Immunoglobulin ProphylaxisNCT07013370
Immunoglobiulin-specific Prophylaxis of Citomegalovirus Infections in Immunocompromised Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
An observational study of Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis and Cytomegalovirus Infections, run by Antonello Di Paolo, M.D., Ph.D. at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a globally prevalent, human-specific herpesvirus characterised by a lifelong latency after primary infection, an often asymptomatic reactivation and affecting up to 100% of adults based on region and age. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 month to 18 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- Anti-CMV immunoglobulins [Megalotect (R)]
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 2 Jun 2025to 2 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 month to 18 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult
Study population: Children who underwent allogeneic HSCT due to any condition
Who may be able to join
- Children who underwent allogeneic HSCT due to any condition
Who cannot join
- Positive personal records of immunoglobulin-related adverse reactions
- CMV reactivation before the CMV-specific immunoglobulin prophylaxis onset
- adoptive cellular post-HSCT immunotherapy for any indication
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Italy1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
Trieste, 34137
Natalia Maximova, MD, natalia.maximova@burlo.trieste.it
Debora Curci, PhD
About this study
Official title: Immunoglobulin-specific Prophylaxis Against Citomegalovirus Infections in Immunocompromised Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a globally prevalent, human-specific herpesvirus characterised by a lifelong latency after primary infection, an often asymptomatic reactivation and affecting up to 100% of adults based on region and age. CMV reactivation has serious risks for immunocompromised patients, especially those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In these patients, CMV can lead to graft failure, multiorgan disease, increased risk of other infections, GVHD, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, and higher transplant-related mortality (TRM). Although antiviral prophylaxis, CMV infection occurs in 38-80% of HSCT recipients, but current antiviral drugs are insufficiently effective and they are associated with adverse effects. Furthermore, treatment failure is due to the high genetic variability of CMV. The protective role of virus-specific antibodies remains under debate. Some studies suggest that high neutralizing antibody titers protect transplant recipients from CMV, while others highlight the importance of T-cell responses. However, recent animal studies showed that humoral immunity alone can prevent CMV reactivation, even without T or NK cells. In solid-organ transplant patients, antibody titers ≥480 have been linked to reduced infection, shorter treatment, and full protection from CMV disease. Although the use of anti-CMV immunoglobulin remains controversial, the IRCCS Burlo Garofolo has used it as post-transplant prophylaxis and second-line treatment for over a decade.
The main objective of their study was to assess whether CMV-specific immunoglobulin prophylaxis reduces CMV incidence and severity in pediatric HSCT patients. Secondary goals included evaluating its effect on transplant outcomes and its efficacy across different ethnic groups. A population pharmacokinetic (POP/PK) study was also conducted to better understand the drug's distribution and elimination and to identify factors influencing its pharmacokinetics in patients.
Read the detailed description
The study will enroll all patients who received standard myeloablative conditioning. GVHD prophylaxis consisting of tacrolimus and, for unrelated donors, rabbit ATG and mycophenolate mofetil. Haploidentical transplants initially used in vivo T-cell depletion with post-transplant cyclophosphamide, later replaced by ex vivo αβ+/CD19+ T-cell depletion.
Outcomes included overall survival (OS), relapse-related mortality (RRM), and GVHD, defined by standard grading systems. Immune reconstitution was measured by CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts, with ≥500 cells/μL in two readings within 100 days post-HSCT considered adequate. Follow-up continued until death or last contact, with a minimum duration of 12 months for survivors.
Viral Load Detection
CMV DNAemia was quantified in whole blood using real-time PCR (CMV ELITe MGB Kit). Monitoring occurred twice weekly during hospitalization, then weekly in outpatient visits until immune reconstitution and end of immunosuppression.
CMV-Specific Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis and Treatment
Prophylaxis was administered using Cytomegatect® (Biotest Pharma GmbH), beginning on day 3 of conditioning and continued biweekly during hospitalization. Post-discharge, it was given at each hospital admission until CD4+ normalization. If DNAemia appeared, a 3-5 day "boost" treatment was given based on risk assessment. Non-responders (based on viral load behavior) discontinued treatment. In cases of CMV disease, dosing and treatment duration were tailored. Cytomegatect was dosed by weight: 1000 U (<10 kg), 2000 U (10-25 kg), 3000 U (25-50 kg), and 4000 U (>50 kg).
Foscarnet was used as first-line therapy within the first post-transplant month. Ganciclovir or valganciclovir was introduced after engraftment. Second-line options included cidofovir, letermovir, and maribavir. Advanced therapies involved NK or CD45RO+ lymphocyte infusions. CMV IgG levels were monitored 24-72 hours after each infusion for inpatients and before administration for outpatients.
CMV-Related Complications
CMV-related complications were classified per Ljungman et al.'s updated definitions. CMV infection referred to virus detection in body fluids or tissues. DNAemia denoted CMV DNA presence in blood. Primary infection was the first detection in previously unexposed patients; recurrent infections occurred after a 4-week CMV-negative interval. Refractory infections showed persistent or increasing viral load despite at least two weeks of treatment. CMV disease followed existing consensus criteria.
Statistical and POP/PK Analyses
Continuous variables were summarized by means or medians with interquartile ranges, depending on distribution (tested via Shapiro-Wilk). Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. Group comparisons were performed using chi-square tests for qualitative variables and Wilcoxon tests for continuous ones. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests assessed survival outcomes. Differences in pharmacokinetics between occasions were evaluated with ANOVA.
Plasma concentrations of anti-CMV immunoglobulin were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach via Monolix 2023.1. Mono-, bi-, and tri-compartmental models with various error structures were evaluated. Covariates (age, weight, creatinine clearance) were assessed for influence on model performance, which was judged based on objective function value (OFV), standard errors, and residual distributions. Individual elimination half-lives were calculated as t½ = (0.693 × Vi) / Cli, where Vi and Cli are individual volume of distribution and clearance values
- Conditions
- Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Transplant-Related Disorder
- Being tested
- Anti-CMV immunoglobulins [Megalotect (R)]
- Keywords
- Cytomegalovirus, allo-HSCT, Transplant-Related mortality
- Medical subject headings
- Cytomegalovirus Infections
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Anti-CMV immunoglobulins [Megalotect (R)]Biological
Children received an anti-CMV immunoglobulin to prevent viral infections
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | Pediatric allo-HSCT recipients who have not received CMV-specific immunoglobulin prophylaxis after transplantation. | |
| Immunoprophylaxis Group | Pediatric allo-HSCT recipients who received an anti-CMV prophylaxis with immunoglobulin (Megalotect) Receives: Biological: Anti-CMV immunoglobulins [Megalotect (R)] |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
CMV reactivation and infection
The rate of viral reactivation and infection in children undergoing all-HSCT
Measured: 12 months since allo-HSCT
Secondary outcomes (4)
Overall Survival
The rate of overall survival since allo-HSCT
Measured: 12 months since allo-HSCT
Hospital stay
The lenght of hospital stay after allo-HSCT
Measured: 12 months since allo-HSCT
Immunological recovery
The percentage of patients in who the function of CD4+ lymphocytes was restored
Measured: 12 months since allo-HSCT
GVHD incidence
The percentage of patients who experienced a GVHD
Measured: 12 months since allo-HSCT
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted10 Jun 2025
- Study start2 Jun 2025
- Primary completion31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion2 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Immunoglobulin ProphylaxisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Antonello Di Paolo, M.D., Ph.D.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Antonello Di Paolo, M.D., Ph.D., University of Pisa
- Investigators
- Natalia Maximova, MD, Principal investigator, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo - Trieste - ITALY
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07013370
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1105/2015_BG
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided: Data sharing will be discussed case by case upon reasonable request and after local IRB approval.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Immunoglobulin-specific Prophylaxis Against Citomegalovirus Infections in Immunocompromised Children Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07013370
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 1105/2015_BG
- Conditions
- Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis, Cytomegalovirus Infections, Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Transplant-Related Disorder
- Keywords
- Cytomegalovirus, allo-HSCT, Transplant-Related mortality
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Antonello Di Paolo, M.D., Ph.D.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- IRCCS Burlo Garofolo
- Study start
- 2 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 2 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 10 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Human cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a globally prevalent, human-specific herpesvirus characterised by a lifelong latency after primary infection, an often asymptomatic reactivation and affecting up to 100% of adults based on region and age. CMV reactivation has serious risks for immunocompromised patients, especially those undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In these patients, CMV can lead to graft failure, multiorgan disease, increased risk of other infections, GVHD, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders, and higher transplant-related mortality (TRM). Although antiviral prophylaxis, CMV infection occurs in 38-80% of HSCT recipients, but current antiviral drugs are insufficiently effective and they are associated with adverse effects. Furthermore, treatment failure is due to the high genetic variability of CMV. The protective role of virus-specific antibodies remains under debate. Some studies suggest that high neutralizing antibody titers protect transplant recipients from CMV, while others highlight the importance of T-cell responses. However, recent animal studies showed that humoral immunity alone can prevent CMV reactivation, even without T or NK cells. In solid-organ transplant patients, antibody titers ≥480 have been linked to reduced infection, shorter treatment, and full protection from CMV disease. Although the use of anti-CMV immunoglobulin remains controversial, the IRCCS Burlo Garofolo has used it as post-transplant prophylaxis and second-line treatment for over a decade.
The main objective of their study was to assess whether CMV-specific immunoglobulin prophylaxis reduces CMV incidence and severity in pediatric HSCT patients. Secondary goals included evaluating its effect on transplant outcomes and its efficacy across different ethnic groups. A population pharmacokinetic (POP/PK) study was also conducted to better understand the drug's distribution and elimination and to identify factors influencing its pharmacokinetics in patients.
Detailed description
The study will enroll all patients who received standard myeloablative conditioning. GVHD prophylaxis consisting of tacrolimus and, for unrelated donors, rabbit ATG and mycophenolate mofetil. Haploidentical transplants initially used in vivo T-cell depletion with post-transplant cyclophosphamide, later replaced by ex vivo αβ+/CD19+ T-cell depletion.
Outcomes included overall survival (OS), relapse-related mortality (RRM), and GVHD, defined by standard grading systems. Immune reconstitution was measured by CD4+ T-lymphocyte counts, with ≥500 cells/μL in two readings within 100 days post-HSCT considered adequate. Follow-up continued until death or last contact, with a minimum duration of 12 months for survivors.
Viral Load Detection
CMV DNAemia was quantified in whole blood using real-time PCR (CMV ELITe MGB Kit). Monitoring occurred twice weekly during hospitalization, then weekly in outpatient visits until immune reconstitution and end of immunosuppression.
CMV-Specific Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis and Treatment
Prophylaxis was administered using Cytomegatect® (Biotest Pharma GmbH), beginning on day 3 of conditioning and continued biweekly during hospitalization. Post-discharge, it was given at each hospital admission until CD4+ normalization. If DNAemia appeared, a 3-5 day "boost" treatment was given based on risk assessment. Non-responders (based on viral load behavior) discontinued treatment. In cases of CMV disease, dosing and treatment duration were tailored. Cytomegatect was dosed by weight: 1000 U (<10 kg), 2000 U (10-25 kg), 3000 U (25-50 kg), and 4000 U (>50 kg).
Foscarnet was used as first-line therapy within the first post-transplant month. Ganciclovir or valganciclovir was introduced after engraftment. Second-line options included cidofovir, letermovir, and maribavir. Advanced therapies involved NK or CD45RO+ lymphocyte infusions. CMV IgG levels were monitored 24-72 hours after each infusion for inpatients and before administration for outpatients.
CMV-Related Complications
CMV-related complications were classified per Ljungman et al.'s updated definitions. CMV infection referred to virus detection in body fluids or tissues. DNAemia denoted CMV DNA presence in blood. Primary infection was the first detection in previously unexposed patients; recurrent infections occurred after a 4-week CMV-negative interval. Refractory infections showed persistent or increasing viral load despite at least two weeks of treatment. CMV disease followed existing consensus criteria.
Statistical and POP/PK Analyses
Continuous variables were summarized by means or medians with interquartile ranges, depending on distribution (tested via Shapiro-Wilk). Categorical variables were presented as counts and percentages. Group comparisons were performed using chi-square tests for qualitative variables and Wilcoxon tests for continuous ones. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests assessed survival outcomes. Differences in pharmacokinetics between occasions were evaluated with ANOVA.
Plasma concentrations of anti-CMV immunoglobulin were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modeling approach via Monolix 2023.1. Mono-, bi-, and tri-compartmental models with various error structures were evaluated. Covariates (age, weight, creatinine clearance) were assessed for influence on model performance, which was judged based on objective function value (OFV), standard errors, and residual distributions. Individual elimination half-lives were calculated as t½ = (0.693 × Vi) / Cli, where Vi and Cli are individual volume of distribution and clearance values
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | – | –Pediatric allo-HSCT recipients who have not received CMV-specific immunoglobulin prophylaxis after transplantation. |
| Immunoprophylaxis Group | – | Biological: Anti-CMV immunoglobulins [Megalotect (R)]Pediatric allo-HSCT recipients who received an anti-CMV prophylaxis with immunoglobulin (Megalotect) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 month to 18 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
- Study population
- Children who underwent allogeneic HSCT due to any condition
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children who underwent allogeneic HSCT due to any condition
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Positive personal records of immunoglobulin-related adverse reactions
- CMV reactivation before the CMV-specific immunoglobulin prophylaxis onset
- adoptive cellular post-HSCT immunotherapy for any indication
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Anti-CMV immunoglobulins [Megalotect (R)]Children received an anti-CMV immunoglobulin to prevent viral infections | Biological | Immunoprophylaxis Group |
Primary outcome
CMV reactivation and infection
Time frame: 12 months since allo-HSCT
The rate of viral reactivation and infection in children undergoing all-HSCT
4 secondary outcomes
Overall Survival
Time frame: 12 months since allo-HSCT
Hospital stay
Time frame: 12 months since allo-HSCT
Immunological recovery
Time frame: 12 months since allo-HSCT
GVHD incidence
Time frame: 12 months since allo-HSCT
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Jun 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided. Data sharing will be discussed case by case upon reasonable request and after local IRB approval.
Related trials for Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis
RecruitingPhase 3
Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Adult Participants With Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial Fibrillation (AF)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Infection Prophylaxis and Management in Treating Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Patients With Hematologic Malignancies Previously Treated With Donor Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic/Lymphoid Cancer, Accelerated Phase Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate Cenvacibart (REGN7508) for Secondary Stroke Prevention in Adult Participants
Secondary Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Natalia Maximova, MD principal investigator
IRCCS Burlo Garofolo - Trieste - ITALY
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis and Cytomegalovirus Infections, run by Antonello Di Paolo, M.D., Ph.D. at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Natalia Maximova, MD (+39-040.3785.111 ext. .565, natalia.maximova@burlo.trieste.it), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
CMV reactivation and infection (time frame: 12 months since allo-HSCT). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jun 2025.