Interstitial Lung DiseaseINTREPIDNCT06980844
Interpretation of the Role of Eosinophils in Diffuse Interstitial Pneumopathies
A study of Interstitial Lung Disease, run by Hopital Foch at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represent a group of rare, heterogeneous disorders of various etiologies, all sharing a common histopathological feature: fibrotic remodeling of the pulmonary parenchyma induced by a chronic inflammatory process. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Interstitial Lung Disease
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 31 May 2025to 28 Feb 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- PID-PNE interest group (n= 30 patients): Adult subjects followed for chronic interstitial lung disease with a follow-up duration > 1 year with at least one biological sample showing a circulating PNE level > 300/mm3 during their follow-up, without any prescription of systemic corticosteroid therapy and antifibrotic agents (PIRFENIDONE and NINTENADIB) responsible for modulation of the eosinophil count.
- 15 patients followed for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and 15 patients with another etiology of ILD will be selected.
- PNE ILD control group (n= 30 patients): Adult subjects with ILD with a PNE level < 150/mm3 during their follow-up, without any prescription of systemic corticosteroid therapy and antifibrotic agents (PIRFENIDONE and NINTENADIB). - Have signed a consent form.
- Be affiliated with a health insurance plan.
Who cannot join
- Patients under 18 years of age
- Patients over 75 years of age
- Pregnant patients
- Subjects with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss)
- Subjects with hypereosinophilic syndrome (NEP > 1500/mm3)
- Subjects with chronic idiopathic eosinophilic pneumonia (Carrington disease)
Show all 13Show fewer
- Subjects with drug-induced interstitial lung disease
- Subjects with respiratory failure (acute and chronic: SaO2 > 92% throughout the procedure)
- Subjects with unstable heart disease
- Subjects with severe comorbidities
- Subjects receiving oxygen therapy
- Subjects deprived of liberty or under guardianship -Patients subject to a guardianship and judicial safeguard measure
- PID-PNE or non-PID PNE patients receiving systemic corticosteroid therapy or antifibrotic treatment (PIRFENIDONE and NINTENADIB)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represent a group of rare, heterogeneous disorders of various etiologies, all sharing a common histopathological feature: fibrotic remodeling of the pulmonary parenchyma induced by a chronic inflammatory process. Although the prevalence of ILDs in France has recently been estimated at 19.4 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, they are frequently encountered in clinical practice due to their need for specialized hospital care. ILDs are associated with significant morbidity and a poor prognosis, despite the heavy burden of current therapeutic strategies. This highlights the urgent need to identify new therapeutic targets for these diseases.
Eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell could represent one such target. As a source of pro-fibrotic mediators such as TGF-β, they may contribute to pulmonary fibrosis from a clinical standpoint. Our hypothesis is that a component of bronchial exacerbation in ILD patients may involve a type 2 immune response through the recruitment and activation of eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell.
Given their role in pro-fibrotic signaling, our objective is to characterize type 2 immunity parameters-focusing in particular on eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell-using a multi-source approach in a cohort of ILD patients. If type 2 immunity is significantly present in this population (referred to as ILD-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell), the investigators will investigate the role of eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell in vitro using a co-culture model involving eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell and respiratory epithelial cells (both bronchial and alveolar). Based on the results obtained, future prospects include evaluating the effects of biotherapy within this model as a preliminary step toward a subsequent clinical study.
Read the detailed description
From a pathophysiological perspective, the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) involves progressive inflammation and fibrosis. These processes gradually remodel the structure of the pulmonary parenchyma-comprising alveoli, alveolar ducts, and bronchioles-into fibrotic tissue. The etiology of ILDs is multifactorial: they may be genetic , environmental, or idiopathic.
Fibrosis leads to clinical symptoms such as progressively worsening dyspnea, dry cough, diffuse fine crackles on auscultation, oxygen desaturation, and general deterioration of the patient's condition. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) typically reveal a restrictive ventilatory defect combined with impaired alveolar diffusion, indicating reduced gas exchange capacity.
Radiological findings may vary and commonly include one or more of the following: ground-glass opacities, reticulations, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, and septal thickening. Although high-resolution chest CT is a key tool in ILD diagnosis, histopathological examination of lung biopsies remains the gold standard. The presence of inflammatory and fibrotic tissue infiltration is the hallmark diagnostic criterion. However, this approach requires bronchoscopy and is highly invasive, particularly for frail patients.
Indeed, ILD patients are susceptible to acute exacerbations, which are characterized by sudden and severe clinical deterioration in respiratory function and can be life-threatening. This phenomenon is well-documented in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
Most diagnoses are established by multidisciplinary discussion (MDD), involving specialists from various fields. While MDD provides a working diagnosis, etiological classification remains suboptimal for many interstitial diseases. For instance, distinguishing between hypersensitivity pneumonitis, IPF, and ILDs associated with rheumatoid arthritis can be challenging-even with advanced imaging techniques.
This has led to more pragmatic classifications such as progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs), where the focus shifts from precise etiology to the presence of a treatable fibrotic phenotype responsive to antifibrotic therapies.
When an etiological diagnosis is straightforward, treatment is targeted: immunosuppressants for connective tissue disease-related ILDs, or antifibrotic agents such as pirfenidone or nintedanib for IPF or fibrosing forms of other ILDs. Unfortunately, despite these therapies, prognosis remains poor for most ILDs-largely due to the occurrence of exacerbations, which are typically managed with high-dose corticosteroids. Over time, patients may progress to chronic respiratory failure requiring long-term oxygen therapy.
This underscores the need for novel therapeutic strategies to improve both functional status and survival.
Given the fibrotic component of the inflammatory response, one avenue of investigation is to identify the biological drivers of ILD onset from a mechanistic and functional standpoint. In this context, some studies have suggested that inflammation may involve the recruitment of eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cells (E-PMNs). While the role of E-PMNs in ILD pathogenesis has been strongly hypothesized, it has yet to be definitively demonstrated.
E-PMNs are circulating granulocytes derived from the hematopoietic lineage. Produced in the bone marrow, they are recruited into tissues following activation of the type 2 (T2) immune response, orchestrated by Th2 lymphocytes and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), primarily via the secretion of IL-5.
This T2 response is triggered by parasitic antigens, allergens, or tissue injury. Although beneficial against parasites, eosinophil recruitment and activation are central to allergic and respiratory pathophysiology and have multiple clinical consequences. E-PMNs release pro-fibrotic mediators such as TGF-β and have been implicated in conditions like chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (Carrington disease) and even endomyocardial fibrosis.
In humans, hypereosinophilia (eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell ≥ 1500/mm³) is a known cause of pulmonary fibrosis. However, new diagnostic thresholds are being considered, as levels ≥150 cells/mm³ may already indicate pathological eosinophilia.
Our clinical observations have revealed the coexistence of ILD and bronchial disease, as well as characteristic "bronchial-type" exacerbations in ILD patients with unexpected eosinophilia. Investigators believe that both this association and its clinical relevance are currently underestimated in the management of ILD.
There is no established consensus on the management of ILD exacerbations, which often result in short- or medium-term mortality. However, recent studies suggest that high-dose corticosteroid therapy may improve outcomes, supporting our hypothesis of a T2-driven "bronchial-like" inflammatory component in some ILD patients.
Nonetheless, corticosteroids are not always effective and may lead to significant side effects, including heightened infection risk and cardiovascular complications.
In this context, E-PMNs could represent the common pathological link between ILD and bronchial inflammation and may serve as an actionable therapeutic target. This would open the door to existing biotherapies, already available in clinical practice.
- Conditions
- Interstitial Lung Disease
- Being tested
- No intervention: no treatment
- Keywords
- T2 response, Eosinophil, Pulmonary fibrosis
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases, Interstitial, Pulmonary Fibrosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No intervention: no treatmentOther
Also called No intervention
translationnal study: Only blood sampling and imaging will be performed on two groups of ILD patients.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ILDs eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell | Other | Patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease with eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell > 300/mm3 in blood (ILDs-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell group of interest) Receives: Other: No intervention: no treatment |
| ILDs NO eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell | Other | eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell < 100/mm3 in blood (ILDs non-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell control group) Receives: Other: No intervention: no treatment |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The highlighting of significant differences in parameters related to T2 immunity (notably eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell) in diffuse interstitial lung disease-EPN cells patients compared to no eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell in ILDs patients.
T2 immunity caractirization. A description of the variables will be provided, by median and interquartile for quantitative variables, taking into account the numbers in each group, and by number and percentages for qualitative variables. Differences in variables between the two groups will be tested using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables and the Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables.
To address the primary objective, variables with a p-value <0.20 will be included in the multivariate model. A forward-backward multiple logistic regression will be performed to identify predictive factors for differentiation in epithelial damage and fibrotic phenomena between the two population groups.
Measured: Two years
Secondary outcomes (3)
To define whether blood eosinophilia is analogous to bronchial eosinophilia in ILDs patients
T2 immunity caractirization
Measured: Two years
To determine whether bronchial eosinophilia is a characteristic that can be targeted by anti-T2 biotherapy
T2 immunity caractirization
Measured: two years
validate these observations from an experimental point of view on an in vitro model of healthy epithelium in coculture with PNE from the blood of PID patients presenting with eosinophilia.
T2 immunity caractirization
Measured: two years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 May 2025
- Study start31 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion28 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion28 Feb 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Interstitial Lung DiseaseStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- Patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease with eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell \> 300/mm3 in blood (ILD-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell group of interest) and eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell \< 100/mm3 in blood (ILD non-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell control group)
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hopital Foch
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06980844
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2022_0155
- Acronym
- INTREPID
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 9 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 20 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Interpretation of the Role of Eosinophils in Diffuse Interstitial Pneumopathies
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06980844
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- INTREPID / 2022_0155
- Conditions
- Interstitial Lung Disease
- Keywords
- T2 response, Eosinophil, Pulmonary fibrosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hopital FochUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 31 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 28 Aug 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 28 Feb 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diffuse interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) represent a group of rare, heterogeneous disorders of various etiologies, all sharing a common histopathological feature: fibrotic remodeling of the pulmonary parenchyma induced by a chronic inflammatory process. Although the prevalence of ILDs in France has recently been estimated at 19.4 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, they are frequently encountered in clinical practice due to their need for specialized hospital care. ILDs are associated with significant morbidity and a poor prognosis, despite the heavy burden of current therapeutic strategies. This highlights the urgent need to identify new therapeutic targets for these diseases.
Eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell could represent one such target. As a source of pro-fibrotic mediators such as TGF-β, they may contribute to pulmonary fibrosis from a clinical standpoint. Our hypothesis is that a component of bronchial exacerbation in ILD patients may involve a type 2 immune response through the recruitment and activation of eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell.
Given their role in pro-fibrotic signaling, our objective is to characterize type 2 immunity parameters-focusing in particular on eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell-using a multi-source approach in a cohort of ILD patients. If type 2 immunity is significantly present in this population (referred to as ILD-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell), the investigators will investigate the role of eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell in vitro using a co-culture model involving eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell and respiratory epithelial cells (both bronchial and alveolar). Based on the results obtained, future prospects include evaluating the effects of biotherapy within this model as a preliminary step toward a subsequent clinical study.
Detailed description
From a pathophysiological perspective, the development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) involves progressive inflammation and fibrosis. These processes gradually remodel the structure of the pulmonary parenchyma-comprising alveoli, alveolar ducts, and bronchioles-into fibrotic tissue. The etiology of ILDs is multifactorial: they may be genetic , environmental, or idiopathic.
Fibrosis leads to clinical symptoms such as progressively worsening dyspnea, dry cough, diffuse fine crackles on auscultation, oxygen desaturation, and general deterioration of the patient's condition. Pulmonary function tests (PFTs) typically reveal a restrictive ventilatory defect combined with impaired alveolar diffusion, indicating reduced gas exchange capacity.
Radiological findings may vary and commonly include one or more of the following: ground-glass opacities, reticulations, traction bronchiectasis, honeycombing, and septal thickening. Although high-resolution chest CT is a key tool in ILD diagnosis, histopathological examination of lung biopsies remains the gold standard. The presence of inflammatory and fibrotic tissue infiltration is the hallmark diagnostic criterion. However, this approach requires bronchoscopy and is highly invasive, particularly for frail patients.
Indeed, ILD patients are susceptible to acute exacerbations, which are characterized by sudden and severe clinical deterioration in respiratory function and can be life-threatening. This phenomenon is well-documented in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF).
Most diagnoses are established by multidisciplinary discussion (MDD), involving specialists from various fields. While MDD provides a working diagnosis, etiological classification remains suboptimal for many interstitial diseases. For instance, distinguishing between hypersensitivity pneumonitis, IPF, and ILDs associated with rheumatoid arthritis can be challenging-even with advanced imaging techniques.
This has led to more pragmatic classifications such as progressive fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (PF-ILDs), where the focus shifts from precise etiology to the presence of a treatable fibrotic phenotype responsive to antifibrotic therapies.
When an etiological diagnosis is straightforward, treatment is targeted: immunosuppressants for connective tissue disease-related ILDs, or antifibrotic agents such as pirfenidone or nintedanib for IPF or fibrosing forms of other ILDs. Unfortunately, despite these therapies, prognosis remains poor for most ILDs-largely due to the occurrence of exacerbations, which are typically managed with high-dose corticosteroids. Over time, patients may progress to chronic respiratory failure requiring long-term oxygen therapy.
This underscores the need for novel therapeutic strategies to improve both functional status and survival.
Given the fibrotic component of the inflammatory response, one avenue of investigation is to identify the biological drivers of ILD onset from a mechanistic and functional standpoint. In this context, some studies have suggested that inflammation may involve the recruitment of eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cells (E-PMNs). While the role of E-PMNs in ILD pathogenesis has been strongly hypothesized, it has yet to be definitively demonstrated.
E-PMNs are circulating granulocytes derived from the hematopoietic lineage. Produced in the bone marrow, they are recruited into tissues following activation of the type 2 (T2) immune response, orchestrated by Th2 lymphocytes and type 2 innate lymphoid cells (ILC2), primarily via the secretion of IL-5.
This T2 response is triggered by parasitic antigens, allergens, or tissue injury. Although beneficial against parasites, eosinophil recruitment and activation are central to allergic and respiratory pathophysiology and have multiple clinical consequences. E-PMNs release pro-fibrotic mediators such as TGF-β and have been implicated in conditions like chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (Carrington disease) and even endomyocardial fibrosis.
In humans, hypereosinophilia (eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell ≥ 1500/mm³) is a known cause of pulmonary fibrosis. However, new diagnostic thresholds are being considered, as levels ≥150 cells/mm³ may already indicate pathological eosinophilia.
Our clinical observations have revealed the coexistence of ILD and bronchial disease, as well as characteristic "bronchial-type" exacerbations in ILD patients with unexpected eosinophilia. Investigators believe that both this association and its clinical relevance are currently underestimated in the management of ILD.
There is no established consensus on the management of ILD exacerbations, which often result in short- or medium-term mortality. However, recent studies suggest that high-dose corticosteroid therapy may improve outcomes, supporting our hypothesis of a T2-driven "bronchial-like" inflammatory component in some ILD patients.
Nonetheless, corticosteroids are not always effective and may lead to significant side effects, including heightened infection risk and cardiovascular complications.
In this context, E-PMNs could represent the common pathological link between ILD and bronchial inflammation and may serve as an actionable therapeutic target. This would open the door to existing biotherapies, already available in clinical practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Patients with diffuse interstitial lung disease with eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell > 300/mm3 in blood (ILD-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell group of interest) and eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell < 100/mm3 in blood (ILD non-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell control group)
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ILDs eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell | Other | Other: No intervention: no treatmentPatients with diffuse interstitial lung disease with eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell > 300/mm3 in blood (ILDs-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell group of interest) |
| ILDs NO eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell | Other | Other: No intervention: no treatmenteosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell < 100/mm3 in blood (ILDs non-eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell control group) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- PID-PNE interest group (n= 30 patients): Adult subjects followed for chronic interstitial lung disease with a follow-up duration > 1 year with at least one biological sample showing a circulating PNE level > 300/mm3 during their follow-up, without any prescription of systemic corticosteroid therapy and antifibrotic agents (PIRFENIDONE and NINTENADIB) responsible for modulation of the eosinophil count.
- 15 patients followed for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) and 15 patients with another etiology of ILD will be selected.
- PNE ILD control group (n= 30 patients): Adult subjects with ILD with a PNE level < 150/mm3 during their follow-up, without any prescription of systemic corticosteroid therapy and antifibrotic agents (PIRFENIDONE and NINTENADIB). - Have signed a consent form.
- Be affiliated with a health insurance plan.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Patients under 18 years of age
- Patients over 75 years of age
- Pregnant patients
- Subjects with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss)
- Subjects with hypereosinophilic syndrome (NEP > 1500/mm3)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No intervention: no treatmentAlso: No interventiontranslationnal study: Only blood sampling and imaging will be performed on two groups of ILD patients. | Other | ILDs NO eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell, ILDs eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell |
Primary outcome
The highlighting of significant differences in parameters related to T2 immunity (notably eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell) in diffuse interstitial lung disease-EPN cells patients compared to no eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell in ILDs patients.
Time frame: Two years
T2 immunity caractirization. A description of the variables will be provided, by median and interquartile for quantitative variables, taking into account the numbers in each group, and by number and percentages for qualitative variables. Differences in variables between the two groups will be tested using the Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test for qualitative variables and the Mann-Whitney test for quantitative variables. To address the primary objective, variables with a p-value <0.20 will be included in the multivariate model. A forward-backward multiple logistic regression will be performed to identify predictive factors for differentiation in epithelial damage and fibrotic phenomena between the two population groups.
3 secondary outcomes
To define whether blood eosinophilia is analogous to bronchial eosinophilia in ILDs patients
Time frame: Two years
To determine whether bronchial eosinophilia is a characteristic that can be targeted by anti-T2 biotherapy
Time frame: two years
validate these observations from an experimental point of view on an in vitro model of healthy epithelium in coculture with PNE from the blood of PID patients presenting with eosinophilia.
Time frame: two years
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2025.
Related trials for Interstitial Lung Disease
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of PIPE 791 in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Inhaled AP01 in Participants With Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
Pulmonary Fibrosis, Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Role of Genetic Factors in the Development of Lung Disease
Cystic Fibrosis, Pulmonary Fibrosis
RecruitingObservational study
Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis of Radiation Pneumonitis Signals In Patients Treated For Cancer With Radiotherapy
Radiation Pneumonitis
RecruitingPhase 2
Ambulatory Oxygen Therapy for Individuals With Mild-to-moderate Interstitial Lung Disease
Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study of Interstitial Lung Disease, run by Hopital Foch at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The highlighting of significant differences in parameters related to T2 immunity (notably eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell) in diffuse interstitial lung disease-EPN cells patients compared to no eosinophilic polymorphonuclear cell in ILDs patients. (time frame: Two years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2025.