AzTrials
AzTrials

Physiological DemandsNCT07011290

Physical and Physiological Demands of Different Recreational Team Handball and Walking Modalitiesmodalities

A study testing Self-paced Walking (W) training sessions, Brisk walking (BW) training sessions and Recreational running team handball (RTH) training sessions in people with Physiological Demands and Elderly, run by University Institute of Maia at 1 site in Portugal.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study aims to determine the physical and physiological demands and perceived experience during different recreational team handball and walking exercise modalities. Secondary purposes are: i) To compare the cardiovascular and blood lactate responses to self-paced walking (W), brisk walking (BW), recreational… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 to 82 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Physiological Demands, Elderly
What is being tested?
Self-paced Walking (W) training sessions, Brisk walking (BW) training sessions and Recreational running team handball (RTH) training sessions
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
22 participants
Where
1 sitePortugal
Study dates
20 Mar 2025to 24 Jun 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 to 82 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males with 50-82 years
  • Previous recreational team handball experience( at least 3 months)

Who cannot join

  • Had any sort of limitation that prevented them from running or gripping a team handball ball
  • Had medical contradictions to partake in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Portugal1 site
  • University of Maia

    Maia

Other trials in Portugal

About this study

Official title: Physical and Physiological Demands, and Perceived Experience Across Different Recreational Team Handball and Walking Exercise Modalities

This study aims to determine the physical and physiological demands and perceived experience during different recreational team handball and walking exercise modalities.

Secondary purposes are:

  1. To compare the cardiovascular and blood lactate responses to self-paced walking (W), brisk walking (BW), recreational walking team handball (WTH), and recreational running team handball (RTH); ii) To compare the perceived experience (Rating of Perceived Exertion (RPE) and Fun levels (FUN)) during self-paced walking (W), brisk walking (BW), recreational walking team handball (WTH), and recreational running team handball (RTH); iii) To compare the activity profile during self-paced walking (W), brisk walking (BW), recreational walking team handball (WTH), and recreational running team handball (RTH);
Read the detailed description

Statistical analysis:

Linear mixed-effects model accounting for repeated measures within the participants, will be used to compare the working demands and perceived experience during the selected exercise modalities. This model will consider the exercise modalities and group as fixed effects and the participants ID as a random effect.

Significance level will be set at 5%, and confidence intervals will be reported for all comparisons.

Randomization:

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups due to logistical constraints. Each group will then perform 2 randomly assigned sequences of 4 exercise modalities (i.e., W, BW, WH, RH).

Being tested
Self-paced Walking (W) training sessions, Brisk walking (BW) training sessions, Recreational running team handball (RTH) training sessions, Recreational walking team handball (WTH) training sessions
Keywords
Recreational walking handball, Older adults, Recreational team handball

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Self-paced Walking (W) training sessionsOther

    Participants will partake in 2 sessions of self-paced walking (W), each composed by 3x14 min periods interspersed by 2 min breaks, in which the participants will walk at a self-selected speed (without running) along a 38x18 m course.

  • Brisk walking (BW) training sessionsOther

    Participants will partake in 2 sessions of brisk walking (BW), each composed by 3x14 min periods, interspersed by 2 min breaks, in which the participants will follow a designated instructor who will dictate the walking speed along a 38x18 m course, thus ensuring that the speed of the walking corresponds to a brisk walking speed.

  • Recreational running team handball (RTH) training sessionsOther

    Recreational running team handball (RTH):

    Participants will partake in 2 sessions of recreational team handball matches (RTH), each composed by 3x14 min periods, interspersed by 2 min breaks on a 40x20m indoor court.

  • Recreational walking team handball (WTH) training sessionsOther

    Recreational walking team handball (WTH):

    Participants will partake in 2 sessions of recreational walking team handball matches (WTH), each composed by 3x14 min periods, interspersed by 2 min breaks on a 40x20m indoor court.

Study groups in NCT07011290
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Self-paced walking (W)OtherEach participant will walk at a self-chosen speed during the set exercise duration.
Receives: Other: Self-paced Walking (W) training sessions
Brisk walking (BW)OtherParticipants will walk at a designated speed corresponding to brisk walking ( moderate-intensity walking) during the set exercise duration. The intensity of this type of walking should allow the participants to talk but not sing during the walk.
Receives: Other: Brisk walking (BW) training sessions
Recreational running team handball (RTH)OtherParticipants will play running recreational team handball (RTH) with the following adaptations to the official rules: use of softer and smaller balls and limited body contact, dribbling and substitutions are not allowed; players rotate positions every 3 min and matches are played as 5v5 or 6v6 game formats.
Receives: Other: Recreational running team handball (RTH) training sessions
Recreational walking team handball (WTH)OtherSame as recreational running team handball (RTH), however, the participants are only permitted to walk and not run (one foot must always be in contact with the ground).
Receives: Other: Recreational walking team handball (WTH) training sessions

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Relative average rate

    During each exercise modality, relative average rate will be determined using heart rate monitors.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  2. Relative time spent in each heart rate zone

    During each exercise modality, relative time spent in each heart rate zone will be determined using heart rate monitors.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Absolute average heart rate

    During each exercise modality, absolute average heart rate will be determined using heart rate monitors.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  2. Absolute time spent in each heart rate zone

    During each exercise modality, absolute time spent in each heart rate zone will be determined using heart rate monitors.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  3. Relative peak heart rate

    During each exercise modality, relative peak heart rate will be determined using heart rate monitors.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  4. Absolute peak heart rate

    During each exercise modality, absolute peak heart rate will be determined using heart rate monitors.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  5. Rating of perceived exertion

    Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) will be determined using the modified (0-10) Borg scale, during each exercise modality.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  6. Fun levels

    Fun levels (FUN) will be determined using an visual analog scale, during each exercise modality.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  7. Blood lactate

    Blood lactate will be measured during the each exercise modality using a portable eletroenzymatic lactate device analyzer.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  8. Accelerations

    The number of accelerations (expressed in m/s²) will be determined during each exercise modality training session using wearable accelerometers. Acceleration thresholds will be defined individually based on activity profiles established in baseline testing.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period

  9. Decelerations

    The number of decelerations (expressed in m/s²) will be determined during each exercise modality training session using wearable accelerometers. Deceleration thresholds will be defined individually based on activity profiles established in baseline testing.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

  10. Player load

    Player load (arbitrary units) will be calculated using data from wearable accelerometers during each exercise modality training session.

    Measured: Over an 8-week period.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Jun 2025
  2. Study start20 Mar 2025
  3. Primary completion24 Jun 2025
  4. Study completion24 Jun 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
22 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07011290
Sponsor's protocol ID
236/2024
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
19 Mar 2025
Last updated
2 Jun 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Martins R, Krustrup P, Castagna C, Mohr M, Teixeira J, Carneiro I, Povoas S. Walking handball as an exercise alternative to conventional walking and recreational team handball. Front Sports Act Living. 2026 Mar 18;8:1784474. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2026.1784474. eCollection 2026.

    PubMed 41930285

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Self-paced Walking (W) training sessions, Brisk walking (BW) training sessions and Recreational running team handball (RTH) training sessions in people with Physiological Demands and Elderly, run by University Institute of Maia at 1 site in Portugal.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jun 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Relative average rate (time frame: Over an 8-week period.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07011290, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jun 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in