Toxic Leadership StylesiWorkCOMPNCT07018089
The Efficacy of the iWork.COMP Among Health Care Professionals
A study testing iWork.Comp in people with Toxic Leadership Styles, run by University of Coimbra at 1 site in Portugal.
Trial summary
According to the literature, the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and/or burnout symptoms among healthcare workers is high. There are several factors than can, directly or indirectly, be related to these symptoms, being the leadership styles one of them. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Toxic Leadership Styles
- What is being tested?
- iWork.Comp
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 200 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePortugal
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2026to 30 May 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Emerging/pre-service (Gen-Z) and current health care worker (i.e., doctors and nurses working in the surgical pathway);
- Aged over 18 years old;
- Assuming both leader and non-leader roles.
Who cannot join
- N/A
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Portugal1 site
Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences of the University of Coimbra
Coimbra, 3000-115
Diana Ribeiro da Silva, PhD, +351 239 851 450, uckeepcaring@fpce.uc.pt
About this study
Official title: The Efficacy of the iWork.COMP Among Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Controlled Trial
According to the literature, the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and/or burnout symptoms among healthcare workers is high. There are several factors than can, directly or indirectly, be related to these symptoms, being the leadership styles one of them. Toxic leadership, as a form of malicious leadership, has been shown to negatively impact the mental health and wellbeing of the workforce, through the adoption of dysfunctional behaviour and/or the presence of deviant personality traits (psychopathic, Machiavellianism, narcissistic) in leaders. Despite its relevance, there is an absence of studies on the efficacy of intervention programs aimed to reduce the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workplace, namely among health care professionals. Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) is considered an effective therapeutic approach for the rehabilitation of individuals with several psychopathological symptoms/disorders (e.g., anxiety, stress, burnout, and deviant personality traits) and for the establishment of healthy relationships with friends, family, and coworkers. In the workplace, CFT-based interventions have been shown to promote employees' wellbeing, through the reduction of stress and burnout symptoms and improvement of healthy and compassionate interpersonal relationships. It is thus mandatory to develop and test cost-effectiveness CFT-based intervention programs able to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workforce, promoting compassionate workplaces in health care systems.
To fulfil this gap, this clinical trial intends to develop and preliminarily test the efficacy of a short-term and low-time consuming internet delivery CFT-based intervention (iWork.COMP) specifically designed to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of compassionate motivation among health care professionals. Following a Randomized Controlled Trial, with 200 participants allocated to either a treatment group (TG) or a waiting-list control group (WLCG), it is hypothesized that the iWork.COMP will reduce the impact of toxic leadership styles, deviant traits and burnout symptoms among the TG when compared with the WLCG. Moreover, we expect that the iWork.COMP will promote wellbeing and a compassionate motivation among the TG when compared with the WLCG.
Read the detailed description
- Introduction Healthcare workers are in significant risk for the development of psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, psychological distress and burnout symptoms. According to the European Agency for Safety and Health Work (EU-OSHA; https://osha.europa.eu/en), there are several factors that may contribute to these mental health issues, such as excessive workload, conflicting demands and lack of role clarity, lack of involvement in making decisions that affect the worker, poorly managed organizational change, ineffective communication, and lack of support from management. These factors can be directly or indirectly related to leadership styles. Within leadership research, there has been an increasing interest in the study of toxic leadership, as a form of malicious leadership, in which leaders, through dysfunctional behaviour and/or deviant personality traits (psychopathic, Machiavelism, narcissistic), negatively impact on the mental health and wellbeing of the workforce. Despite its relevance, there is an absence of studies on the efficacy of intervention programs aimed at reducing the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workplace, namely among health care professionals. Within psychotherapeutic interventions, there has been a growing empirical support for compassion-based interventions (e.g., Compassion-Focused Therapy; CFT), in a wide range of contexts. Recent studies have shown that CFT is considered an effective therapeutic approach for the rehabilitation of individuals with several psychopathological symptoms/disorders (e.g., anxiety, stress, burnout, and deviant personality traits) and for the establishment of healthy relationships with friends, family, and coworkers. In the workplace, CFT-based interventions have been shown to promote employees' wellbeing, through the reduction of stress and burnout symptoms and improvement of healthy and compassionate interpersonal relationships. Compassion can be conceptualized as a motivation to be sensitive to the suffering of one-self and others, allied with the wisdom and commitment to prevent and/or relieve it. It is linked with psychological well-being and has been found to be negatively associated with emotion dysregulation, shame and self-criticism. In the workplace, compassion has been linked with work commitment and work satisfaction. Moreover, compassion at work has been negatively associated with burnout symptoms. It is thus mandatory to develop and test cost-effectiveness CFT-based intervention programs able to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workforce, promoting compassionate workplaces in health care systems. These mitigation programs can impact on an individual, team, and organizational levels. Promoting a compassionate motivation among health care professionals is crucial to their mental and physical health, to their wellbeing at work, and, consequently, to the delivery of safe, high-quality, and patient-centered care to the population.
- Study Design This study will follow a Randomized Controlled Trial design (RCT; CONSORT-Statement) involving health care units from the Health Local Unity of Coimbra (HLU Coimbra; selected by the hospital's administration). The selected health care units will be randomly assigned to the Treatment Group (TG) and to the Waiting List Control Group WLCG). The randomization at the health care unit level (and not at an individual level) intends to maximize the intervention effects, as all participants will be receiving the intervention at the same time, potentially boosting and cumulating individual and team intervention effects. Individuals who agree to participate in this RCT will sign an informed consent and will be asked to fulfil their socioeconomic data and a set of questionnaires (baseline assessment, M0). Participants will be assessed in three more assessment points (4-weeks intervals): middle of the intervention (M1), post treatment (M2) and 4-week follow-up (M3). All assessments (M0 to M3) will approximately take 10 minutes.
- Participants Participants will be 200 emerging/pre-service (Gen-Z) and current health care workers (i.e., doctors and nurses working in the surgical pathway), aged over 18 years old and assuming both leader and non-leader roles in two (or more) similar Portuguese health care units. As the iWork.COMP program aims to be applied to all the workforce, no more restrictions are planned on age as well as on gender distribution. Regarding the sample size, a power analysis was conducted a priori (GPower v3.1 software), specifying for F tests (multivariate analysis of variances: repeated measures, within-between interaction), showing that a sample of 162 participants was necessary to detect medium effects with a significance level of .05 and a power of .90.
- Intervention The iWork.COMP is a short-term and low-time consuming internet delivery CFT-based intervention specifically designed to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of compassionate motivation in the workforce of EU hospitals. The iWork.COMP encompasses 8 individual sessions (20 minutes each; mixed format including text, audio and video presentations), which will be available weekly for participants at the KEEPCARING website (https://keepcaring.eu). Each session has three parts. Part 1 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at that moment and on the source of their stress (if applicable). In Part 2, the theme of the session is developed. Finally, Part 3 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at the end of the session and on the usefulness of the session; an optional open question to provide feedback will also be displayed. At the end of the iWork.COMP, participants will have full access to a SOS-Button tool, which aims to provide short-term exercises when one is dealing with an acute stressful situation.
- Measures During the four assessment moments, both TG and WLCG participants will answer a set of questionnaires already validated for the Portuguese population, aimed at measuring toxic leadership styles (Toxic Leadership Scale; TLS); deviant personality traits (Dirty Dozen; DD); burnout (Burnout Assessment Tool; BAT-12); wellbeing (Daniels's Five-Factor Measure; D-FAW), and compassion (Fears of Compassion Scales; FCS). A detailed description of these questionnaires will be presented in the outcome measures section.
- Data analysis The data will be analyzed with SPSS v29 and Mplus v8 statistical software. Preliminary analyses, namely for comparisons between groups at baseline on sociodemographic data and outcome measures, will resort to independent-samples t-tests and chi-square tests. Internal consistency calculations will be based on Cronbach's alpha guidelines. To test the efficacy of the iWork.COMP, data will be analyzed both at an individual (Reliable Change Index) and group level (Latent Growth Curve Models). If Latent Growth Curve models don't present acceptable fit indices, treatment effects will be assessed through MANOVAs.
- Ethical Considerations To address any ethical considerations, a series of procedures will be carried out.
First, all procedures involved in this project will be allied with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Applicable national laws and regulations will also be followed. Moreover, all procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra (CEDI/FPCEUC: 97/4).
Second, after the selection and randomization of the health care units, it will be conducted a series of meetings with the leaders and staff of the units. These meetings intend to inform about the nature and aims of the study, to explain the assessment procedures, to clarify any doubt that may arise, and to invite them to voluntarily participate. It will be explained that their decision to participate or not will have no negative consequences or monetary rewards, and that they can withdraw from the study at any time without further explanation. Confidentiality and anonymity will be guaranteed. Participants will fulfil a written informed consent.
Third, participants will be asked to provide their e-mail address (optional). The e-mail addresses will not be linked with the individual data of participants and will only be used to notify them regarding the availability of the sessions (for the TG) and/or assessment periods (for both TG and WLCG). Participants can ask to be removed from the mailing list at any time without further explanations.
Four, to assure data confidentiality, the following procedures will be carried out: 1) use of a system code in each research protocol; 2) unpair the research protocol and the informed consent, to maintain participants' anonymity; 3) collect personal data strictly necessary for research purposes; 4) enter data in statistical software, analyzing them exclusively in a collective way; 5) use of respondent-specific codes to link data from one time-point to the next.
Fifth, although participants in the WLCG will not receive any intervention during the study period, they will be able to access the iWork.COMP program (and then to the SOS-Button tool) after the study completion, if they choose to.
- Conditions
- Toxic Leadership Styles
- Being tested
- iWork.Comp
- Keywords
- Health care workers, Surgical pathway, Clinical Trial, Compassion Focused Therapy, iWork.COMP
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
iWork.CompBehavioural
Also called CFT for health care professionals
The iWork.COMP is a short-term and low-time consuming internet delivery CFT-based intervention specifically designed to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of compassionate motivation in the workforce of EU hospitals. The iWork.COMP encompasses 8 individual sessions (20 minutes each; mixed format including text, audio and video presentations), which will be available weekly for participants at the KEEPCARING website (https://keepcaring.eu). Each session has three parts. Part 1 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at that moment and on the source of their stress (if applicable). In Part 2, the theme of the session is developed. Finally, Part 3 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at the end of the session and on the usefulness of the session; an optional open question to provide feedback will also be displayed.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group | Experimental | The TG will receive iWork.COMP. The iWork.COMP is an 8-week internet delivery intervention based on CFT, aimed at reducing the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of a compassionate motivation. After this period, participants will have access to the SOS-Button tool. Participants in this group will be assessed in four assessment-points (4-weeks intervals; approximately 10 minutes per assessment point): baseline, middle of the intervention, post-treatment, four-week follow-up. Receives: Behavioral: iWork.Comp |
| Waiting List Control Group | No intervention | This group will not receive any intervention during the study period. However, the access to the iWork.COMP program (and then to the SOS-Button tool) will be available after the study completion, if they choose to. Participants in this group will be assessed in four assessment-point (4-weeks intervals; approximately 10 minutes per assessment point): baseline, middle of the intervention, post-treatment, four-week follow-up. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The Toxic Leadership Scale
Toxic Leadership: The Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS) is a 15-item instrument that aims to measure the five toxic leadership dimensions proposed by Schmidt: Abusive Supervision (i.e., the demonstration of hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviors), Authoritarian Leadership (i.e., an absolute control over his/her subordinates and all decision making), Narcissism (i.e., a grandiose and self-centered style), Self-promotion (i.e., a presentation of the self as a smart and capable person), and Unpredictability. Items are rated on a six-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Higher total scores indicate higher levels of toxic leadership style. The TLS will be used in the present study to assess employees' perception of their direct leader's toxic leadership styles. Psychometric studies of the TLS have demonstrated a very good internal consistency (α ranging from .87 to .93).
Measured: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
Secondary outcomes (4)
The Dirty Dozen
Dark Triad: The Dirty Dozen (DD) is a brief 12-item questionnaire that aims to measures the "Dark Triad", as a constellation of three overlapping, although distinct, constructs: Machiavellianism (i.e., a manipulative and cold interpersonal style), Psychopathy (i.e., a callous, unemphatic and impulsive style), and Narcissism (i.e., a grandiose and dominant style). Items are scored using a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Totally Disagree) to 5 (Totally Agree). Higher total scores indicate higher levels of Dark Triad traits. The other-report version of the scale will be used in the present study to assess employees' perception of their direct leader's Dark Triad traits. Psychometric studies of the other-report version of the DD have demonstrated good to very good internal consistency (α ranging from .87 to .93).
Measured: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
The Burnout Assessment Tool
The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-12) is a brief 12-item self-report instrument that measures participant's four core burnout symptoms: Exhaustion (e.g., "At work, I feel physically exhausted."), Mental Distance (e.g., "I struggle to find any enthusiasm for my work."), Cognitive Impairment (e.g., "At work, I have problems staying focused."), and Emotional Impairment (e.g., "At work, I feel unable to control my emotions."). Items are rated on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Never) to 5 (Always). Higher scores indicate the participant's frequency of these symptoms. The BAT-12 will be used in the present study to assess employees' burnout symptoms and respective frequency. Psychometric studies of the BAT-12 have demonstrated good to very good internal consistency (α ranging from .85 to .95).
Measured: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
The Daniels's Five-Factor Measure
The Daniels's Five-Factor Measure (D-FAW) is a self-report questionnaire aimed at measuring participants' affective wellbeing in the past week at work. It comprised 10 items that purports to measure levels of Positive Activated Affect (PA; e.g., Happy", "At ease") and Negative Activated Affect (NA; e.g., "Anxious", "Tired"). Participants will be instructed to classify the feelings experienced using a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Not at all) to 6 (Very much). Higher total scores indicate greater affective wellbeing at work, after the five items related to negative emotions have been reversed. Studies have demonstrated a good internal consistency for the PA and NA factors (α > .80 and .80).
Measured: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
The Fears of Compassion Scales
The Fears of Compassion Scales (FCS) include three self-report questionnaires (total of 38-items) aimed at measuring fears, blocks and resistances to the three flows of compassion as posted by the CFT framework: expressing compassion for others (10 items; e.g., "People will take advantage of me if they see me as too compassionate"); receiving compassion from others (13 items; e.g., "Wanting others to be kind to oneself is a weakness"); and being self-compassionate (15 items; e.g., "I feel that I don't deserve to be kind and forgiving to myself"). Items are rated on a five-point Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (Don't agree at all) to 4 (Completely agree). These scales have been presenting acceptable to very good internal consistencies (α ranging from .78 to .87 on the original version; ranging from .88 to .94 in the Portuguese version).
Measured: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2025
- Study start1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion30 May 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (33)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Toxic Leadership StylesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- This project will use a longitudinal design. The healthcare units will be randomly assigned to two conditions: the TG and WLCG. Considering that concealment of group allocation is not possible within the iWork.COMP (which is a transversal issue in any psycho-educative/psychotherapeutic approach), this specific RCT will not have a blinded design.
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Coimbra
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Union
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Diana Ribeiro da Silva, University of Coimbra
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07018089
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 101137244
- Other IDs
- HORIZON-HLTH-2023-CARE-04
- Acronym
- iWorkCOMP
- Status last verified
- Sep 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Hao Q, Wang D, Xie M, Tang Y, Dou Y, Zhu L, Wu Y, Dai M, Wu H, Wang Q. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Mental Health Problems Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 15;12:567381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.567381. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34211406Batra K, Singh TP, Sharma M, Batra R, Schvaneveldt N. Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 5;17(23):9096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239096.
PubMed 33291511Boucher VG, Dahl M, Lee J, Faulkner G, Beauchamp MR, Puterman E. An umbrella review and meta-analysis of 87 meta-analyses examining healthcare workers' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2025 Apr 15;375:423-436. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.109. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
PubMed 39862981(4) LeBreton JM, Shiverdecker LK, Grimaldi EM. The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;5(1):387-414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451
(5) Whicker ML. Toxic leaders: When organizations go bad. Quorum; 1996.
Wasson RS, Barratt C, O'Brien WH. Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Self-compassion in Health Care Professionals: a Meta-analysis. Mindfulness (N Y). 2020;11(8):1914-1934. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01342-5. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
PubMed 32421083Kirby JN, Tellegen CL, Steindl SR. A Meta-Analysis of Compassion-Based Interventions: Current State of Knowledge and Future Directions. Behav Ther. 2017 Nov;48(6):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PubMed 29029675(9) Gilbert P, Simos G. Compassion focused therapy: Clinical practice and applications. Routledge; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035879
Ribeiro da Silva D, Rijo D, Brazao N, Paulo M, Miguel R, Castilho P, Vagos P, Gilbert P, Salekin RT. The efficacy of the PSYCHOPATHY.COMP program in reducing psychopathic traits: A controlled trial with male detained youth. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jun;89(6):499-513. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000659.
PubMed 34264698Matos M, Albuquerque I, Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pedroso Lima M, Palmeira L, Petrocchi N, McEwan K, Maratos FA, Gilbert P. Nurturing compassion in schools: A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a Compassionate Mind Training program for teachers. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 1;17(3):e0263480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263480. eCollection 2022.
PubMed 35231057(12) Gilbert P. Introducing compassion-focused therapy. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2009;15(3):199-208. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.107.005264
Zessin U, Dickhauser O, Garbade S. The Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2015 Nov;7(3):340-64. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12051. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
PubMed 26311196(14) Gouveia MJ, Canavarro MC, Moreira H. Associations between mindfulness, self-compassion, difficulties in emotion regulation, and emotional eating among adolescents with overweight/obesity. J Child Fam Stud. 2018;28(1):273-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1239-5
(15) Gilbert P, Procter S. Compassionate mind training for people with high shame and self-criticism: Overview and pilot study of a group therapy approach. Clin Psychol Psychother. 2006;13(6):353-379. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.507
(16) Eldor L, Shoshani A. Caring relationships in school staff: Exploring the link between compassion and teacher work engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2016;59:126-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.06.001
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Efficacy of the iWork.COMP Among Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07018089
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- iWorkCOMP / 101137244
- Conditions
- Toxic Leadership Styles
- Keywords
- Health care workers, Surgical pathway, Clinical Trial, Compassion Focused Therapy, iWork.COMP
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CoimbraUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- European Union
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 May 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
According to the literature, the prevalence of anxiety, depression, and/or burnout symptoms among healthcare workers is high. There are several factors than can, directly or indirectly, be related to these symptoms, being the leadership styles one of them. Toxic leadership, as a form of malicious leadership, has been shown to negatively impact the mental health and wellbeing of the workforce, through the adoption of dysfunctional behaviour and/or the presence of deviant personality traits (psychopathic, Machiavellianism, narcissistic) in leaders. Despite its relevance, there is an absence of studies on the efficacy of intervention programs aimed to reduce the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workplace, namely among health care professionals. Compassion Focused Therapy (CFT) is considered an effective therapeutic approach for the rehabilitation of individuals with several psychopathological symptoms/disorders (e.g., anxiety, stress, burnout, and deviant personality traits) and for the establishment of healthy relationships with friends, family, and coworkers. In the workplace, CFT-based interventions have been shown to promote employees' wellbeing, through the reduction of stress and burnout symptoms and improvement of healthy and compassionate interpersonal relationships. It is thus mandatory to develop and test cost-effectiveness CFT-based intervention programs able to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workforce, promoting compassionate workplaces in health care systems.
To fulfil this gap, this clinical trial intends to develop and preliminarily test the efficacy of a short-term and low-time consuming internet delivery CFT-based intervention (iWork.COMP) specifically designed to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of compassionate motivation among health care professionals. Following a Randomized Controlled Trial, with 200 participants allocated to either a treatment group (TG) or a waiting-list control group (WLCG), it is hypothesized that the iWork.COMP will reduce the impact of toxic leadership styles, deviant traits and burnout symptoms among the TG when compared with the WLCG. Moreover, we expect that the iWork.COMP will promote wellbeing and a compassionate motivation among the TG when compared with the WLCG.
Detailed description
- Introduction Healthcare workers are in significant risk for the development of psychopathology, including depression, anxiety, psychological distress and burnout symptoms. According to the European Agency for Safety and Health Work (EU-OSHA; https://osha.europa.eu/en), there are several factors that may contribute to these mental health issues, such as excessive workload, conflicting demands and lack of role clarity, lack of involvement in making decisions that affect the worker, poorly managed organizational change, ineffective communication, and lack of support from management. These factors can be directly or indirectly related to leadership styles. Within leadership research, there has been an increasing interest in the study of toxic leadership, as a form of malicious leadership, in which leaders, through dysfunctional behaviour and/or deviant personality traits (psychopathic, Machiavelism, narcissistic), negatively impact on the mental health and wellbeing of the workforce. Despite its relevance, there is an absence of studies on the efficacy of intervention programs aimed at reducing the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workplace, namely among health care professionals. Within psychotherapeutic interventions, there has been a growing empirical support for compassion-based interventions (e.g., Compassion-Focused Therapy; CFT), in a wide range of contexts. Recent studies have shown that CFT is considered an effective therapeutic approach for the rehabilitation of individuals with several psychopathological symptoms/disorders (e.g., anxiety, stress, burnout, and deviant personality traits) and for the establishment of healthy relationships with friends, family, and coworkers. In the workplace, CFT-based interventions have been shown to promote employees' wellbeing, through the reduction of stress and burnout symptoms and improvement of healthy and compassionate interpersonal relationships. Compassion can be conceptualized as a motivation to be sensitive to the suffering of one-self and others, allied with the wisdom and commitment to prevent and/or relieve it. It is linked with psychological well-being and has been found to be negatively associated with emotion dysregulation, shame and self-criticism. In the workplace, compassion has been linked with work commitment and work satisfaction. Moreover, compassion at work has been negatively associated with burnout symptoms. It is thus mandatory to develop and test cost-effectiveness CFT-based intervention programs able to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles in the workforce, promoting compassionate workplaces in health care systems. These mitigation programs can impact on an individual, team, and organizational levels. Promoting a compassionate motivation among health care professionals is crucial to their mental and physical health, to their wellbeing at work, and, consequently, to the delivery of safe, high-quality, and patient-centered care to the population.
- Study Design This study will follow a Randomized Controlled Trial design (RCT; CONSORT-Statement) involving health care units from the Health Local Unity of Coimbra (HLU Coimbra; selected by the hospital's administration). The selected health care units will be randomly assigned to the Treatment Group (TG) and to the Waiting List Control Group WLCG). The randomization at the health care unit level (and not at an individual level) intends to maximize the intervention effects, as all participants will be receiving the intervention at the same time, potentially boosting and cumulating individual and team intervention effects. Individuals who agree to participate in this RCT will sign an informed consent and will be asked to fulfil their socioeconomic data and a set of questionnaires (baseline assessment, M0). Participants will be assessed in three more assessment points (4-weeks intervals): middle of the intervention (M1), post treatment (M2) and 4-week follow-up (M3). All assessments (M0 to M3) will approximately take 10 minutes.
- Participants Participants will be 200 emerging/pre-service (Gen-Z) and current health care workers (i.e., doctors and nurses working in the surgical pathway), aged over 18 years old and assuming both leader and non-leader roles in two (or more) similar Portuguese health care units. As the iWork.COMP program aims to be applied to all the workforce, no more restrictions are planned on age as well as on gender distribution. Regarding the sample size, a power analysis was conducted a priori (GPower v3.1 software), specifying for F tests (multivariate analysis of variances: repeated measures, within-between interaction), showing that a sample of 162 participants was necessary to detect medium effects with a significance level of .05 and a power of .90.
- Intervention The iWork.COMP is a short-term and low-time consuming internet delivery CFT-based intervention specifically designed to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of compassionate motivation in the workforce of EU hospitals. The iWork.COMP encompasses 8 individual sessions (20 minutes each; mixed format including text, audio and video presentations), which will be available weekly for participants at the KEEPCARING website (https://keepcaring.eu). Each session has three parts. Part 1 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at that moment and on the source of their stress (if applicable). In Part 2, the theme of the session is developed. Finally, Part 3 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at the end of the session and on the usefulness of the session; an optional open question to provide feedback will also be displayed. At the end of the iWork.COMP, participants will have full access to a SOS-Button tool, which aims to provide short-term exercises when one is dealing with an acute stressful situation.
- Measures During the four assessment moments, both TG and WLCG participants will answer a set of questionnaires already validated for the Portuguese population, aimed at measuring toxic leadership styles (Toxic Leadership Scale; TLS); deviant personality traits (Dirty Dozen; DD); burnout (Burnout Assessment Tool; BAT-12); wellbeing (Daniels's Five-Factor Measure; D-FAW), and compassion (Fears of Compassion Scales; FCS). A detailed description of these questionnaires will be presented in the outcome measures section.
- Data analysis The data will be analyzed with SPSS v29 and Mplus v8 statistical software. Preliminary analyses, namely for comparisons between groups at baseline on sociodemographic data and outcome measures, will resort to independent-samples t-tests and chi-square tests. Internal consistency calculations will be based on Cronbach's alpha guidelines. To test the efficacy of the iWork.COMP, data will be analyzed both at an individual (Reliable Change Index) and group level (Latent Growth Curve Models). If Latent Growth Curve models don't present acceptable fit indices, treatment effects will be assessed through MANOVAs.
- Ethical Considerations To address any ethical considerations, a series of procedures will be carried out.
First, all procedures involved in this project will be allied with the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Applicable national laws and regulations will also be followed. Moreover, all procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Coimbra (CEDI/FPCEUC: 97/4).
Second, after the selection and randomization of the health care units, it will be conducted a series of meetings with the leaders and staff of the units. These meetings intend to inform about the nature and aims of the study, to explain the assessment procedures, to clarify any doubt that may arise, and to invite them to voluntarily participate. It will be explained that their decision to participate or not will have no negative consequences or monetary rewards, and that they can withdraw from the study at any time without further explanation. Confidentiality and anonymity will be guaranteed. Participants will fulfil a written informed consent.
Third, participants will be asked to provide their e-mail address (optional). The e-mail addresses will not be linked with the individual data of participants and will only be used to notify them regarding the availability of the sessions (for the TG) and/or assessment periods (for both TG and WLCG). Participants can ask to be removed from the mailing list at any time without further explanations.
Four, to assure data confidentiality, the following procedures will be carried out: 1) use of a system code in each research protocol; 2) unpair the research protocol and the informed consent, to maintain participants' anonymity; 3) collect personal data strictly necessary for research purposes; 4) enter data in statistical software, analyzing them exclusively in a collective way; 5) use of respondent-specific codes to link data from one time-point to the next.
Fifth, although participants in the WLCG will not receive any intervention during the study period, they will be able to access the iWork.COMP program (and then to the SOS-Button tool) after the study completion, if they choose to.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- This project will use a longitudinal design. The healthcare units will be randomly assigned to two conditions: the TG and WLCG. Considering that concealment of group allocation is not possible within the iWork.COMP (which is a transversal issue in any psycho-educative/psychotherapeutic approach), this specific RCT will not have a blinded design.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment Group | Experimental | Behavioral: iWork.CompThe TG will receive iWork.COMP. The iWork.COMP is an 8-week internet delivery intervention based on CFT, aimed at reducing the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of a compassionate motivation. After this period, participants will have access to the SOS-Button tool. Participants in this group will be assessed in four assessment-points (4-weeks intervals; approximately 10 minutes per assessment point): baseline, middle of the intervention, post-treatment, four-week follow-up. |
| Waiting List Control Group | No intervention | –This group will not receive any intervention during the study period. However, the access to the iWork.COMP program (and then to the SOS-Button tool) will be available after the study completion, if they choose to. Participants in this group will be assessed in four assessment-point (4-weeks intervals; approximately 10 minutes per assessment point): baseline, middle of the intervention, post-treatment, four-week follow-up. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Emerging/pre-service (Gen-Z) and current health care worker (i.e., doctors and nurses working in the surgical pathway);
- Aged over 18 years old;
- Assuming both leader and non-leader roles.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- N/A
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| iWork.CompAlso: CFT for health care professionalsThe iWork.COMP is a short-term and low-time consuming internet delivery CFT-based intervention specifically designed to mitigate the impact of toxic leadership styles through the development of compassionate motivation in the workforce of EU hospitals. The iWork.COMP encompasses 8 individual sessions (20 minutes each; mixed format including text, audio and video presentations), which will be available weekly for participants at the KEEPCARING website (https://keepcaring.eu). Each session has three parts. Part 1 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at that moment and on the source of their stress (if applicable). In Part 2, the theme of the session is developed. Finally, Part 3 encompasses a brief check-in on the stress level of the participant at the end of the session and on the usefulness of the session; an optional open question to provide feedback will also be displayed. | Behavioural | Treatment Group |
Primary outcome
The Toxic Leadership Scale
Time frame: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
Toxic Leadership: The Toxic Leadership Scale (TLS) is a 15-item instrument that aims to measure the five toxic leadership dimensions proposed by Schmidt: Abusive Supervision (i.e., the demonstration of hostile verbal and nonverbal behaviors), Authoritarian Leadership (i.e., an absolute control over his/her subordinates and all decision making), Narcissism (i.e., a grandiose and self-centered style), Self-promotion (i.e., a presentation of the self as a smart and capable person), and Unpredictability. Items are rated on a six-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 6 (Strongly Agree). Higher total scores indicate higher levels of toxic leadership style. The TLS will be used in the present study to assess employees' perception of their direct leader's toxic leadership styles. Psychometric studies of the TLS have demonstrated a very good internal consistency (α ranging from .87 to .93).
4 secondary outcomes
The Dirty Dozen
Time frame: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
The Burnout Assessment Tool
Time frame: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
The Daniels's Five-Factor Measure
Time frame: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
The Fears of Compassion Scales
Time frame: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Sep 2026.
- Background: PubMed 34211406Hao Q, Wang D, Xie M, Tang Y, Dou Y, Zhu L, Wu Y, Dai M, Wu H, Wang Q. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Mental Health Problems Among Healthcare Workers During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2021 Jun 15;12:567381. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.567381. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 33291511Batra K, Singh TP, Sharma M, Batra R, Schvaneveldt N. Investigating the Psychological Impact of COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers: A Meta-Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 5;17(23):9096. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239096.
- Background: PubMed 39862981Boucher VG, Dahl M, Lee J, Faulkner G, Beauchamp MR, Puterman E. An umbrella review and meta-analysis of 87 meta-analyses examining healthcare workers' mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2025 Apr 15;375:423-436. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2025.01.109. Epub 2025 Jan 23.
- Background(4) LeBreton JM, Shiverdecker LK, Grimaldi EM. The dark triad and workplace behavior. Annu Rev Organ Psychol Organ Behav. 2017;5(1):387-414. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032117-104451
- Background(5) Whicker ML. Toxic leaders: When organizations go bad. Quorum; 1996.
- Background: PubMed 32421083Wasson RS, Barratt C, O'Brien WH. Effects of Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Self-compassion in Health Care Professionals: a Meta-analysis. Mindfulness (N Y). 2020;11(8):1914-1934. doi: 10.1007/s12671-020-01342-5. Epub 2020 Mar 5.
- Background: PubMed 29029675Kirby JN, Tellegen CL, Steindl SR. A Meta-Analysis of Compassion-Based Interventions: Current State of Knowledge and Future Directions. Behav Ther. 2017 Nov;48(6):778-792. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
- Background(9) Gilbert P, Simos G. Compassion focused therapy: Clinical practice and applications. Routledge; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035879
- Background: PubMed 34264698Ribeiro da Silva D, Rijo D, Brazao N, Paulo M, Miguel R, Castilho P, Vagos P, Gilbert P, Salekin RT. The efficacy of the PSYCHOPATHY.COMP program in reducing psychopathic traits: A controlled trial with male detained youth. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 Jun;89(6):499-513. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000659.
- Background: PubMed 35231057Matos M, Albuquerque I, Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pedroso Lima M, Palmeira L, Petrocchi N, McEwan K, Maratos FA, Gilbert P. Nurturing compassion in schools: A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of a Compassionate Mind Training program for teachers. PLoS One. 2022 Mar 1;17(3):e0263480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263480. eCollection 2022.
- Background(12) Gilbert P. Introducing compassion-focused therapy. Adv Psychiatr Treat. 2009;15(3):199-208. https://doi.org/10.1192/apt.bp.107.005264
- Background: PubMed 26311196Zessin U, Dickhauser O, Garbade S. The Relationship Between Self-Compassion and Well-Being: A Meta-Analysis. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2015 Nov;7(3):340-64. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12051. Epub 2015 Aug 26.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing iWork.Comp in people with Toxic Leadership Styles, run by University of Coimbra at 1 site in Portugal.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Portugal. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Diana Ribeiro da Silva, PhD (+351 239 851 450, uckeepcaring@fpce.uc.pt), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The Toxic Leadership Scale (time frame: Baseline; 4 weeks (middle intervention); 8 weeks (post-intervention); 12 weeks (Follow-up)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07018089, which also lists 33 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 8 Nov 2026.