Advanced Practice NursingIMPACTEDNCT07004270
Evaluation of the Impact of Emergency Advanced Practice Nurses One Year After Implementation in the Adult Emergency Department of a French University Hospital
An observational study of Advanced Practice Nursing and Emergency Departments, run by Poitiers University Hospital at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
In France and around the world, emergency care facilities are facing increasing demand, with rising waiting times. Differentiating care pathways, notably by opening a fast-track unit, helps to improve patient flow and waiting time; which contributes to patient satisfaction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Advanced Practice Nursing, Emergency Departments, Patient Satisfaction
- How many people
- 921 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2025to 30 Sep 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients seen in the fast-track emergency department during the inclusion periods, who were cared by an Advanced Practice Nurse or physician, and who did not refuse to be included in the study by gathering their routine care data and, if applicable, their anonymous responses to the patient satisfaction survey.
Who may be able to join
- Patient arrived in fast-track unit during Advanced Practice Nurses' attendance periods
- Adult over or equal 18 years old
Who cannot join
- Patient who refused to participate to the research
- Patient deprived of total or partial liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
- Patients under guardianship or trusteeship
- Patient with diagnosed cognitive disorders
- Non-French-speaking patient
- Patients who left without waiting for treatment or against medical advice
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of the Impact of Emergency Advanced Practice Nurses One Year After Implementation in the Adult Emergency Department of a French University Hospital - A Monocentric Cross-sectional Observational Study
In France and around the world, emergency care facilities are facing increasing demand, with rising waiting times. Differentiating care pathways, notably by opening a fast-track unit, helps to improve patient flow and waiting time; which contributes to patient satisfaction. However, a link between patient satisfaction and waiting time is not always found when patients perceive a humanistic approach in care.
The implementation of an advanced practice nurse in an emergency department is a way to graduate the offer of care and reduce waiting times before consultation and length of stay for patients with minor degree of severity. In this care context, Advanced Practice Nurses maintain and even improve patient satisfaction.
Read more
Since July 2024, two Advanced Practice Nurses have integrated Poitiers University Hospital's adult emergency department. Considering the existing and ongoing literature to knowledge, an evaluation of the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses 1 year after their implementation in a French University Hospital would be the first study of its kind.
According to the results of previous international studies, the investigators assume that emergency Advanced Practice Nurses activities have a positive impact on the French healthcare system: on the quality of care perceived by patients and on the emergency care pathways of all fast-track patients by maintaining the same level of safety. This study aims to evaluate the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses in a French University Hospital on patient perception of quality of care, safety and patient care pathways in emergency departments.
This monocentric cross-sectional observational study is a prospective survey of patient satisfaction and experience with a satisfaction questionnaire; and a retrospective survey on routine care data.
The study's main objective is to evaluate the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses in a French University Hospital on patient-perceived quality of care by measuring the overall satisfaction of patients who receive care from Advanced Practice Nurses during their emergency care pathway. Overall patient satisfaction will be measured in a survey conducted with a patient satisfaction and experience questionnaire.
The secondary objectives of this study are several:
- Assess patients' acceptability of being cared by an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate patient satisfaction with the communication and care relationship with an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate the rate of recommendation of an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse by the patients who receive care from an Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate the safety of care pathways including an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses implementation on emergency care pathways for fast-track patients
Consistent with each objective and outcome, the study will compare:
- groups before and after the implementation of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses
- or subgroups in the period after implementation of advanced practice nurses: with and without emergency Advanced Practice Nurses intervention The anonymous patient satisfaction and experience survey will be sent by a link in a verified e-mail during the emergency department visit of patients included in the study, admitted to emergency department between 02/06/2025 and 29/06/2025.
Routine care data will be collected from Poitiers hospital medical records for fast-track patients who did not refuse to take part in the study during the following periods:
- Before Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation from 05/27/2024 to 06/23/2024
- After Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation from 02/06/2025 to 29/06/2025
- Medical subject headings
- Emergencies, Patient Satisfaction
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Compare rate of patients overall satisfied of care received in the emergency department with Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention to the overall satisfaction rate without Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention
Measured: Day 1
Secondary outcomes (10)
Rate of patients who have refused care from an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
Measured: Day 1
Rate of patients satisfied with the clearness of information and/or responses about their health and cares
Measured: Day 1
Rate of patients satisfied with the relation with the health providers
Measured: Day 1
Rate of patients reinsured after an emergency visit
Measured: Day 1
Rate of patients who would recommend emergency care by an Advanced Practice Nurse
Measured: Day 1
Compare rates of 72-hours reconsultation in emergency departments for the same reason, of fast-track patients care pathway with and without Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention
Measured: Day 3
Compare rates of complaints related to patients fast-track care in pathway with and without Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention
Measured: Day 1
Compare rates of adverse events and serious adverse events for patients in the fast-track pathway with and without Advanced Practice Nurse
Measured: Day 1
Compare waiting times in minutes before first medical contact or with Advanced Practice Nurse in the fast-track pathway before and after Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation
Measured: Day 1
Compare median length of stay of fast-track patient's pathway before and after Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation
Measured: Day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2025
- Study start2 Jun 2025
- Primary completion30 Sep 2025
- Study completion30 Sep 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Advanced Practice NursingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Poitiers University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 921 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07004270
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IMPACTED
- Acronym
- IMPACTED
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 26 May 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Oct 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Oct 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of the Impact of Emergency Advanced Practice Nurses One Year After Implementation in the Adult Emergency Department of a French University Hospital - A Monocentric Cross-sectional Observational Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07004270
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IMPACTED / IMPACTED
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 921 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Poitiers University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Sep 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
In France and around the world, emergency care facilities are facing increasing demand, with rising waiting times. Differentiating care pathways, notably by opening a fast-track unit, helps to improve patient flow and waiting time; which contributes to patient satisfaction. However, a link between patient satisfaction and waiting time is not always found when patients perceive a humanistic approach in care.
The implementation of an advanced practice nurse in an emergency department is a way to graduate the offer of care and reduce waiting times before consultation and length of stay for patients with minor degree of severity. In this care context, Advanced Practice Nurses maintain and even improve patient satisfaction.
Since July 2024, two Advanced Practice Nurses have integrated Poitiers University Hospital's adult emergency department. Considering the existing and ongoing literature to knowledge, an evaluation of the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses 1 year after their implementation in a French University Hospital would be the first study of its kind.
According to the results of previous international studies, the investigators assume that emergency Advanced Practice Nurses activities have a positive impact on the French healthcare system: on the quality of care perceived by patients and on the emergency care pathways of all fast-track patients by maintaining the same level of safety. This study aims to evaluate the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses in a French University Hospital on patient perception of quality of care, safety and patient care pathways in emergency departments.
This monocentric cross-sectional observational study is a prospective survey of patient satisfaction and experience with a satisfaction questionnaire; and a retrospective survey on routine care data.
The study's main objective is to evaluate the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses in a French University Hospital on patient-perceived quality of care by measuring the overall satisfaction of patients who receive care from Advanced Practice Nurses during their emergency care pathway. Overall patient satisfaction will be measured in a survey conducted with a patient satisfaction and experience questionnaire.
The secondary objectives of this study are several:
- Assess patients' acceptability of being cared by an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate patient satisfaction with the communication and care relationship with an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate the rate of recommendation of an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse by the patients who receive care from an Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate the safety of care pathways including an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
- Evaluate the impact of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses implementation on emergency care pathways for fast-track patients
Consistent with each objective and outcome, the study will compare:
- groups before and after the implementation of emergency Advanced Practice Nurses
- or subgroups in the period after implementation of advanced practice nurses: with and without emergency Advanced Practice Nurses intervention The anonymous patient satisfaction and experience survey will be sent by a link in a verified e-mail during the emergency department visit of patients included in the study, admitted to emergency department between 02/06/2025 and 29/06/2025.
Routine care data will be collected from Poitiers hospital medical records for fast-track patients who did not refuse to take part in the study during the following periods:
- Before Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation from 05/27/2024 to 06/23/2024
- After Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation from 02/06/2025 to 29/06/2025
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients seen in the fast-track emergency department during the inclusion periods, who were cared by an Advanced Practice Nurse or physician, and who did not refuse to be included in the study by gathering their routine care data and, if applicable, their anonymous responses to the patient satisfaction survey.
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Patient arrived in fast-track unit during Advanced Practice Nurses' attendance periods
- Adult over or equal 18 years old
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient who refused to participate to the research
- Patient deprived of total or partial liberty by a judicial or administrative decision
- Patients under guardianship or trusteeship
- Patient with diagnosed cognitive disorders
- Non-French-speaking patient
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Compare rate of patients overall satisfied of care received in the emergency department with Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention to the overall satisfaction rate without Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention
Time frame: Day 1
10 secondary outcomes
Rate of patients who have refused care from an emergency Advanced Practice Nurse
Time frame: Day 1
Rate of patients satisfied with the clearness of information and/or responses about their health and cares
Time frame: Day 1
Rate of patients satisfied with the relation with the health providers
Time frame: Day 1
Rate of patients reinsured after an emergency visit
Time frame: Day 1
Rate of patients who would recommend emergency care by an Advanced Practice Nurse
Time frame: Day 1
Compare rates of 72-hours reconsultation in emergency departments for the same reason, of fast-track patients care pathway with and without Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention
Time frame: Day 3
Compare rates of complaints related to patients fast-track care in pathway with and without Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention
Time frame: Day 1
Compare rates of adverse events and serious adverse events for patients in the fast-track pathway with and without Advanced Practice Nurse
Time frame: Day 1
Compare waiting times in minutes before first medical contact or with Advanced Practice Nurse in the fast-track pathway before and after Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation
Time frame: Day 1
Compare median length of stay of fast-track patient's pathway before and after Advanced Practice Nurses' implementation
Time frame: Day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Oct 2025.
Related trials for Advanced Practice Nursing
Not yet recruiting
Impact of an Emergency Advanced Practice Nurse on Complications After Home Discharge of Oxygen-Dependent Patients Managed in the Emergency Department: A Quantitative and Qualitative Study
Acute Respiratory Conditions Requiring Oxygen Therapy, Advanced Practice Nursing
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognosis of Epilepsy With Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and Surgery
Epilepsies, Focal, Drug Restistant Epilepsie
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Implementation of Advanced Practice Nurses for Specific Patient Groups
Evaluate Structures, Processes, and Experiences Related to the Implementation of APN Roles
Not yet recruiting
Connected Blood Pressure Monitoring in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Initiating Covalent BTK Inhibitors
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Follicular Lymphoma ( FL)
Recruiting
Impact of an Intervention Integrating the MPHS Nursing Model of Care on the Partnership in Health, With the Patient Followed in Primary Care by an Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) for One or More Stabilized Chronic Pathologies
Chronic Disease
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Advanced Practice Nursing and Emergency Departments, run by Poitiers University Hospital at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Oct 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Compare rate of patients overall satisfied of care received in the emergency department with Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention to the overall satisfaction rate without Advanced Practice Nurse's intervention (time frame: Day 1). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Oct 2025.