AzTrials
AzTrials

PCI PatientsNCT07024446

Comparison of Cardiovascular Risks Between Hip Fracture Surgery With Continued DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ) Within 6 Weeks vs After 6 Weeks Post-PCI(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

An observational study of PCI Patients and DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy), run by Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is commonly used to treat stable ischemic heart disease. Among patients, 7.5% require surgical treatment, and up to 20% may need noncardiac surgery (NCS) within two years. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 79 years
What is being tested?
The time interval between PCI and NCS
How many people
50 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
1 Jul 2025to 1 Jul 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 79 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with stable coronary artery disease undergoing hip fracture surgery after PCI were divided into two groups: 25 cases in the surgery group within 6 weeks after PCI (observation group) and 25 cases in the surgery group after 6 weeks post-PCI (control group).

Who may be able to join

  • Normal hs-cTnI levels prior to NCS BMI 20-28 kg/m² Post-PCI procedure, currently on regular DAPT therapy Complete PCI procedural documentation (date, quantity, stent type) Mentally sound, capable of normal communication

Who cannot join

  • Abnormal hs-cTnI before NCS; Accompanied by dysfunction of other organs History of other major surgeries Risk factors for stent thrombosis (age >79 years, impaired left ventricular function, stent implantation due to acute coronary syndrome, multiple stents, diabetes, renal insufficiency with creatinine >1.5 mg/dl) Abnormal coagulation function Local anesthesia surgery Inability to cooperate

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Cardiovascular Risks Between Hip Fracture Surgery With Continued (Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ) Within 6 Weeks vs After 6 Weeks Post-(Percutaneous Coronary Intervention): A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is commonly used to treat stable ischemic heart disease. Among patients, 7.5% require surgical treatment, and up to 20% may need noncardiac surgery (NCS) within two years.

Compared to patients without coronary stents, those requiring NCS shortly after PCI face an increased risk of perioperative major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), primarily manifested as thrombotic and bleeding events. Guidelines recommend 6-12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) post-PCI to prevent stent thrombosis, which is associated with an elevated risk of perioperative bleeding during NCS. Multiple retrospective studies suggest that the incidence of MACCE decreases as the interval between PCI and NCS lengthens, reaching a risk level similar to non-PCI patients after 12 months. However, other studies indicate that the risk in patients with similar PCI-NCS intervals correlates more with surgical complexity and urgency. Guidelines advise adequate antiplatelet therapy post-PCI to prevent stent thrombosis and recommend avoiding elective surgery within 4-6 weeks after PCI, contingent on bleeding and thrombotic risk assessments.

Read more

Many post-PCI patients facing NCS option to delay surgery after weighing the risks of discontinuing antiplatelet therapy versus postponement, which not only reduces quality of life but also increases the risks associated with delayed surgery. Additionally, retrospective studies have found that in unavoidable emergency or time-sensitive surgeries, the heightened perioperative cardiovascular risk is primarily due to the underlying surgical condition affecting organ function, rather than the PCI-NCS interval or antiplatelet therapy discontinuation.

Recent advancements in minimally invasive surgical techniques have reduced trauma and bleeding, leading to broader indications for surgery in patients on anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy. The widespread use of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) with advanced antiproliferative drugs has further lowered stent thrombosis rates. Moreover, refined PCI techniques minimize vascular injury during stent placement, reducing the likelihood of extra-stent restenosis. From an anesthesiology perspective, concerns for post-PCI surgical patients extend beyond bleeding risks to whether cardiac function can withstand perioperative hemodynamic changes. As surgical and anesthetic techniques evolve, traditional single-method anesthesia is increasingly replaced by combined techniques that ensure adequate analgesia while minimizing hemodynamic disturbances, maintaining oxygen supply-demand balance, and reducing ischemic and bleeding events.

Hip fractures in elderly patients, often termed the "last fracture in life," carry high surgical and anesthetic risks for those with coronary artery disease. While PCI addresses coronary stenosis, the use or discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy exposes patients to bleeding and ischemic risks. The optimal timing for hip fracture surgery is within 48 hours; delays may lead to malunion, prolonged bedrest complications (e.g., pressure sores, pneumonia), and increased deep vein thrombosis risk. Modern hip fracture surgeries (e.g., internal fixation, hip replacement, Proximal femoral nail antirotation internal fixation) are well-established, with reduced bleeding and faster recovery, making it feasible to perform surgery without interrupting antiplatelet therapy.

Existing research primarily consists of retrospective analyses of cardiovascular risk prediction in post-PCI patients undergoing NCS, with no recent prospective studies. Guideline recommendations on PCI-NCS intervals remain unchanged since 2016. Consequently, many PCI patients must delay surgery, enduring unpredictable risks and diminished quality of life.

This study aims to prospectively observe the incidence of MACCE in hip fracture surgery performed within six weeks post-PCI without discontinuing DAPT. The findings may provide evidence for the feasibility of early post-PCI surgery, offer clinicians and patients safer antithrombotic strategies, and present a new option to improve patient quality of life.

Being tested
The time interval between PCI and NCS

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The time interval between PCI and NCSOther

    Using 6 weeks post-PCI as the demarcation point, patients within 6 weeks were assigned to the observation group, while those beyond 6 weeks formed the control group.

Study groups in NCT07024446
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Observation groupWithin 6 weeks after PCI
Receives: Other: The time interval between PCI and NCS
Control groupbeyond 6 weeks after PCI
Receives: Other: The time interval between PCI and NCS

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Perioperative changes in blood High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels

    Detection using chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA)

    Measured: From admission to discharge

  2. Electrocardiogram ST-T changes

    Measured: From admission to discharge

  3. Perioperative surgical site blood loss

    Including intraoperative blood drainage volume, gauze usage, and postoperative wound bleeding drainage volume

    Measured: Perioperative period

  4. Occurrence of Perioperative Adverse Events and Patient Self-Reported Symptoms

    Measured: From admission to discharge

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Changes in blood hs-cTnI levels

    Detection using chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA)

    Measured: Once a month within six months after discharge.

  2. Electrocardiogram ST-T changes

    Measured: Once a month within six months after discharge

  3. Occurrence of Perioperative Adverse Events and Patient Self-Reported Symptoms

    Measured: Half a year after discharge

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jun 2025
  2. Study start1 Jul 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion1 Jan 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
50 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07024446
Sponsor's protocol ID
Continued DAPT after PCI
Status last verified
May 2025
First submitted
29 May 2025
Last updated
17 Jun 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of PCI Patients and DAPT(Dual Antiplatelet Therapy), run by Fujian Medical University Union Hospital.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Perioperative changes in blood High-sensitivity cardiac troponin I (hs-cTnI) levels (time frame: From admission to discharge). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jun 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in