HemiplegiaNCT07014696
ICF-Based Effects of PNF and Kinesio Taping on Hand Function in Hemiplegic Stroke
A study testing PNF application Group, KB application Group and PNF+KB application Group in people with Hemiplegia and Hemiplegia Due to Stroke, run by Istinye University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This clinical trial aims to compare the effects of kinesio taping and PNF on hemiplegic hand functions. In addition, the effects of these applications on body structure, activity, and participation will be examined. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hemiplegia, Hemiplegia Due to Stroke, Hand Functionality
- What is being tested?
- PNF application Group, KB application Group and PNF+KB application Group
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 54 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Jun 2025to 30 Mar 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
None listed.
Who cannot join
- Exclusion Criteria (Junior et al., 2019; Kim \& Kim, 2015; Saklecha et al., 2023)
- Individuals with bilateral hemiplegia
- Individuals with unstable vital signs
- Individuals with any open wound in the upper extremity
- Pathological conditions affecting upper extremity sensation (undergoing surgery after fracture, etc.)
- Individuals with a BMI value greater than 29.9 kg/m2
Show all 10Show fewer
- Individuals with a Standardized Mini Mental Test score below 24 points (18 points)
- Individuals with major neurological or rheumatological disorders affecting the musculoskeletal system other than stroke (Polyneuropathy, Parkinson's, Multiple Sclerosis, Rheumatoid Arthritis, etc.)
- Presence of upper extremity amputation
- Being at less than stage 4 according to Brunnstrom staging
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites, 2 recruiting
- Recruiting
İstinye University, Bahçeşehir Liv Hospital
Istanbul, Bahçeşir
Berrak Varhan, +90 5467696639, berrak.varhan@istinye.edu.tr
- Recruiting
Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi, SUVAM Havza Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Merkezin
Samsun, Havza, 55400
elif önder, +90 5453776207, elifonder2011@hotmail.com
elif önder
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the Effects of PNF and Kinesiological Taping on Hand Function in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients Based on the ICF Framework
This clinical trial aims to compare the effects of kinesio taping and PNF on hemiplegic hand functions. In addition, the effects of these applications on body structure, activity, and participation will be examined. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do kinesio taping and PNF applications have different effects on hemiplegic hand function? Are kinesio taping and PNF applications effective in body structure, activity, and participation? The researchers will compare the advantages of kinesio taping and PNF applications over each other.
Read more
Participants:
Kinesio taping and/or PNF applications will be applied 3 days a week for 8 weeks.
Tests will be performed on the first and last day of the study to evaluate hand functions.
Read the detailed description
This study aims to investigate the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and kinesiology taping on hand functions in hemiplegic stroke patients. In order to evaluate functionality, it will be evaluated with the Box block test, Fugl Meyer upper extremity test, ARAT, and nine-hole peg test. In order to examine the cases within the scope of functionality, disability, and health international classification (ICF), environmental quality scale, upper extremity motor activity diary-28, stroke impact scale, and social adaptation scale will be evaluated.
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and disability among adults over the age of 60 worldwide. Approximately 17 million people have a stroke every year in the world and 140 thousand people in our country. Data from all over the world also reveal that the incidence of stroke will increase in the coming years. By definition, stroke is a clinical condition that develops after focal infarction or hemorrhage in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and spinal cord, causes focal neurological dysfunction, can last 24 hours or longer and can even result in death. After a stroke, the surrounding brain tissue is deprived of oxygen and essential nutrients, and if left untreated, it can lead to permanent tissue damage, including neuronal cell death. Damages that occur after a stroke cause motor, sensory, and cognitive impairments in individuals; upper extremity dysfunction, balance, and walking difficulties, causing people to be dependent on various degrees in their daily life activities. Post-stroke disability reduces the quality of life of the individual and their relatives, affecting their lives. It also causes both socioeconomic and social problems. Approximately 50-75% of those affected in the early post-stroke period experience upper extremity impairment, and a large portion of them will live with long-term upper extremity impairment. Although most individuals regain walking function after stroke, very few individuals are able to use their upper extremities, especially their hands, at a fully functional level. Upper extremity function after stroke is among the main causes of long-term disability. This is because the natural recovery of upper extremity function is generally more limited than that of the lower extremity. Impaired use of the upper extremity persists in approximately 60% of patients even 6 months after stroke. Exercise interventions are necessary to improve upper extremity motor functions and activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke patients, because persistent upper extremity dysfunction is strongly associated with decreased activities of daily living and poor quality of life after stroke.
Abnormal synergies occur in the extremities of patients who have had a stroke. The literature has described two main synergies for the upper extremity: Flexion or extension synergy patterns. These synergies in the upper extremity and hand lead to loss of mobility, interfere with activities of daily living including dressing and hygiene, may cause skin breakdown, and may cause pain. Over time, weakness in the hemiparetic hand, motor disorders caused by abnormal synergies, and permanent spasticity begin to cause secondary changes in the musculoskeletal system that may limit the use of the arm and hand and affect functional mobility; soft tissue shortening and contracture formation may be observed. There is a wide range of treatments for upper extremity recovery following stroke. In these methods, integrated treatments are recommended for both the hand and arm. Upper limb rehabilitation aims to provide all possible means to regain lost function and increase the autonomy of stroke patients, taking into account any remaining impairments and disabilities. Carr and Shepherd suggested that poor recovery in the upper limb may result from the direct effects of stroke as well as from inadequate, inappropriate or incorrect therapeutic interventions. However, little information is available to explain what best represents the "optimal treatment". The chosen treatment modality may be directed at a specific impairment (e.g. muscle weakness) or functional movements (e.g. grasping and letting go activity). These treatment modalities may be used separately or combined to address the multifactorial impairments that may arise following stroke, i.e. primary problems and secondary complications. Therefore, it should be noted that upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke will involve a complex intervention that requires the cooperation of the patient, caregivers, and the rehabilitation team.
Neuromuscular therapies, one of the approaches used in the treatment of stroke, include multiple methods. In recent years, activities related to the recovery of motor functions have become the focus of research by scientists dedicated to the development of the topic of brain plasticity, which allows a person to adapt to the environment through learning and self-repair after damage. A typical example of neural plasticity is the recovery process after ischemic stroke, which initiates the reorganization of the central nervous system and the assumption of some functions by undamaged parts of brain structures. Reorganization also involves the expansion of cortical areas that provide the neural substrate for the recovery or adaptation of motor activities after damage. The results of studies on brain plasticity have revealed that the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) technique, one of the neuromuscular treatments, provides the development of neurorehabilitation. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) is a therapeutic approach that provides input with cutaneous, proprioceptive, auditory and visual stimuli to provide functional improvement in motor movement and can play a vital role in the rehabilitation of many injuries. PNF is a special manual technique that combines different planes of movement and is applied by physiotherapists to improve the functional status of the patient. This method plays an effective role in supporting the patient to achieve their goals by making movements more functional. Studies have shown that it is effective in pain management, increasing range of motion, developing muscle strength and endurance, improving balance and coordination, providing proximal stability and supporting functional progress. Neuromuscular reeducation applications are widely preferred in the early rehabilitation processes of acute or subacute periods in order to improve motor functions of paralyzed patients. This method stimulates the proprioceptive organs in the muscles and tendons to improve muscle functions, promotes the emergence of postural reflexes, and regulates muscle contraction to increase strength, flexibility, balance, and coordination. Many articles have revealed that a PNF-based program has the potential to produce positive results on motor function in older adults with acute and chronic paralysis. A 2018 study found that PNF was effective in improving upper extremity motor skills and function in stroke patients in the acute and/or subacute stages, while other studies found that it was effective in reducing spasticity, increasing joint range of motion, and improving self-care function in the chronic stage.
Another neuromuscular treatment method used in stroke patients is kinesiology taping. Kinesiology taping (KT) was introduced by Kenzo Kase in 1996 and is a combination of applying appropriate tension along the elastic therapeutic tape and placing the target muscle in a tense position, and is widely used as an interesting and relatively new method for various clinical treatments. KT is a type of elastic, cotton, adhesive bandage with a 140% extensibility that can mimic the elasticity and tension of human skin, muscle, and fascia. Previous studies have shown that kinesiology taping can increase blood circulation, provide mechanical support and proprioceptive feedback, improve joint range of motion, and activate muscles. KT has gained popularity in clinical practice and has been used in clinical practice worldwide. KT applications may promote functional use of the upper and lower extremities by supporting weak muscles, relaxing overstretched muscles, reducing pain and further improving balance ability. Based on these observations, kinesiology taping is considered a potential treatment for spasticity, motor control and tone regulation, providing prorioceptive input and increasing functions. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is an international and standardized classification system developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be applied in many branches of health and to evaluate functionality, disability and health holistically. ICF can be used for many purposes, this classification system is a policy and planning tool for decision makers. In addition to being used to categorize health, ICF can be used to determine functional status and to plan rehabilitation programs and guide goal achievement. An interdisciplinary team approach in stroke treatment, where different specialists work together harmoniously and closely, has been described as the basis for effective stroke rehabilitation programs. Measuring, reporting and comparing outcomes across each treatment approach is important to improve outcomes and make informed choices about how to optimize healthcare and rationalize costs.
- Conditions
- Hemiplegia, Hemiplegia Due to Stroke, Hand Functionality, Upper Extremity, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Kinesio Taping
- Being tested
- PNF application Group, KB application Group, PNF+KB application Group
- Keywords
- hand functionality, hemiplegia, hemiplegia due to stroke, upper extremity, ICF, Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, kinesio taping
- Medical subject headings
- Hemiplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PNF application GroupProcedure or surgery
PNF Application; in the application method, the subjects will be in a sitting position. The application will be made to the fingers, wrist and forearm in both D1 and D2 directions in flexion and extension patterns. The techniques will start using rhythmic initiation, then the combination of isotonics, dynamic-opposite, rhythmic stabilization and muscle-relaxation are determined. The movements will be made in 10 repetitions with rest in between (Saklecha et al., 2023).
KB application GroupProcedure or surgery
KB Application; In the taping treatment to be applied, taping will be applied starting from the fingers and up to the elbow with kinesiology taping (Huang et al., 2019). Taping will be done 3 days a week and the tape will remain on the patient for 2 days.
PNF+KB application GroupProcedure or surgery
PNF+ KB Application; In this application, both PNF and taping will be applied. After each application, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups at the end of each session. When all treatments are completed, re-evaluations will be made by the blind physiotherapist
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: PNF application Group | Experimental | In the PNF method to be applied to the first group, the subjects will be in a sitting position. The application will be made to the fingers, wrist and forearm in both D1 and D2 direction flexion and extension patterns. The techniques will start by using rhythmic initiation, then the combination of isotonics, dynamic-opposite, rhythmic stabilization and muscle-relaxation will be determined. The movements will be done with 10 repetitions and rest in between. The exercises will continue for 8 weeks, 3 days a week.After all applications, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups. Receives: Procedure: PNF application Group |
| Group 2: KB Application Group | Experimental | In the taping treatment to be applied to the second group, taping will be applied starting from the fingers to the elbow with kinesiology taping. Taping will be done 3 days a week and the tape will remain on the patient for 2 days. Exercises will continue 3 days a week for 8 weeks. After all applications, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups. Receives: Procedure: KB application Group |
| Group 3: PNF+KB application Group | Experimental | The third group will be applied both PNF and taping. Exercises will continue 3 days a week for 8 weeks. After all applications, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups. Receives: Procedure: PNF+KB application Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Fugl Meyer assessment
The Fugl Meyer assessment scale is a stroke-specific, performance-based scale, and each parameter is scored as 0; unsuccessful, 1; partially successful, and 2; completely successful performance. In the shoulder, elbow, and forearm, reflex activity, voluntary movements performed with dynamic flexor and/or extensor synergies, voluntary movements performed using dynamic flexor and extensor synergies together, voluntary movements performed without or with very little dependence on synergies, and normal reflex activity parameters are evaluated. When evaluating the wrist, three different functions of the wrist muscles are evaluated. In the hemiplegia hand evaluation, 7 movements (flexion, extension, and five grip functions) are evaluated. In the coordination/speed evaluation, a finger-nose test is performed for the upper extremity. During this test, tremor, dysmetria, and speed of movement are evaluated. The maximum motor performance score for the upper extremity is 66 points.
Measured: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
The ARAT observes arm and hand movements during the performance of a variety of reaching and grasping tasks. It measures the ability to qualitatively manipulate and carry large or small objects in relation to manual dexterity and proximal strength for the upper extremity. The ARAT rates the upper extremity on a 4-point scale (maximum of 57 points for each upper extremity): 3 points if the task is performed normally; 2 points if the task is completed but takes an abnormally long time; 2 points if performed with great difficulty or poorly coordinated movements; 1 point if the task is only partially completed; and 0 points if the task is not performed at all.
Measured: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
The Box-Block Test
The Box-Block Test measures unilateral manual dexterity. It is a fast, simple and inexpensive test. It can be used in a wide variety of diseases, including stroke patients. It consists of a box divided into two and 150 blocks. The wooden blocks are cubes measuring 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm. The barrier in the middle of the box is 15.2 cm. Patients are asked to throw the blocks from one section to the other, one by one, within 60 seconds and the number of blocks is recorded.
Measured: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Nine hole Peg Test
It is a simple and quick test used to evaluate changes in hand functions. The participant is asked to insert nine rods into a wooden block with nine holes as quickly as possible and then remove them. The test is repeated twice and the score is determined as the average of the two trials. The participant is expected to perform the test with the hand on the affected side of the body.
Measured: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Environmental Quality Scale
The scale evaluates the impact of the environment on the individual's abilities and limitations while performing daily activities. The short form consists of 26 questions in total. Each question includes two options: facilitating and challenging.
The scale's scoring ranges from -3 to 3. The facilitating option includes a score of 1 to 3, and the challenging option includes a score of -1 to -3. A score between 1 and 3 indicates that environmental factors facilitate the individual's daily life and social roles, and a score of zero indicates that they have no effect on social interaction. A score between -1 and -3 is considered negative. All positive and negative results are added up separately. The application takes approximately 10 minutes.
Measured: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Upper Extremity Motor Activity Diary-28
This scale, which aims to evaluate the function of the hemiparetic upper extremity, was developed by Uswatte et al. in 2006. 30 upper extremity functions are evaluated and scored with 2 different scales as "level of use" and "quality of use". The scores for each scale are calculated by adding them up and dividing them by the number of marked items. The validity and reliability of the scale in Turkish has been done.
Measured: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Social Adaptation Scale
The social adaptation scale is a scale consisting of 10 items (34). The survey focuses on personal experiences, perspectives and personal satisfaction with the level of integration with society rather than the objective and observable aspects of social integration.
Measured: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2025
- Study start1 Jun 2025
- Primary completion30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Mar 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HemiplegiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istinye UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Treatment Method: Patients who continue the rehabilitation program due to hemiplegic stroke and meet the inclusion criteria will be treated. The treatment will be applied in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program for 24 sessions, 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Group 1: PNF application Group (n: 18): Conventional Physiotherapy + PNF application Group 2: KB application Group (n: 18): Conventional Physiotherapy + KB application Group 3: PNF+KB application Group (n: 18): Conventional Physiotherapy + PNF + KB application
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istinye University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ondokuz Mayıs University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Elif Önder, Istinye University
- Investigators
- Berrak Varhan, Study director, Istinye UniversityMahmut Yaran, Study director, Ondokuz Mayıs University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07014696
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024000565-1
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 20 May 2025
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION METHOD APPLICATION ON UPPER LIMB FUNCTIONS IN PATIENTS AFTER STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the Effects of PNF and Kinesiological Taping on Hand Function in Hemiplegic Stroke Patients Based on the ICF Framework
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07014696
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024000565-1
- Conditions
- Hemiplegia, Hemiplegia Due to Stroke, Hand Functionality, Upper Extremity, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation, Kinesio Taping
- Keywords
- hand functionality, hemiplegia, hemiplegia due to stroke, upper extremity, ICF, Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation, kinesio taping
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 54 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Istinye UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Ondokuz Mayıs University
- Study start
- 1 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Mar 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This clinical trial aims to compare the effects of kinesio taping and PNF on hemiplegic hand functions. In addition, the effects of these applications on body structure, activity, and participation will be examined. The main questions it aims to answer are:
Do kinesio taping and PNF applications have different effects on hemiplegic hand function? Are kinesio taping and PNF applications effective in body structure, activity, and participation? The researchers will compare the advantages of kinesio taping and PNF applications over each other.
Participants:
Kinesio taping and/or PNF applications will be applied 3 days a week for 8 weeks.
Tests will be performed on the first and last day of the study to evaluate hand functions.
Detailed description
This study aims to investigate the effects of proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation and kinesiology taping on hand functions in hemiplegic stroke patients. In order to evaluate functionality, it will be evaluated with the Box block test, Fugl Meyer upper extremity test, ARAT, and nine-hole peg test. In order to examine the cases within the scope of functionality, disability, and health international classification (ICF), environmental quality scale, upper extremity motor activity diary-28, stroke impact scale, and social adaptation scale will be evaluated.
Stroke is the second leading cause of death and disability among adults over the age of 60 worldwide. Approximately 17 million people have a stroke every year in the world and 140 thousand people in our country. Data from all over the world also reveal that the incidence of stroke will increase in the coming years. By definition, stroke is a clinical condition that develops after focal infarction or hemorrhage in the cerebral cortex, cerebellum and spinal cord, causes focal neurological dysfunction, can last 24 hours or longer and can even result in death. After a stroke, the surrounding brain tissue is deprived of oxygen and essential nutrients, and if left untreated, it can lead to permanent tissue damage, including neuronal cell death. Damages that occur after a stroke cause motor, sensory, and cognitive impairments in individuals; upper extremity dysfunction, balance, and walking difficulties, causing people to be dependent on various degrees in their daily life activities. Post-stroke disability reduces the quality of life of the individual and their relatives, affecting their lives. It also causes both socioeconomic and social problems. Approximately 50-75% of those affected in the early post-stroke period experience upper extremity impairment, and a large portion of them will live with long-term upper extremity impairment. Although most individuals regain walking function after stroke, very few individuals are able to use their upper extremities, especially their hands, at a fully functional level. Upper extremity function after stroke is among the main causes of long-term disability. This is because the natural recovery of upper extremity function is generally more limited than that of the lower extremity. Impaired use of the upper extremity persists in approximately 60% of patients even 6 months after stroke. Exercise interventions are necessary to improve upper extremity motor functions and activities of daily living (ADL) in stroke patients, because persistent upper extremity dysfunction is strongly associated with decreased activities of daily living and poor quality of life after stroke.
Abnormal synergies occur in the extremities of patients who have had a stroke. The literature has described two main synergies for the upper extremity: Flexion or extension synergy patterns. These synergies in the upper extremity and hand lead to loss of mobility, interfere with activities of daily living including dressing and hygiene, may cause skin breakdown, and may cause pain. Over time, weakness in the hemiparetic hand, motor disorders caused by abnormal synergies, and permanent spasticity begin to cause secondary changes in the musculoskeletal system that may limit the use of the arm and hand and affect functional mobility; soft tissue shortening and contracture formation may be observed. There is a wide range of treatments for upper extremity recovery following stroke. In these methods, integrated treatments are recommended for both the hand and arm. Upper limb rehabilitation aims to provide all possible means to regain lost function and increase the autonomy of stroke patients, taking into account any remaining impairments and disabilities. Carr and Shepherd suggested that poor recovery in the upper limb may result from the direct effects of stroke as well as from inadequate, inappropriate or incorrect therapeutic interventions. However, little information is available to explain what best represents the "optimal treatment". The chosen treatment modality may be directed at a specific impairment (e.g. muscle weakness) or functional movements (e.g. grasping and letting go activity). These treatment modalities may be used separately or combined to address the multifactorial impairments that may arise following stroke, i.e. primary problems and secondary complications. Therefore, it should be noted that upper extremity rehabilitation after stroke will involve a complex intervention that requires the cooperation of the patient, caregivers, and the rehabilitation team.
Neuromuscular therapies, one of the approaches used in the treatment of stroke, include multiple methods. In recent years, activities related to the recovery of motor functions have become the focus of research by scientists dedicated to the development of the topic of brain plasticity, which allows a person to adapt to the environment through learning and self-repair after damage. A typical example of neural plasticity is the recovery process after ischemic stroke, which initiates the reorganization of the central nervous system and the assumption of some functions by undamaged parts of brain structures. Reorganization also involves the expansion of cortical areas that provide the neural substrate for the recovery or adaptation of motor activities after damage. The results of studies on brain plasticity have revealed that the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) technique, one of the neuromuscular treatments, provides the development of neurorehabilitation. Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) is a therapeutic approach that provides input with cutaneous, proprioceptive, auditory and visual stimuli to provide functional improvement in motor movement and can play a vital role in the rehabilitation of many injuries. PNF is a special manual technique that combines different planes of movement and is applied by physiotherapists to improve the functional status of the patient. This method plays an effective role in supporting the patient to achieve their goals by making movements more functional. Studies have shown that it is effective in pain management, increasing range of motion, developing muscle strength and endurance, improving balance and coordination, providing proximal stability and supporting functional progress. Neuromuscular reeducation applications are widely preferred in the early rehabilitation processes of acute or subacute periods in order to improve motor functions of paralyzed patients. This method stimulates the proprioceptive organs in the muscles and tendons to improve muscle functions, promotes the emergence of postural reflexes, and regulates muscle contraction to increase strength, flexibility, balance, and coordination. Many articles have revealed that a PNF-based program has the potential to produce positive results on motor function in older adults with acute and chronic paralysis. A 2018 study found that PNF was effective in improving upper extremity motor skills and function in stroke patients in the acute and/or subacute stages, while other studies found that it was effective in reducing spasticity, increasing joint range of motion, and improving self-care function in the chronic stage.
Another neuromuscular treatment method used in stroke patients is kinesiology taping. Kinesiology taping (KT) was introduced by Kenzo Kase in 1996 and is a combination of applying appropriate tension along the elastic therapeutic tape and placing the target muscle in a tense position, and is widely used as an interesting and relatively new method for various clinical treatments. KT is a type of elastic, cotton, adhesive bandage with a 140% extensibility that can mimic the elasticity and tension of human skin, muscle, and fascia. Previous studies have shown that kinesiology taping can increase blood circulation, provide mechanical support and proprioceptive feedback, improve joint range of motion, and activate muscles. KT has gained popularity in clinical practice and has been used in clinical practice worldwide. KT applications may promote functional use of the upper and lower extremities by supporting weak muscles, relaxing overstretched muscles, reducing pain and further improving balance ability. Based on these observations, kinesiology taping is considered a potential treatment for spasticity, motor control and tone regulation, providing prorioceptive input and increasing functions. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) is an international and standardized classification system developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) to be applied in many branches of health and to evaluate functionality, disability and health holistically. ICF can be used for many purposes, this classification system is a policy and planning tool for decision makers. In addition to being used to categorize health, ICF can be used to determine functional status and to plan rehabilitation programs and guide goal achievement. An interdisciplinary team approach in stroke treatment, where different specialists work together harmoniously and closely, has been described as the basis for effective stroke rehabilitation programs. Measuring, reporting and comparing outcomes across each treatment approach is important to improve outcomes and make informed choices about how to optimize healthcare and rationalize costs.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
- Model description
- Treatment Method: Patients who continue the rehabilitation program due to hemiplegic stroke and meet the inclusion criteria will be treated. The treatment will be applied in addition to the conventional physiotherapy program for 24 sessions, 3 days a week for 8 weeks. Group 1: PNF application Group (n: 18): Conventional Physiotherapy + PNF application Group 2: KB application Group (n: 18): Conventional Physiotherapy + KB application Group 3: PNF+KB application Group (n: 18): Conventional Physiotherapy + PNF + KB application
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group 1: PNF application Group | Experimental | Procedure: PNF application GroupIn the PNF method to be applied to the first group, the subjects will be in a sitting position. The application will be made to the fingers, wrist and forearm in both D1 and D2 direction flexion and extension patterns. The techniques will start by using rhythmic initiation, then the combination of isotonics, dynamic-opposite, rhythmic stabilization and muscle-relaxation will be determined. The movements will be done with 10 repetitions and rest in between. The exercises will continue for 8 weeks, 3 days a week.After all applications, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups. |
| Group 2: KB Application Group | Experimental | Procedure: KB application GroupIn the taping treatment to be applied to the second group, taping will be applied starting from the fingers to the elbow with kinesiology taping. Taping will be done 3 days a week and the tape will remain on the patient for 2 days. Exercises will continue 3 days a week for 8 weeks. After all applications, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups. |
| Group 3: PNF+KB application Group | Experimental | Procedure: PNF+KB application GroupThe third group will be applied both PNF and taping. Exercises will continue 3 days a week for 8 weeks. After all applications, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (0 listed)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Exclusion Criteria (Junior et al., 2019; Kim \& Kim, 2015; Saklecha et al., 2023)
- Individuals with bilateral hemiplegia
- Individuals with unstable vital signs
- Individuals with any open wound in the upper extremity
- Pathological conditions affecting upper extremity sensation (undergoing surgery after fracture, etc.)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PNF application GroupPNF Application; in the application method, the subjects will be in a sitting position. The application will be made to the fingers, wrist and forearm in both D1 and D2 directions in flexion and extension patterns. The techniques will start using rhythmic initiation, then the combination of isotonics, dynamic-opposite, rhythmic stabilization and muscle-relaxation are determined. The movements will be made in 10 repetitions with rest in between (Saklecha et al., 2023). | Procedure or surgery | Group 1: PNF application Group |
| KB application GroupKB Application; In the taping treatment to be applied, taping will be applied starting from the fingers and up to the elbow with kinesiology taping (Huang et al., 2019). Taping will be done 3 days a week and the tape will remain on the patient for 2 days. | Procedure or surgery | Group 2: KB Application Group |
| PNF+KB application GroupPNF+ KB Application; In this application, both PNF and taping will be applied. After each application, conventional treatment will be applied to all three groups at the end of each session. When all treatments are completed, re-evaluations will be made by the blind physiotherapist | Procedure or surgery | Group 3: PNF+KB application Group |
Primary outcome
The Fugl Meyer assessment
Time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
The Fugl Meyer assessment scale is a stroke-specific, performance-based scale, and each parameter is scored as 0; unsuccessful, 1; partially successful, and 2; completely successful performance. In the shoulder, elbow, and forearm, reflex activity, voluntary movements performed with dynamic flexor and/or extensor synergies, voluntary movements performed using dynamic flexor and extensor synergies together, voluntary movements performed without or with very little dependence on synergies, and normal reflex activity parameters are evaluated. When evaluating the wrist, three different functions of the wrist muscles are evaluated. In the hemiplegia hand evaluation, 7 movements (flexion, extension, and five grip functions) are evaluated. In the coordination/speed evaluation, a finger-nose test is performed for the upper extremity. During this test, tremor, dysmetria, and speed of movement are evaluated. The maximum motor performance score for the upper extremity is 66 points.
Action Research Arm Test (ARAT)
Time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
The ARAT observes arm and hand movements during the performance of a variety of reaching and grasping tasks. It measures the ability to qualitatively manipulate and carry large or small objects in relation to manual dexterity and proximal strength for the upper extremity. The ARAT rates the upper extremity on a 4-point scale (maximum of 57 points for each upper extremity): 3 points if the task is performed normally; 2 points if the task is completed but takes an abnormally long time; 2 points if performed with great difficulty or poorly coordinated movements; 1 point if the task is only partially completed; and 0 points if the task is not performed at all.
The Box-Block Test
Time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
The Box-Block Test measures unilateral manual dexterity. It is a fast, simple and inexpensive test. It can be used in a wide variety of diseases, including stroke patients. It consists of a box divided into two and 150 blocks. The wooden blocks are cubes measuring 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm x 2.5 cm. The barrier in the middle of the box is 15.2 cm. Patients are asked to throw the blocks from one section to the other, one by one, within 60 seconds and the number of blocks is recorded.
Nine hole Peg Test
Time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
It is a simple and quick test used to evaluate changes in hand functions. The participant is asked to insert nine rods into a wooden block with nine holes as quickly as possible and then remove them. The test is repeated twice and the score is determined as the average of the two trials. The participant is expected to perform the test with the hand on the affected side of the body.
3 secondary outcomes
Environmental Quality Scale
Time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Upper Extremity Motor Activity Diary-28
Time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Social Adaptation Scale
Time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2026.
- Results publicationEFFECTIVENESS OF THE PROPRIOCEPTIVE NEUROMUSCULAR FACILITATION METHOD APPLICATION ON UPPER LIMB FUNCTIONS IN PATIENTS AFTER STROKE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF LITERATURE
- Effectiveness of the proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation method application on upper lımb functions in patients after stroke: a systematic review of literatureLink provided by the sponsor.
- Factors associated with post-stroke social participation: A quantitative study based on the ICF frameworkLink provided by the sponsor.
- Effectiveness of kinesio taping for chronic stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysisLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Hemiplegia
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Upper Extremity Physiotherapy and Home Exercises on Functional Outcomes in Individuals With Stroke
Stroke
Recruiting
Task-Oriented Training Versus High-Intensity Gait Training in People With Chronic Stroke
Stroke, Hemiplegia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Studies of the Variable Phenotypic Presentations of Rapid-Onset Dystonia Parkinsonism and Other Movement Disorders
Dystonia, Parkinsonism
RecruitingObservational study
Post-Stroke Apraxia, Motor Function, Balance, and Gait
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
RecruitingObservational study
Ideomotor Apraxia and Robotic Gait Rehabilitation Outcomes After Stroke
Stroke, Ideomotor Apraxia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Berrak Varhan study director
Istinye University
Mahmut Yaran study director
Ondokuz Mayıs University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing PNF application Group, KB application Group and PNF+KB application Group in people with Hemiplegia and Hemiplegia Due to Stroke, run by Istinye University at 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 0 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact elif önder (+905453776207, elifonder2011@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Fugl Meyer assessment (time frame: Beginning of the study and end of week 8 (when 24 sessions are completed)). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07014696, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2026.