Kidney TransplantationMIPDTacNCT07030660
Model-based Medication Dosing Assist for Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation
A study testing Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
Trial summary
The daily dosing of tacrolimus, the most important immunosuppressant used after kidney transplantation, is a rather complex process in which many factors can have an influence in each individual in a unique way and variable over time. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Kidney Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD)
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 357 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBelgium
- Study dates
- 11 May 2021to 28 Mar 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- 18 years of age and older
- single kidney transplantation
- treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids
Who cannot join
- combined organ transplantation
- ongoing tacrolimus treatment prior to study enrollment
- requirement for tacrolimus target concentration ranges outside the study range (12-15 ng/mL)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Integrated Model-based Medication Dosing Assist App(Lication) in Klinisch Werk Station (KWS). Proof-of-Concept Validation Study: Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation.
The daily dosing of tacrolimus, the most important immunosuppressant used after kidney transplantation, is a rather complex process in which many factors can have an influence in each individual in a unique way and variable over time. Based on retrospective and simulation studies in many hundreds of kidney transplant patients at the UZ Leuven, we developed a computer program that, based on your individual characteristics (e.g. age, hematocrit, ...) and the routinely measured concentration of tacrolimus in blood, suggests an individual dose to the physician for the next administration of tacrolimus. The physician must always approve (i.e., "validate") the dose of tacrolimus suggested by the computer in the electronic medical prescription before effective administration may occur. This is true for all medications. The physician can also, at any time, not approve the computer-proposed dose of tacrolimus and determine a dose him/herself.
A preliminary study on historical data of more than 300 kidney transplant patients from the UZ Leuven showed that the computer program predicted the dosage of tacrolimus better, reaching the optimal blood concentrations faster and in a higher percentage of patients compared to the classical calculation of the dose.
Read more
The purpose of this validation project is to directly compare computer-assisted dosing with the dosing suggested by physicians in order to learn in whom computer-assisted dosing gives a clear additional benefit.
Practical implementation of the study. Fate will determine whether in your case, during the first 14 days (maximum) after transplantation, the dosage of tacrolimus is suggested by the computer program (and validated by the physician; 2/3 chance) or whether the dosage of tacrolimus is determined only by the physician (1/3 chance). The clinical course after kidney transplantation will be identical to all patients according to routine treatment and follow-up. No additional blood draws or other additional tests will be performed; the hospital stay will not be prolonged by this validation study and there are no costs associated with this study.
Possible risks: there are no risks in participating in this study since the dose of tacrolimus administered will always be approved by a doctor (medication can only be prescribed by a medical doctor), regardless of whether the computer program is used or not.
Read the detailed description
Tacrolimus (Prograft™, Advagraf™, Astellas), a calcineurin-inhibitor, is globally used as primary immunosuppressive drug in all types of solid organ transplantation (kidney, liver, lung, heart, pancreas, bowel,….). Tacrolimus is characterized by a strongly variable oral absorption (oral bioavailability) that necessitates continuous therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of tacrolimus dosing during clinical follow-up. Tacrolimus has a critical (narrow) therapeutic index whereby clinicians use pre-dose blood tacrolimus levels (C0) to guide dose adaptations aimed at predefined target concentration ranges that vary with time after grafting and according to clinical conditions. Attaining target concentration ranges is important to avoid rejection and toxicity. Clinicians currently execute tacrolimus dose adaptations based on (previous) experience, varying (pharmacological) knowledge about variables that affect tacrolimus disposition and clinical circumstances.
Based on the exploratory analysis of a test set of 315 kidney transplant patients in the University Hospitals Leuven with extensive tacrolimus PK data available, the accuracy and precision of this clinical approach was shown to be suboptimal. At day 2 post-transplantation clinicians underestimate tacrolimus exposure (i.e. overdose) in 63% of patients, overestimate exposure (i.e. underdose) in 23% of patients and correctly predict the dose in 14% of patients. Over time these numbers considerably improve: at day 4, in 30% of patients tacrolimus exposure is correctly predicted/dosed and at day 10, in 24% of patients correctly predicted/dosed, respectively. These numbers appear low, but the clinicians performance is hampered by variable individual experience with the drug, the rapidly changing post-transplantation circumstances (gastrointestinal motility, steroid tapering, peri- and post-transplantation hemodynamic changes, co-medication, comorbidity, …) and lack of pharmacometric (PM) training, which leads to the use of steady-state approaches to execute dose adaptations (previous tacrolimus concentration and corresponding dose) in patients who are effectively not in steady-state.
These problems are not unique for tacrolimus. In pharmacometrics, algorithms for data-driven identification of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters in a population, a posteriori identification of individual PK/PD parameters and control of concentration and/or effect targets are available. They can be implemented in clinical patient care via software linked to a graphical user interface operable by clinicians lacking formal pharmacometric training. We hypothesize that such a software will help clinicians, in a safe environment, to significantly increase precision and decrease bias while aiming for the optimal individualized dosing of tacrolimus (personalized or precision dosing in solid organ recipients.
The use of organ-specific predictive pharmacometric PK models (PM) for tacrolimus that take into account genetic, demographic (age, body weight), biological (hematocrit) and other parameters (time after transplantation, calculated tacrolimus oral clearance from previous dosing) that influence ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Elimination) of tacrolimus, can support clinicians in determining the optimal dose adaptations in routine clinical practice. With model-based dosing support or dosing assistance, quality of clinical care can be potentially improved:
- Faster achievement of target therapeutic concentrations ranges
- Attenuation of "off-target concentrations" (sub- and supra-therapeutic)
- Reduction of intra-patient variability of C0 (IPV)
- Less tacrolimus pre-dose trough concentration measurements (except in initial phase)
- More accurate dose adjustments in the presence of known (and unknown) inhibitors / inducers of tacrolimus ADME (drug-drug interactions; DDI)
- Potential pharmaco-economic advantage
- Improved drug tolerance / quality of life patients (less adverse effects)
- Optimization of clinical workflow (automation clinical decision tree in KWS)
- Improved patient safety (traceable validated decision process)
- Support, education and (learning) feedback for medical trainees
Based on the high-grade granularity of the tacrolimus clinical PK data repository and the acquired knowledge from in vivo and ex vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic studies about tacrolimus disposition, a predictive PM model for kidney transplantation was developed. Simultaneously, a "mathematical engine" was constructed in R™ (Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman). This generic mathematical engine allows construction and execution of different types of organ-specific (in case of tacrolimus) or drug-specific PM-based models to support the clinical TDM process.
The specific PM PK model for tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation will be validated as a proof-of-concept index test model in a prospective randomized study in the nephrology department of the university hospitals Leuven (PI Prof dr Dirk Kuypers). The primary endpoints of this study will be a selection of operational parameters and dosing accuracy. Study design and size (statistical power) will not allow evaluation of health-related or medical outcome (e.g. acute rejection, graft and patient survival). Because of the strong practical clinical orientation of the application, a bi-directional integrative software communication link was established between the hosptial electronic patient file (EPF) [KWS/EMV (Klinisch Werk Station / Elektronisch Medisch Voorschrift] module and the mathematical engine with the PM PK model.
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Being tested
- Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD)
- Keywords
- MIPD, Model-Informed Precision Dosing, Tacrolimus, Kidney Transplantation, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD)Other
Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Active comparator | Model-Informed Precision Dosing of tacrolimus Receives: Other: Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) |
| Control arm | No intervention | Physician-based dosing of tacrolimus |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Time to reach 3 in-target tacrolimus concentrations in the 8 days following transplant.
Time to reach 3 in-target tacrolimus concentrations in the 8 days following transplant.
Measured: From enrollment to 8 days after transplantation
Probability of Target Attainment (PTA) in the first 8 days (%)
Probability of target tacrolimus range attainment in the first 8 days (%)
Measured: From enrollment to 8 days after transplantation
Secondary outcomes (2)
Average fraction of tacrolimus concentrations in target range per patient
Average fraction of tacrolimus concentrations in target range per patient
Measured: From enrollment to 14 days after transplantation
Overall squared log-distance from target tacrolimus concentration range
Overall squared log-distance from target window
Measured: From enrollment to 14 days after transplantation
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jun 2025
- Study start11 May 2021
- Primary completion28 Mar 2025
- Study completion28 Mar 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (2)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Kidney TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by KU LeuvenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Random allocation to computer-driven Model-Informed Precision Dosing or physician dosing
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 357 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- KU Leuven
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dirk R.J. Kuypers, KU Leuven
- Investigators
- Dirk Kuypers, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, KU Leuven
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07030660
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UZ Leuven S63463
- Acronym
- MIPDTac
- Status last verified
- Jun 2025
- First submitted
- 5 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Jun 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication
Publications
Faelens R, Luyckx N, Kuypers D, Bouillon T, Annaert P. Predicting model-informed precision dosing: A test-case in tacrolimus dose adaptation for kidney transplant recipients. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;11(3):348-361. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12758. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
PubMed 35020971Kuypers DRJ, Annaert P, Jallah B, Naesens M, Teuns M, Laenen A, Faelens R. Electronic Patient File-Embedded Model-Informed Precision Dosing Compared with Physician Dosing of Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2026 Feb;119(2):381-392. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70090. Epub 2025 Oct 11.
PubMed 41074581
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jun 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Integrated Model-based Medication Dosing Assist App(Lication) in Klinisch Werk Station (KWS). Proof-of-Concept Validation Study: Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07030660
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MIPDTac / UZ Leuven S63463
- Conditions
- Kidney Transplantation
- Keywords
- MIPD, Model-Informed Precision Dosing, Tacrolimus, Kidney Transplantation, Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 357 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- KU LeuvenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 11 May 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 28 Mar 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 28 Mar 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The daily dosing of tacrolimus, the most important immunosuppressant used after kidney transplantation, is a rather complex process in which many factors can have an influence in each individual in a unique way and variable over time. Based on retrospective and simulation studies in many hundreds of kidney transplant patients at the UZ Leuven, we developed a computer program that, based on your individual characteristics (e.g. age, hematocrit, ...) and the routinely measured concentration of tacrolimus in blood, suggests an individual dose to the physician for the next administration of tacrolimus. The physician must always approve (i.e., "validate") the dose of tacrolimus suggested by the computer in the electronic medical prescription before effective administration may occur. This is true for all medications. The physician can also, at any time, not approve the computer-proposed dose of tacrolimus and determine a dose him/herself.
A preliminary study on historical data of more than 300 kidney transplant patients from the UZ Leuven showed that the computer program predicted the dosage of tacrolimus better, reaching the optimal blood concentrations faster and in a higher percentage of patients compared to the classical calculation of the dose.
The purpose of this validation project is to directly compare computer-assisted dosing with the dosing suggested by physicians in order to learn in whom computer-assisted dosing gives a clear additional benefit.
Practical implementation of the study. Fate will determine whether in your case, during the first 14 days (maximum) after transplantation, the dosage of tacrolimus is suggested by the computer program (and validated by the physician; 2/3 chance) or whether the dosage of tacrolimus is determined only by the physician (1/3 chance). The clinical course after kidney transplantation will be identical to all patients according to routine treatment and follow-up. No additional blood draws or other additional tests will be performed; the hospital stay will not be prolonged by this validation study and there are no costs associated with this study.
Possible risks: there are no risks in participating in this study since the dose of tacrolimus administered will always be approved by a doctor (medication can only be prescribed by a medical doctor), regardless of whether the computer program is used or not.
Detailed description
Tacrolimus (Prograft™, Advagraf™, Astellas), a calcineurin-inhibitor, is globally used as primary immunosuppressive drug in all types of solid organ transplantation (kidney, liver, lung, heart, pancreas, bowel,….). Tacrolimus is characterized by a strongly variable oral absorption (oral bioavailability) that necessitates continuous therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of tacrolimus dosing during clinical follow-up. Tacrolimus has a critical (narrow) therapeutic index whereby clinicians use pre-dose blood tacrolimus levels (C0) to guide dose adaptations aimed at predefined target concentration ranges that vary with time after grafting and according to clinical conditions. Attaining target concentration ranges is important to avoid rejection and toxicity. Clinicians currently execute tacrolimus dose adaptations based on (previous) experience, varying (pharmacological) knowledge about variables that affect tacrolimus disposition and clinical circumstances.
Based on the exploratory analysis of a test set of 315 kidney transplant patients in the University Hospitals Leuven with extensive tacrolimus PK data available, the accuracy and precision of this clinical approach was shown to be suboptimal. At day 2 post-transplantation clinicians underestimate tacrolimus exposure (i.e. overdose) in 63% of patients, overestimate exposure (i.e. underdose) in 23% of patients and correctly predict the dose in 14% of patients. Over time these numbers considerably improve: at day 4, in 30% of patients tacrolimus exposure is correctly predicted/dosed and at day 10, in 24% of patients correctly predicted/dosed, respectively. These numbers appear low, but the clinicians performance is hampered by variable individual experience with the drug, the rapidly changing post-transplantation circumstances (gastrointestinal motility, steroid tapering, peri- and post-transplantation hemodynamic changes, co-medication, comorbidity, …) and lack of pharmacometric (PM) training, which leads to the use of steady-state approaches to execute dose adaptations (previous tacrolimus concentration and corresponding dose) in patients who are effectively not in steady-state.
These problems are not unique for tacrolimus. In pharmacometrics, algorithms for data-driven identification of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) parameters in a population, a posteriori identification of individual PK/PD parameters and control of concentration and/or effect targets are available. They can be implemented in clinical patient care via software linked to a graphical user interface operable by clinicians lacking formal pharmacometric training. We hypothesize that such a software will help clinicians, in a safe environment, to significantly increase precision and decrease bias while aiming for the optimal individualized dosing of tacrolimus (personalized or precision dosing in solid organ recipients.
The use of organ-specific predictive pharmacometric PK models (PM) for tacrolimus that take into account genetic, demographic (age, body weight), biological (hematocrit) and other parameters (time after transplantation, calculated tacrolimus oral clearance from previous dosing) that influence ADME (Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Elimination) of tacrolimus, can support clinicians in determining the optimal dose adaptations in routine clinical practice. With model-based dosing support or dosing assistance, quality of clinical care can be potentially improved:
- Faster achievement of target therapeutic concentrations ranges
- Attenuation of "off-target concentrations" (sub- and supra-therapeutic)
- Reduction of intra-patient variability of C0 (IPV)
- Less tacrolimus pre-dose trough concentration measurements (except in initial phase)
- More accurate dose adjustments in the presence of known (and unknown) inhibitors / inducers of tacrolimus ADME (drug-drug interactions; DDI)
- Potential pharmaco-economic advantage
- Improved drug tolerance / quality of life patients (less adverse effects)
- Optimization of clinical workflow (automation clinical decision tree in KWS)
- Improved patient safety (traceable validated decision process)
- Support, education and (learning) feedback for medical trainees
Based on the high-grade granularity of the tacrolimus clinical PK data repository and the acquired knowledge from in vivo and ex vivo pharmacokinetic and pharmacogenetic studies about tacrolimus disposition, a predictive PM model for kidney transplantation was developed. Simultaneously, a "mathematical engine" was constructed in R™ (Ross Ihaka and Robert Gentleman). This generic mathematical engine allows construction and execution of different types of organ-specific (in case of tacrolimus) or drug-specific PM-based models to support the clinical TDM process.
The specific PM PK model for tacrolimus in de novo kidney transplantation will be validated as a proof-of-concept index test model in a prospective randomized study in the nephrology department of the university hospitals Leuven (PI Prof dr Dirk Kuypers). The primary endpoints of this study will be a selection of operational parameters and dosing accuracy. Study design and size (statistical power) will not allow evaluation of health-related or medical outcome (e.g. acute rejection, graft and patient survival). Because of the strong practical clinical orientation of the application, a bi-directional integrative software communication link was established between the hosptial electronic patient file (EPF) [KWS/EMV (Klinisch Werk Station / Elektronisch Medisch Voorschrift] module and the mathematical engine with the PM PK model.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Random allocation to computer-driven Model-Informed Precision Dosing or physician dosing
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Intervention arm | Active comparator | Other: Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD)Model-Informed Precision Dosing of tacrolimus |
| Control arm | No intervention | –Physician-based dosing of tacrolimus |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- 18 years of age and older
- single kidney transplantation
- treated with tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil and corticosteroids
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- combined organ transplantation
- ongoing tacrolimus treatment prior to study enrollment
- requirement for tacrolimus target concentration ranges outside the study range (12-15 ng/mL)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD)Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) of tacrolimus in kidney transplantation | Other | Intervention arm |
Primary outcome
Time to reach 3 in-target tacrolimus concentrations in the 8 days following transplant.
Time frame: From enrollment to 8 days after transplantation
Time to reach 3 in-target tacrolimus concentrations in the 8 days following transplant.
Probability of Target Attainment (PTA) in the first 8 days (%)
Time frame: From enrollment to 8 days after transplantation
Probability of target tacrolimus range attainment in the first 8 days (%)
2 secondary outcomes
Average fraction of tacrolimus concentrations in target range per patient
Time frame: From enrollment to 14 days after transplantation
Overall squared log-distance from target tacrolimus concentration range
Time frame: From enrollment to 14 days after transplantation
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jun 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 35020971Faelens R, Luyckx N, Kuypers D, Bouillon T, Annaert P. Predicting model-informed precision dosing: A test-case in tacrolimus dose adaptation for kidney transplant recipients. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2022 Mar;11(3):348-361. doi: 10.1002/psp4.12758. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41074581Kuypers DRJ, Annaert P, Jallah B, Naesens M, Teuns M, Laenen A, Faelens R. Electronic Patient File-Embedded Model-Informed Precision Dosing Compared with Physician Dosing of Tacrolimus in Kidney Transplantation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2026 Feb;119(2):381-392. doi: 10.1002/cpt.70090. Epub 2025 Oct 11.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. All IPD that underlie results in a publication
Related trials for Kidney Transplantation
Enrolling by invitation
Online Exercise Program for Transplant Patients: A Pilot Study
Kidney Transplantation, Physical Function
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Mezagitamab in Adults With Late Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR) After a Kidney Transplant
Antibody-Mediated Rejection (AMR)
Not yet recruiting
Hypothermic Kidney Machine Perfusion With Omnisol
End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD), Kidney Transplant
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Biomarker-Guided Mycophenolate Mofetil Elimination in Low-Risk Older Adult Kidney Transplant Recipients
Kidney Transplant Recipient
Recruiting
Non-Invasive Monitoring of Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients and Immunosuppression Personalization: an Open-labeled Multicenter Randomized Controlled Study
Pediatric Kidney Disease, Transplant;Failure,Kidney
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dirk Kuypers, MD, PhD principal investigator
KU Leuven
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Model-Informed Precision Dosing (MIPD) in people with Kidney Transplantation, run by KU Leuven at 1 site in Belgium.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jun 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Time to reach 3 in-target tacrolimus concentrations in the 8 days following transplant. (time frame: From enrollment to 8 days after transplantation). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07030660, which also lists 2 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jun 2025.