Chronic Respiratory AcidosisNCT06970002
Respiratory Stabilization in Chronic Acidosis Before Bronchofiberoscopy & Non-Invasive Ventilation Effectivenes
A study testing Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support method and Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method in people with Chronic Respiratory Acidosis, run by Medical University of Silesia.
Trial summary
Bronchofiberoscopy (FOB) is a minimally invasive and safe procedure performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. FOB frequently impairs respiratory function, which may lead to possible exacerbation of respiratory failure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Respiratory Acidosis
- What is being tested?
- Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support method and Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 210 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Oct 2025to 31 Oct 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age with indications for diagnostic bronchoscopy:
- Diagnostic test: suspected lung cancer, suspected sarcoidosis, mediastinal lymphadenopathy,
- Patient who signed a written informed consent to participate in the study,
- pCO2 > 45 mmHg and/or HCO3- > 27 mmol/l but pH ≥ 7.35 in a blood gas test performed immediately before qualification for bronchoscopy.
Who cannot join
- Lack of written informed consent of the subject to participate in the research project,
- Coronary artery disease CCS III/IV,
- Hemodynamic failure, use of pressor amines, myocardial infarction in the last 2 weeks without PCI treatment, unstable angina pectoris, severe arrhythmias - especially ventricular,
- Pneumothorax not secured with drainage,
- Platelet count <20,000/µl, if platelets are not transfused immediately before/during the procedure,
- INR > 1.5xULN or APTT >36 s.1.5xULN, in the case of diagnostic FOB [16],
- Anemia: hemoglobin (Hb) level <6 g/dl or 6-10 g/dl if the physician prescribes a blood transfu-sion,
- Patients who were intubated before randomization.
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Szymon Skoczyński, PhD, professor of university contact
About this study
Official title: Assessment of the Importance of Respiratory Stabilization in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Acidosis Before a Diagnostic Bronchofiberoscopy, as Well as the Effectiveness of Different Types of Non-invasive Ventilation During the Procedure
Bronchofiberoscopy (FOB) is a minimally invasive and safe procedure performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. FOB frequently impairs respiratory function, which may lead to possible exacerbation of respiratory failure.
Currently, the most frequent respiratory support is passive oxygen therapy, but non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are increasingly attempted, however the optimal setting and indications for NIV and HFNC in patients undergoing FOB with respiratory acidosis, haven't been determined yet.
Read more
Methods:
The study protocol describes a prospective, multicenter, two- armed randomized controlled trial (RCT).
The investigators aim to study two patients groups, based on FOB indications and the type of respiratory acidosis:
- Diagnostic FOB; patients with chronic respiratory acidosis (pH ≥7.35; pCO2 > 45mmHg and/or HCO3- >27 mmol/l);
- randomized to: passive oxygen, NIV, HFNC;
- total number of participants: 210
Randomization:
two-step randomization (1st randomization :a or b; 2nd randomization: i- iii method of respiratory support):
- Stabilization of respiratory parameters before FOB (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC iii. Passive oxygen therapy b. FOB right away (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC
Before FOB, both groups will undergo arterial blood gas analysis (ABG). During FOB there will be a continuous monitoring of vital signs as in: SpO2, FiO2, TcCO2, ECG, and Heart Rate. After FOB, the investigators are going to perform another ABG, mark endpoints, and complications, if any arise.
Results:
Based on the selected endpoints, or any complication related to FOB the investigators hope to determine which of the respiratory methods: passive oxygen, NIV, HFNC or IMV provides the best support, leading to a lower number of complications and overall a better tolerance of FOB by the patient. Additionally, our aim is to find the optimal settings for NIV and HFNC in both studied groups.
Conclusions:
The results of this study are going to assess the need and the role of the optimal respiratory support method among patients with respiratory acidosis, leading to a shorter time from admission to diagnosis, better tolerance during the procedure, quicker recovery after procedure.
Read the detailed description
Project description Assessment of the importance of respiratory stabilization in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis before undergoing bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes, as well as the effectiveness of different types of non-invasive ventilation during the procedure.
The aim of the project The aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition the investigators want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation.
Project justification Bronchofiberoscopy is a minimally invasive procedure performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
BF is a safe method with high diagnostic value for respiratory diseases. It helps in the diagnosis of hemoptysis, interstitial lung diseases, respiratory system neoplasms and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. In addition, BF can be used therapeutically in cases of foreign body aspiration, airway patency, e.g. in patients with pneumonia or tumors.
BF carries a risk of complications, such as worsening hypoxia, which may contribute to the exacerbation of respiratory failure and secondarily influence the occurrence of cardiac and pulmonary complications.
Sedation improves the patient's tolerance of the procedure, but may contribute to the development of hypoxia and/or respiratory acidosis, which is why various non-invasive mechanical ventilation techniques are more commonly used during the procedure.
The basic method of respiratory support is passive oxygen therapy, although HFNC and NIV are also increasingly used. There are facilities that use HFNC as a standard method of respiratory support. At the moment, there are no clear guidelines published that are supported by experimental data confirming the safety and efficacy of HFNC and NIV in patients with complete respiratory failure who require bronchoscopic procedures.
An important factor for conducting an effective procedure is its good tolerance by the patient, which includes proper blood oxygenation and stable hemodynamic function during the procedure. Inadequate oxygen support ensures the maintenance of proper saturation, whilst the patient may develop acute respiratory acidosis during this time resulting from hypoventilation secondary to the procedure and/or sedation. For this reason, it is important to determine the optimal principles of respiratory support that will allow sedation and BF to be performed with good tolerance and minimizing the risk of complications, because patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or heart failure are particularly susceptible to developing significant hypercapnia during sedation.
NIV is increasingly used to support BF. It prevents atelectasis, reduces the muscle effort associated with breathing, which alleviates dyspnea and the risk of respiratory failure, and also allows for ensuring a normal respiratory rate in a patient undergoing sedation. NIV additionally reduces the risk of serious complications after heart, thoracic and abdominal surgeries. NIV allows for safe performance of diagnostic and therapeutic BF in patients with exacerbation of respiratory failure and in patients with severe chronic respiratory failure.
HFNC is a respiratory support method that allows for obtaining a controlled amount of oxygen in the respiratory mixture - FiO2 with values up to 1.0 (100%). High air flow is associated with other significant advantages of this method - generating a constant, small positive pressure in the airways (CPAP), and washing out respiratory gases from the anatomical dead space, which additionally supports the treatment of total respiratory failure, and functions as air heating and humidification improve the patient's comfort.
NIV and HFNC are used to increase the safety of BF in patients with respiratory failure. This would indicate the possibility of using these methods of respiratory support during diagnostic BF in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis. In patients with acute acidosis or exacerbation of chronic respiratory acidosis, diagnostic BF should be performed after compensation of acidosis.
Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that NIV-BF and/or HFNC-BF are superior in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis. There are also no designated device settings for patients with compensated respiratory acidosis.
Detailed indications and contraindications for performing the above-mentioned procedures have not been determined, nor have the optimal parameters of respiratory support in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis been established.
So far, in this group, intubation has been considered before the procedure in order to safely perform bronchofiberoscopy. Performing BF in an intubated patient results in critical narrowing of the airways, which necessitates mechanical ventilation with the use of high therapeutic pressures, which may result, among others, in barotrauma (injury of the lungs caused by change in air pressure). Because the standard bronchofiberscope fills the lumen of the endotracheal tube almost completely, and the examination can only be performed in patients intubated with a tube of 8 mm or larger in diameter. Small patients, including women, may require intubation with a narrower tube, and in such cases the only solution is to use a pediatric or ultrathin bronchoscope.
In patients who have not been intubated, BF may cause exacerbation of respiratory failure, which may lead to the need for urgent intubation and transfer to the ICU. This complication is extremely rare, as most patients are disqualified from BF.
The possibility of performing BF without the need to equalize blood gas parameters before the procedure may allow for increased access to diagnostics and a reduction in the frequency of intubation of patients.
The study was designed as a multicenter, international prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). Blood gas analysis will be performed before randomization to confirm chronic respiratory acidosis.
The experiment will be conducted in the respiratory wards participating in the study.
Therefore, the use of NIV and HFNC in patients requiring diagnostic BF who have chronic respiratory acidosis is a research area of potentially great clinical importance.
Silesian Medical University Bioethics Committee (SUM BC) approved the protocole, Resolution No: BNW/NWN/0052/KB1/95/I/24/25
Aim of the study:
- Verification of the role of HFNC, NIV in increasing the safety and availability of bronchoscopic examinations,
- Attempt to determine indications and contraindications to specific respiratory support techniques in patients with indications for BF and chronic respiratory acidosis: HFNC-BF, NIV-BF,
- Attempt to determine the optimal settings for patients with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing bronchoscopic procedures: HFNC, NIV.
Study group
The study will include patients (women and men) who express informed consent to participate in the proposed study. Recruitment will be conducted in people ≥18 years of age with indications for bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes.
An interview will be conducted with patients in conditions of privacy and meeting the GDPR criteria. Patients will be thoroughly informed about the course of the study, encouraged to ask questions, with full explanation of doubts. Then, patients will be asked to provide written consent to participate in the research project.
The target planned number of 210 patients studied from all groups (105 patients in each) was calculated based on the risk of complications in the form of intubation during BF in patients with respiratory failure with a frequency estimated at 0.2-2%.
Study population:
COPD, Kyphoscoliosis, Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), Heart failure, Pulmonary arterial hypertension and the presence of indications for diagnostic BF.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age with indications for diagnostic bronchoscopy: ◦ Diagnostic test: suspected lung cancer, suspected sarcoidosis, mediastinal lymphadenopathy,
- Patient who signed a written informed consent to participate in the study,
- pCO2 > 45 mmHg and/or HCO3- > 27 mmol/l but pH ≥ 7.35 in a blood gas test performed immediately before qualification for bronchoscopy.
Exclusion criteria
- Lack of written informed consent of the subject to participate in the research project,
- Coronary artery disease CCS III/IV,
- Hemodynamic failure, use of pressor amines, myocardial infarction in the last 2 weeks without PCI treatment, unstable angina pectoris, severe arrhythmias - especially ventricular,
- Pneumothorax not secured with drainage,
- Platelet count <20,000/µl, if platelets are not transfused immediately before/during the procedure,
- INR > 1.5xULN or APTT >36 s.1.5xULN, in the case of diagnostic FOB,
- Anemia: hemoglobin (Hb) level <6 g/dl or 6-10 g/dl if the physician prescribes a blood transfusion,
- Patients who were intubated before randomization.
Research methodology A detailed medical history will be collected from the patients (including comorbidities, medications they are taking, smoking history, and NYHA, modified medical research council (mMRC), Charlson's scale, Borg's scale, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (Apache II), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) questionnaires). In case of patients undergoing diagnostic FOB a pulmonary function tests (spirometry) will be performed if the patient's clinical condition allows performing it. Blood pressure, saturation, and arterial blood gases (approximately 2.0 ml) will be measured. Arterial blood gases before and after the test. After the patient has been qualified to a specific group, they will be randomly assigned to a given method of respiratory support.
Course of the study and escalation of therapy In the case of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy, the patient will be fitted with special nasal cannulas and then the examination will be performed. In the case of NIV, the patient will be fitted with a non-invasive ventilation mask with a special bronchoscopic elbow containing a valve enabling the introduction of the bronchofiberscope. The examination will compare the initial settings of the devices, which will be maintained provided that the examination is carried out correctly and the patient's clinical condition is stable. In the case of desaturations, hypercapnia or other abnormalities in the assessment of the patient, the settings may be changed or the method may be converted on the basis of therapy escalation (HFNC → NIV).
Monitoring During the entire examination, parameters such as SpO2, FiO2, TcCO2, ECG and heart rate (these parameters will be monitored continuously) as well as arterial blood pressure using a non-invasive method (measured every 5 minutes) will be monitored.
BF will be performed using optical or video bronchofiberscopes or endobronchial endosonography (EBUS) devices. The diameter of the bronchofiberscope used should be noted as well as the type and dose of sedation used during BF in each of the three randomized groups, although bearing in mind that the depth of sedation should be within the RASS range of 0 to -3.
After BF
After the bronchofiberoscopy, arterial blood gasometry will be repeated and the subjects will be assessed at the end of the occurrence of the assumed endpoints.
Data obtained from the interview and additional tests will be anonymously entered into a computer database in accordance with the GDPR criteria and then statistically processed. Appropriate conclusions will be drawn based on the obtained results.
Randomization Randomization will be performed. The database and online randomization platform will be assessable for participating centers online at www.pneumosilesia.org available for collaborating centers after receiving their BC approval.
The patients undergoing a diagnostic FOB there will be a two-step randomization, firstly they will be randomized into two categories deciding if they should be firstly stabilized in terms of respiratory parameters, or not.
Two-step randomization (1st randomization :a or b; 2nd randomization: i- iii method of respiratory support):
- Stabilization of respiratory parameters before FOB (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC iii. Passive oxygen therapy b. FOB right away (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC Device settings
- HFNC, flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%,
- NIV will be conducted in ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%,
Project duration: 3 years
Expected Endpoints
- Possibility of using RASS 0 - -3 sedation (patient comfort) despite signs of hypoventilation,
- Increased safety and comfort of BF in patients with respiratory failure (decrease in the number of procedures in which mild and severe complications occurred),
- Lower probability of exacerbation of acidosis in patients in the NIV group,
- Endpoints and complications such as hospitalization time, bronchospasm, hypoxemia episode, decompensated respiratory acidosis, local bleeding, fever, need to interrupt the procedure, intubation and transfer to the ICU, cardiac arrest, pneumothorax, death will be marked.
Measurable endpoints:
- Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds,
- PaO2 before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- PaO2/FiO2 before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- Hypercapnia measured transcutaneously TcCO2, increase in PaCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the examination,
- PaCO2 before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- pH before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- Drop in pH below 7.35 after the end of the examination,
- Duration of hospitalization,
- Time to diagnosis of the diagnosed disease
- Time to start targeted treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, X-ray, antibiotic, steroid)
- Nosocomial infections,
- New cardiac arrhythmia [>30 s - supraventricular; any ventricular (salvo, bigeminy, etc.),
- Hypotension, below 90/60 or a drop of more than 30% of the initial value,
- Duration of HNFC and/or NIV therapy after the procedure,
- Need for escalation of therapy HFNC-> NIV, NIV-> intubation,
- Premature termination of the procedure,
- Need for transfer to the ICU,
- Complications related to the procedure: fever, bronchospasm, glottis damage, pneumothorax, bleeding,
- Resuscitation,
- Periprocedural death,
- Death - long-term follow-up.
Each complication will be described in 3 time intervals (1-during BF, 2-up to 2h after BF, 3-up to 24h after BF). Long-term prognosis will be assessed based on a telephone conversation with study participants and/or their family members/caregivers after the study recruitment is completed. In the absence of contact, survival will be determined based on Electronic Verification of Beneficiaries' Entitlements.
Funding: The work was supported by the Silesian Medical University (BNW-1-118/N/4/K).
- Conditions
- Chronic Respiratory Acidosis
- Being tested
- Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support method, Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method
- Keywords
- Bronchofiberoscopy (FOB), High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC), Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV), Passive Oxygen Therapy, Lung Disease Diagnosis, Chronic Respiratory Acidosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support methodDevice
The aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition we want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation.
Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support methodDevice
The aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition we want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| No respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNC | Active comparator | The use of HFNC in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB without stabilizing their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) HFNC settings: flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, Receives: Device: Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method |
| No respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIV | Active comparator | The use of NIV in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB without stabilizing their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) NIV settings: ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92% Receives: Device: Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support method |
| Respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNC | Active comparator | Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method The use of HFNC in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB with stabilization of their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) HFNC settings: flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, Receives: Device: Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method |
| Respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIV | Active comparator | The use of NIV in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB with stabilization of their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) NIV settings: ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92% Receives: Device: Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support method |
| Respiratory stabilization before FOB: passive oxygen | No intervention | The use of passive oxygen in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB with stabilization of their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HFNC allows to perform a safe diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg; pH 7.35-7.45; HCO3- >27mmol/L)
The investiagors aim to determine if using NIV or HFNC instead of passive oxygen support during the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg, pH 7.35-7.45, HCO3- >27 mmol/L) results in better respiratory stabiliziation during the procedure without the need to escalate respiratory support therapy during and after the procedure, marking endpoints such as:
- Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds,
- PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study,
- PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- Need to extend HNFC therapy after FOB - [time in minutes],
- Need to escalate HFNC therapy -> NIV, NIV -> intubation,
Measured: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
NIV allows to perform a safe diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg; pH 7.35-7.45; HCO3- >27mmol/L)
The investiagors aim to determine if using NIV instead of passive oxygen support during the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg, pH 7.35-7.45, HCO3- >27 mmol/L) results in better respiratory stabiliziation during the procedure without the need to escalate respiratory support therapy during and after the procedure, marking endpoints such as:
- Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds,
- PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study,
- PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- Need to extend NIV therapy after FOB - [time in minutes],
- Need to escalate NIV therapy -> intubation,
Measured: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
Optimal settings for HFNC in patients with chronic hypercapnia undergoing a diagnostic FOB
Primarily the devices will be set to:
- HFNC: flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, During FOB all needed changes in settings for a safe procedures will be marked, if the need for that arises.
Measurment of parameters for the optimal setting choice:
Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds, PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
A comaparison of BGA before and after the procedure will allow to determine if those settings and the method itself performs well.
Measured: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
Optimal settings for NIV in patients with chronic hypercapnia undergoing a diagnostic FOB
Primarily the device will be set to:
NIV will be conducted in ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, During FOB all needed changes in settings for a safe procedures will be marked, if the need for that arises.
Measurment of parameters for the optimal setting choice:
Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds, PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
A comaparison of BGA before and after the procedure will allow to determine if those settings and the method itself performs well.
Measured: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
The number of complications after a diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia
Endpoints and complications such as prolonged hospitalization, bronchospasm, hypoxemia episode, decompensated respiratory acidosis, local bleeding, fever, need to interrupt the procedure, transfer to the ICU, pneumothorax, death will be marked.
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 years
Secondary outcomes (1)
NIV vs HFNC, is one better then the other to support a diagnostic BF in patients with chronic hypercapnia
Secondary outcome, provided the primary outcomes show a good tolerance of both methods is the comparison of respiratory paramethers and analysis of NIV and HFNC, and finding a new standard for the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia
- PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds
- Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2 during the procedure, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the procedure,
- PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
- pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis,
Measured: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 May 2025
- Study start1 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic Respiratory AcidosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of Silesia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Szymon Skoczyński, PhD, professor of university, Principal investigator, Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06970002
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- BNW/NWN/0052/KB1/95/I/24/25
- Status last verified
- Apr 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 14 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Danel A, Tobiczyk E, Warcholinski A, Trzaska-Sobczak M, Swinarew A, Brozek G, Trejnowska E, Batura-Gabryel H, Jedynak A, Scala R, Barczyk A, Cofta S, Skoczynski S. May noninvasive mechanical ventilation and/ or continuous positive airway pressure increase the bronchoalveolar lavage salvage in patients with pulmonary diseases? Randomized clinical trial - Study protocol. Adv Med Sci. 2023 Sep;68(2):482-490. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
PubMed 37945441Fu ES, Downs JB, Schweiger JW, Miguel RV, Smith RA. Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry. Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1552-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1552.
PubMed 15539726Skoczynski S, Ogonowski M, Tobiczyk E, Krzyzak D, Brozek G, Wierzbicka A, Trzaska-Sobczak M, Trejnowska E, Studnicka A, Swinarew A, Kucewicz-Czech E, Gierek D, Rychlik W, Barczyk A. Risk factors of complications during noninvasive mechanical ventilation -assisted flexible bronchoscopy. Adv Med Sci. 2021 Sep;66(2):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
PubMed 33892212Skoczynski S, Minarowski L, Tobiczyk E, Oraczewska A, Glinka K, Ficek K, Mroz R, Barczyk A. Noninvasive Ventilation-Facilitated Bronchofiberoscopy in Patients with Respiratory Failure. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1160:53-64. doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_375.
PubMed 30989590Oraczewska A, Cofta S, Warcholinski A, Trejnowska E, Brozek G, Swinarew A, Stolz D, Scala R, Barczyk A, Skoczynski S. The use of non-invasive respiratory assistance to facilitate bronchofiberoscopy performance in patients with hypoxemic (type one) respiratory failure - Study protocol. Adv Med Sci. 2023 Sep;68(2):474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2023.10.011. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
PubMed 37945440Qanash S, Hakami OA, Al-Husayni F, Gari AG. Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: Indications, Diagnostic Yield and Complications. Cureus. 2020 Oct 24;12(10):e11122. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11122.
PubMed 33133790
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Assessment of the Importance of Respiratory Stabilization in Patients With Chronic Respiratory Acidosis Before a Diagnostic Bronchofiberoscopy, as Well as the Effectiveness of Different Types of Non-invasive Ventilation During the Procedure
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06970002
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BNW/NWN/0052/KB1/95/I/24/25
- Conditions
- Chronic Respiratory Acidosis
- Keywords
- Bronchofiberoscopy (FOB), High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC), Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV), Passive Oxygen Therapy, Lung Disease Diagnosis, Chronic Respiratory Acidosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 210 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of SilesiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 14 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bronchofiberoscopy (FOB) is a minimally invasive and safe procedure performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes. FOB frequently impairs respiratory function, which may lead to possible exacerbation of respiratory failure.
Currently, the most frequent respiratory support is passive oxygen therapy, but non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and high flow nasal cannula (HFNC) are increasingly attempted, however the optimal setting and indications for NIV and HFNC in patients undergoing FOB with respiratory acidosis, haven't been determined yet.
Methods:
The study protocol describes a prospective, multicenter, two- armed randomized controlled trial (RCT).
The investigators aim to study two patients groups, based on FOB indications and the type of respiratory acidosis:
- Diagnostic FOB; patients with chronic respiratory acidosis (pH ≥7.35; pCO2 > 45mmHg and/or HCO3- >27 mmol/l);
- randomized to: passive oxygen, NIV, HFNC;
- total number of participants: 210
Randomization:
two-step randomization (1st randomization :a or b; 2nd randomization: i- iii method of respiratory support):
- Stabilization of respiratory parameters before FOB (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC iii. Passive oxygen therapy b. FOB right away (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC
Before FOB, both groups will undergo arterial blood gas analysis (ABG). During FOB there will be a continuous monitoring of vital signs as in: SpO2, FiO2, TcCO2, ECG, and Heart Rate. After FOB, the investigators are going to perform another ABG, mark endpoints, and complications, if any arise.
Results:
Based on the selected endpoints, or any complication related to FOB the investigators hope to determine which of the respiratory methods: passive oxygen, NIV, HFNC or IMV provides the best support, leading to a lower number of complications and overall a better tolerance of FOB by the patient. Additionally, our aim is to find the optimal settings for NIV and HFNC in both studied groups.
Conclusions:
The results of this study are going to assess the need and the role of the optimal respiratory support method among patients with respiratory acidosis, leading to a shorter time from admission to diagnosis, better tolerance during the procedure, quicker recovery after procedure.
Detailed description
Project description Assessment of the importance of respiratory stabilization in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis before undergoing bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes, as well as the effectiveness of different types of non-invasive ventilation during the procedure.
The aim of the project The aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition the investigators want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation.
Project justification Bronchofiberoscopy is a minimally invasive procedure performed for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
BF is a safe method with high diagnostic value for respiratory diseases. It helps in the diagnosis of hemoptysis, interstitial lung diseases, respiratory system neoplasms and mediastinal lymphadenopathy. In addition, BF can be used therapeutically in cases of foreign body aspiration, airway patency, e.g. in patients with pneumonia or tumors.
BF carries a risk of complications, such as worsening hypoxia, which may contribute to the exacerbation of respiratory failure and secondarily influence the occurrence of cardiac and pulmonary complications.
Sedation improves the patient's tolerance of the procedure, but may contribute to the development of hypoxia and/or respiratory acidosis, which is why various non-invasive mechanical ventilation techniques are more commonly used during the procedure.
The basic method of respiratory support is passive oxygen therapy, although HFNC and NIV are also increasingly used. There are facilities that use HFNC as a standard method of respiratory support. At the moment, there are no clear guidelines published that are supported by experimental data confirming the safety and efficacy of HFNC and NIV in patients with complete respiratory failure who require bronchoscopic procedures.
An important factor for conducting an effective procedure is its good tolerance by the patient, which includes proper blood oxygenation and stable hemodynamic function during the procedure. Inadequate oxygen support ensures the maintenance of proper saturation, whilst the patient may develop acute respiratory acidosis during this time resulting from hypoventilation secondary to the procedure and/or sedation. For this reason, it is important to determine the optimal principles of respiratory support that will allow sedation and BF to be performed with good tolerance and minimizing the risk of complications, because patients with lung diseases such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or heart failure are particularly susceptible to developing significant hypercapnia during sedation.
NIV is increasingly used to support BF. It prevents atelectasis, reduces the muscle effort associated with breathing, which alleviates dyspnea and the risk of respiratory failure, and also allows for ensuring a normal respiratory rate in a patient undergoing sedation. NIV additionally reduces the risk of serious complications after heart, thoracic and abdominal surgeries. NIV allows for safe performance of diagnostic and therapeutic BF in patients with exacerbation of respiratory failure and in patients with severe chronic respiratory failure.
HFNC is a respiratory support method that allows for obtaining a controlled amount of oxygen in the respiratory mixture - FiO2 with values up to 1.0 (100%). High air flow is associated with other significant advantages of this method - generating a constant, small positive pressure in the airways (CPAP), and washing out respiratory gases from the anatomical dead space, which additionally supports the treatment of total respiratory failure, and functions as air heating and humidification improve the patient's comfort.
NIV and HFNC are used to increase the safety of BF in patients with respiratory failure. This would indicate the possibility of using these methods of respiratory support during diagnostic BF in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis. In patients with acute acidosis or exacerbation of chronic respiratory acidosis, diagnostic BF should be performed after compensation of acidosis.
Currently, there is no evidence to suggest that NIV-BF and/or HFNC-BF are superior in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis. There are also no designated device settings for patients with compensated respiratory acidosis.
Detailed indications and contraindications for performing the above-mentioned procedures have not been determined, nor have the optimal parameters of respiratory support in patients with chronic respiratory acidosis been established.
So far, in this group, intubation has been considered before the procedure in order to safely perform bronchofiberoscopy. Performing BF in an intubated patient results in critical narrowing of the airways, which necessitates mechanical ventilation with the use of high therapeutic pressures, which may result, among others, in barotrauma (injury of the lungs caused by change in air pressure). Because the standard bronchofiberscope fills the lumen of the endotracheal tube almost completely, and the examination can only be performed in patients intubated with a tube of 8 mm or larger in diameter. Small patients, including women, may require intubation with a narrower tube, and in such cases the only solution is to use a pediatric or ultrathin bronchoscope.
In patients who have not been intubated, BF may cause exacerbation of respiratory failure, which may lead to the need for urgent intubation and transfer to the ICU. This complication is extremely rare, as most patients are disqualified from BF.
The possibility of performing BF without the need to equalize blood gas parameters before the procedure may allow for increased access to diagnostics and a reduction in the frequency of intubation of patients.
The study was designed as a multicenter, international prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT). Blood gas analysis will be performed before randomization to confirm chronic respiratory acidosis.
The experiment will be conducted in the respiratory wards participating in the study.
Therefore, the use of NIV and HFNC in patients requiring diagnostic BF who have chronic respiratory acidosis is a research area of potentially great clinical importance.
Silesian Medical University Bioethics Committee (SUM BC) approved the protocole, Resolution No: BNW/NWN/0052/KB1/95/I/24/25
Aim of the study:
- Verification of the role of HFNC, NIV in increasing the safety and availability of bronchoscopic examinations,
- Attempt to determine indications and contraindications to specific respiratory support techniques in patients with indications for BF and chronic respiratory acidosis: HFNC-BF, NIV-BF,
- Attempt to determine the optimal settings for patients with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing bronchoscopic procedures: HFNC, NIV.
Study group
The study will include patients (women and men) who express informed consent to participate in the proposed study. Recruitment will be conducted in people ≥18 years of age with indications for bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes.
An interview will be conducted with patients in conditions of privacy and meeting the GDPR criteria. Patients will be thoroughly informed about the course of the study, encouraged to ask questions, with full explanation of doubts. Then, patients will be asked to provide written consent to participate in the research project.
The target planned number of 210 patients studied from all groups (105 patients in each) was calculated based on the risk of complications in the form of intubation during BF in patients with respiratory failure with a frequency estimated at 0.2-2%.
Study population:
COPD, Kyphoscoliosis, Obesity hypoventilation syndrome (OHS), Heart failure, Pulmonary arterial hypertension and the presence of indications for diagnostic BF.
Inclusion criteria:
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age with indications for diagnostic bronchoscopy: ◦ Diagnostic test: suspected lung cancer, suspected sarcoidosis, mediastinal lymphadenopathy,
- Patient who signed a written informed consent to participate in the study,
- pCO2 > 45 mmHg and/or HCO3- > 27 mmol/l but pH ≥ 7.35 in a blood gas test performed immediately before qualification for bronchoscopy.
Exclusion criteria
- Lack of written informed consent of the subject to participate in the research project,
- Coronary artery disease CCS III/IV,
- Hemodynamic failure, use of pressor amines, myocardial infarction in the last 2 weeks without PCI treatment, unstable angina pectoris, severe arrhythmias - especially ventricular,
- Pneumothorax not secured with drainage,
- Platelet count <20,000/µl, if platelets are not transfused immediately before/during the procedure,
- INR > 1.5xULN or APTT >36 s.1.5xULN, in the case of diagnostic FOB,
- Anemia: hemoglobin (Hb) level <6 g/dl or 6-10 g/dl if the physician prescribes a blood transfusion,
- Patients who were intubated before randomization.
Research methodology A detailed medical history will be collected from the patients (including comorbidities, medications they are taking, smoking history, and NYHA, modified medical research council (mMRC), Charlson's scale, Borg's scale, acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II (Apache II), simplified acute physiology score II (SAPS II), Richmond agitation-sedation scale (RASS) questionnaires). In case of patients undergoing diagnostic FOB a pulmonary function tests (spirometry) will be performed if the patient's clinical condition allows performing it. Blood pressure, saturation, and arterial blood gases (approximately 2.0 ml) will be measured. Arterial blood gases before and after the test. After the patient has been qualified to a specific group, they will be randomly assigned to a given method of respiratory support.
Course of the study and escalation of therapy In the case of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy, the patient will be fitted with special nasal cannulas and then the examination will be performed. In the case of NIV, the patient will be fitted with a non-invasive ventilation mask with a special bronchoscopic elbow containing a valve enabling the introduction of the bronchofiberscope. The examination will compare the initial settings of the devices, which will be maintained provided that the examination is carried out correctly and the patient's clinical condition is stable. In the case of desaturations, hypercapnia or other abnormalities in the assessment of the patient, the settings may be changed or the method may be converted on the basis of therapy escalation (HFNC → NIV).
Monitoring During the entire examination, parameters such as SpO2, FiO2, TcCO2, ECG and heart rate (these parameters will be monitored continuously) as well as arterial blood pressure using a non-invasive method (measured every 5 minutes) will be monitored.
BF will be performed using optical or video bronchofiberscopes or endobronchial endosonography (EBUS) devices. The diameter of the bronchofiberscope used should be noted as well as the type and dose of sedation used during BF in each of the three randomized groups, although bearing in mind that the depth of sedation should be within the RASS range of 0 to -3.
After BF
After the bronchofiberoscopy, arterial blood gasometry will be repeated and the subjects will be assessed at the end of the occurrence of the assumed endpoints.
Data obtained from the interview and additional tests will be anonymously entered into a computer database in accordance with the GDPR criteria and then statistically processed. Appropriate conclusions will be drawn based on the obtained results.
Randomization Randomization will be performed. The database and online randomization platform will be assessable for participating centers online at www.pneumosilesia.org available for collaborating centers after receiving their BC approval.
The patients undergoing a diagnostic FOB there will be a two-step randomization, firstly they will be randomized into two categories deciding if they should be firstly stabilized in terms of respiratory parameters, or not.
Two-step randomization (1st randomization :a or b; 2nd randomization: i- iii method of respiratory support):
- Stabilization of respiratory parameters before FOB (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC iii. Passive oxygen therapy b. FOB right away (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) i. NIV ii. HFNC Device settings
- HFNC, flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%,
- NIV will be conducted in ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%,
Project duration: 3 years
Expected Endpoints
- Possibility of using RASS 0 - -3 sedation (patient comfort) despite signs of hypoventilation,
- Increased safety and comfort of BF in patients with respiratory failure (decrease in the number of procedures in which mild and severe complications occurred),
- Lower probability of exacerbation of acidosis in patients in the NIV group,
- Endpoints and complications such as hospitalization time, bronchospasm, hypoxemia episode, decompensated respiratory acidosis, local bleeding, fever, need to interrupt the procedure, intubation and transfer to the ICU, cardiac arrest, pneumothorax, death will be marked.
Measurable endpoints:
- Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds,
- PaO2 before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- PaO2/FiO2 before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- Hypercapnia measured transcutaneously TcCO2, increase in PaCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the examination,
- PaCO2 before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- pH before and after BF from blood gas analysis,
- Drop in pH below 7.35 after the end of the examination,
- Duration of hospitalization,
- Time to diagnosis of the diagnosed disease
- Time to start targeted treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, X-ray, antibiotic, steroid)
- Nosocomial infections,
- New cardiac arrhythmia [>30 s - supraventricular; any ventricular (salvo, bigeminy, etc.),
- Hypotension, below 90/60 or a drop of more than 30% of the initial value,
- Duration of HNFC and/or NIV therapy after the procedure,
- Need for escalation of therapy HFNC-> NIV, NIV-> intubation,
- Premature termination of the procedure,
- Need for transfer to the ICU,
- Complications related to the procedure: fever, bronchospasm, glottis damage, pneumothorax, bleeding,
- Resuscitation,
- Periprocedural death,
- Death - long-term follow-up.
Each complication will be described in 3 time intervals (1-during BF, 2-up to 2h after BF, 3-up to 24h after BF). Long-term prognosis will be assessed based on a telephone conversation with study participants and/or their family members/caregivers after the study recruitment is completed. In the absence of contact, survival will be determined based on Electronic Verification of Beneficiaries' Entitlements.
Funding: The work was supported by the Silesian Medical University (BNW-1-118/N/4/K).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| No respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNC | Active comparator | Device: Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support methodThe use of HFNC in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB without stabilizing their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) HFNC settings: flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, |
| No respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIV | Active comparator | Device: Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support methodThe use of NIV in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB without stabilizing their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 >45 mmHg; HCO3- > 27 mmol/l) NIV settings: ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92% |
| Respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNC | Active comparator | Device: Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support methodUse of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method The use of HFNC in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB with stabilization of their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) HFNC settings: flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, |
| Respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIV | Active comparator | Device: Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support methodThe use of NIV in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB with stabilization of their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) NIV settings: ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92% |
| Respiratory stabilization before FOB: passive oxygen | No intervention | –The use of passive oxygen in pateints with chronic respiratory acidosis undergoing diagnostic FOB with stabilization of their respiratory paramethers before the procedure (pH 7.35-7.45; pCO2 35-45 mmHg; HCO3- >27 mmol/l) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patient ≥ 18 years of age with indications for diagnostic bronchoscopy:
- Patient who signed a written informed consent to participate in the study,
- pCO2 > 45 mmHg and/or HCO3- > 27 mmol/l but pH ≥ 7.35 in a blood gas test performed immediately before qualification for bronchoscopy.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Lack of written informed consent of the subject to participate in the research project,
- Coronary artery disease CCS III/IV,
- Hemodynamic failure, use of pressor amines, myocardial infarction in the last 2 weeks without PCI treatment, unstable angina pectoris, severe arrhythmias - especially ventricular,
- Pneumothorax not secured with drainage,
- Platelet count <20,000/µl, if platelets are not transfused immediately before/during the procedure,
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support methodThe aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition we want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation. | Device | No respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIV, Respiratory stabilization before FOB: NIV |
| Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support methodThe aim of this project is to assess the safety, indications and contrindications to perform bronchofiberoscopy for diagnostic purposes in patient with chronic respiratory acidosis with the use of Non-invasive Ventilation (NIV) and High Flow Nasal Cannula (HNFC). In addition we want to determine the extent to which the usage of respiratory support during bronchofiberoscopy (BF) will help to avoid complications such as hypoxemia, decompensation of chronic respiratory failure, deterioration of gas exchange and hemodynamic instability, as well as intubation. | Device | No respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNC, Respiratory stabilization before FOB: HFNC |
Primary outcome
HFNC allows to perform a safe diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg; pH 7.35-7.45; HCO3- >27mmol/L)
Time frame: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
The investiagors aim to determine if using NIV or HFNC instead of passive oxygen support during the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg, pH 7.35-7.45, HCO3- >27 mmol/L) results in better respiratory stabiliziation during the procedure without the need to escalate respiratory support therapy during and after the procedure, marking endpoints such as: * Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds, * PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, * PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Need to extend HNFC therapy after FOB - [time in minutes], * Need to escalate HFNC therapy -> NIV, NIV -> intubation,
NIV allows to perform a safe diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg; pH 7.35-7.45; HCO3- >27mmol/L)
Time frame: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
The investiagors aim to determine if using NIV instead of passive oxygen support during the procedure in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg, pH 7.35-7.45, HCO3- >27 mmol/L) results in better respiratory stabiliziation during the procedure without the need to escalate respiratory support therapy during and after the procedure, marking endpoints such as: * Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds, * PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, * PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * pH before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, * Need to extend NIV therapy after FOB - [time in minutes], * Need to escalate NIV therapy -> intubation,
Optimal settings for HFNC in patients with chronic hypercapnia undergoing a diagnostic FOB
Time frame: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
Primarily the devices will be set to: - HFNC: flow 60L/min, temperature 34 ºC and FiO2 under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, During FOB all needed changes in settings for a safe procedures will be marked, if the need for that arises. Measurment of parameters for the optimal setting choice: Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds, PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, A comaparison of BGA before and after the procedure will allow to determine if those settings and the method itself performs well.
Optimal settings for NIV in patients with chronic hypercapnia undergoing a diagnostic FOB
Time frame: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)
Primarily the device will be set to: NIV will be conducted in ST mode (spontaneous to forced), number of breaths 16-18/minute, EPAP (expiratory positive pressure) 6-12 cmH2O, Tins (duration) 0.8-1.1s, PS 12-23 cm H2O and oxygen flow under saturation control to achieve SpO2≥ 92%, During FOB all needed changes in settings for a safe procedures will be marked, if the need for that arises. Measurment of parameters for the optimal setting choice: Hypoxemia, decrease in saturation >5% for more than 30 seconds, PO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, PO2/FiO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, Hypercapnia measured transcutaneous TcCO2, increase in PCO2 >10 mm Hg for more than 30 seconds during the study, PCO2 before and after FOB from blood gas analysis, A comaparison of BGA before and after the procedure will allow to determine if those settings and the method itself performs well.
The number of complications after a diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 years
Endpoints and complications such as prolonged hospitalization, bronchospasm, hypoxemia episode, decompensated respiratory acidosis, local bleeding, fever, need to interrupt the procedure, transfer to the ICU, pneumothorax, death will be marked.
1 secondary outcome
NIV vs HFNC, is one better then the other to support a diagnostic BF in patients with chronic hypercapnia
Time frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 May 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 37945441Danel A, Tobiczyk E, Warcholinski A, Trzaska-Sobczak M, Swinarew A, Brozek G, Trejnowska E, Batura-Gabryel H, Jedynak A, Scala R, Barczyk A, Cofta S, Skoczynski S. May noninvasive mechanical ventilation and/ or continuous positive airway pressure increase the bronchoalveolar lavage salvage in patients with pulmonary diseases? Randomized clinical trial - Study protocol. Adv Med Sci. 2023 Sep;68(2):482-490. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2023.10.009. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 15539726Fu ES, Downs JB, Schweiger JW, Miguel RV, Smith RA. Supplemental oxygen impairs detection of hypoventilation by pulse oximetry. Chest. 2004 Nov;126(5):1552-8. doi: 10.1378/chest.126.5.1552.
- Results publication: PubMed 33892212Skoczynski S, Ogonowski M, Tobiczyk E, Krzyzak D, Brozek G, Wierzbicka A, Trzaska-Sobczak M, Trejnowska E, Studnicka A, Swinarew A, Kucewicz-Czech E, Gierek D, Rychlik W, Barczyk A. Risk factors of complications during noninvasive mechanical ventilation -assisted flexible bronchoscopy. Adv Med Sci. 2021 Sep;66(2):246-253. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2021.04.001. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
- Results publication: PubMed 30989590Skoczynski S, Minarowski L, Tobiczyk E, Oraczewska A, Glinka K, Ficek K, Mroz R, Barczyk A. Noninvasive Ventilation-Facilitated Bronchofiberoscopy in Patients with Respiratory Failure. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2019;1160:53-64. doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_375.
- Results publication: PubMed 37945440Oraczewska A, Cofta S, Warcholinski A, Trejnowska E, Brozek G, Swinarew A, Stolz D, Scala R, Barczyk A, Skoczynski S. The use of non-invasive respiratory assistance to facilitate bronchofiberoscopy performance in patients with hypoxemic (type one) respiratory failure - Study protocol. Adv Med Sci. 2023 Sep;68(2):474-481. doi: 10.1016/j.advms.2023.10.011. Epub 2023 Nov 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 33133790Qanash S, Hakami OA, Al-Husayni F, Gari AG. Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy: Indications, Diagnostic Yield and Complications. Cureus. 2020 Oct 24;12(10):e11122. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11122.
Related trials for Chronic Respiratory Acidosis
Enrolling by invitationPhase 2
Chronic Exogenous Ketosis in HFpEF
Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFPEF), Heart Failure With Normal Ejection Fraction
Not yet recruiting
Extracorporeal Carbon Dioxide Removal Plus Noninvasive Ventilation in Patients With COPD Not Eligible for Intubation
Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Recruiting
Nasal High Flow Versus Non-invasive Ventilation for Early Treatment of Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease With Hypercapnic Acidosis
Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Hypercapnic Acidosis
RecruitingObservational study
North American Mitochondrial Disease Consortium Patient Registry and Biorepository (NAMDC)
Mitochondrial Disorders, Mitochondrial Genetic Disorders
Not yet recruiting
Evaluation of the Effects on Carbon Dioxide (paCO2) of a New Oronasal Mask in Patients With Severe COPD Exacerbation Requiring Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation
COPD, Respiratory Acidosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Szymon Skoczyński, PhD, professor of university contact
Szymon Skoczyński, PhD, professor of university principal investigator
Department of Lung Diseases and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Use of NIV during FOB as a respiratory support method and Use of HFNC during FOB as a respiratory support method in people with Chronic Respiratory Acidosis, run by Medical University of Silesia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Mikołaj Rycerski, Student (+48530379348, miko.ryc99@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HFNC allows to perform a safe diagnostic FOB in patients with chronic hypercapnia (pCO2>45mmHg; pH 7.35-7.45; HCO3- >27mmol/L) (time frame: During the procedure, and after up to the arterial blood gas analysis (1day)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06970002, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 May 2025.