Cardiovascular DiseasesNCT07020195
QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System in Optimizing Revascularization Strategy for Multivessel Disease
A study testing Traditional SYNTAX scoring and QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System in people with Cardiovascular Diseases, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University.
Trial summary
The revascularization treatment of multi vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) has always been a complex and important field in the treatment of coronary heart disease. The relative benefits of PCI and CABG vascular reconstruction strategies have always been a controversial topic in the field of MVD treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- What is being tested?
- Traditional SYNTAX scoring and QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 1,200 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 31 Dec 2029
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age ≥ 18 years old;
- Diagnosed as MVD patient by coronary angiography (≥ 50% stenosis in ≥ 2 major vessels);
- Plan to undergo PCI or CABG treatment, and ensure that the contrast images meet the imaging quality requirements for QFR analysis;
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent form, be able to participate in randomization and cooperate in completing all follow-up visits.
Who cannot join
- Acute myocardial infarction requires emergency PCI;
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF<30%) or cardiogenic shock;
- The quality of coronary angiography images is poor, such as vascular overlap, respiratory artifacts, projection angles less than 25 °, or frame rates less than 15 frames per second;
- Failure of QFR analysis due to severe calcified lesions (determined by the central laboratory);
- eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73m ² or contrast agent allergy;
- Patients using intravenous pressors, intra aortic balloon counterpulsation, or other mechanical circulatory support devices;
Show all 14Show fewer
- Patients undergoing tracheal intubation treatment;
- Patients who have received thrombolytic therapy before admission;
- Pregnant women;
- Expected survival time<1 year due to non cardiac reasons;
- Patients who are not expected to receive antiplatelet therapy for at least 6 months;
- Patients who have received CABG treatment in the past or plan to receive CABG treatment;
- Patients who plan to undergo any surgical procedure within 6 months;
- There are other conditions that may interfere with follow-up, such as dementia, drug abuse including drug use and drug dependence for other reasons.
About this study
Official title: QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System in Optimizing Revascularization Strategy for Multivessel Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
The revascularization treatment of multi vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) has always been a complex and important field in the treatment of coronary heart disease. The relative benefits of PCI and CABG vascular reconstruction strategies have always been a controversial topic in the field of MVD treatment. At present, SYNTAX score is the most commonly used imaging scoring system in clinical practice for quantitatively evaluating the complexity of coronary artery MVD, preliminary selection of revascularization strategies, and risk stratification. However, the SYNTAX score is entirely based on anatomical information of the lesion, and the assessment of the degree of coronary artery ischemia caused by the lesion is not accurate enough. Relying solely on anatomical structures for scoring may overestimate the harm of non ischemic lesions. The functional SYNTAX score (FSS) combines functional assessment of coronary artery lesions with anatomical structure scoring, only including lesions with hemodynamic significance, effectively optimizing the traditional SYNTAX scoring system. Compared with traditional SYNTAX scoring, FSS can reduce the number of high-risk patients, objectively evaluate the functional significance of lesions, and guide PCI treatment, significantly improving clinical prognosis.
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. However, it is currently unclear whether FSS based on QFR can achieve objective and accurate risk stratification, guide the selection of revascularization strategies, and improve the long-term prognosis of patients with coronary artery MVD. Higher quality prospective clinical trials need to be designed for verification.
Therefore, this study will use a functional SYNTAX scoring system based on QFR (QFR-FSS) to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the guiding value of QFR-FSS in selecting revascularization strategies for patients with coronary artery MVD and its impact on long-term cardiovascular prognosis.
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Being tested
- Traditional SYNTAX scoring, QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System
- Keywords
- Multivessel Disease, QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System
- Medical subject headings
- Cardiovascular Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Traditional SYNTAX scoringProcedure or surgery
Using traditional SYNTAX scoring to guide the selection of revascularization strategies
QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score SystemProcedure or surgery
Using QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System to guide the selection of revascularization strategies
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional SYNTAX scoring (SS) | Active comparator | Using traditional SYNTAX scoring to guide the selection of revascularization strategies Receives: Procedure: Traditional SYNTAX scoring |
| QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System (QFR-FSS) | Experimental | Using QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System to guide the selection of revascularization strategies Receives: Procedure: QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 2 years after PCI or CABG surgery, defined as the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemia driven revascularization.
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (7)
Composite endpoint of cardiogenic death and myocardial infarction
Composite endpoint of cardiogenic death and myocardial infarction
Measured: 2 years
Disease success rate
Disease success rate: including lesion success evaluated by contrast imaging (evaluated by the central laboratory, with a visual residual stenosis degree of less than 30% and TIMI blood flow grade 3 for lesions treated with stent implantation); The residual stenosis degree of lesions treated with balloon dilation is less than 50% visually, TIMI blood flow grade 3, and the functional evaluation of lesions is successful (evaluated by the central laboratory, QFR ≥ 0.80 immediately after surgery).
Measured: 2 years
Clinical success rate
Clinical success rate: On the basis of successful imaging lesions at 30 days, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, the incidence of MACE within the same hospitalization period (up to 7 days).
Measured: 2 years
The incidence of myocardial infarction
The incidence of myocardial infarction at 30 days, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery, including perioperative myocardial infarction (SCAI definition) and spontaneous myocardial infarction.
Measured: 2 years
The incidence of all revascularization
The incidence of all revascularization (ischemia driven, non ischemia driven revascularization; infarct related artery, non infarct related artery revascularization, culprit and non culprit lesion revascularization) at 30 days, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery.
Measured: 2 years
The incidence of confirmed and possible stent thrombosis
The incidence of confirmed and possible stent thrombosis (ARC-2 definition) at 30 days, 1 month, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery (including stent thrombosis within the time range of acute, subacute, late, and late onset).
Measured: 2 year
Postoperative quality of life scores
Postoperative quality of life scores at 2 years (EQ-5D Scale).
Measured: 2 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Jun 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Cardiovascular DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07020195
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QFR-FSS
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 26 May 2025
- Last updated
- 13 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System in Optimizing Revascularization Strategy for Multivessel Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07020195
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QFR-FSS
- Conditions
- Cardiovascular Diseases
- Keywords
- Multivessel Disease, QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 1,200 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 31 Dec 2029 (estimated)
- First posted
- 13 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The revascularization treatment of multi vessel coronary artery disease (MVD) has always been a complex and important field in the treatment of coronary heart disease. The relative benefits of PCI and CABG vascular reconstruction strategies have always been a controversial topic in the field of MVD treatment. At present, SYNTAX score is the most commonly used imaging scoring system in clinical practice for quantitatively evaluating the complexity of coronary artery MVD, preliminary selection of revascularization strategies, and risk stratification. However, the SYNTAX score is entirely based on anatomical information of the lesion, and the assessment of the degree of coronary artery ischemia caused by the lesion is not accurate enough. Relying solely on anatomical structures for scoring may overestimate the harm of non ischemic lesions. The functional SYNTAX score (FSS) combines functional assessment of coronary artery lesions with anatomical structure scoring, only including lesions with hemodynamic significance, effectively optimizing the traditional SYNTAX scoring system. Compared with traditional SYNTAX scoring, FSS can reduce the number of high-risk patients, objectively evaluate the functional significance of lesions, and guide PCI treatment, significantly improving clinical prognosis.
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is a novel method for evaluating the functional significance of coronary artery stenosis. However, it is currently unclear whether FSS based on QFR can achieve objective and accurate risk stratification, guide the selection of revascularization strategies, and improve the long-term prognosis of patients with coronary artery MVD. Higher quality prospective clinical trials need to be designed for verification.
Therefore, this study will use a functional SYNTAX scoring system based on QFR (QFR-FSS) to conduct a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate the guiding value of QFR-FSS in selecting revascularization strategies for patients with coronary artery MVD and its impact on long-term cardiovascular prognosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional SYNTAX scoring (SS) | Active comparator | Procedure: Traditional SYNTAX scoringUsing traditional SYNTAX scoring to guide the selection of revascularization strategies |
| QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System (QFR-FSS) | Experimental | Procedure: QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score SystemUsing QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System to guide the selection of revascularization strategies |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age ≥ 18 years old;
- Diagnosed as MVD patient by coronary angiography (≥ 50% stenosis in ≥ 2 major vessels);
- Plan to undergo PCI or CABG treatment, and ensure that the contrast images meet the imaging quality requirements for QFR analysis;
- Voluntarily sign the informed consent form, be able to participate in randomization and cooperate in completing all follow-up visits.
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Acute myocardial infarction requires emergency PCI;
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction (LVEF<30%) or cardiogenic shock;
- The quality of coronary angiography images is poor, such as vascular overlap, respiratory artifacts, projection angles less than 25 °, or frame rates less than 15 frames per second;
- Failure of QFR analysis due to severe calcified lesions (determined by the central laboratory);
- eGFR<30 mL/min/1.73m ² or contrast agent allergy;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional SYNTAX scoringUsing traditional SYNTAX scoring to guide the selection of revascularization strategies | Procedure or surgery | Traditional SYNTAX scoring (SS) |
| QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score SystemUsing QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System to guide the selection of revascularization strategies | Procedure or surgery | QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System (QFR-FSS) |
Primary outcome
The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE)
Time frame: 2 years
The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) 2 years after PCI or CABG surgery, defined as the composite endpoint of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and ischemia driven revascularization.
7 secondary outcomes
Composite endpoint of cardiogenic death and myocardial infarction
Time frame: 2 years
Disease success rate
Time frame: 2 years
Clinical success rate
Time frame: 2 years
The incidence of myocardial infarction
Time frame: 2 years
The incidence of all revascularization
Time frame: 2 years
The incidence of confirmed and possible stent thrombosis
Time frame: 2 year
Postoperative quality of life scores
Time frame: 2 year
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jun 2025.
Related trials for Cardiovascular Diseases
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
ENDOTHELION Study Group: Effect of Bosentan in NAION Patients
Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Recruiting
PAW-Hydrogel for Chronic Wound Healing
Diabetic Foot Ulcer (DFU), Pressure Ulcer (PU)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Traditional SYNTAX scoring and QFR-Based Functional SYNTAX Score System in people with Cardiovascular Diseases, run by First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
The incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jun 2025.