ICFNCT07021781
Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Coding: Effectiveness of a Mobile Application for Patient Questionnaires
A study testing MedQuest mobile application and Traditional Paper-Based Questionnaires in people with ICF and Rehabilitation, run by Tulip Medicine at 2 sites in Kazakhstan.
Trial summary
Mobile applications and artificial intelligence are increasingly integrated into medical practice, yet their impact on workflow optimization and diagnostic accuracy remains understudied. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- ICF, Rehabilitation, Artifical Intelligence
- What is being tested?
- MedQuest mobile application and Traditional Paper-Based Questionnaires
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 185 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesKazakhstan
- Study dates
- 25 Nov 2024to 26 Feb 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged 18 and older.
- Owned a smartphone (iOS or Android operating system) with internet access.
- Deemed by the investigator to be able to understand and comply with the study requirements.
- Provided a signed and dated written informed consent form, along with any necessary personal data processing permissions, before any examination procedures.
Who cannot join
- Patients with severe cognitive impairments that would prevent them from understanding and completing the questionnaires independently
- Patients with severe visual impairments that would interfere with their ability to use mobile applications
- Patients who declined to participate after being informed about the study protocol
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Kazakhstan2 sites
"Green Clinic" LLC
Astana, 010000
"National Scientific Oncological Center" LLC
Astana, 010000
About this study
Mobile applications and artificial intelligence are increasingly integrated into medical practice, yet their impact on workflow optimization and diagnostic accuracy remains understudied. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the MedQuest mobile application in optimizing patient questionnaire processes and assesses the accuracy of AI-driven International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) coding in comparison to traditional clinician-based coding.
Read the detailed description
The advancement of digital health technologies has significantly transformed clinical workflows, enabling the integration of mobile applications into routine medical practice. Smartphones and tablets equipped with specialized software have transformed methods of accessing medical information, communication between medical staff and patients, and approaches to healthcare delivery. As a result, there has been an improvement in clinical efficiency and optimization of doctors' working time.
Modern mobile applications in healthcare cover a wide range of functions, including medical reference books and drug databases, health monitoring applications, telemedicine services, and remote patient monitoring applications. Proper use of such applications demonstrates effectiveness in improving the quality of patient care and reducing appointment times. Moreover, the widespread adoption of smartphones among various age groups, including the elderly, contributes to the integration of mobile applications in the rehabilitation process. This opens up opportunities for effective control of treatment and rehabilitation processes in a remote format, which is particularly relevant for rural areas and regions with a shortage of medical personnel.
At the current stage, one of the key challenges faced by doctors is limited patient appointment time, especially in conditions of staff shortages and high load on the medical system. In Kazakhstan, general practitioners are allocated 15 minutes per patient appointment, while narrow specialists have 20 minutes. During this short period, the doctor must conduct patient interviews, perform examinations, and complete all necessary medical documentation. This significantly complicates the possibility of in-depth patient assessment and increases the risk of medical errors, especially when there is insufficient time for comprehensive clinical decisions.
Of particular interest in this context are developments using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. They have the potential to accelerate diagnostics, support decision-making, and improve diagnostic accuracy, particularly in disease classification according to the ICF. However, the efficacy of AI-driven tools in functional health classification remains underexplored, particularly in real-world clinical settings. Research in this area could provide important data on how well artificial intelligence handles ICF diagnoses and how useful its recommendations can be for doctors.
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health is a fundamental tool of modern medicine that has significantly expanded the traditional approach to patient assessment. Its fundamental value lies in its holistic view of human health, overcoming the limitations of the classical medical model, which focuses primarily on diagnoses and pathophysiological disorders. The ICF offers a universal standardised language for specialists worldwide, ensuring effective communication between representatives of different medical disciplines. In contrast to the disease-oriented diagnostic classification of ICD, the ICF focuses on the functional capacity of the individual, which is crucial for planning and evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions. Its relevance also extends to various areas of clinical practice, including geriatrics, where it helps to comprehensively assess the condition of elderly patients; neurology, where it is used in stroke, brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases; orthopaedics and traumatology to assess functional limitations after injury; and psychiatry, paediatrics and social medicine (18-20). The ICF is particularly valuable in the context of health and insurance systems, where it serves as a basis for decisions about coverage and resource allocation.
The choice of MedQuest as a technological platform for our research is dictated by a complex of factors that determine the effectiveness of a modern approach to medical questionnaires. First of all, there was an acute internal need to develop a specialized application, as our rehabilitation practice involves the use and interpretation of a significant volume of scales and questionnaires to assess the functional status of patients. In this regard, automatic assignment of ICF diagnoses with a qualifier significantly reduces diagnosis time and increases the objectivity of patient functional status assessment. Moreover, the mobile questionnaire format not only minimizes errors associated with manual data transfer but also makes the process more accessible to patients. It should be noted that the system effectively collects and processes responses, providing convenient analytical tools, while cloud storage improves information accessibility for medical specialist. Additionally, the transition to electronic questionnaires also reduces environmental impact by decreasing paper and other resource consumption. Undoubtedly, special attention should be paid to data security - mobile applications are equipped with protection features such as encryption and multi-level authentication, ensuring medical information confidentiality in accordance with regulatory requirements of HIPAA (USA), GDPR (EU) and, importantly, order of Kazakhstan "On Approval of Rules for Collection, Processing, Storage, Protection and Provision of Personal Medical Data by Digital Healthcare Subjects". It is worth emphasizing that electronic questionnaire completion allows patients to think through their answers more carefully in a calm environment, without feeling time pressure, which, in turn, contributes to obtaining more accurate data and reducing stress associated with medical facility visits. Parallel to this, the capability for remote monitoring and patient interaction through mobile applications allows doctors to track condition dynamics without frequent personal visits, which is especially useful for patients with chronic conditions and those living in remote or hard-to-reach areas. At the same time, the application of artificial intelligence opens possibilities for identifying non-obvious correlations and formulating personalized recommendations, while ensuring a high level of data protection through encryption and authentication.
Given the relevance of the problem and insufficient study of the issue, this research aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of the MedQuest mobile application compared to traditional paper-based questionnaire methods, with two primary outcomes: the impact on questionnaire completion time during physician appointments and the accuracy of AI-generated ICF coding compared to coding performed by qualified medical specialists. Secondary outcomes include user satisfaction among clinicians and ICF coding consistency.
- Conditions
- ICF, Rehabilitation, Artifical Intelligence, Application
- Being tested
- MedQuest mobile application, Traditional Paper-Based Questionnaires
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, surveys and questionnaires, artificial intelligence, international classification of functioning, disability and health, mobile applications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MedQuest mobile applicationOther
Participants in this group will complete standardized questionnaires and scales using the MedQuest mobile application. Physicians will provide patients with a QR code, allowing them to access assigned digital questionnaires on their personal mobile devices or provided tablets. The application facilitates the digital input of patient responses. Following completion, the MedQuest application automatically processes the questionnaire data and utilizes an integrated artificial intelligence system (Claude 3.5 Sonnet, version from 22.10.2024) to generate recommended International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) codes. The application also provides an integrated calculator for questionnaire scores. This intervention aims to streamline the assessment process, reduce completion time, and enhance the efficiency and accuracy of ICF coding through AI integration.
Traditional Paper-Based QuestionnairesOther
Participants in this group will complete all standardized questionnaires and scales (e.g. SF-36, Barthel Index, etc.) manually on printed paper forms. Physicians will complete the forms and patients will complete their responses with a pen or pencil. Subsequent evaluation and processing of these questionnaires will be performed by physicians via the Medquest application, followed by manual identification and recording of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) codes based on clinical judgment and established guidelines. This method represents the traditional approach to patient assessment and data collection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | Paper-based group Receives: Other: Traditional Paper-Based Questionnaires |
| Experimental | Experimental | MedQuest group Receives: Other: MedQuest mobile application |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time required to complete and process questionnaire
Comparative analysis of the total time spent on completing standardized questionnaires between the control group (paper-based) and the experimental group (mobile app). In the control group, this includes both the time it takes for patients to complete the questionnaire and the time it takes for the medical staff to digitize the data. In the experimental group, only the time it takes to complete the questionnaire is measured, as the digital format eliminates the need for additional data processing.
Measured: Baseline
Accuracy of AI-generated ICF coding compared to clinician coding
Agreement between International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) codes generated by an AI system and codes from trained medical professionals. Agreement was assessed using the quadratic weighted kappa coefficient across 22 ICF domains covering body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors.
Measured: At study completion, approximately 3 months
Secondary outcomes (2)
Clinician Satisfaction with the MedQuest Mobile App
The SUS assesses 10 parameters including system complexity, ease of use, need for technical support, integration of features, consistency, learnability, confidence in use, and required knowledge on a 5-point Likert scale.
Measured: At study completion, approximately 3 months
AI Performance Metrics for ICF Code Classification
Detailed evaluation of artificial intelligence system performance in ICF coding through sensitivity (recall) and specificity analysis for each individual ICF qualifier code (0-4). Performance metrics include per-code sensitivity and specificity values, micro-averaged metrics (weighted by instance frequency), and macro-averaged metrics (unweighted average across all codes). Sensitivity measures the AI's ability to correctly identify true positive cases, while specificity measures its ability to correctly identify true negative cases. Micro-averaging provides overall system performance weighted by code frequency, while macro-averaging gives equal weight to all qualifier levels regardless of prevalence.
Measured: At study completion, approximately 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Jun 2025
- Study start25 Nov 2024
- Primary completion26 Feb 2025
- Study completion26 Feb 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ICFStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Tulip Medicine
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Didar Khassenov, Tulip Medicine
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07021781
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NROC 2
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 29 May 2025
- Last updated
- 15 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Kurban Z, Khassenov D, Burkitbaev Z, Bulekbayeva S, Chinaliyev A, Bakhtiyar S, Saparbayev S, Sultanaliyev T, Zhunissova U, Slivkina N, Titskaya E, Arias L, Aldakuatova D, Yessenbayeva G, Ermakhan Z. Artificial intelligence-enhanced mapping of the international classification of functioning, disability and health via a mobile app: a randomized controlled trial. Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;13:1590401. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590401. eCollection 2025.
PubMed 40837960
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integrating Artificial Intelligence Into International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health Coding: Effectiveness of a Mobile Application for Patient Questionnaires
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07021781
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NROC 2
- Conditions
- ICF, Rehabilitation, Artifical Intelligence, Application
- Keywords
- rehabilitation, surveys and questionnaires, artificial intelligence, international classification of functioning, disability and health, mobile applications
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 185 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Tulip MedicineUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 25 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Feb 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Feb 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Mobile applications and artificial intelligence are increasingly integrated into medical practice, yet their impact on workflow optimization and diagnostic accuracy remains understudied. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the MedQuest mobile application in optimizing patient questionnaire processes and assesses the accuracy of AI-driven International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) coding in comparison to traditional clinician-based coding.
Detailed description
The advancement of digital health technologies has significantly transformed clinical workflows, enabling the integration of mobile applications into routine medical practice. Smartphones and tablets equipped with specialized software have transformed methods of accessing medical information, communication between medical staff and patients, and approaches to healthcare delivery. As a result, there has been an improvement in clinical efficiency and optimization of doctors' working time.
Modern mobile applications in healthcare cover a wide range of functions, including medical reference books and drug databases, health monitoring applications, telemedicine services, and remote patient monitoring applications. Proper use of such applications demonstrates effectiveness in improving the quality of patient care and reducing appointment times. Moreover, the widespread adoption of smartphones among various age groups, including the elderly, contributes to the integration of mobile applications in the rehabilitation process. This opens up opportunities for effective control of treatment and rehabilitation processes in a remote format, which is particularly relevant for rural areas and regions with a shortage of medical personnel.
At the current stage, one of the key challenges faced by doctors is limited patient appointment time, especially in conditions of staff shortages and high load on the medical system. In Kazakhstan, general practitioners are allocated 15 minutes per patient appointment, while narrow specialists have 20 minutes. During this short period, the doctor must conduct patient interviews, perform examinations, and complete all necessary medical documentation. This significantly complicates the possibility of in-depth patient assessment and increases the risk of medical errors, especially when there is insufficient time for comprehensive clinical decisions.
Of particular interest in this context are developments using artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. They have the potential to accelerate diagnostics, support decision-making, and improve diagnostic accuracy, particularly in disease classification according to the ICF. However, the efficacy of AI-driven tools in functional health classification remains underexplored, particularly in real-world clinical settings. Research in this area could provide important data on how well artificial intelligence handles ICF diagnoses and how useful its recommendations can be for doctors.
The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health is a fundamental tool of modern medicine that has significantly expanded the traditional approach to patient assessment. Its fundamental value lies in its holistic view of human health, overcoming the limitations of the classical medical model, which focuses primarily on diagnoses and pathophysiological disorders. The ICF offers a universal standardised language for specialists worldwide, ensuring effective communication between representatives of different medical disciplines. In contrast to the disease-oriented diagnostic classification of ICD, the ICF focuses on the functional capacity of the individual, which is crucial for planning and evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation interventions. Its relevance also extends to various areas of clinical practice, including geriatrics, where it helps to comprehensively assess the condition of elderly patients; neurology, where it is used in stroke, brain injury and neurodegenerative diseases; orthopaedics and traumatology to assess functional limitations after injury; and psychiatry, paediatrics and social medicine (18-20). The ICF is particularly valuable in the context of health and insurance systems, where it serves as a basis for decisions about coverage and resource allocation.
The choice of MedQuest as a technological platform for our research is dictated by a complex of factors that determine the effectiveness of a modern approach to medical questionnaires. First of all, there was an acute internal need to develop a specialized application, as our rehabilitation practice involves the use and interpretation of a significant volume of scales and questionnaires to assess the functional status of patients. In this regard, automatic assignment of ICF diagnoses with a qualifier significantly reduces diagnosis time and increases the objectivity of patient functional status assessment. Moreover, the mobile questionnaire format not only minimizes errors associated with manual data transfer but also makes the process more accessible to patients. It should be noted that the system effectively collects and processes responses, providing convenient analytical tools, while cloud storage improves information accessibility for medical specialist. Additionally, the transition to electronic questionnaires also reduces environmental impact by decreasing paper and other resource consumption. Undoubtedly, special attention should be paid to data security - mobile applications are equipped with protection features such as encryption and multi-level authentication, ensuring medical information confidentiality in accordance with regulatory requirements of HIPAA (USA), GDPR (EU) and, importantly, order of Kazakhstan "On Approval of Rules for Collection, Processing, Storage, Protection and Provision of Personal Medical Data by Digital Healthcare Subjects". It is worth emphasizing that electronic questionnaire completion allows patients to think through their answers more carefully in a calm environment, without feeling time pressure, which, in turn, contributes to obtaining more accurate data and reducing stress associated with medical facility visits. Parallel to this, the capability for remote monitoring and patient interaction through mobile applications allows doctors to track condition dynamics without frequent personal visits, which is especially useful for patients with chronic conditions and those living in remote or hard-to-reach areas. At the same time, the application of artificial intelligence opens possibilities for identifying non-obvious correlations and formulating personalized recommendations, while ensuring a high level of data protection through encryption and authentication.
Given the relevance of the problem and insufficient study of the issue, this research aims to comprehensively evaluate the effectiveness of the MedQuest mobile application compared to traditional paper-based questionnaire methods, with two primary outcomes: the impact on questionnaire completion time during physician appointments and the accuracy of AI-generated ICF coding compared to coding performed by qualified medical specialists. Secondary outcomes include user satisfaction among clinicians and ICF coding consistency.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | Active comparator | Other: Traditional Paper-Based QuestionnairesPaper-based group |
| Experimental | Experimental | Other: MedQuest mobile applicationMedQuest group |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Aged 18 and older.
- Owned a smartphone (iOS or Android operating system) with internet access.
- Deemed by the investigator to be able to understand and comply with the study requirements.
- Provided a signed and dated written informed consent form, along with any necessary personal data processing permissions, before any examination procedures.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with severe cognitive impairments that would prevent them from understanding and completing the questionnaires independently
- Patients with severe visual impairments that would interfere with their ability to use mobile applications
- Patients who declined to participate after being informed about the study protocol
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MedQuest mobile applicationParticipants in this group will complete standardized questionnaires and scales using the MedQuest mobile application. Physicians will provide patients with a QR code, allowing them to access assigned digital questionnaires on their personal mobile devices or provided tablets. The application facilitates the digital input of patient responses. Following completion, the MedQuest application automatically processes the questionnaire data and utilizes an integrated artificial intelligence system (Claude 3.5 Sonnet, version from 22.10.2024) to generate recommended International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) codes. The application also provides an integrated calculator for questionnaire scores. This intervention aims to streamline the assessment process, reduce completion time, and enhance the efficiency and accuracy of ICF coding through AI integration. | Other | Experimental |
| Traditional Paper-Based QuestionnairesParticipants in this group will complete all standardized questionnaires and scales (e.g. SF-36, Barthel Index, etc.) manually on printed paper forms. Physicians will complete the forms and patients will complete their responses with a pen or pencil. Subsequent evaluation and processing of these questionnaires will be performed by physicians via the Medquest application, followed by manual identification and recording of International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) codes based on clinical judgment and established guidelines. This method represents the traditional approach to patient assessment and data collection. | Other | Control |
Primary outcome
Time required to complete and process questionnaire
Time frame: Baseline
Comparative analysis of the total time spent on completing standardized questionnaires between the control group (paper-based) and the experimental group (mobile app). In the control group, this includes both the time it takes for patients to complete the questionnaire and the time it takes for the medical staff to digitize the data. In the experimental group, only the time it takes to complete the questionnaire is measured, as the digital format eliminates the need for additional data processing.
Accuracy of AI-generated ICF coding compared to clinician coding
Time frame: At study completion, approximately 3 months
Agreement between International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) codes generated by an AI system and codes from trained medical professionals. Agreement was assessed using the quadratic weighted kappa coefficient across 22 ICF domains covering body functions, body structures, activities and participation, and environmental factors.
2 secondary outcomes
Clinician Satisfaction with the MedQuest Mobile App
Time frame: At study completion, approximately 3 months
AI Performance Metrics for ICF Code Classification
Time frame: At study completion, approximately 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jun 2025.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 40837960Kurban Z, Khassenov D, Burkitbaev Z, Bulekbayeva S, Chinaliyev A, Bakhtiyar S, Saparbayev S, Sultanaliyev T, Zhunissova U, Slivkina N, Titskaya E, Arias L, Aldakuatova D, Yessenbayeva G, Ermakhan Z. Artificial intelligence-enhanced mapping of the international classification of functioning, disability and health via a mobile app: a randomized controlled trial. Front Public Health. 2025 Aug 5;13:1590401. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1590401. eCollection 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for ICF
Recruiting
Interactive Intensive Gait Training in Walking Limitations
Neurologic Ambulation Disorder
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Respiratory Muscle Strength Training in Children With Asthma
Asthma (Diagnosis)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Multiple Sclerosis Severity and Caregiver Health Outcomes
Multiple Sclerosis, Caregiver Burden
Recruiting
Lung Transplant Candidates: Effects of Aerobic vs. HIIT Training on ICF Assessments
Lung Transplantation
RecruitingObservational study
ICF-Based Biopsychosocial Assessment With AI-Assisted Profile Prediction: Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis Model
Trapeziometacarpal Osteoarthritis, Thumb Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing MedQuest mobile application and Traditional Paper-Based Questionnaires in people with ICF and Rehabilitation, run by Tulip Medicine at 2 sites in Kazakhstan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Kazakhstan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time required to complete and process questionnaire (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07021781, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jun 2025.