Artificial Intelligence (AI) in DiagnosisDECIDE-AINCT07027189
The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Dentists' Decision-Making Process During Caries Detection
A study testing Artificial intelligence in diagnosis in people with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis and Artificial Intelligence Supported Image Reviewing, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on the decision-making process for intervention after caries lesion detection. Participants will be dentists working in the Netherlands randomly divided into two groups. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis, Artificial Intelligence Supported Image Reviewing
- What is being tested?
- Artificial intelligence in diagnosis
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 25 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNetherlands
- Study dates
- 2 Oct 2025to 2 Jun 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Graduated, practising dentists.
- At least three years of experience
Who cannot join
- Retired dentists.
- Specialized practitioners (e.g., orthodontists and oral surgeons) if their typical practice does not involve routine caries diagnostics and treatment planning.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Netherlands1 site
Department of Dentistry Radboud Uniersity Medical Center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 EX
Dilek Sezen-Hulsmans, Dentist, 00491708975313, dilek.sezen-hulsmans@radboudumc.nl
Dr. Cenci, Max.Cenci@radboudumc.nl
About this study
Official title: DECIDE-AI:The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Dentists' Decision-Making Process During Caries Detection: A Randomized Controlled Study
This study aims to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on the decision-making process for intervention after caries lesion detection. Participants will be dentists working in the Netherlands randomly divided into two groups. Dentists will be divided into two groups and receive a set of bitewing radiographs, which first will be evaluated with or without AI support according to their group. Participants will examine caries lesions on the radiographs and formulate treatment plans accordingly. Then, after a wash-out period of one month, the same radiographs, but in the opposite condition of AI support and again formulate treatment suggestions according to the present caries lesions.
Read the detailed description
This crossover randomized controlled trial evaluates the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) decision support on dentists' treatment planning following caries detection bitewing radiographs. The study targets clinical decision-making processes by assessing how AI influences diagnostic interpretation and subsequent treatment suggestions. Dentists will be randomly assigned into two study arms. Each participant will evaluate a standardized set of digital bitewing radiographs under two conditions: once with AI assistance and once without, separated by a one-month wash-out period to minimize recall bias. The AI tool provides caries detection prompts based on radiographic analysis but does not suggest treatment. The crossover design enables within-subject comparison, controlling for individual diagnostic thresholds. The radiographs remain constant across both phases to isolate the influence of AI support. The study focuses on diagnostic performance and clinical decision outcomes, both with and without AI support. Treatment decisions are categorized into three predefined levels: no treatment, non-invasive treatment (e.g., fluoride application, polishing, sealing), and invasive intervention (i.e., restorative treatment). Diagnostic accuracy is measured against a reference standard and reported in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Caries detection will be classified using a modified International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS). This study design allows to quantify AI's impact on diagnostic performance, as well as on potential shifts in treatment approach. The study aims to contribute to evidence-based guidance on the integration of AI tools into clinical dental practice.
- Conditions
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis, Artificial Intelligence Supported Image Reviewing
- Being tested
- Artificial intelligence in diagnosis
- Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence, Caries Detection, Decision-making, Dental Imaging, Treatment Planning
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Artificial intelligence in diagnosisDiagnostic test
AI-based diagnostic programs have proved to enhance diagnostic performance, however research on its effects on treatment decisions is scarce. In contrast to other studies focusing on AI's accuracy or the resulting increase in dentists' accuracy, this study aims to investigate the differences in dentists' treatment recommendations when supported by AI versus when they are not during caries detection.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Caries detection without AI, Phase 2: Caries detection with AI | Active comparator | In this group participants will examine caries lesions on the radiographs without AI support first. Then, after a wash-out period of one month, all participants will re-examine the same radiographs with AI. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Artificial intelligence in diagnosis |
| Phase 1: Caries detection with AI, Phase 2: Caries detection without AI | Active comparator | In this group participants will examine caries lesions on the radiographs with AI support first. Then, after a wash-out period of one month, all participants will re-examine the same radiographs without AI. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Artificial intelligence in diagnosis |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Treatment decisions: Compare the treatment recommendations of dentists for caries lesions detected with and without AI support.
The given options will be "no treatment", "non-invasive treatment" (fluoride varnish, polishing, sealing), and "restoration".
Participants' answers will be compared to a reference standard.
Measured: Each participant will be assessed over a period of up to 2 months (includes both evaluation phases and washout period)
Secondary outcomes (1)
Diagnostic Accuracy in Caries Detection
RA0: No radiolucency - No visible caries. RA1: Radiolucency confined to the outer half of enamel - Enamel caries. RA2: Radiolucency extending to the inner half of enamel but not reaching dentin - Moderate enamel caries.
RA3: Radiolucency extending into the outer third of dentin - Dentin caries. RA4: Radiolucency extending into the middle of dentin - Advanced dentin caries. RA5: Radiolucency extending into the inner third of dentin - Severe dentin caries.
Participants' answers will be compared to a reference standard.
Measured: Each participant will be assessed over a period of up to 2 months (includes both evaluation phases and washout period)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Jun 2025
- Study start2 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion2 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion2 Jun 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Artificial Intelligence (AI) in DiagnosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Prime Dental Alliance Eindhoven
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07027189
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-18123
- Other IDs
- 2025
- Acronym
- DECIDE-AI
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 28 May 2025
- Last updated
- 18 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Panyarak W, Wantanajittikul K, Suttapak W, Charuakkra A, Prapayasatok S. Feasibility of deep learning for dental caries classification in bitewing radiographs based on the ICCMS radiographic scoring system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023 Feb;135(2):272-281. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
PubMed 36513589Ayan E, Bayraktar Y, Celik C, Ayhan B. Dental student application of artificial intelligence technology in detecting proximal caries lesions. J Dent Educ. 2024 Apr;88(4):490-500. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13437. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
PubMed 38200405Mertens S, Krois J, Cantu AG, Arsiwala LT, Schwendicke F. Artificial intelligence for caries detection: Randomized trial. J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103849. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
PubMed 34656656Laske M, Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Braspenning JCC, van der Sanden WJM, Huysmans MCDNJM, Bruers JJ. Minimally Invasive Intervention for Primary Caries Lesions: Are Dentists Implementing This Concept? Caries Res. 2019;53(2):204-216. doi: 10.1159/000490626. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
PubMed 30107377Ammar N, Kuhnisch J. Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-aided caries detection on bitewing radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
PubMed 38450159Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Maganur PC, Vishwanathaiah S, Patil S, Baeshen HA, Sarode SC, Bhandi S. Developments, application, and performance of artificial intelligence in dentistry - A systematic review. J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):508-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
PubMed 33384840
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- DECIDE-AI:The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Dentists' Decision-Making Process During Caries Detection: A Randomized Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07027189
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DECIDE-AI / 2025-18123
- Conditions
- Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis, Artificial Intelligence Supported Image Reviewing
- Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence, Caries Detection, Decision-making, Dental Imaging, Treatment Planning
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 25 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Radboud University Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Prime Dental Alliance Eindhoven
- Study start
- 2 Oct 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- 2 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 2 Jun 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 18 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the influence of artificial intelligence (AI) on the decision-making process for intervention after caries lesion detection. Participants will be dentists working in the Netherlands randomly divided into two groups. Dentists will be divided into two groups and receive a set of bitewing radiographs, which first will be evaluated with or without AI support according to their group. Participants will examine caries lesions on the radiographs and formulate treatment plans accordingly. Then, after a wash-out period of one month, the same radiographs, but in the opposite condition of AI support and again formulate treatment suggestions according to the present caries lesions.
Detailed description
This crossover randomized controlled trial evaluates the effect of artificial intelligence (AI) decision support on dentists' treatment planning following caries detection bitewing radiographs. The study targets clinical decision-making processes by assessing how AI influences diagnostic interpretation and subsequent treatment suggestions. Dentists will be randomly assigned into two study arms. Each participant will evaluate a standardized set of digital bitewing radiographs under two conditions: once with AI assistance and once without, separated by a one-month wash-out period to minimize recall bias. The AI tool provides caries detection prompts based on radiographic analysis but does not suggest treatment. The crossover design enables within-subject comparison, controlling for individual diagnostic thresholds. The radiographs remain constant across both phases to isolate the influence of AI support. The study focuses on diagnostic performance and clinical decision outcomes, both with and without AI support. Treatment decisions are categorized into three predefined levels: no treatment, non-invasive treatment (e.g., fluoride application, polishing, sealing), and invasive intervention (i.e., restorative treatment). Diagnostic accuracy is measured against a reference standard and reported in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Caries detection will be classified using a modified International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS). This study design allows to quantify AI's impact on diagnostic performance, as well as on potential shifts in treatment approach. The study aims to contribute to evidence-based guidance on the integration of AI tools into clinical dental practice.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Caries detection without AI, Phase 2: Caries detection with AI | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Artificial intelligence in diagnosisIn this group participants will examine caries lesions on the radiographs without AI support first. Then, after a wash-out period of one month, all participants will re-examine the same radiographs with AI. |
| Phase 1: Caries detection with AI, Phase 2: Caries detection without AI | Active comparator | Diagnostic Test: Artificial intelligence in diagnosisIn this group participants will examine caries lesions on the radiographs with AI support first. Then, after a wash-out period of one month, all participants will re-examine the same radiographs without AI. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Graduated, practising dentists.
- At least three years of experience
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Retired dentists.
- Specialized practitioners (e.g., orthodontists and oral surgeons) if their typical practice does not involve routine caries diagnostics and treatment planning.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Artificial intelligence in diagnosisAI-based diagnostic programs have proved to enhance diagnostic performance, however research on its effects on treatment decisions is scarce. In contrast to other studies focusing on AI's accuracy or the resulting increase in dentists' accuracy, this study aims to investigate the differences in dentists' treatment recommendations when supported by AI versus when they are not during caries detection. | Diagnostic test | Phase 1: Caries detection with AI, Phase 2: Caries detection without AI, Phase 1: Caries detection without AI, Phase 2: Caries detection with AI |
Primary outcome
Treatment decisions: Compare the treatment recommendations of dentists for caries lesions detected with and without AI support.
Time frame: Each participant will be assessed over a period of up to 2 months (includes both evaluation phases and washout period)
The given options will be "no treatment", "non-invasive treatment" (fluoride varnish, polishing, sealing), and "restoration". Participants' answers will be compared to a reference standard.
1 secondary outcome
Diagnostic Accuracy in Caries Detection
Time frame: Each participant will be assessed over a period of up to 2 months (includes both evaluation phases and washout period)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jun 2025.
- Background: PubMed 36513589Panyarak W, Wantanajittikul K, Suttapak W, Charuakkra A, Prapayasatok S. Feasibility of deep learning for dental caries classification in bitewing radiographs based on the ICCMS radiographic scoring system. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2023 Feb;135(2):272-281. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2022.06.012. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
- Background: PubMed 38200405Ayan E, Bayraktar Y, Celik C, Ayhan B. Dental student application of artificial intelligence technology in detecting proximal caries lesions. J Dent Educ. 2024 Apr;88(4):490-500. doi: 10.1002/jdd.13437. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
- Background: PubMed 34656656Mertens S, Krois J, Cantu AG, Arsiwala LT, Schwendicke F. Artificial intelligence for caries detection: Randomized trial. J Dent. 2021 Dec;115:103849. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103849. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
- Background: PubMed 30107377Laske M, Opdam NJM, Bronkhorst EM, Braspenning JCC, van der Sanden WJM, Huysmans MCDNJM, Bruers JJ. Minimally Invasive Intervention for Primary Caries Lesions: Are Dentists Implementing This Concept? Caries Res. 2019;53(2):204-216. doi: 10.1159/000490626. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
- Background: PubMed 38450159Ammar N, Kuhnisch J. Diagnostic performance of artificial intelligence-aided caries detection on bitewing radiographs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Jpn Dent Sci Rev. 2024 Dec;60:128-136. doi: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2024.02.001. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
- Background: PubMed 33384840Khanagar SB, Al-Ehaideb A, Maganur PC, Vishwanathaiah S, Patil S, Baeshen HA, Sarode SC, Bhandi S. Developments, application, and performance of artificial intelligence in dentistry - A systematic review. J Dent Sci. 2021 Jan;16(1):508-522. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.019. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
- Dutch professional profile description for dentists.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Comparing an AI-driven Hearing Test With the Standard Hearing Test in Adults With Hearing Loss and Tinnitus
Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Tinnitus
Not yet recruiting
AI-Powered Sleep Hygiene Mentor for Adults Living With HIV
Sleep Wake Disorders, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
RecruitingPhase 3
Using an Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tool for Melanoma Diagnosis
Malignant Melanoma of Skin, Other and Unspecified Malignant Neoplasm of Skin
Active, not recruiting
Pai.ACT: AI-Driven ACT Chatbot for Mental Health Triage and Service Evaluation
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Attention Deficit Disorder With Hyperactivity (ADHD)
Not yet recruiting
MAGICS - Multi-Agent Generative AI in Clinical Simulation for Clinical Deterioration Training
Clinical Reasoning in Nursing Education, Virtual Simulation
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Department of Dentistry Radboud Uniersity Medical Center
Nijmegen, Netherlands
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Artificial intelligence in diagnosis in people with Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis and Artificial Intelligence Supported Image Reviewing, run by Radboud University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Each site lists its own contact: choose the nearest one under Trial locations. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Treatment decisions: Compare the treatment recommendations of dentists for caries lesions detected with and without AI support. (time frame: Each participant will be assessed over a period of up to 2 months (includes both evaluation phases and washout period)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07027189, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2025.