We Are Not Studying a Disease or ConditionStimMAPNCT06989749
Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Modulation of Affect and Pain
A study testing Anodal tDCS and Cathodal tDCS in people with We Are Not Studying a Disease or Condition, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This double-blind randomized crossover study aims to examine the effects of left primary motor cortex (M1) tDCS on evoked thermal pain perception, pain-related decision making, and placebo effects by manipulated pain and monetary offers accepted by others. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- We Are Not Studying a Disease or Condition
- What is being tested?
- Anodal tDCS and Cathodal tDCS
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2023to 30 Nov 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- ages 18-55
- Participants must be capable of performing experimental tasks (e.g., are able to read)
- Fluent or native speakers of English
Who cannot join
- No self-reported current or history of depression, bipolar disorder, or other psychiatric diagnosis.
- No self-reported current seizure disorder (i.e., seizure within past 10 years)
- No history of stroke or other major neurological diagnosis.
- No self-reported current chronic pain, or acute pain within three months of the study period.
- No current migraine disorder (i.e., 15 headache days or more in 1 month).
- No use of central nervous system-effective medication or other medication for neurological/psychiatric treatment. No self-reported substance abuse within the last six months.
- No contraindication to MRI or tDCS (e.g., pregnancy, claustrophobia, pacemakers, ear/cochlear implants, shrapnel injuries, clips, or other ferromagnetic/electrical objects/devices, diagnosed brain abnormality such as tumor, or skin lesions on the scalp.).
- No contraindications for induced pain (e.g., no heart disease, high blood pressure, heart surgery, heart problems of any kind, severe asthma, respiratory problems of any kind, fibromyalgia, Raynaud's Syndrome or Disease, chronic pain, diabetes).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Dartmouth College
Hanover, New Hampshire, 03755
David Gantz M Lab Manager, MA, 423-557-3790, david.m.gantz@dartmouth.edu
About this study
This double-blind randomized crossover study aims to examine the effects of left primary motor cortex (M1) tDCS on evoked thermal pain perception, pain-related decision making, and placebo effects by manipulated pain and monetary offers accepted by others. The investigators plan to collect data for up to 50 participants who undergo four separate sessions: an initial pain calibration session and three experimental sessions with either anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS. Each session includes pain testing before and after a single tDCS protocol (either anodal, cathodal, or sham), a pain-monetary decision-making task, and social placebo pain tests. All tasks following tDCS will take place inside the MR scanner. The investigators hypothesize that anodal M1 tDCS will decrease pain ratings, and that cathodal tDCS will increase them, both relative to the sham condition. The investigators will also examine the effects of M1 tDCS on social decision-making to examine whether it affects participants' valuation of pain and their altruistic behavior, as well as how these same factors impact pain sensation in the placebo task. The investigators hypothesize that participants will behave hyperaltruistically during the decision-making task, and that the same factors that influence choice will also impact pain perception in the same context.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to examine the effects of M1 tDCS on induced experimental pain, pain-related decision making, and independently manipulate expectations based on the pain and monetary offered by others. This study involves 4 sessions, one thermal calibration session and three full study sessions where subjects will experience one of three tDCS conditions: anodal, cathodal, or sham. Participants receive only one condition of tDCS for each full session, and the order of which tDCS condition they receive is randomized. Participants are also asked to complete a decision-making task during each full study session, a Single-trial heat stimulation task based on the decision-making task, and finally a Social Decision Making and Placebo Responses task. Participants will complete all tasks following tDCS inside the MR scanner.
The initial pain calibration session is performed as a part of the screening process for each participant to ensure that all temperatures delivered during any subsequent procedures are within participants' tolerable range, and to obtain consent to participate in this research. The calibration procedure can improve the accuracy of the measurement because it adjusts the temperature based on the participants' reported sensation and allows for the determination of an individual's pain and tolerance level. Four runs (6 trials in each run and 24 trials totally) of noxious heat are administered to six forearm sites using iterative adaptive logistic regression. Each stimulus lasts 13 seconds, with 1.5 seconds for ramping. Sensation is rated on a circular scale from "no sensation" to "strongest imaginable". Participants report pain and tolerance with "yes" or "no" responses to "Painful?" and "Tolerate?" questions. The first calibration run familiarizes participants with 47°C heat on all sites. The second run includes 45°C, 47°C, and 48.9°C stimuli twice, randomly distributed. Runs three and four include low and high temperatures based on the pain and tolerance responses of previous trials. A logistic regression based on a 90% response to pain and tolerance of previous trials is used to determine the low and high threshold and is updated after each trial. After the final trial, low (pain) and high (tolerance) temperatures are determined using logistic regression across all trials, and three sites with the least mean absolute error values in rate-temperature linear regression are chosen for pain stimulation.
Each full session includes 3 run pains runs before tDCS, 20 min tDCS, 3 run pains tests after tDCS, Decision making task, and 3 runs of social decision making and placebo responses task. Each full session begins with three pain runs on three different regions of the right forearm (out of the 6 possible regions) used during the initial calibration session, and ends with three more pain runs on these same regions after tDCS. Each pain run consists of 12 trials using each participants' unique temperature range (pain and tolerance) obtained from the calibration session, such that there are 36 trials before tDCS, and 36 trials after tDCS.
The tDCS device is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes using the StarStim system (Neuroelectrics, Spain). Electrodes are placed on the C3 and FP2 regions. There is a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation for each tDCS condition to minimize any discomfort during stimulation. During stimulation, a random fractal image is displayed on the participant's computer screen. Originally, the main purpose of presenting a random image during each tDCS stimulation was to facilitate a 1-month follow-up session for a memory test planned for future study. The assignment of pictures to task conditions is randomized for each participant and therefore picture identity is not confounded with task variables. After tDCS, participants complete a questionnaire related to sensations induced by tDCS.
Decision-making task During the initial phase of the decision-making task, participants are presented with 128 trials where they are given the option to either accept or reject offers for pain and monetary reward levels. The pain levels for the offers are randomized from 8 possible levels of each participant's own unique pain tolerance threshold (or 20%-90% of their tolerance), and the monetary rewards are also randomized from $1 to $8. The presentation order of the pain levels and monetary values for each offer are also randomized (e.g., $5 for 60%, or, 20% for $3, etc.). Participants are instructed that each monetary value represents 10 heat stimulation at that percentage of tolerance. The 128 offers are divided into two sets of 64 trials each, where the first set involves decisions about offers for oneself, while the second set involves decisions about offers for others. No heat stimulation is involved while participants complete the first phase of the task, and the trials are presented in blocks of 8 for each type. Upon completing the initial phase of the task, a random selection of trials decided for others are chosen, and the average reward value associated with the accepted trials among these trials is paid to the participants as compensation for their involvement in this task. In addition, one random trial from the decisions participants made for himself/herself is selected, and participants receive either 10 heat stimulation at that percent of tolerance and additional monetary value or no pain/monetary.
Social Decision Making and Placebo Responses Participants are also told during the second phase of this task that they will additionally receive three sets of 12 heat stimulation trials randomly selected from previous participants' decisions for future participants. Participants are first shown the decision from the previous participant (e.g., x. 50% tolerance paired with $4) and then receive a heat stimulation based on that offer. However, unbeknownst to participants, participants either receive a "high" or "low" temperature every trial in which the high temperature is always the participants maximum heat tolerance, and the low temperature is the maximum heat tolerance minus 1 degree celsius.
Full study sessions are scheduled with at least five days in between sessions, and roughly during the same time of day (e.g., morning, afternoon, evening, etc.).
- Being tested
- Anodal tDCS, Cathodal tDCS, Sham tDCS
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, experimental pain, pain-related decision-making, social placebo effects
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Anodal tDCSOther
Also called Anodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an experimental manipulation of brain circuitry using electrical current applied to the scalp. The equipment is commercially available (StarStim8, Neuroelectrics, Spain) and marketed for experimental research on brain function. Current is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes. Electrodes are placed on the C3 and FP2 regions. There is a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation for each tDCS condition to minimize any discomfort during stimulation. In the anodal condition, real tDCS stimulation enters from the C3 electrode, and exits at the FP2 electrode.
Cathodal tDCSOther
Also called Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an experimental manipulation of brain circuitry using electrical current applied to the scalp. The equipment is commercially available (StarStim8, Neuroelectrics, Spain) and marketed for experimental research on brain function. Current is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes. Electrodes are placed on the C3 and FP2 regions. There is a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation for each tDCS condition to minimize any discomfort during stimulation. In the cathodal condition, real tDCS stimulation enters from the FP2 electrode, and exits at the C3 electrode.
Sham tDCSOther
Also called Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
This is the sham (or placebo) tDCS intervention. The tDCS device is applied for one minute, for a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Condition 1: Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS | Other | Each participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm anodal is applied session 1, cathodal is applied session 2, and sham is applied session 3. Receives: Other: Anodal tDCS; Other: Cathodal tDCS; Other: Sham tDCS |
| Condition 2: Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS | Other | Each participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm anodal is applied session 1, sham is applied session 2, and cathodal is applied session 3. Receives: Other: Anodal tDCS; Other: Cathodal tDCS; Other: Sham tDCS |
| Condition 3: Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS | Other | Each participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm sham is applied session 1, cathodal is applied session 2, and anodal is applied session 3. Receives: Other: Anodal tDCS; Other: Cathodal tDCS; Other: Sham tDCS |
| Condition 4: Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS | Other | Each participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm sham is applied session 1, anodal is applied session 2, and cathodal is applied session 3. Receives: Other: Anodal tDCS; Other: Cathodal tDCS; Other: Sham tDCS |
| Condition 5: Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS | Other | Each participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm cathodal is applied session 1, sham is applied session 2, and anodal is applied session 3. Receives: Other: Anodal tDCS; Other: Cathodal tDCS; Other: Sham tDCS |
| Condition 6: Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS | Other | Each participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm cathodal is applied session 1, anodal is applied session 2, and sham is applied session 3. Receives: Other: Anodal tDCS; Other: Cathodal tDCS; Other: Sham tDCS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Self-reported pain level following each thermal stimulus, measured on a visual analog scale. 0-100 scale with 0 indicating no pain and higher values indicating more pain.
Measured: 3-10 sec post-stimulus throughout testing sessions, on average complete within 1 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted25 May 2025
- Study start9 Sep 2023
- Primary completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for We Are Not Studying a Disease or ConditionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Trustees of Dartmouth College
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tor Wager, Trustees of Dartmouth College
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06989749
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00032315
- Acronym
- StimMAP
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 8 May 2025
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Electronic data will be stored indefinitely and will not be shared with other investigators without explicit permission from the overseeing IRB.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Modulation of Affect and Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06989749
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- StimMAP / STUDY00032315
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, experimental pain, pain-related decision-making, social placebo effects
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 25 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This double-blind randomized crossover study aims to examine the effects of left primary motor cortex (M1) tDCS on evoked thermal pain perception, pain-related decision making, and placebo effects by manipulated pain and monetary offers accepted by others. The investigators plan to collect data for up to 50 participants who undergo four separate sessions: an initial pain calibration session and three experimental sessions with either anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS. Each session includes pain testing before and after a single tDCS protocol (either anodal, cathodal, or sham), a pain-monetary decision-making task, and social placebo pain tests. All tasks following tDCS will take place inside the MR scanner. The investigators hypothesize that anodal M1 tDCS will decrease pain ratings, and that cathodal tDCS will increase them, both relative to the sham condition. The investigators will also examine the effects of M1 tDCS on social decision-making to examine whether it affects participants' valuation of pain and their altruistic behavior, as well as how these same factors impact pain sensation in the placebo task. The investigators hypothesize that participants will behave hyperaltruistically during the decision-making task, and that the same factors that influence choice will also impact pain perception in the same context.
Detailed description
This study aims to examine the effects of M1 tDCS on induced experimental pain, pain-related decision making, and independently manipulate expectations based on the pain and monetary offered by others. This study involves 4 sessions, one thermal calibration session and three full study sessions where subjects will experience one of three tDCS conditions: anodal, cathodal, or sham. Participants receive only one condition of tDCS for each full session, and the order of which tDCS condition they receive is randomized. Participants are also asked to complete a decision-making task during each full study session, a Single-trial heat stimulation task based on the decision-making task, and finally a Social Decision Making and Placebo Responses task. Participants will complete all tasks following tDCS inside the MR scanner.
The initial pain calibration session is performed as a part of the screening process for each participant to ensure that all temperatures delivered during any subsequent procedures are within participants' tolerable range, and to obtain consent to participate in this research. The calibration procedure can improve the accuracy of the measurement because it adjusts the temperature based on the participants' reported sensation and allows for the determination of an individual's pain and tolerance level. Four runs (6 trials in each run and 24 trials totally) of noxious heat are administered to six forearm sites using iterative adaptive logistic regression. Each stimulus lasts 13 seconds, with 1.5 seconds for ramping. Sensation is rated on a circular scale from "no sensation" to "strongest imaginable". Participants report pain and tolerance with "yes" or "no" responses to "Painful?" and "Tolerate?" questions. The first calibration run familiarizes participants with 47°C heat on all sites. The second run includes 45°C, 47°C, and 48.9°C stimuli twice, randomly distributed. Runs three and four include low and high temperatures based on the pain and tolerance responses of previous trials. A logistic regression based on a 90% response to pain and tolerance of previous trials is used to determine the low and high threshold and is updated after each trial. After the final trial, low (pain) and high (tolerance) temperatures are determined using logistic regression across all trials, and three sites with the least mean absolute error values in rate-temperature linear regression are chosen for pain stimulation.
Each full session includes 3 run pains runs before tDCS, 20 min tDCS, 3 run pains tests after tDCS, Decision making task, and 3 runs of social decision making and placebo responses task. Each full session begins with three pain runs on three different regions of the right forearm (out of the 6 possible regions) used during the initial calibration session, and ends with three more pain runs on these same regions after tDCS. Each pain run consists of 12 trials using each participants' unique temperature range (pain and tolerance) obtained from the calibration session, such that there are 36 trials before tDCS, and 36 trials after tDCS.
The tDCS device is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes using the StarStim system (Neuroelectrics, Spain). Electrodes are placed on the C3 and FP2 regions. There is a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation for each tDCS condition to minimize any discomfort during stimulation. During stimulation, a random fractal image is displayed on the participant's computer screen. Originally, the main purpose of presenting a random image during each tDCS stimulation was to facilitate a 1-month follow-up session for a memory test planned for future study. The assignment of pictures to task conditions is randomized for each participant and therefore picture identity is not confounded with task variables. After tDCS, participants complete a questionnaire related to sensations induced by tDCS.
Decision-making task During the initial phase of the decision-making task, participants are presented with 128 trials where they are given the option to either accept or reject offers for pain and monetary reward levels. The pain levels for the offers are randomized from 8 possible levels of each participant's own unique pain tolerance threshold (or 20%-90% of their tolerance), and the monetary rewards are also randomized from $1 to $8. The presentation order of the pain levels and monetary values for each offer are also randomized (e.g., $5 for 60%, or, 20% for $3, etc.). Participants are instructed that each monetary value represents 10 heat stimulation at that percentage of tolerance. The 128 offers are divided into two sets of 64 trials each, where the first set involves decisions about offers for oneself, while the second set involves decisions about offers for others. No heat stimulation is involved while participants complete the first phase of the task, and the trials are presented in blocks of 8 for each type. Upon completing the initial phase of the task, a random selection of trials decided for others are chosen, and the average reward value associated with the accepted trials among these trials is paid to the participants as compensation for their involvement in this task. In addition, one random trial from the decisions participants made for himself/herself is selected, and participants receive either 10 heat stimulation at that percent of tolerance and additional monetary value or no pain/monetary.
Social Decision Making and Placebo Responses Participants are also told during the second phase of this task that they will additionally receive three sets of 12 heat stimulation trials randomly selected from previous participants' decisions for future participants. Participants are first shown the decision from the previous participant (e.g., x. 50% tolerance paired with $4) and then receive a heat stimulation based on that offer. However, unbeknownst to participants, participants either receive a "high" or "low" temperature every trial in which the high temperature is always the participants maximum heat tolerance, and the low temperature is the maximum heat tolerance minus 1 degree celsius.
Full study sessions are scheduled with at least five days in between sessions, and roughly during the same time of day (e.g., morning, afternoon, evening, etc.).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Basic science
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 6
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Condition 1: Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS | Other | Other: Anodal tDCS, Other: Cathodal tDCS, Other: Sham tDCSEach participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm anodal is applied session 1, cathodal is applied session 2, and sham is applied session 3. |
| Condition 2: Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS | Other | Other: Anodal tDCS, Other: Cathodal tDCS, Other: Sham tDCSEach participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm anodal is applied session 1, sham is applied session 2, and cathodal is applied session 3. |
| Condition 3: Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS | Other | Other: Anodal tDCS, Other: Cathodal tDCS, Other: Sham tDCSEach participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm sham is applied session 1, cathodal is applied session 2, and anodal is applied session 3. |
| Condition 4: Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS | Other | Other: Anodal tDCS, Other: Cathodal tDCS, Other: Sham tDCSEach participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm sham is applied session 1, anodal is applied session 2, and cathodal is applied session 3. |
| Condition 5: Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS | Other | Other: Anodal tDCS, Other: Cathodal tDCS, Other: Sham tDCSEach participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm cathodal is applied session 1, sham is applied session 2, and anodal is applied session 3. |
| Condition 6: Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS | Other | Other: Anodal tDCS, Other: Cathodal tDCS, Other: Sham tDCSEach participant experiences an initial pain calibration session, followed by three full study sessions involving anodal, cathodal, or sham tDCS interventions. Only one intervention type (anodal, cathodal, or sham) is applied per session, in a randomized and double-blind fashion. In this arm cathodal is applied session 1, anodal is applied session 2, and sham is applied session 3. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- ages 18-55
- Participants must be capable of performing experimental tasks (e.g., are able to read)
- Fluent or native speakers of English
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- No self-reported current or history of depression, bipolar disorder, or other psychiatric diagnosis.
- No self-reported current seizure disorder (i.e., seizure within past 10 years)
- No history of stroke or other major neurological diagnosis.
- No self-reported current chronic pain, or acute pain within three months of the study period.
- No current migraine disorder (i.e., 15 headache days or more in 1 month).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Anodal tDCSAlso: Anodal Transcranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an experimental manipulation of brain circuitry using electrical current applied to the scalp. The equipment is commercially available (StarStim8, Neuroelectrics, Spain) and marketed for experimental research on brain function. Current is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes. Electrodes are placed on the C3 and FP2 regions. There is a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation for each tDCS condition to minimize any discomfort during stimulation. In the anodal condition, real tDCS stimulation enters from the C3 electrode, and exits at the FP2 electrode. | Other | Condition 1: Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS, Condition 2: Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS, Condition 3: Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS, Condition 4: Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS, Condition 5: Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS, Condition 6: Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS |
| Cathodal tDCSAlso: Cathodal Transcranial Direct Current StimulationTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is an experimental manipulation of brain circuitry using electrical current applied to the scalp. The equipment is commercially available (StarStim8, Neuroelectrics, Spain) and marketed for experimental research on brain function. Current is applied at 2 mA for 20 minutes. Electrodes are placed on the C3 and FP2 regions. There is a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation for each tDCS condition to minimize any discomfort during stimulation. In the cathodal condition, real tDCS stimulation enters from the FP2 electrode, and exits at the C3 electrode. | Other | Condition 1: Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS, Condition 2: Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS, Condition 3: Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS, Condition 4: Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS, Condition 5: Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS, Condition 6: Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS |
| Sham tDCSAlso: Sham Transcranial Direct Current StimulationThis is the sham (or placebo) tDCS intervention. The tDCS device is applied for one minute, for a 30-second ramp-up and 30-second ramp-down of stimulation. | Other | Condition 1: Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS, Condition 2: Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS, Condition 3: Sham tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS, Condition 4: Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Cathodal tDCS, Condition 5: Cathodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS -> Anodal tDCS, Condition 6: Cathodal tDCS -> Anodal tDCS -> Sham tDCS |
Primary outcome
Pain Visual Analogue Scale
Time frame: 3-10 sec post-stimulus throughout testing sessions, on average complete within 1 month
Self-reported pain level following each thermal stimulus, measured on a visual analog scale. 0-100 scale with 0 indicating no pain and higher values indicating more pain.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Electronic data will be stored indefinitely and will not be shared with other investigators without explicit permission from the overseeing IRB.
Related trials for We Are Not Studying a Disease or Condition
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Diode Laser and 20% Benzocaine Anesthetic Gel on Pain Reduction Following Tooth Separation With Elastomeric Separators in Fixed Orthodontic Patients: A Randomized Trial in Karachi-Pakistan
We Are Not Studying a Disease or Condition, Pain Reduction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Anodal tDCS and Cathodal tDCS in people with We Are Not Studying a Disease or Condition, run by Trustees of Dartmouth College at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Tor Wager D Principal Investigator, PhD (603-646-2196, Tor.D.Wager@Dartmouth.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain Visual Analogue Scale (time frame: 3-10 sec post-stimulus throughout testing sessions, on average complete within 1 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.