AzTrials
AzTrials

Lung Cancer (NSCLC)APACHIE-01NCT06993896

Physical Activity During Chemo- and/or Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer

An observational study of Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The main goal of this trial is to describe the pattern of physical activity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer during chemo- and/or immunotherapy, to evaluate potential predictors of those patterns and to assess potential correlations with patient reported outcomes (pain-, distress-, and fatigue scores). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
How many people
38 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
16 Jun 2025to 31 Dec 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients receiving chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer who possess a smart phone with a step counter.

Who may be able to join

  • Histologically proven non-small cell lung cancer
  • Indication for chemo- and/or immunotherapy
  • Possession of and ability to use a smart phone that includes a step counter
  • Willingness to wear the smart phone close to the body at any time
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Written informed consent
  • Capacity of the patient to consent

Who cannot join

  • Small-cell lung cancer
  • Karnofsky performance score <60
  • Thoracic surgery within 3 months prior to chemo- and/or immunotherapy
  • Expected Non-Compliance

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Dirk Rades, Prof. Dr. med. contact

0049-451-500 ext. 45400

dirk.rades@uksh.de

Sabine Bohnet, Dr. med. contact

0049-451-500 ext. 45001

sabine.bohnet@uksh.de

About this study

Official title: Assessment of Physical Activity During Chemo- and/or Immunotherapy for Lung Cancer

The main goal of this trial is to describe the pattern of physical activity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer during chemo- and/or immunotherapy, to evaluate potential predictors of those patterns and to assess potential correlations with patient reported outcomes (pain-, distress-, and fatigue scores). To reach this goal, this trial will be first trial in which the mean number of steps per week performed at baseline and during each week of chemo- and or immunotherapy will be collected in a standardized prospective way. The trial is exploratory in nature with the aim to generate scientific hypotheses to be investigated in future clinical trials.

Read the detailed description

Lung cancer belongs to the most common types of solid cancer in Europe and Northern America. Most patients with non-small cell lung cancer receive chemo- and/or immunotherapy. Many patients with distant metastases (stage IV disease) are treated with chemo- and/or immunotherapy alone or combined with palliative radiotherapy. Moreover, a considerable number of patients assigned to thoracic surgery receive neoadjuvant chemo- and/or immunotherapy without irradiation. The chemo- and/or immunotherapy regimens used for non-small cell lung cancer may be associated with adverse events including fatigue. Patients who experience significant treatment-related toxicity may not be able to receive the complete chemo- and/or immunotherapy as planned. Physical activity may be helpful in this context. In a retrospective study, adherence to an exercise program was associated with fewer dose reductions and delays of chemotherapy. Moreover, several studies performed in patients with lung cancer suggested that physical activity had a positive effect on the patient's quality of live. Thus, physical activity prior to and during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer appears important.

Adherence to an exercise program sometimes may be challenging for the patients, particularly if they experience treatment-related fatigue or other adverse events. The question arose whether an easy-to-use mobile app installed on the patient's smart phone reminding patients several times daily to perform a certain number of steps will have a positive effect on their physical activity during chemo- and/or immunotherapy. The patient's smart phone will also be used for counting the steps. Such an app is currently under development within the European Territorial Co-Operation project "Health Advancing Technologies for Elderly (HeAT)". This app will be tested in a prospective phase 2 trial. For proper sample size calculation and design of the trial, the current prospective study is required, which evaluates the weeks with a mean number of steps per week at baseline and during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

The main goal of this trial is to evaluate patterns and predictors of physical activity during chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer. The primary endpoint is to assess the mean number of steps per week during the first three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer. The baseline value is represented by the mean number of steps during the last week prior to chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Any type of smart phone is allowed, as long as it has a step counter. In addition, associations between mean number of steps per week and a pain-score, a distress-score and a fatigue-score will be evaluated. The recruitment of all 38 patients should be completed within 4 months. The treatment period will be 9-10 weeks (three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy). This equals a total running time for the trial of approximately 6 months.

Sample size calculation: Due to the exploratory character of this trial, sample size estimation is not based on a specific statistical hypothesis system. Instead, the sample size is derived by the following simple statistical reasoning and feasibility aspects. The goal of this study is to compare mean number of steps per week between various study weeks. Therefore, the effect size is considered as a relevant parametrization of the shift in mean values. The effect size defined as the mean of the paired difference divided by its standard deviation, and therefore, constitutes a standardized scale indicating the number of standard deviations by which the means differ. Assuming that an effect size of 0.5 for the mean number of steps per week between two study weeks is clinically interesting/relevant and worth to be detected, 34 patients are required to achieve a power of 80% with a level of significance of 5% (two-sided) using a t-test for comparing two paired means. This sample size is also considered feasible in this single-center trial setting considering the planned study duration. Assuming that 10% of the patients may not be included in the descriptive analyses due to lack of data, a total number of 38 patients should be enrolled to this exploratory, hypothesis-generating trial.

Keywords
lung cancer, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, physical activity
Medical subject headings
Lung Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Motor Activity

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT06993896
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Patients with steps counted by their smart phoneThe purpose is to obtain a patient's mean number of steps per week directly from the patient's smart phone which has a step counter.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Mean number of steps per week performed at baseline and during the first three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer

    The primary endpoint is to assess the mean number of steps per week during the first three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer. The baseline value is represented by the mean number of steps during the last week prior to chemotherapy and/or immunotherapy. Any type of smart phone is allowed, as long as it has a step counter.

    Measured: through study completion, 9 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Degree of the impact of pain on the mean number of steps per week asessed using the Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Pain will be assessed prior to chemo- and/or immunotherapy, weekly during the three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy, and at end of treatment with the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (self-assessment, ranging from 0 points = no pain to 10 points = maximum pain). Pain scores of 0-5 points will be compared to pain scores of 6-10 points.

    Measured: through study completion, 9 weeks

  2. Degree of the impact of distress on the mean number of steps per week asessed using the Distress Thermometer

    Distress will be assessed prior to chemo- and/or immunotherapy, weekly during the three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy, and at end of treatment with the Distress Thermometer (self-assessment, ranging from 0 points = no distress to 10 points = maximum distress). Distress scores of 0-5 points will be compared to distress scores of 6-10 points.

    Measured: through study completion, 9 weeks

  3. Degree of the impact of fatigue on the mean number of steps per week asessed using the Fatigue Asessment Scale (FAS)

    Fatigue will be assessed prior to chemo- and/or immunotherapy, weekly during the three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy, and at end of treatment with the Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS) (self-assessment, ranging from 0 points = no fatigue to 50 points = maximum fatigue) [© FAS (Fatigue Assessment Scale)]. Fatigue scores of 0-21 points (no fatigue) will be compared to fatigue scores of 22-50 points (substantial fatigue).

    Measured: through study completion, 9 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 May 2025
  2. Study start16 Jun 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Nov 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
38 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06993896
Sponsor's protocol ID
APACHIE-01
Acronym
APACHIE-01
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
16 May 2025
Last updated
29 May 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Lung Cancer (NSCLC), run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dirk Rades, Prof. Dr. med. (0049-451-500 ext. 45400, dirk.rades@uksh.de), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Mean number of steps per week performed at baseline and during the first three cycles of chemo- and/or immunotherapy for lung cancer (time frame: through study completion, 9 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in