Large B Cell LymphomaCARLYMNCT06988085
Impact of Lymphodepletion Regimen on the Response to CAR T-cells in Patients With With Relapsed/Refractory Large B-cell Lymphoma
An observational study of Large B Cell Lymphoma and CAR T Cell, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.
Trial summary
CAR T cells therapy has transformed the prognostic of relapsed/refractory large B cells lymphomas. Relapse however is still high and multiple causes have been studied. CAR expansion seems to be necessary to for response and lymphodepletion type and exposure, notably to fludarabine, associated with expansion and… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Large B Cell Lymphoma, CAR T Cell
- What is being tested?
- Blood sampling
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- How many people
- 42 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 30 May 2025to 30 May 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Adult patients aged 18 and over treated with commercial CAR T-cells (Lisocabtagene maraleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, or Axicabtagene ciloleucel) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Who may be able to join
- Adult patient aged 18 years and older
- Treated with commercial CAR T-cells (Lisocabtagene maraleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, or Axicabtagene ciloleucel), with standard lymphodepletion consisting of Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide
- Presenting with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma that is refractory or has relapsed after at least one line of treatment
- Creatinine clearance > 50 ml/min (Cockcroft CKD-EPI)
Who cannot join
- Weight ≤ 50 kg
- Out-of-specification reinfusion product
- Individual participating in another study with an ongoing exclusion period at the time of inclusion
- Person under guardianship or curatorship, or deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Patient's opposition to the study
About this study
Official title: Impact de la lymphodéplétion Dans la réponse Aux CAR T-cells Dans Les Lymphomes B Agressifs réfractaires ou en Rechute
CAR T cells therapy has transformed the prognostic of relapsed/refractory large B cells lymphomas. Relapse however is still high and multiple causes have been studied. CAR expansion seems to be necessary to for response and lymphodepletion type and exposure, notably to fludarabine, associated with expansion and response.
The aim of the study is to analyse prospectivaly Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide exposure and correlate exposure to expansion, therapeutic response and survival.
Read the detailed description
Currently, a standard dose of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is administered according to the type of CAR T-cells used.
For Tisa-cel, a dose of 25 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 250 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.
For Axi-cel, a dose of 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 500 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.
For Liso-cel, a dose of 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 300 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.
The administration of lymphodepletion is quite straightforward and follows a standard practice. Urinary tract protection is ensured by injecting Uromitexan just before cyclophosphamide, then at 3, 6, and 9 hours after the cyclophosphamide injection.
In all three cases, CAR T-cell infusion takes place on Day 0, following two days of monitoring without treatment.
The doses selected for each CAR T-cell therapy in the context of B-cell malignancies have been optimized based on pivotal studies (Locke 2019, Zhang 2020) up to market approval to achieve the best efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Indeed, treatment doses have been adjusted due to severe adverse effects (grade 3-4 neurotoxicity, hypotension with shock and cardiac arrest, death; Kochenderfer 2015, Schuster 2017 and 2019, Geyer 2019), even though higher doses had shown better efficacy (Curran 2019).
Our study hypothesis is to prospectively analyze fludarabine exposure to propose, in the future, a personalized lymphodepletion dosing strategy to achieve better CAR T-cell expansion and, consequently, improved efficacy.
This will require hyperhydration with 3L of saline solution per 24 hours over three days, administration of fludarabine over 30 minutes, followed 30 minutes later by a 2-hour infusion of cyclophosphamide. Prevention of cyclophosphamide-induced urinary toxicity will be managed through Uromitexan injections before and at 3, 6, and 9 hours after cyclophosphamide administration, as per standard procedure.
According to study design, six blood samples will be collected, including a pre-dose sample within the hour before fludarabine administration, followed by samples at 30 minutes ±10 minutes, 1 hour ±15 minutes, 3 hours ±30 minutes, 7 hours ±1 hour, and 9 hours ±1 hour after the end of the fludarabine infusion. These samples will be taken longitudinally on days 1 and 3 of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide infusion (i.e., Day -5 and Day -3 before CAR T-cell administration on Day 0).
The concentrations of the circulating metabolite of fludarabine (F-ara-A) and the active metabolite of cyclophosphamide (phosphoramide mustard) will be quantified using a validated method according to European guidelines (EMEA 2012) via liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. All analyses will be centralized at the Biological Pharmacology Laboratory of Saint-Louis Hospital under the supervision of Dr. Laurianne Goldwirt.
Total exposure to F-ara-A (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC₀-∞]) will be determined using a population pharmacokinetic model (Langerhorst et al., 2019) with Bayesian estimation (NONMEM software). Exposure to phosphoramide mustard (AUC₀-7h) will be assessed using a non-compartmental approach (PKanalix software). Residual concentrations (T₀) will be measured on Day 3.
The analysis will focus on the level of exposure to lymphodepletion, with patients classified into two groups based on whether their exposure is optimal or not, meaning whether the measured dose is below or above the minimal optimal dose. Further analysis will evaluate CAR T-cell expansion, therapeutic response, patient survival, and toxicities (CRS, ICANS, cytopenia) within these two groups.
Additionally, we will assess HLA-DR expression on monocytes at inclusion, a factor recently identified as predictive of the response to lymphodepletion and CAR T-cell expansion (Bourbon 2022).
We will then assess the the impact of fludarabine exposure and cylophophamide exposure on therapeutic responses after CAR t cells therapy and their toxicities. Global response, complete response, and progression will be measured on month 1, month 3 and at one year. Overall survivall will be assessed throughout the study.
- Conditions
- Large B Cell Lymphoma, CAR T Cell
- Being tested
- Blood sampling
- Keywords
- Large B cell lymphoma, CAR T cell, Lymphodepletion, Fludarabine exposure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Blood samplingOther
Before and after fludarabine infusion
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | Not described Receives: Other: Blood sampling |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Progression Free Survival
One year after the CAR T therapy
Measured: At 1 year
Secondary outcomes (21)
Global response
Measured: At 1 month
Complete response
Measured: At 1 month
Global response
Measured: At 3 months
Complete response
Measured: At 3 months
Overall survival
Measured: At 1 year
CAR T specific toxixity assessment
During CAR administration based on used classification (Classification Lee/ASCT 2019)
Measured: Up to 1 year
CAR T specific toxixity assessment
During CAR administration based on cytopenia grading
Measured: Up to 1 year
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 0
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 2
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 4
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 6
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 8
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 10
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 30
CAR T cell expansion
By flow cytometry/PCR
Measured: At day 15
HLA-DR expression
Measured: At day 0
Compliance of autologous reconstitution
Measured: At 1 month
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Measured: At 2 months
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Measured: At 3 months
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Measured: At 6 months
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Measured: At 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 May 2025
- Study start30 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Large B Cell LymphomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06988085
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- APHP221165
- Acronym
- CARLYM
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 4 Apr 2025
- Last updated
- 23 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Impact de la lymphodéplétion Dans la réponse Aux CAR T-cells Dans Les Lymphomes B Agressifs réfractaires ou en Rechute
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06988085
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CARLYM / APHP221165
- Conditions
- Large B Cell Lymphoma, CAR T Cell
- Keywords
- Large B cell lymphoma, CAR T cell, Lymphodepletion, Fludarabine exposure
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 42 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 30 May 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 May 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 23 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
CAR T cells therapy has transformed the prognostic of relapsed/refractory large B cells lymphomas. Relapse however is still high and multiple causes have been studied. CAR expansion seems to be necessary to for response and lymphodepletion type and exposure, notably to fludarabine, associated with expansion and response.
The aim of the study is to analyse prospectivaly Fludarabine and cyclophosphamide exposure and correlate exposure to expansion, therapeutic response and survival.
Detailed description
Currently, a standard dose of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide is administered according to the type of CAR T-cells used.
For Tisa-cel, a dose of 25 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 250 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.
For Axi-cel, a dose of 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 500 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.
For Liso-cel, a dose of 30 mg/m²/day of fludarabine is administered from Day -5 to Day -3, and a dose of 300 mg/m²/day of cyclophosphamide is administered from Day -5 to Day -3.
The administration of lymphodepletion is quite straightforward and follows a standard practice. Urinary tract protection is ensured by injecting Uromitexan just before cyclophosphamide, then at 3, 6, and 9 hours after the cyclophosphamide injection.
In all three cases, CAR T-cell infusion takes place on Day 0, following two days of monitoring without treatment.
The doses selected for each CAR T-cell therapy in the context of B-cell malignancies have been optimized based on pivotal studies (Locke 2019, Zhang 2020) up to market approval to achieve the best efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. Indeed, treatment doses have been adjusted due to severe adverse effects (grade 3-4 neurotoxicity, hypotension with shock and cardiac arrest, death; Kochenderfer 2015, Schuster 2017 and 2019, Geyer 2019), even though higher doses had shown better efficacy (Curran 2019).
Our study hypothesis is to prospectively analyze fludarabine exposure to propose, in the future, a personalized lymphodepletion dosing strategy to achieve better CAR T-cell expansion and, consequently, improved efficacy.
This will require hyperhydration with 3L of saline solution per 24 hours over three days, administration of fludarabine over 30 minutes, followed 30 minutes later by a 2-hour infusion of cyclophosphamide. Prevention of cyclophosphamide-induced urinary toxicity will be managed through Uromitexan injections before and at 3, 6, and 9 hours after cyclophosphamide administration, as per standard procedure.
According to study design, six blood samples will be collected, including a pre-dose sample within the hour before fludarabine administration, followed by samples at 30 minutes ±10 minutes, 1 hour ±15 minutes, 3 hours ±30 minutes, 7 hours ±1 hour, and 9 hours ±1 hour after the end of the fludarabine infusion. These samples will be taken longitudinally on days 1 and 3 of fludarabine and cyclophosphamide infusion (i.e., Day -5 and Day -3 before CAR T-cell administration on Day 0).
The concentrations of the circulating metabolite of fludarabine (F-ara-A) and the active metabolite of cyclophosphamide (phosphoramide mustard) will be quantified using a validated method according to European guidelines (EMEA 2012) via liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. All analyses will be centralized at the Biological Pharmacology Laboratory of Saint-Louis Hospital under the supervision of Dr. Laurianne Goldwirt.
Total exposure to F-ara-A (area under the concentration-time curve [AUC₀-∞]) will be determined using a population pharmacokinetic model (Langerhorst et al., 2019) with Bayesian estimation (NONMEM software). Exposure to phosphoramide mustard (AUC₀-7h) will be assessed using a non-compartmental approach (PKanalix software). Residual concentrations (T₀) will be measured on Day 3.
The analysis will focus on the level of exposure to lymphodepletion, with patients classified into two groups based on whether their exposure is optimal or not, meaning whether the measured dose is below or above the minimal optimal dose. Further analysis will evaluate CAR T-cell expansion, therapeutic response, patient survival, and toxicities (CRS, ICANS, cytopenia) within these two groups.
Additionally, we will assess HLA-DR expression on monocytes at inclusion, a factor recently identified as predictive of the response to lymphodepletion and CAR T-cell expansion (Bourbon 2022).
We will then assess the the impact of fludarabine exposure and cylophophamide exposure on therapeutic responses after CAR t cells therapy and their toxicities. Global response, complete response, and progression will be measured on month 1, month 3 and at one year. Overall survivall will be assessed throughout the study.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma | – | Other: Blood sampling |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Adult patients aged 18 and over treated with commercial CAR T-cells (Lisocabtagene maraleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, or Axicabtagene ciloleucel) for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adult patient aged 18 years and older
- Treated with commercial CAR T-cells (Lisocabtagene maraleucel, Tisagenlecleucel, or Axicabtagene ciloleucel), with standard lymphodepletion consisting of Fludarabine and Cyclophosphamide
- Presenting with aggressive large B-cell lymphoma that is refractory or has relapsed after at least one line of treatment
- Creatinine clearance > 50 ml/min (Cockcroft CKD-EPI)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Weight ≤ 50 kg
- Out-of-specification reinfusion product
- Individual participating in another study with an ongoing exclusion period at the time of inclusion
- Person under guardianship or curatorship, or deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision
- Patient's opposition to the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Blood samplingBefore and after fludarabine infusion | Other | Adult patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma |
Primary outcome
Progression Free Survival
Time frame: At 1 year
One year after the CAR T therapy
21 secondary outcomes
Global response
Time frame: At 1 month
Complete response
Time frame: At 1 month
Global response
Time frame: At 3 months
Complete response
Time frame: At 3 months
Overall survival
Time frame: At 1 year
CAR T specific toxixity assessment
Time frame: Up to 1 year
CAR T specific toxixity assessment
Time frame: Up to 1 year
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 0
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 2
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 4
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 6
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 8
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 10
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 30
CAR T cell expansion
Time frame: At day 15
HLA-DR expression
Time frame: At day 0
Compliance of autologous reconstitution
Time frame: At 1 month
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Time frame: At 2 months
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Time frame: At 3 months
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Time frame: At 6 months
Monitoring of autologous reconstitution
Time frame: At 12 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 May 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Large B Cell Lymphoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Study of Oral MRT-2359 in Selected Cancer Patients
NSCLC, SCLC
Active, not recruitingEarly Phase 1
Iomab-ACT: A Pilot Study of 131-I Apamistamab Followed by CD19-Targeted CAR T-Cell Therapy for Patients With Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia or Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
B-ALL, DLBCL
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
The CARDIOPROTECT Trial
Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), Cardiotoxicity
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
QLS4131 Plus Isa-V-CHOP in Newly Diagnosed, HIV-Negative PBL: A Single-Center, Single-Arm, Phase II Study
Plasmablastic Lymphoma
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing the Effectiveness of a Combination Targeted Therapy (ViPOR) for Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Aggressive B-cell Lymphoma
High Grade B-Cell Lymphoma With MYC and BCL6 Rearrangements, Recurrent Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Large B Cell Lymphoma and CAR T Cell, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Progression Free Survival (time frame: At 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 May 2025.