mortality

    Measured: From randomization to day 90

  13. Mortality

    Measured: From randomization to day 28 or intensive care unit and hospital discharge

  14. Nursing workload: time spent in the patient room by nursing staff during the 24 hours post randomization in both groups

    measured as person.hours

    Measured: From randomization to 24 hours post randomization

  15. Evolution of patient's quality of life

    using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The response is given on 5-point scales (1: no problems; 2: slight problems; 3: moderate problems; 4: severe problems; 5: extreme problems or total inability)

    Measured: At 90 days

  16. Evolution of patient's quality of life

    using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The response is given on 5-point scales (1: no problems; 2: slight problems; 3: moderate problems; 4: severe problems; 5: extreme problems or total inability)

    Measured: At 5 years

  17. Safety: skin lesions, lines dislodgement, central line infection, vomiting, (up to day 28 or intensive care unit discharge whichever occurs first).

    Measured: From randomization to day 28 or intensive care unit discharge whichever occurs first).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 May 2025
  2. Study start30 Nov 2025
  3. Primary completionNov 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionOct 2034 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
1,078 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06966310
Sponsor's protocol ID
DR230003
Acronym
PRONECAP
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
2 May 2025
Last updated
4 May 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Prone position in people with Community-acquired Pneumonia, run by University Hospital, Tours at 38 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 38 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Stephan EHRMANN (2.47.47.38.55 ext. +33, stephanehrmann@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Intubation within 28 days of randomization (time frame: From randomization to day 28). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 May 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in