Mental Health Help-SeekingMULINCT06998654
Feasibility of a Digital Intervention for Patients Frequently Admitted to Psychiatric Acute Wards
A study testing Muli-app in people with Mental Health Help-Seeking and Digital Health, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
This qualitative feasibility study investigates a digital health app designed for patients who are frequently admitted to the psychiatric acute ward, to facilitate crisis support outside of office hours to avoid unnecessary readmissions, as well as self-harm. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Mental Health Help-Seeking, Digital Health, Readmissions
- What is being tested?
- Muli-app
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- 12 Jun 2025to 31 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- older than 18 years
- reside in one of the study municipalities
- admitted into the Muli service
- have had at least three admissions into the psychiatric acute ward in the last 12 months
- staff members at the local psychiatric hospital who respond to patient contacts made through the app
Who cannot join
- staff members at the local psychiatric hospital who rare not tasked with responding to patient contacts made through the app.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Norway1 site
Haukeland University Hospital
Bergen
Mette Senneseth, Phd, +47 41208207, mette.senneseth@helse-bergen.no
About this study
Official title: Feasibility of a Digital Intervention for Patients Frequently Admitted to Psychiatric Acute Wards: the MULI App Study
This qualitative feasibility study investigates a digital health app designed for patients who are frequently admitted to the psychiatric acute ward, to facilitate crisis support outside of office hours to avoid unnecessary readmissions, as well as self-harm. As this is a novel app to be implemented in an already existing service, key uncertainties regarding the intervention content and its delivery needs to be addressed before potentially conducting a full-scale trial, or, alternatively, to inform further intervention refinement. Such uncertainties are appropriate to explore in a feasibility study according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions.
There is a need to investigate whether the app is acceptable and useful to the patients using it, and to the healthcare providers who respond to it. There is also a need to know whether the healthcare providers responding to the app find the task manageable. The context in which the staff are to deliver the intervention, i.e. the in-bed ward, may be subject to different barriers, such as a staff shortage due to sick leave and heavy workload in the ward. Such barriers are essential to identify ahead of possible future trials in other contexts.
Read the detailed description
The present study is a part of the larger Revolving Door Project, a collaborative service innovation project between a university hospital and two municipalities in Norway. The revolving door project aims to create a more sustainable service to prevent unnecessary hospital readmissions, reducing the strain repeated rehospitalisations can produce and also reducing financial costs. By collecting valuable insights from key stakeholders, critical points in the healthcare services have been identified and outlined in the "emergency loop". This loop illustrates how the current service solution can worsen the revolving door problem by failing to offer timely and adequate help and ultimately risking an escalation of the patient's difficulties. To address these issues, a new healthcare service has been developed to meet the needs of the stakeholders. The service is aimed at individuals who are repeatedly readmitted and discharged from the psychiatric acute ward, who have emotionally unstable traits (not necessarily diagnosis specific), where previously attempted measures have proven insufficient and where there is an insecurity in the help apparatus as to how to help the patient.
The Muli-service The muli-app is a part of a new service, called The Muli-service. This service comprises a collaborative multidisciplinary team (Muli-team), with representatives from municipal mental health services, local psychiatric hospital, psychiatric acute ward, and police. This team coordinates admissions and collaborates with individuals to improve communication and cooperation between services and patients. As such, the Muli-service isn't a new treatment but an intervention meant to complement and enhance existing treatment and mental health provision.
The collaborative part of the service is already established. In addition, the revolving door project has developed the Muli-app, which is the focus of the present feasibility study. A Person-Based Approach has been used to guide the development the app, where stakeholders have been consulted iteratively. The app was created based on stakeholders reported needs, to provide them with an alternative means to seek help outside of office hours, which is a typical time for emergency hospital admissions. The goal is to provide timely and adequate help and thus prevent further escalation of the situation. This aligns with recommendations in the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on the quality of mental health services.
The Muli-app At the point of download, the app consists of a few predefined sets of emotion regulation exercises and contact information for emergency services. Tailored content (i.e crisis plan and crisis measures) will be written in collaboration between patient and therapist/Muli-contact. Possible crisis measures for each individual patient will be discussed and agreed upon in the Muli-team in advance, ensuring that these measures are in fact feasible. The patient will be presented with the options, and from this the patient and therapist agree upon the most fitting crisis measures to be put into the app. This is communicated back to the Muli-team.
Patients admitted into the Muli-service will be informed of the app through their Muli-contact in the collaborative team and receive an invitation to participate in this study. Study participants who consent to participation will be set up with a user profile in the Muli app and receive a text message from the developers informing them of how to access the app on their own smartphones. The Muli-app will be available to download in app-stores but won't work unless an existing profile is connected to the patient. study participants will receive training from their Muli-contact on how to use the app.
One in-patient ward at the local psychiatric hospital responds when patients activate the contact-based measures through the app outside of office hours. The ward will be provided smart-phones connected to the app-software, notifying them when a patient makes contact through the app. For every evening and night shift (and all shifts during weekends), one healthcare worker will be assigned to carry the Muli-phone and reply when a patient activates the contact-based functions.
The staff who respond at the ward all have bachelor's degrees as registered nurses or learning disability nurses, while some are specialized mental health nurses. Staff have received training in principles of Mentalization-Based Therapy by a licensed psychologist, which will be applied when study participants make contact. Staff will also receive training on the app technology and protocol by a Muli representative.
As this intervention is meant to complement existing treatment, no limitations are made regarding the type of treatment study participants receive parallel to the feasibility testing of the app.
The present feasibility study addresses several aims. To assess acceptability, perceived usefulness, implementation feasibility and fidelity, narrative data will be collected through qualitative interviews with participants. App usage data and information regarding the number of hospital admissions and emergency services during the trial phase will be collected at the end of trial, to identify possible change and enable further contextualization of the narrative data. The findings may bring forth hidden aspects of how the intervention works in practice.
Data collection methods Patient perspectives will be monitored using semi-structured interviews (N=5). These interviews will be conducted in a safe and undisturbed location chosen by the users themselves or digitally if they prefer. Each interview is expected to last approximately one hour and will be audio recorded.
Three months after the app has been tested, focus group interviews with staff (N=20) will be conducted. These interviews will take place in a suitable location at the district psychiatric center. All interviews will be transcribed into text, excluding identifying information. All audio files will be deleted after transcription.
Quantitative data on patient app usage will be collected through the Muli app, with the patient's consent given via the app. Data on the number of readmissions and/or contacts with emergency services will be gathered through interviews with patients.
Any adverse events during trial phase, will be monitored by the Muli-service team and reported to research team on a weekly basis.
Data analysis Qualitative data from in-depth interviews and focus group interviews will be analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data will be triangulated and analyzed together to gain a broader understanding of the findings.
- Conditions
- Mental Health Help-Seeking, Digital Health, Readmissions
- Being tested
- Muli-app
- Keywords
- Digital mental health intervention, self help, crisis support, readmissions
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Muli-appBehavioural
The Muli-app is designed after a traffic-light model, indicating different levels of severity of emotional distress and need for help. Green parts represent self-management measures that can be taken to try to regulate themselves (coping plan, write notes for their next appointment , and exercises to reduce emotional distress.) Yellow parts represent contact-based measures when the patient needs someone to talk to outside office hours, to de-escalate emotional distress and to avoid further crisis. This function connects study participants with mental health professionals at the local psychiatric hospital outside office hours (chat, phone or videocall). When the patient activates this function, the staff at the local hospital have 30 minutes to reply. The red part also activates contact with the local psychiatric hospital, but with a need of acute response, activating acute measures stated in the coping plan, such as access to an open bed in the municipality.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Muli-app | Other | The feasibility study will be conduced using a concurrent mixed methods design, where quantitative and qualitative data are collected simultaneously.
The trial will be run in two neighbouring municipalities in Norway that are affiliated with the same university hospital. To allow for sufficient time to engage with the intervention, the two trial-phases will be run, each lasting 3 months. For patients, the intervention will be tested in real-life situations, wherever they lead their everyday lives. Qualitative data will be collected through individual interviews in the patients' preferred settings. App-usage data will be collected through the app-platform.
For staff, qualitative data will be collected through focus group interviews at the local psychiatric hospital tasked with responding when patients make contact through the app. Suitable meeting rooms will be provided to ensure privacy. Receives: Behavioral: Muli-app |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Acceptability of the digital mental health intervention for patients
Acceptability refers to the degree to which patients feel that the digital health service is appropriate, comfortable, and aligned with their needs and values. Focus: How patients perceive the app in terms of relevance, usability, and emotional response.
Data Source: Semi-structured interviews.
Research Questions:
- How do patients experience using the app?
- What aspects of the app do they find helpful or frustrating?
- Would they be willing to use it again?
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Acceptability of the digital mental health intervention for healthcare providers
Acceptability refers to the extent to which the digital intervention fits within clinical routines, professional standards, and ethical expectations.
Focus: How healthcare workers perceive the app's fit with their workflow, values, and patient care.
Data Source: Focus group interviews.
Research Questions:
- How do healthcare workers experience integrating the app into their practice?
- What concerns or benefits do they identify?
- Does the app align with their professional judgment and routines?
Measured: From enrollment to end of trial phase, 3 months
Perceived usefulness of the digital mental health intervention for patients
Usefulness is understood as the degree to which the intervention helps users achieve their goals or solve a problem. Focus: Whether the app is seen as beneficial in supporting patient self-management.
Data Source: Interviews with patients
Research Questions:
- In what ways do users feel the app supports their needs and goals?
- Are there features they find particularly valuable or lacking?
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Perceived usefulness of the intervention for healthcare providers
Usefulness is understood as the extent to which the digital service contributes to improved care delivery, decision-making, or communication with patients.
Focus: Whether the app is seen as beneficial in supporting clinical care. Data Source: Focusgroup interviews.
Research Questions:
- In what ways do users feel the app supports them in their clinical care?
- Are there features they find particularly valuable or lacking?
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of contacts with health services
Number of readmissions and/or contacts with emergency services during the feasibility trial phase.
Data source: interviews with patients.
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial, 3 months
Implementation feasibility of the digital intervention
Implementation feasibility is understood as the extent to which the digital intervnetion can be practically and successfully delivered in a real-world setting, considering technical, organizational, and contextual factors.
Focus: Technical, organizational and contextual factors affecting the delivery and use of the app.
Data Source: focus group interviews with healthcare workers (implementation staff)
Research Questions:
- What barriers or facilitators affect the implementation of the app?
- Are there technical, organizational, or contextual challenges?
- What adaptations are needed for successful implementation?
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Fidelity to protocol
Fidelity to protocol is understood as the degree to which the digital intervention is delivered and used as originally intended, according to the planned procedures, content, and timing.
Focus: Whether the app is used as intended and what deviations occur. Data Source: Interviews (with patients) and focus-group interviews (with health care providers), and app-usage logs
Research Questions:
- Do users follow the intended use of the app?
- What factors lead to deviations from the protocol?
- How do these deviations affect the perceived value of the app?
Measured: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 May 2025
- Study start12 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Mental Health Help-SeekingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Haukeland University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The present study is a feasibility study of a digital mental health intervention, "the Muli-app". The app is developed through an iterative process with different stakeholders, peers and service users, and will be tested with 5 service users (patients) in this feasibility study.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Haukeland University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Mette Senneseth, Haukeland University Hospital
- Investigators
- Mette Senneseth, Phd, Principal investigator, Centre for research and education in forensic psychiatry, Haukeland Univeristy Hospital.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06998654
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 0-4322
- Acronym
- MULI
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 14 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 31 May 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: To protect the integrity and anonymity of study participants, IPD will not be shared due to the sensitive nature of the data being collected from a very limited sample size.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 31 May 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Feasibility of a Digital Intervention for Patients Frequently Admitted to Psychiatric Acute Wards: the MULI App Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT06998654
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MULI / 0-4322
- Conditions
- Mental Health Help-Seeking, Digital Health, Readmissions
- Keywords
- Digital mental health intervention, self help, crisis support, readmissions
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Haukeland University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Western Norway University of Applied Sciences
- Study start
- 12 Jun 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 31 May 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This qualitative feasibility study investigates a digital health app designed for patients who are frequently admitted to the psychiatric acute ward, to facilitate crisis support outside of office hours to avoid unnecessary readmissions, as well as self-harm. As this is a novel app to be implemented in an already existing service, key uncertainties regarding the intervention content and its delivery needs to be addressed before potentially conducting a full-scale trial, or, alternatively, to inform further intervention refinement. Such uncertainties are appropriate to explore in a feasibility study according to the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions.
There is a need to investigate whether the app is acceptable and useful to the patients using it, and to the healthcare providers who respond to it. There is also a need to know whether the healthcare providers responding to the app find the task manageable. The context in which the staff are to deliver the intervention, i.e. the in-bed ward, may be subject to different barriers, such as a staff shortage due to sick leave and heavy workload in the ward. Such barriers are essential to identify ahead of possible future trials in other contexts.
Detailed description
The present study is a part of the larger Revolving Door Project, a collaborative service innovation project between a university hospital and two municipalities in Norway. The revolving door project aims to create a more sustainable service to prevent unnecessary hospital readmissions, reducing the strain repeated rehospitalisations can produce and also reducing financial costs. By collecting valuable insights from key stakeholders, critical points in the healthcare services have been identified and outlined in the "emergency loop". This loop illustrates how the current service solution can worsen the revolving door problem by failing to offer timely and adequate help and ultimately risking an escalation of the patient's difficulties. To address these issues, a new healthcare service has been developed to meet the needs of the stakeholders. The service is aimed at individuals who are repeatedly readmitted and discharged from the psychiatric acute ward, who have emotionally unstable traits (not necessarily diagnosis specific), where previously attempted measures have proven insufficient and where there is an insecurity in the help apparatus as to how to help the patient.
The Muli-service The muli-app is a part of a new service, called The Muli-service. This service comprises a collaborative multidisciplinary team (Muli-team), with representatives from municipal mental health services, local psychiatric hospital, psychiatric acute ward, and police. This team coordinates admissions and collaborates with individuals to improve communication and cooperation between services and patients. As such, the Muli-service isn't a new treatment but an intervention meant to complement and enhance existing treatment and mental health provision.
The collaborative part of the service is already established. In addition, the revolving door project has developed the Muli-app, which is the focus of the present feasibility study. A Person-Based Approach has been used to guide the development the app, where stakeholders have been consulted iteratively. The app was created based on stakeholders reported needs, to provide them with an alternative means to seek help outside of office hours, which is a typical time for emergency hospital admissions. The goal is to provide timely and adequate help and thus prevent further escalation of the situation. This aligns with recommendations in the European Psychiatric Association (EPA) guidance on the quality of mental health services.
The Muli-app At the point of download, the app consists of a few predefined sets of emotion regulation exercises and contact information for emergency services. Tailored content (i.e crisis plan and crisis measures) will be written in collaboration between patient and therapist/Muli-contact. Possible crisis measures for each individual patient will be discussed and agreed upon in the Muli-team in advance, ensuring that these measures are in fact feasible. The patient will be presented with the options, and from this the patient and therapist agree upon the most fitting crisis measures to be put into the app. This is communicated back to the Muli-team.
Patients admitted into the Muli-service will be informed of the app through their Muli-contact in the collaborative team and receive an invitation to participate in this study. Study participants who consent to participation will be set up with a user profile in the Muli app and receive a text message from the developers informing them of how to access the app on their own smartphones. The Muli-app will be available to download in app-stores but won't work unless an existing profile is connected to the patient. study participants will receive training from their Muli-contact on how to use the app.
One in-patient ward at the local psychiatric hospital responds when patients activate the contact-based measures through the app outside of office hours. The ward will be provided smart-phones connected to the app-software, notifying them when a patient makes contact through the app. For every evening and night shift (and all shifts during weekends), one healthcare worker will be assigned to carry the Muli-phone and reply when a patient activates the contact-based functions.
The staff who respond at the ward all have bachelor's degrees as registered nurses or learning disability nurses, while some are specialized mental health nurses. Staff have received training in principles of Mentalization-Based Therapy by a licensed psychologist, which will be applied when study participants make contact. Staff will also receive training on the app technology and protocol by a Muli representative.
As this intervention is meant to complement existing treatment, no limitations are made regarding the type of treatment study participants receive parallel to the feasibility testing of the app.
The present feasibility study addresses several aims. To assess acceptability, perceived usefulness, implementation feasibility and fidelity, narrative data will be collected through qualitative interviews with participants. App usage data and information regarding the number of hospital admissions and emergency services during the trial phase will be collected at the end of trial, to identify possible change and enable further contextualization of the narrative data. The findings may bring forth hidden aspects of how the intervention works in practice.
Data collection methods Patient perspectives will be monitored using semi-structured interviews (N=5). These interviews will be conducted in a safe and undisturbed location chosen by the users themselves or digitally if they prefer. Each interview is expected to last approximately one hour and will be audio recorded.
Three months after the app has been tested, focus group interviews with staff (N=20) will be conducted. These interviews will take place in a suitable location at the district psychiatric center. All interviews will be transcribed into text, excluding identifying information. All audio files will be deleted after transcription.
Quantitative data on patient app usage will be collected through the Muli app, with the patient's consent given via the app. Data on the number of readmissions and/or contacts with emergency services will be gathered through interviews with patients.
Any adverse events during trial phase, will be monitored by the Muli-service team and reported to research team on a weekly basis.
Data analysis Qualitative data from in-depth interviews and focus group interviews will be analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Quantitative and qualitative data will be triangulated and analyzed together to gain a broader understanding of the findings.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The present study is a feasibility study of a digital mental health intervention, "the Muli-app". The app is developed through an iterative process with different stakeholders, peers and service users, and will be tested with 5 service users (patients) in this feasibility study.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Muli-app | Other | Behavioral: Muli-appThe feasibility study will be conduced using a concurrent mixed methods design, where quantitative and qualitative data are collected simultaneously. The trial will be run in two neighbouring municipalities in Norway that are affiliated with the same university hospital. To allow for sufficient time to engage with the intervention, the two trial-phases will be run, each lasting 3 months. For patients, the intervention will be tested in real-life situations, wherever they lead their everyday lives. Qualitative data will be collected through individual interviews in the patients' preferred settings. App-usage data will be collected through the app-platform. For staff, qualitative data will be collected through focus group interviews at the local psychiatric hospital tasked with responding when patients make contact through the app. Suitable meeting rooms will be provided to ensure privacy. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- older than 18 years
- reside in one of the study municipalities
- admitted into the Muli service
- have had at least three admissions into the psychiatric acute ward in the last 12 months
- staff members at the local psychiatric hospital who respond to patient contacts made through the app
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- staff members at the local psychiatric hospital who rare not tasked with responding to patient contacts made through the app.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Muli-appThe Muli-app is designed after a traffic-light model, indicating different levels of severity of emotional distress and need for help. Green parts represent self-management measures that can be taken to try to regulate themselves (coping plan, write notes for their next appointment , and exercises to reduce emotional distress.) Yellow parts represent contact-based measures when the patient needs someone to talk to outside office hours, to de-escalate emotional distress and to avoid further crisis. This function connects study participants with mental health professionals at the local psychiatric hospital outside office hours (chat, phone or videocall). When the patient activates this function, the staff at the local hospital have 30 minutes to reply. The red part also activates contact with the local psychiatric hospital, but with a need of acute response, activating acute measures stated in the coping plan, such as access to an open bed in the municipality. | Behavioural | Muli-app |
Primary outcome
Acceptability of the digital mental health intervention for patients
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Acceptability refers to the degree to which patients feel that the digital health service is appropriate, comfortable, and aligned with their needs and values. Focus: How patients perceive the app in terms of relevance, usability, and emotional response. Data Source: Semi-structured interviews. Research Questions: * How do patients experience using the app? * What aspects of the app do they find helpful or frustrating? * Would they be willing to use it again?
Acceptability of the digital mental health intervention for healthcare providers
Time frame: From enrollment to end of trial phase, 3 months
Acceptability refers to the extent to which the digital intervention fits within clinical routines, professional standards, and ethical expectations. Focus: How healthcare workers perceive the app's fit with their workflow, values, and patient care. Data Source: Focus group interviews. Research Questions: * How do healthcare workers experience integrating the app into their practice? * What concerns or benefits do they identify? * Does the app align with their professional judgment and routines?
Perceived usefulness of the digital mental health intervention for patients
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Usefulness is understood as the degree to which the intervention helps users achieve their goals or solve a problem. Focus: Whether the app is seen as beneficial in supporting patient self-management. Data Source: Interviews with patients Research Questions: * In what ways do users feel the app supports their needs and goals? * Are there features they find particularly valuable or lacking?
Perceived usefulness of the intervention for healthcare providers
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Usefulness is understood as the extent to which the digital service contributes to improved care delivery, decision-making, or communication with patients. Focus: Whether the app is seen as beneficial in supporting clinical care. Data Source: Focusgroup interviews. Research Questions: * In what ways do users feel the app supports them in their clinical care? * Are there features they find particularly valuable or lacking?
3 secondary outcomes
Number of contacts with health services
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial, 3 months
Implementation feasibility of the digital intervention
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.
Fidelity to protocol
Time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 31 May 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. To protect the integrity and anonymity of study participants, IPD will not be shared due to the sensitive nature of the data being collected from a very limited sample size.
Related trials for Mental Health Help-Seeking
Not yet recruiting
Short, Wordless Animated Storytelling to Promote Mental Health Help-Seeking in Young Adults: A U.S. Online Randomized Controlled Trial
Mental Health Help-Seeking
Active, not recruiting
MHE3 Clinical Trial - Overcoming Obstacles
Mental Health Services, Community Mental Health Services
Recruiting
YOUCA App for Parents of Children With Mental Health Issues: A Pilot Study of Usability and Efficacy
Mental Health Help-Seeking, Mental Health Difficulties
Active, not recruiting
Mental Health Help-seeking Promotion in Older Adults
Mental Health Help-seeking
Not yet recruiting
Brief Intervention Addressing Stigma Among Parents of Children With Mental Health Problems
Depression Disorders, ADHD
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Mette Senneseth, Phd principal investigator
Centre for research and education in forensic psychiatry, Haukeland Univeristy Hospital.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Muli-app in people with Mental Health Help-Seeking and Digital Health, run by Haukeland University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 May 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Ane A Buer, Phd candidate (+47 45054749, anabu@hvl.no), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Acceptability of the digital mental health intervention for patients (time frame: From enrollment to the end of trial phase, 3 months.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 May 2025.