Cognitive Stimulation Therapy for Residents With Dementia in Nursing Homes

This study was a quasi-experimental one group pretest-posttest designed to evaluate the significance of a 7-week CST program among residents of a long-term care facility with mild to moderate dementia. The primary aim was to investigate the preliminary effect of CST on cognition and engagement in individuals with mild-to-moderate dementia.

The study was conducted at Ridgewood Health Campus and aimed to enroll approximately 10 participants over an estimated period of 1 to 2 months. Recruitment was completed with one research team member meeting site staff, where she presented the study and prepared them to identify eligible individuals based on the inclusion criteria. Site staff then provided a list of potential participants and gave access to relevant medical records, which the research team reviewed before reaching out to potential participants and/or their legal representatives via email, phone, or in person.

Interested participants and their Powers of Attorney (POAs) received an informational handout explaining study expectations. If the POA expressed interest in participation, an electronic version of the informed consent form was provided and reviewed. Research team members were available to address questions via phone, email, Zoom, or in person. The signed consent forms were returned electronically or physically, and a copy was retained by the participant and/or their POA.

As 10 participants enrolled, they first completed a one-week screening period, followed by one week of pre-testing. The CST intervention was administered twice weekly for 45 minutes over 7 weeks, followed by a one-week post-intervention assessment period.

To ensure fidelity of the CST intervention, the Principal Investigator (PI) and Co-Investigators (Co-PIs) completed formal training through the North American Cognitive Stimulation Therapy Training Institute through Saint Louis University, School of Medicine. The CST practice manual was also followed strictly. The research team then collaborated closely with on-site staff to address concerns related to participant safety, treatment environment, or study procedures. In the event of an adverse event, the research team planned to follow all HIPAA and facility protocols and planned to report the incident to the PI.

Given the vulnerability of the participant population, the research team prioritized ethical considerations. All study materials, including the participant handout and consent forms, were written in plain language and at an appropriate reading level. Power of Attorneys were given adequate time and support to make informed decisions. Additionally, on-site staff (nursing staff and aides) who were familiar with the participants were present during sessions to help meet their individual needs and advocate on their behalf. Additionally, because occupational therapy students co-facilitated the CST sessions, a licensed occupational therapist was present for all sessions to ensure participant safety and to ensure proper implementation of the intervention.

Participation was entirely voluntary, and participants could withdraw from the study at any time without penalty or loss of benefits. Participants were able to decline individual sessions or activities without consequence. During evaluations, participants were able to skip any question they did not wish to answer. Data from assessments were included in the analysis only if at least 75% of items were completed per participant. If a participant attended greater than or equal to 50% of the scheduled sessions (7 out of 14 sessions), their data was retained for analysis. Data from participants who attended fewer than 7 sessions were planned to be included from analysis, and this was addressed in the final report.

CST has not been associated with harmful side effects in previous studies, suggesting minimal risk to participants. Nonetheless, the possibility of emotional discomfort or other adverse events remained. Psychological effects were monitored, and any incident was planned to be addressed promptly following institutional and facility procedures. A potential risk includes unintentional disclosure of identifiable information, although safeguards have been implemented to mitigate this.

Data collection was managed using an encrypted password-protected flash drive with encryption and a password-protected file folder. Participant names were linked to unique ID codes necessary for tracking consent and study progress. Only coded identifiers were used in outcome data collection. Names were recorded solely on consent forms and a separate secure document linking names to ID codes, which will be stored for six years in accordance with data retention policies. After this period, all physical and electronic data will be securely destroyed.

Access to data was and will continue to be restricted to the PI and four Collaborative Institutional Training Initiative program (CITI) certified research members. Electronic documents were stored on two secure, encrypted, and password-protected flash drives. All team members' laptops are password-protected and use two-factor authentication. Devices have been and will continue to be stored securely when not in use, and team members adhere to strict data security practices when in public settings. Physical copies of data are stored in a password-protected file folder and stored with the faculty advisor.

All study procedures comply with Northern Kentucky University's institutional ethical guidelines. All protocol changes were submitted to the Institutional Review Board (IRB) before the start of the intervention and were approved. Data management followed validated protocols with comprehensive quality control measures to ensure the integrity and confidentiality of all collected data.