AzTrials
AzTrials

Upper Git BleedingNCT06996613

Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Upper Git Bleeding

An observational study of Upper Git Bleeding, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Comparison between the effects and results of the two strategies of blood transfusion, liberal and restrictive in patients with upper Git bleeding Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 100 years
Conditions the study is for
Upper Git Bleeding
What is being tested?
Upper endoscopy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
22 May 2025to 30 Nov 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 100 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with upper Git bleeding in sohag university hospital

Who may be able to join

  • all patients presented by upper GIT bleeding and their CBC show anemia and need blood transfusion

Who cannot join

  • all patients less than 18 years and patients have anemia and received blood transfusion by another causes other than GIT bleeding

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of medicine sohag university

    Sohag

    Reham Elsayed, 01148187498, reham-elsayed-post@med.sohag.edu.eg

    Reham Elsayed

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Liberal Versus Restrictive Transfusion Strategy in Patients With Upper Git Bleeding in Sohag University Hospital

Comparison between the effects and results of the two strategies of blood transfusion, liberal and restrictive in patients with upper Git bleeding

Read the detailed description

Comparison between safety, efficacy and mortality rate in the two strategies of blood transfusion, liberal(target Hb 9-11g/dl) and restrictive(target Hb 7-9 g/dl )in patients with upper Git bleeding in sohag university hospital, and how other risk factors as liver cirrhosis , CKD,and cause of bleeding in the patient affect results and expected complications that may be occur after blood transfusion

Being tested
Upper endoscopy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Upper endoscopyProcedure or surgery

    It's a diagnostic endoscope to show the cause of upper Git bleeding

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the rate of complication of both liberal and restrictive transfusion strategy in upper Git bleeding

    To assess outcomes and any unwanted complications of both liberal and restrictive transfusion strategy in patients with upper GIT bleeding after reaching target Hb

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 May 2025
  2. Study start22 May 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Oct 2025 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2025 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06996613
Sponsor's protocol ID
Soh-Med--25-5-12MS
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
21 May 2025
Last updated
30 May 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided: Risk of re identification of participant data and privacy concerns * Reuse of data for proposes that had not been approved by participants * Reuse of data for unfair commercial proposes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Upper Git Bleeding, run by Sohag University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Reham Elsayed (01148187498, reham-elsayed-post@med.sohag.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the rate of complication of both liberal and restrictive transfusion strategy in upper Git bleeding (time frame: Baseline). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 May 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in