AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Ischemic StrokeNCT06984965

Role of EEG in Differentiation Between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke

An observational study of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Acute Haemorrhagic Stroke, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Searching electrical activity registered by EEG in acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and comparing these parameters to the post-stroke recovery patterns to investigate the role of EEG as a differentiation tool and as a predictor of post-stroke recovery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 80 years
How many people
300 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
1 Dec 2025to Mar 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with acute Ischemic stroke: ischemic arteria cerebri media infarct confirmed by MRI, or acute Hemorrhagic stroke: spontaneous intraparenchymal bleeding confirmed by CT, onset <72 hours before expected time of performing EEG.

Who may be able to join

  • Age above 18 and below 80 years.
  • Acute Ischemic stroke: ischemic arteria cerebri media infarct confirmed by MRI.
  • Acute Hemorrhagic stroke: spontaneous intraparenchymal bleeding confirmed by CT.
  • Stroke onset <72 hours before expected time of performing EEG.
  • First-ever ischemic stroke.
  • Measurable deficit on the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS).
  • Able to give and sign informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Transient Ischemic Attacks (TIAs).
  • Greater than 72 hours past the initial insult.
  • Patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage, traumatic haemorrhage (epidural/subdural bleeding), cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, indication for urgent neurosurgical intervention.
  • History of other central nervous system diseases.
  • Any signs unfit for MRI/EEG scan.
  • Injury or active infection of electrode cap placement area.
Show all 17Show fewer
  • Claustrophobia; recognition disorder.
  • Known skull defect or head trauma.
  • Previous neurological procedure (metallic implant, brain pace, cranial operation history).
  • Significant physical impairment that would restrict the ability to use the portable EEG devices.
  • Presence of malignancy or systemic rheumatic disease
  • Non-stroke disease or lesion affecting the sensorimotor system.
  • Alcohol or drug addiction.
  • Presence of pump/shunt.
  • Presence of Malignancy.
  • Presence of severe cognitive impairment.
  • History of epilepsy or taking medication due to epilepsy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Gena ELassall, Bachelor of medicine and gener contact

+201028914897

genaelassall312@gmail.com

Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Neurology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University

    Asyut, Asyut Governorate, 71511

    Gena ELassall, 01028914897

    Gena ELassall

    Recruiting

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Electroencephalogram (EEG) in Differentiation Between Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke and Its Role as a Predictor of Post-stroke Recovery

Searching electrical activity registered by EEG in acute ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke and comparing these parameters to the post-stroke recovery patterns to investigate the role of EEG as a differentiation tool and as a predictor of post-stroke recovery.

Read the detailed description

In this study, EEG will be performed on each patient included; within 72 hours of the onset of the stroke. The EEG device will be used within the intended use as described in the user manuals. The electrodes are put on the patient's head, and the EEG signal is recorded for several minutes; the amplifier is used to amplify the EEG signal and reduce artifacts. A complete EEG and data will be collected at baseline and on follow-up to observe the differences in EEG patterns to perform a qualitative assessment of the EEG results.

EEG patterns depend on the size and location of acute ischemic stroke, including generalized or focal slowing or both and epileptiform discharges. Abnormal neuronal activity is determined by comparing a part of the patient's brain not affected by stroke to a part of the patient's brain affected by stroke. Moreover, Abnormal blood flow is interpreted by comparing the abnormal EEG patterns in the areas of infarctions or hemorrhage to the normal brain tissue signals. The aim is to compare electric waveforms from an EEG device between patients with acute ischemic and acute hemorrhagic stroke (at baseline which is within 72 hours of the onset of acute ischemic and acute hemorrhagic stroke and through study completion, an average of 3 to 6 months).

Keywords
EEG, Acute Ischaemic Stroke, Acute Haemorrhagic Stroke, Stroke Recovery
Medical subject headings
Ischemic Stroke

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06984965
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ischaemic Stroke GroupPatients with ischemic arteria cerebri media infarct confirmed by MRI.
Haemorrhagic Stroke GroupPatients with spontaneous intraparenchymal bleeding confirmed by CT.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion of Participants With Focal Slowing in the Stroke-Affected Hemisphere

    Presence of focal slowing (e.g., increased delta or theta activity) in the stroke-affected hemisphere versus the unaffected hemisphere. Patterns categorized as "ischemic" or "hemorrhagic."; this will be measured in percentage (%).

    Measured: Baseline (within 72 hours of stroke onset)

  2. Proportion of Participants With Interhemispheric Asymmetry in EEG Waveforms

    Qualitative assessment of EEG asymmetry between affected and unaffected hemispheres at baseline. Frequency of each will be measured in percentage (%).

    Measured: Baseline (within 72 hours of stroke onset)

  3. Proportion of Participants With Absent or Diminished EEG Reactivity

    Absence or reduction in EEG reactivity to external stimuli (e.g., auditory, tactile) in the affected hemisphere; this will be measures by precentage (%).

    Measured: Baseline (within 72 hours of stroke onset)

  4. Proportion of Participants With Epileptiform Activity on EEG

    Presence of epileptiform discharges (e.g., spikes or sharp waves) on EEG in the stroke-affected hemisphere; thsi will be measured by precentage (%).

    Measured: Baseline (within 72 hours of stroke onset)

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Correlation Between Baseline EEG Findings and Functional Recovery

    Association between initial qualitative EEG abnormalities (e.g., focal slowing, asymmetry) and functional outcomes measured by standardized scales (e.g., Modified Rankin Scale) at 6 months; measured by Correlation coefficient (r).

    Measured: Phase I (Baseline EEG assessment) and Phase III (3 to 6 month follow-up functional evaluation)

  2. Prediction of Post-Stroke Seizures Based on EEG Findings

    Proportion of participants with specific EEG abnormalities (e.g., epileptiform activity) at baseline who develop post-stroke seizures within 3 to 6 months, measured by percentage (%).

    Measured: Phase I (Baseline EEG assessment) and Phase III (3 to 6 month follow-up functional evaluation)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 May 2025
  2. Study start1 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completionMar 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
300 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06984965
Sponsor's protocol ID
04-2024-200998
Status last verified
Nov 2026
First submitted
28 Dec 2024
Last updated
5 Nov 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Acute Ischemic Stroke and Acute Haemorrhagic Stroke, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gena ELassall, Bachelor of medicine and gener (+201028914897, genaelassall312@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion of Participants With Focal Slowing in the Stroke-Affected Hemisphere (time frame: Baseline (within 72 hours of stroke onset)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Nov 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in