Mindful EatingNCT06987812
Turkish Adaptation of the MIND-EAT Scale
An observational study of Mindful Eating, run by Atılım University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Background: Mindful eating is an important concept that refers to individuals regulating their eating behaviors by being aware of factors such as physical hunger, satiety, emotional states and environmental influences. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 weeks and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Mindful Eating
- How many people
- 360 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2025to 15 Jun 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 weeks and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The population of this study consists of male and female individuals aged 18 years and over.
Who may be able to join
- Individuals 18 years of age and older Volunteers, individuals with no communication problems will be included in the study.
Who cannot join
- Individuals under 18 years of age, Individuals with communication problems and Individuals with any psychological disorder will not be included in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Rahime Evra Karakaya, PhD contact
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Atılım University
Ankara
About this study
Official title: Turkish Adaptation of The Mindful Eating Scale (MIND-EAT Scale): Validity and Reliability Study
Background:
Mindful eating is an important concept that refers to individuals regulating their eating behaviors by being aware of factors such as physical hunger, satiety, emotional states and environmental influences. This approach can be used especially in psychologically based interventions such as eating disorders, emotional eating and combating obesity.
Read more
Aim: In this study, it is aimed to adapt the MIND-EAT scale into Turkish and to analyze its validity and reliability.
Methods The sample of the study consists of at least 360 volunteer individuals aged 18 and over. Care will be taken to ensure a balanced gender distribution in the sample selection. The data collection process will be carried out through an online survey platform using non-probability random sampling method. In addition to obtaining information on the demographic characteristics (age, gender, education level, etc.) and eating habits of the participants through the survey, the Mindful Eating Scale (MIND-EAT Scale) will be applied as the main data collection tool. The Intuitive Eating Scale 2 (IES-2) and the Three Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ-R21) will be used to test the validity of the scale. To assess the reliability of the scale, a minimum of 20 participants will be administered the scale again at a 2-week interval.
Expected Results of the Study: If the MIND-EAT scale is adapted to the Turkish population with a validity and reliability study, it will determine whether individuals have eating awareness and will contribute to the development of more effective approaches.
Read the detailed description
Although eating behavior is primarily a physiological response to hunger, social and cultural factors can also trigger eating even when there is no need to eat. Extrinsically motivated eating behavior cannot be regulated by the body's signals of satiety. Therefore, approaches such as mindful eating (ME) have been developed to reduce the influence of extrinsic motivation and increase the importance of intrinsic motivation and the sensory properties of food. ME is the state of focusing on and being mindful of food while eating. Although the goal is not weight loss, it is thought that paying attention to the experience of food can increase awareness of the impact of food on a person and lead to healthier choices. Mindfulness has proven positive effects on overall health and is recommended by the American Heart Association. Furthermore, mindfulness-based approaches have been shown to have positive effects on changing maladaptive eating behaviors in individuals of different weights. Given these positive aspects, it is important to have a comprehensive scale that covers all aspects of mindful eating and offers an overall scoring.
In this study, it is aimed to adapt the MIND-EAT scale into Turkish and to analyze its validity and reliability.
Type, Population and Sample of the Study:
The sample of the study will consist of individuals aged 18 and over. Individuals who are volunteers and have no communication problems will be included in the study. The approval of the participants will be obtained in the study, which will be started if the ethics committee approval is obtained. Care will be taken to ensure that the number of men and women in the sample is close to each other. In the validity and reliability study, data will be collected with an online questionnaire. In the internal construct validity phase of the study, it was aimed to reach at least 360 individuals by including at least 15 people for each item in the scale (24 x 15 = 360) for the sample size calculation.
The scale will be administered to at least 360 individuals aged 18 years and over by non-probability, random sampling method. A "participant number" will be given to the form filled out by each participant. The scale will be reapplied 2 weeks later to a minimum of 20 participants, which is required for test-retest reliability.
In this study, written permission was obtained by the developers of the MIND-EAT Scale via e-mail for the Turkish validity and reliability of the scale. Following the ethics committee permission, the language adaptation process of the MIND-EAT scale will be carried out first. The next stage will be the validity and reliability testing of the scale by applying it in the targeted sample.
Language Adaptation of the Scale:
For the language adaptation study of the original French language scale, the original scale will be independently translated into Turkish by three experts who are fluent in French. In language adaptation, standard translation-back translation method will be used to minimize expression differences. The process of adaptation of the scale into Turkish will be completed after the form obtained as a result of back-translation and the original version are evaluated in terms of consistency and semantic integrity by applying expert opinion and making the necessary arrangements.
Evaluation of the Linguistic Equivalence of the Scale:
In order to evaluate the linguistic equivalence of the finalized scale, at least 10 people who have the same characteristics as the study group and who have an advanced knowledge of French will be asked to apply the French and Turkish forms of the scale at 2-week intervals. The similarities between the applications of the scale in two languages will be examined and its linguistic validity will be evaluated.
Testing the Reliability of the Scale:
The finalized Turkish scale will be administered to a sample of at least 360 participants. The consistency of the responses to the scale items will be examined with Cronbach alpha coefficient. The item-total correlation coefficient will also be calculated for each item. In the evaluation of test-retest reliability, it is planned to reapply the scale to at least 20 participants with an interval of 2 weeks.
Testing the Validity of the Scale:
Intuitive Eating Scale 2 (IES-2) and Three Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ-R21) will be used to test the criterion-related validity of the MIND-EAT Scale. It was decided to apply the Intuitive Eating Scale 2 and the Trifactor Eating Scale to the study sample in the evaluation of the relationship between these two scales, which were predicted to show an above average relationship with the scale whose validity was evaluated The reason for selecting the Intuitive Eating Scale 2 and the Trifactor Eating Scales for testing the criterion-related validity; Both intuitive eating and eating mindfulness enable individuals to encourage conscious regulation of their eating behaviors, while eating mindfulness, as measured in the Three-factor eating scale, can help balance behaviors such as emotional and external eating and help one develop a healthier eating pattern based on internal signals. When used together, these scales can contribute to individuals' deeper understanding and control of their eating behaviors. The construct validity of the MIND-EAT scale is assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
Data Collection Tools:
General information of the participants:
General characteristics of the participants such as age, gender, weight, height, education, disease status and information about their eating habits will be recorded.
MIND-EAT scale:
This scale was developed by Van Beekum et al. as a comprehensive measure of mindful eating behaviors in which responses are rated on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from 1 "never or almost never" to 5 "always or almost always". It consists of 6 sub-dimensions and includes 24 items. The scale score is obtained by dividing the score obtained from the items by the number of items. Sub-dimension scores can also be calculated by dividing the score obtained from the questions related to each sub-dimension by the number of questions in the sub-dimension. The scale has no cut-off point. For the Turkish validity and reliability of the scale, written permission was obtained from Van Beekum via e-mail.
Intuitive Eating Scale 2 (IES-2):
The Intuitive Eating Scale (IES) is a 21-item scale developed by Tylka and colleagues in 2006 to measure intuitive eating behavior. Later, an improved version of the scale, the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2), was created by Tylka and Kroon Van Diest in 2013. The IES-2 has a 23-item structure by adding 12 new items to the 11 items in the original scale. The IES-2, which has four subscales, assesses the following dimensions: eating for physical rather than emotional reasons; unconditional permission to eat; trust in hunger and satiety signals; and congruence of body-food choices. The Turkish adaptation of the scale was conducted by Bakıner and the internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.89. It is accepted that the higher the score obtained from the scale, the higher the intuitive eating behavior of the individual.
Three Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ-R21):
The Three-Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ) developed by Stunkard and Messick is a tool used to measure eating behavior. This scale, which was adapted into Turkish by Karakuş et al. consists of 21 items and is named as TFEQ-R21. The scale is used to assess uncontrolled eating behavior and consists of three subscales. Uncontrolled eating is defined as the loss of control while eating without any external factor or feeling of hunger.
Data Collection:
Data will be collected by the researchers. Expected Results of the Study: If the MIND-EAT scale is adapted to the Turkish population with a validity and reliability study, it will determine whether individuals have eating awareness and will contribute to the development of more effective approaches.
- Conditions
- Mindful Eating
- Keywords
- mindful eating, mindfulness, MIND-EAT, nutrition, Turkish scale
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Testing scale reliability
In the evaluation of test-retest reliability, it is planned to reapply the scale to at least 20 participants with an interval of 2 weeks.
Measured: Up to one month
Secondary outcomes (1)
Testing the validity of the scale
Testing the Validity of the ScaleIntuitive Eating Scale 2 (IES-2) and Three-Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ-R21) will be used to test the criterion-related validity of the MIND-EAT Scale. It was decided to apply the Intuitive Eating Scale 2 and the Three-Factor Eating Scale to the research sample in the evaluation of the relationship between these two scales, which were predicted to show an above average relationship with the scale whose validity was evaluated.
Measured: Up to one month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2025
- Study start1 Mar 2025
- Primary completion1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion15 Jun 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Mindful EatingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Atılım University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06987812
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Sedef Gungor-MIND-EAT scale-01
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 16 May 2025
- Last updated
- 23 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Mathieu J. What should you know about mindful and intuitive eating? J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Dec;109(12):1982-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.023. No abstract available.
PubMed 19942013Grider HS, Douglas SM, Raynor HA. The Influence of Mindful Eating and/or Intuitive Eating Approaches on Dietary Intake: A Systematic Review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Apr;121(4):709-727.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
PubMed 33279464Tapper K. Mindful eating: what we know so far. Nutr Bull. 2022 Jun;47(2):168-185. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12559. Epub 2022 May 10.
PubMed 36045097Lee EKP, Yeung NCY, Xu Z, Zhang D, Yu CP, Wong SYS. Effect and Acceptability of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure or Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Hypertension. 2020 Dec;76(6):1992-2001. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16160. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
PubMed 33131316Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Gathright EC, Donahue ML, Balletto B, Feulner MM, DeCosta J, Cruess DG, Wing RR, Carey MP, Salmoirago-Blotcher E. Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2020 Jan 1;54(1):67-73. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz020.
PubMed 31167026Levine GN, Cohen BE, Commodore-Mensah Y, Fleury J, Huffman JC, Khalid U, Labarthe DR, Lavretsky H, Michos ED, Spatz ES, Kubzansky LD. Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021 Mar 9;143(10):e763-e783. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000947. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
PubMed 33486973Peitz D, Schulze J, Warschburger P. Getting a deeper understanding of mindfulness in the context of eating behavior: Development and validation of the Mindful Eating Inventory. Appetite. 2021 Apr 1;159:105039. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105039. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
PubMed 33186622Osborne JW. & Costello AB. Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Pract Assess Res & Eval, 2004;9:1-9.
Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S124-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016.
PubMed 14978648Akırmak, Ü., Bakıner, E., Bolak Boratav, H. & Güneri, G. Cross-cultural adaptation of the intuitive eating scale-2: psychometric evaluation in a sample in Turkey. Current Psychology, 2018; 40: 1083-1093.
Karakuş, S. Ş., Yıldırım, H., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. Üç Faktörlü Yeme Ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 2016; 15(3): 229-237. DOI: 10.5455/pmb.1-1446540396.
Van Beekum M, Shankland R, Rodhain A, Robert M, Marchand C, Herry A, Prioux C, Touvier M, Barday M, Turgon R, Avignon A, Leys C, Peneau S. Development and validation of the mindful eating scale (mind-eat scale) in a general population. Appetite. 2024 Aug 1;199:107398. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107398. Epub 2024 May 6.
PubMed 38710449Tylka TL, Kroon Van Diest AM. The Intuitive Eating Scale-2: item refinement and psychometric evaluation with college women and men. J Couns Psychol. 2013 Jan;60(1):137-53. doi: 10.1037/a0030893.
PubMed 23356469Bakıner, E. (2017). Turkish adaptation of the Intuitive Eating Scale-2. Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul Bilgi Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
Stunkard AJ, Messick S. The three-factor eating questionnaire to measure dietary restraint, disinhibition and hunger. J Psychosom Res. 1985;29(1):71-83. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(85)90010-8.
PubMed 3981480
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Turkish Adaptation of The Mindful Eating Scale (MIND-EAT Scale): Validity and Reliability Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06987812
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Sedef Gungor-MIND-EAT scale-01
- Conditions
- Mindful Eating
- Keywords
- mindful eating, mindfulness, MIND-EAT, nutrition, Turkish scale
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 360 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Atılım UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 15 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Background:
Mindful eating is an important concept that refers to individuals regulating their eating behaviors by being aware of factors such as physical hunger, satiety, emotional states and environmental influences. This approach can be used especially in psychologically based interventions such as eating disorders, emotional eating and combating obesity.
Aim: In this study, it is aimed to adapt the MIND-EAT scale into Turkish and to analyze its validity and reliability.
Methods The sample of the study consists of at least 360 volunteer individuals aged 18 and over. Care will be taken to ensure a balanced gender distribution in the sample selection. The data collection process will be carried out through an online survey platform using non-probability random sampling method. In addition to obtaining information on the demographic characteristics (age, gender, education level, etc.) and eating habits of the participants through the survey, the Mindful Eating Scale (MIND-EAT Scale) will be applied as the main data collection tool. The Intuitive Eating Scale 2 (IES-2) and the Three Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ-R21) will be used to test the validity of the scale. To assess the reliability of the scale, a minimum of 20 participants will be administered the scale again at a 2-week interval.
Expected Results of the Study: If the MIND-EAT scale is adapted to the Turkish population with a validity and reliability study, it will determine whether individuals have eating awareness and will contribute to the development of more effective approaches.
Detailed description
Although eating behavior is primarily a physiological response to hunger, social and cultural factors can also trigger eating even when there is no need to eat. Extrinsically motivated eating behavior cannot be regulated by the body's signals of satiety. Therefore, approaches such as mindful eating (ME) have been developed to reduce the influence of extrinsic motivation and increase the importance of intrinsic motivation and the sensory properties of food. ME is the state of focusing on and being mindful of food while eating. Although the goal is not weight loss, it is thought that paying attention to the experience of food can increase awareness of the impact of food on a person and lead to healthier choices. Mindfulness has proven positive effects on overall health and is recommended by the American Heart Association. Furthermore, mindfulness-based approaches have been shown to have positive effects on changing maladaptive eating behaviors in individuals of different weights. Given these positive aspects, it is important to have a comprehensive scale that covers all aspects of mindful eating and offers an overall scoring.
In this study, it is aimed to adapt the MIND-EAT scale into Turkish and to analyze its validity and reliability.
Type, Population and Sample of the Study:
The sample of the study will consist of individuals aged 18 and over. Individuals who are volunteers and have no communication problems will be included in the study. The approval of the participants will be obtained in the study, which will be started if the ethics committee approval is obtained. Care will be taken to ensure that the number of men and women in the sample is close to each other. In the validity and reliability study, data will be collected with an online questionnaire. In the internal construct validity phase of the study, it was aimed to reach at least 360 individuals by including at least 15 people for each item in the scale (24 x 15 = 360) for the sample size calculation.
The scale will be administered to at least 360 individuals aged 18 years and over by non-probability, random sampling method. A "participant number" will be given to the form filled out by each participant. The scale will be reapplied 2 weeks later to a minimum of 20 participants, which is required for test-retest reliability.
In this study, written permission was obtained by the developers of the MIND-EAT Scale via e-mail for the Turkish validity and reliability of the scale. Following the ethics committee permission, the language adaptation process of the MIND-EAT scale will be carried out first. The next stage will be the validity and reliability testing of the scale by applying it in the targeted sample.
Language Adaptation of the Scale:
For the language adaptation study of the original French language scale, the original scale will be independently translated into Turkish by three experts who are fluent in French. In language adaptation, standard translation-back translation method will be used to minimize expression differences. The process of adaptation of the scale into Turkish will be completed after the form obtained as a result of back-translation and the original version are evaluated in terms of consistency and semantic integrity by applying expert opinion and making the necessary arrangements.
Evaluation of the Linguistic Equivalence of the Scale:
In order to evaluate the linguistic equivalence of the finalized scale, at least 10 people who have the same characteristics as the study group and who have an advanced knowledge of French will be asked to apply the French and Turkish forms of the scale at 2-week intervals. The similarities between the applications of the scale in two languages will be examined and its linguistic validity will be evaluated.
Testing the Reliability of the Scale:
The finalized Turkish scale will be administered to a sample of at least 360 participants. The consistency of the responses to the scale items will be examined with Cronbach alpha coefficient. The item-total correlation coefficient will also be calculated for each item. In the evaluation of test-retest reliability, it is planned to reapply the scale to at least 20 participants with an interval of 2 weeks.
Testing the Validity of the Scale:
Intuitive Eating Scale 2 (IES-2) and Three Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ-R21) will be used to test the criterion-related validity of the MIND-EAT Scale. It was decided to apply the Intuitive Eating Scale 2 and the Trifactor Eating Scale to the study sample in the evaluation of the relationship between these two scales, which were predicted to show an above average relationship with the scale whose validity was evaluated The reason for selecting the Intuitive Eating Scale 2 and the Trifactor Eating Scales for testing the criterion-related validity; Both intuitive eating and eating mindfulness enable individuals to encourage conscious regulation of their eating behaviors, while eating mindfulness, as measured in the Three-factor eating scale, can help balance behaviors such as emotional and external eating and help one develop a healthier eating pattern based on internal signals. When used together, these scales can contribute to individuals' deeper understanding and control of their eating behaviors. The construct validity of the MIND-EAT scale is assessed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
Data Collection Tools:
General information of the participants:
General characteristics of the participants such as age, gender, weight, height, education, disease status and information about their eating habits will be recorded.
MIND-EAT scale:
This scale was developed by Van Beekum et al. as a comprehensive measure of mindful eating behaviors in which responses are rated on a 5-point frequency scale ranging from 1 "never or almost never" to 5 "always or almost always". It consists of 6 sub-dimensions and includes 24 items. The scale score is obtained by dividing the score obtained from the items by the number of items. Sub-dimension scores can also be calculated by dividing the score obtained from the questions related to each sub-dimension by the number of questions in the sub-dimension. The scale has no cut-off point. For the Turkish validity and reliability of the scale, written permission was obtained from Van Beekum via e-mail.
Intuitive Eating Scale 2 (IES-2):
The Intuitive Eating Scale (IES) is a 21-item scale developed by Tylka and colleagues in 2006 to measure intuitive eating behavior. Later, an improved version of the scale, the Intuitive Eating Scale-2 (IES-2), was created by Tylka and Kroon Van Diest in 2013. The IES-2 has a 23-item structure by adding 12 new items to the 11 items in the original scale. The IES-2, which has four subscales, assesses the following dimensions: eating for physical rather than emotional reasons; unconditional permission to eat; trust in hunger and satiety signals; and congruence of body-food choices. The Turkish adaptation of the scale was conducted by Bakıner and the internal consistency coefficient was found to be 0.89. It is accepted that the higher the score obtained from the scale, the higher the intuitive eating behavior of the individual.
Three Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ-R21):
The Three-Factor Eating Scale (TFEQ) developed by Stunkard and Messick is a tool used to measure eating behavior. This scale, which was adapted into Turkish by Karakuş et al. consists of 21 items and is named as TFEQ-R21. The scale is used to assess uncontrolled eating behavior and consists of three subscales. Uncontrolled eating is defined as the loss of control while eating without any external factor or feeling of hunger.
Data Collection:
Data will be collected by the researchers. Expected Results of the Study: If the MIND-EAT scale is adapted to the Turkish population with a validity and reliability study, it will determine whether individuals have eating awareness and will contribute to the development of more effective approaches.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case only
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 weeks and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The population of this study consists of male and female individuals aged 18 years and over.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Individuals 18 years of age and older Volunteers, individuals with no communication problems will be included in the study.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Individuals under 18 years of age, Individuals with communication problems and Individuals with any psychological disorder will not be included in the study.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Testing scale reliability
Time frame: Up to one month
In the evaluation of test-retest reliability, it is planned to reapply the scale to at least 20 participants with an interval of 2 weeks.
1 secondary outcome
Testing the validity of the scale
Time frame: Up to one month
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2025.
- Background: PubMed 19942013Mathieu J. What should you know about mindful and intuitive eating? J Am Diet Assoc. 2009 Dec;109(12):1982-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2009.10.023. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 33279464Grider HS, Douglas SM, Raynor HA. The Influence of Mindful Eating and/or Intuitive Eating Approaches on Dietary Intake: A Systematic Review. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2021 Apr;121(4):709-727.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2020.10.019. Epub 2020 Dec 3.
- Background: PubMed 36045097Tapper K. Mindful eating: what we know so far. Nutr Bull. 2022 Jun;47(2):168-185. doi: 10.1111/nbu.12559. Epub 2022 May 10.
- Background: PubMed 33131316Lee EKP, Yeung NCY, Xu Z, Zhang D, Yu CP, Wong SYS. Effect and Acceptability of Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction Program on Patients With Elevated Blood Pressure or Hypertension: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Hypertension. 2020 Dec;76(6):1992-2001. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16160. Epub 2020 Nov 2.
- Background: PubMed 31167026Scott-Sheldon LAJ, Gathright EC, Donahue ML, Balletto B, Feulner MM, DeCosta J, Cruess DG, Wing RR, Carey MP, Salmoirago-Blotcher E. Mindfulness-Based Interventions for Adults with Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Behav Med. 2020 Jan 1;54(1):67-73. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaz020.
- Background: PubMed 33486973Levine GN, Cohen BE, Commodore-Mensah Y, Fleury J, Huffman JC, Khalid U, Labarthe DR, Lavretsky H, Michos ED, Spatz ES, Kubzansky LD. Psychological Health, Well-Being, and the Mind-Heart-Body Connection: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021 Mar 9;143(10):e763-e783. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000947. Epub 2021 Jan 25.
- Background: PubMed 33186622Peitz D, Schulze J, Warschburger P. Getting a deeper understanding of mindfulness in the context of eating behavior: Development and validation of the Mindful Eating Inventory. Appetite. 2021 Apr 1;159:105039. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105039. Epub 2020 Nov 10.
- BackgroundOsborne JW. & Costello AB. Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis. Pract Assess Res & Eval, 2004;9:1-9.
- Background: PubMed 14978648Sperber AD. Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. Gastroenterology. 2004 Jan;126(1 Suppl 1):S124-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2003.10.016.
- BackgroundAkırmak, Ü., Bakıner, E., Bolak Boratav, H. & Güneri, G. Cross-cultural adaptation of the intuitive eating scale-2: psychometric evaluation in a sample in Turkey. Current Psychology, 2018; 40: 1083-1093.
- BackgroundKarakuş, S. Ş., Yıldırım, H., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. Üç Faktörlü Yeme Ölçeğinin Türk kültürüne uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. TAF Preventive Medicine Bulletin, 2016; 15(3): 229-237. DOI: 10.5455/pmb.1-1446540396.
- Background: PubMed 38710449Van Beekum M, Shankland R, Rodhain A, Robert M, Marchand C, Herry A, Prioux C, Touvier M, Barday M, Turgon R, Avignon A, Leys C, Peneau S. Development and validation of the mindful eating scale (mind-eat scale) in a general population. Appetite. 2024 Aug 1;199:107398. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2024.107398. Epub 2024 May 6.
Related trials for Mindful Eating
Recruiting
Nutrition Outcomes Using a Randomized Intervention Via Smartphone on Dietary Habits
Healthy Adult Participants, Mindful Eating Intervention
Recruiting
Effects of a Mindful Self-Compassion Intervention on Psychological Adjustment in Breast Cancer Survivors
Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Food-Body-Mind Intervention (16 Weeks)
Mental Health Wellness, Emotional Problem
Recruiting
Mindful Moms, Mindful Meals (MMMM) Study
Nutrition in Early Infancy, Nutrition Habits
Not yet recruiting
Mindful Eating and Mindful Movement for Persons With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Type 2 Diabetes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rahime Evra Karakaya, PhD contact
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Mindful Eating, run by Atılım University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sedef Güngör, PhD (05379561862, sedefglsz@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Testing scale reliability (time frame: Up to one month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06987812, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2025.