Unipolar DepressionPhase 2NCT07002554
Bright Light Therapy for Depressed Geriatric Inpatients
A Phase 2 study testing Bright light therapy and dim red light in people with Unipolar Depression, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Bright light therapy has been shown to be effective for the treatment of both seasonal and non-seasonal unipolar depression as well as bipolar depression, primarily in outpatients under the age of 60. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Unipolar Depression
- What is being tested?
- Bright light therapy and dim red light
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 14 Nov 2025to 31 Jul 2027
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- A current episode of non-psychotic unipolar depression as the primary reason for psychiatric hospitalization
- Currently hospitalized on the MUSC Senior Care Unit
- Age 60 years or older
- HAMD-17 ≥8
Who cannot join
- Any prior use of bright light therapy
- Primary indication for hospitalization is for a disorder other than major depressive disorder (determined by patient's treatment team)
- Photosensitive medical conditions or current use of photosensitizing medications - if patients have been advised by a treating clinician at any point to avoid sunlight because of their current medication regimen or medical condition, they will be considered to have a photosensitive medical condition and will be excluded from this study.
- Treatment with ECT; if a patient's condition deteriorates during study participation such that the treatment team feels ECT would be in their best interest, they will be withdrawn from study participation. For logistical and transport purposes, the study team feels that exclusion of patients receiving ECT will be necessarily. Additionally, these patients would likely be excluded from a future larger RCT given that ECT would likely interfere with signal of BLT efficacy.
- Uncontrolled headaches or any migraines within the last month
- Major neurocognitive disorder
Show all 10Show fewer
- Severe intellectual disability
- Inability to consent for the study
- Active psychosis
- Inmates
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Medical University of South Carolina Institute of Psychiatry Senior Care Unit
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
About this study
Official title: The LIGHT-60 Trial - Light Intervention for Geriatric Patients Hospitalized for Depression Treatment
Bright light therapy has been shown to be effective for the treatment of both seasonal and non-seasonal unipolar depression as well as bipolar depression, primarily in outpatients under the age of 60. There is a dearth of studies exploring the efficacy of this treatment modality among elderly depressed inpatients, which is our study population.
Read the detailed description
Investigators are studying the ability of light therapy to reduce depressive symptoms in elderly patients who are hospitalized with unipolar depression (depression that is not due to bipolar disorder). Participants will receive either active light treatment or inactive treatment (also known as placebo).
- Conditions
- Unipolar Depression
- Being tested
- Bright light therapy, dim red light
- Keywords
- Depression, Geriatrics, Psychiatry, Stress Disorders
- Medical subject headings
- Depressive Disorder, Depression, Stress Disorders, Traumatic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Bright light therapyDevice
Also called light therapy
the Verilux® HappyLight® Lumi Plus light therapy box, which delivers UV-free, full-spectrum LED light at an intensity of 10,000 lux
dim red lightDevice
The control group will use the same light box device, configured to emit dim red light. This will be achieved by setting the box to its lowest brightness setting and overlaying a translucent red filter over the light display. This setup is intended to maintain the appearance and experience of light exposure while minimizing any therapeutic effect.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Bright light therapy | Experimental | Participants in the intervention group will receive bright light therapy (BLT) consisting of 10,000 lux of bright white light administered for 30 minutes each morning, ideally within 30 minutes of awakening. Participants in both arms will continue to receive other treatment as usual (group therapy and medication management) as deemed appropriate by their treating clinicians. Receives: Device: Bright light therapy |
| Dim Red light | Sham comparator | Participants in the control group will receive a placebo condition using an identical light box fitted with a translucent red screen to emit dim red light at an intensity of less than 2,500 lux, which lacks efficacy for depression treatment based on prior research. Participants in both arms will continue to receive other treatment as usual (group therapy and medication management) as deemed appropriate by their treating clinicians. Receives: Device: dim red light |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Study completion rate
Percentage of patients who complete the study while psychiatrically hospitalized
Measured: Up to week 6 (Upon time of discharge from inpatient unit)
Adequacy of allocation blinding
assessed by the proportion of participants who correctly identify their study arm allocation. Blinding will be considered adequate if the proportion of correct guesses does not significantly exceed chance levels
Measured: Up to week 6 (Upon time of discharge from inpatient unit)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Preliminary efficacy data - Mean change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 item scale (HAMD-17)
HAMD-17 is a commonly used clinician rating scale for depressive symptoms
Measured: Day of enrollment, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6
Preliminary efficacy data - Mean change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) Score
BDI-II is a commonly used self-report rating scale for depressive symptoms
Measured: Day of enrollment, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2025
- Study start14 Nov 2025
- Primary completion30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Unipolar DepressionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Medical University of South CarolinaThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Rindy Fernandes, DO, Principal investigator, Medical University of South Carolina
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07002554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00139703
- Other IDs
- R25DA020537
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 6 May 2025
- Last updated
- 16 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Zhao X, Ma J, Wu S, Chi I, Bai Z. Light therapy for older patients with non-seasonal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:291-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.041. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
PubMed 29500957Geoffroy PA, Schroder CM, Reynaud E, Bourgin P. Efficacy of light therapy versus antidepressant drugs, and of the combination versus monotherapy, in major depressive episodes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2019 Dec;48:101213. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101213. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
PubMed 31600678Oldham MA, Ciraulo DA. Bright light therapy for depression: a review of its effects on chronobiology and the autonomic nervous system. Chronobiol Int. 2014 Apr;31(3):305-19. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.833935. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
PubMed 24397276Tong H, Dong N, Lam CLM, Lee TMC. The effect of bright light therapy on major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Asian J Psychiatr. 2024 Sep;99:104149. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104149. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
PubMed 39067131Menegaz de Almeida A, Aquino de Moraes FC, Cavalcanti Souza ME, Cavalcanti Orestes Cardoso JH, Tamashiro F, Miranda C, Fernandes L, Kreuz M, Alves Kelly F. Bright Light Therapy for Nonseasonal Depressive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 1;82(1):38-46. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2871.
PubMed 39356500Sit DK, McGowan J, Wiltrout C, Diler RS, Dills JJ, Luther J, Yang A, Ciolino JD, Seltman H, Wisniewski SR, Terman M, Wisner KL. Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy for Bipolar Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;175(2):131-139. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101200. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
PubMed 28969438
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The LIGHT-60 Trial - Light Intervention for Geriatric Patients Hospitalized for Depression Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07002554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00139703
- Conditions
- Unipolar Depression
- Keywords
- Depression, Geriatrics, Psychiatry, Stress Disorders
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Medical University of South CarolinaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- 14 Nov 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bright light therapy has been shown to be effective for the treatment of both seasonal and non-seasonal unipolar depression as well as bipolar depression, primarily in outpatients under the age of 60. There is a dearth of studies exploring the efficacy of this treatment modality among elderly depressed inpatients, which is our study population.
Detailed description
Investigators are studying the ability of light therapy to reduce depressive symptoms in elderly patients who are hospitalized with unipolar depression (depression that is not due to bipolar disorder). Participants will receive either active light treatment or inactive treatment (also known as placebo).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Bright light therapy | Experimental | Device: Bright light therapyParticipants in the intervention group will receive bright light therapy (BLT) consisting of 10,000 lux of bright white light administered for 30 minutes each morning, ideally within 30 minutes of awakening. Participants in both arms will continue to receive other treatment as usual (group therapy and medication management) as deemed appropriate by their treating clinicians. |
| Dim Red light | Sham comparator | Device: dim red lightParticipants in the control group will receive a placebo condition using an identical light box fitted with a translucent red screen to emit dim red light at an intensity of less than 2,500 lux, which lacks efficacy for depression treatment based on prior research. Participants in both arms will continue to receive other treatment as usual (group therapy and medication management) as deemed appropriate by their treating clinicians. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- A current episode of non-psychotic unipolar depression as the primary reason for psychiatric hospitalization
- Currently hospitalized on the MUSC Senior Care Unit
- Age 60 years or older
- HAMD-17 ≥8
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Any prior use of bright light therapy
- Primary indication for hospitalization is for a disorder other than major depressive disorder (determined by patient's treatment team)
- Photosensitive medical conditions or current use of photosensitizing medications - if patients have been advised by a treating clinician at any point to avoid sunlight because of their current medication regimen or medical condition, they will be considered to have a photosensitive medical condition and will be excluded from this study.
- Treatment with ECT; if a patient's condition deteriorates during study participation such that the treatment team feels ECT would be in their best interest, they will be withdrawn from study participation. For logistical and transport purposes, the study team feels that exclusion of patients receiving ECT will be necessarily. Additionally, these patients would likely be excluded from a future larger RCT given that ECT would likely interfere with signal of BLT efficacy.
- Uncontrolled headaches or any migraines within the last month
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Bright light therapyAlso: light therapythe Verilux® HappyLight® Lumi Plus light therapy box, which delivers UV-free, full-spectrum LED light at an intensity of 10,000 lux | Device | Bright light therapy |
| dim red lightThe control group will use the same light box device, configured to emit dim red light. This will be achieved by setting the box to its lowest brightness setting and overlaying a translucent red filter over the light display. This setup is intended to maintain the appearance and experience of light exposure while minimizing any therapeutic effect. | Device | Dim Red light |
Primary outcome
Study completion rate
Time frame: Up to week 6 (Upon time of discharge from inpatient unit)
Percentage of patients who complete the study while psychiatrically hospitalized
Adequacy of allocation blinding
Time frame: Up to week 6 (Upon time of discharge from inpatient unit)
assessed by the proportion of participants who correctly identify their study arm allocation. Blinding will be considered adequate if the proportion of correct guesses does not significantly exceed chance levels
2 secondary outcomes
Preliminary efficacy data - Mean change in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale 17 item scale (HAMD-17)
Time frame: Day of enrollment, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6
Preliminary efficacy data - Mean change in Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II) Score
Time frame: Day of enrollment, week 1, week 2, week 4, week 6
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 29500957Zhao X, Ma J, Wu S, Chi I, Bai Z. Light therapy for older patients with non-seasonal depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2018 May;232:291-299. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.041. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 31600678Geoffroy PA, Schroder CM, Reynaud E, Bourgin P. Efficacy of light therapy versus antidepressant drugs, and of the combination versus monotherapy, in major depressive episodes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. 2019 Dec;48:101213. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.101213. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
- Background: PubMed 24397276Oldham MA, Ciraulo DA. Bright light therapy for depression: a review of its effects on chronobiology and the autonomic nervous system. Chronobiol Int. 2014 Apr;31(3):305-19. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2013.833935. Epub 2014 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 39067131Tong H, Dong N, Lam CLM, Lee TMC. The effect of bright light therapy on major depressive disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Asian J Psychiatr. 2024 Sep;99:104149. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104149. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
- Background: PubMed 39356500Menegaz de Almeida A, Aquino de Moraes FC, Cavalcanti Souza ME, Cavalcanti Orestes Cardoso JH, Tamashiro F, Miranda C, Fernandes L, Kreuz M, Alves Kelly F. Bright Light Therapy for Nonseasonal Depressive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 1;82(1):38-46. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.2871.
- Background: PubMed 28969438Sit DK, McGowan J, Wiltrout C, Diler RS, Dills JJ, Luther J, Yang A, Ciolino JD, Seltman H, Wisniewski SR, Terman M, Wisner KL. Adjunctive Bright Light Therapy for Bipolar Depression: A Randomized Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2018 Feb 1;175(2):131-139. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16101200. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Unipolar Depression
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Neural Circuit Effects of Ketamine in Depression
Major Depressive Disorder
Active, not recruiting
rTMS to Target Neural Connectivity and Rumination in Treatment-Resistant Depression
Depression, Treatment Resistant
Recruiting
Peer-Delivered Behavioral Activation in a CCBHC
Major Depressive Disorder, Substance Use Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
Efficacy of Statins Among Major Depressive Disorder
Major Depressive Disorder, MDD
Recruiting
IMST for Dementia Risk Reduction
Systolic Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Rindy Fernandes, DO principal investigator
Medical University of South Carolina
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Bright light therapy and dim red light in people with Unipolar Depression, run by Medical University of South Carolina at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Study completion rate (time frame: Up to week 6 (Upon time of discharge from inpatient unit)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07002554, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Apr 2026.