AzTrials
AzTrials

Multiple SclerosisPROCLAIMNCT07032246

Clinical Impact Through AI-assisted MS Care - A Prospective Multi-center Study

A study testing quantitative brain MRI (icobrain mr) in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Radiologically Isolated Syndrome, run by icometrix at 6 sites in 3 countries.

Enrolling by invitation

Enrolling by invitation. The study team selects and invites participants, usually from an existing group of patients.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of the PROCLAIM study is to assess the effectiveness of quantitative brain MRI, as measured by icobrain mr, on the detection of disease activity in multiple sclerosis, including the identification of smouldering disease, and the downstream effects on clinical decision making and patient outcomes in a… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
quantitative brain MRI (icobrain mr)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
750 participants
Where
6 sitesin 3 countries
Study dates
9 Oct 2025to 30 Nov 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to independently understand, evaluate and sign the informed consent form.
  • Able to comply with the study protocol, including having a mobile device capable of running the icompanion app.
  • Have a definite diagnosis of MS, confirmed as per revised McDonald 2017 criteria (treated or untreated) and/or a diagnosis of RIS/CIS (following the revised McDonald criteria presented during ECTRIMS 2024)
  • Patients early in the disease course of RRMS (CIS/RIS, RRMS with disease duration < 7 years), patients with initial diagnosis of relapsing MS and disease duration 12-18 years (prone to convert to SPMS).
  • Clinical and brain MRI data available at least one year prior to the study
  • Age >= 18 years

Who cannot join

  • Unable or unwilling to understand, evaluate and sign the informed consent form.
  • Any contraindications for undergoing an MRI.
  • Currently involved in another interventional study.
  • Currently pregnant or planning a pregnancy in the coming 2 years.
  • Any concomitant disease that may require chronic treatment with systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressants during the study.
  • Retrospective MRI not meeting requirements: at least, 3D T1-weighted images and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images (3D, or 2D with maximal slice thickness of 3mm).
  • Patients with confirmed diagnosis of PPMS.

Trial locations and contacts

6 sites in 3 countries. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

6 sites in 3 countries

Germany3 sites
  • Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, State of Berlin, 131256

  • Katholisches Klinikum Bochum - St. Joseph-Hospital

    Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44791

  • Technische Universität Dresden

    Dresden, Saxony, 01062

Other trials in Germany

Italy2 sites
  • ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo

    Bergamo

  • Casa di Cura Igea

    Milan

Other trials in Italy

Czechia1 site
  • General University Hospital Prague

    Prague, Prague, 2 128 00

Other trials in Czechia

About this study

The goal of the PROCLAIM study is to assess the effectiveness of quantitative brain MRI, as measured by icobrain mr, on the detection of disease activity in multiple sclerosis, including the identification of smouldering disease, and the downstream effects on clinical decision making and patient outcomes in a real-world setting.

The study will compare an intervention arm implementing quantitative brain MRI (using the CE-marked medical device software icobrain mr) as part of Standard of Care, and a control arm implementing Standard of Care without quantitative brain MRI.

Read the detailed description

PROCLAIM (Clinical Impact through AI-assisted MS care: a prospective multi-centre study) is a prospective multi-country multi-site comparative effectiveness study conducted within the scope of the EU-funded research project "Clinical impact through AI-assisted MS Care" (CLAIMS). Quantitative brain MRI will be implemented in this study based on the icobrain mr medical device. icobrain mr is an AI software solution for brain MRI analysis in multiple sclerosis that provides quantitative measurements on disease activity and progression. icobrain mr is CE-marked as a medical device software Class IIa and will be used in PROCLAIM according to its intended use. The study does not involve procedures additional to those performed under the normal conditions of use of the device, nor any other invasive or burdensome procedures.

The study will assess the impact of using quantitative brain MRI, as measured by icobrain mr, on the quality of care. In particular, the study will evaluate the impact on detecting disease activity in MS, as well as on clinical decision-making and clinical outcomes in routine clinical practice for people with MS (pwMS). The study will target both the inflammatory and smouldering components of the disease using assessments already used in daily clinical routine. Exploratory analyses will focus on the relation to other biomarkers used in clinical routine of the participating sites (optic coherence tomography (OCT), evoked potentials (EPs)), as well as patient reported outcomes and passive monitoring measurements (sleep duration, step count and environmental temperature) collected via the icompanion patient app, in conjunction with clinical and radiological parameters.

Being tested
quantitative brain MRI (icobrain mr), Standard of Care (SOC)
Keywords
Multiple Sclerosis, Quantitative Brain MRI, icobrain mr, Neurodegeneration, Disease activity, Disease worsening
Medical subject headings
Multiple Sclerosis, Nerve Degeneration

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • quantitative brain MRI (icobrain mr)Device

    Quantitative brain MRI refers to using a specialised software to compute volumes of brain structures and of MS lesions from brain MRI scans, and to measures differences between a previous brain MRI scan and the current brain MRI scan.

    The quantitative brain MRI solution being investigated in the PROCLAIM study is icobrain mr, a software solution that uses artificial intelligence (AI) to help with tracking of MS disease progression by measuring brain structures and lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

  • Standard of Care (SOC)Other

    Standard of Care practices at each participating site for management of multiple sclerosis.

Study groups in NCT07032246
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Standard of CareActive comparatorStandard of Care practices at each participating site will be employed. Participants in the control arm will receive care according to the usual procedures of the site, without icobrain mr analysis being provided to the participating site during the main study period.
Receives: Other: Standard of Care (SOC)
Standard of Care with quantitative brain MRI (icobrain mr)ExperimentalParticipants in the intervention arm will receive care according to the usual procedures of the participating sites and will have their brain MRI scans analysed using the icobrain mr software. icobrain mr results for each participant will be provided to the participating site prior to the regular clinic visit during the study period.
Receives: Device: quantitative brain MRI (icobrain mr); Other: Standard of Care (SOC)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Impact of using icobrain mr on detecting (inflammatory or smouldering) disease activity

    The difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of patients for whom disease activity or progression is reported by the neurologist at baseline.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Impact of using icobrain mr on the clinical outcome

    The difference between control arm and interventional arm in the number of patients with no disease activity or progression at month 24.

    Measured: month 24

Secondary outcomes (18)
  1. Proportion of patients who switch treatment

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of patients who switch their treatment due to detection of disease activity at baseline.

    Measured: baseline

  2. Objective of each treatment switch

    Descriptive analysis of the type and reason of treatment switches.

    Measured: baseline

  3. Role of disease activity on MRI in the decision to make a treatment switch

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of patients who switch their treatment due to disease activity on MRI.

    Measured: baseline

  4. Role of quantitative brain MRI in the decision to make a treatment switch

    Number of treatment switches in the interventional arm in which quantitative brain MRI played a role in the clinical decision-making process to switch DMT.

    Measured: baseline

  5. Neurologist confidence in the clinical decision-making process (Likert scale: 1 - not confident, 2 - slightly confident, 3 - somewhat confident, 4 - fairly confident, 5 - very confident)

    Difference between control and interventional arm in the average confidence of the neurologist in the clinical decision-making process at baseline.

    Measured: baseline

  6. Neurologist confidence in confirming the diagnosis of MS (Likert scale: 1 - not confident, 2 - slightly confident, 3 - somewhat confident, 4 - fairly confident, 5 - very confident)

    Difference between control and interventional arm in the average confidence of the neurologist in confirming diagnosis of MS at baseline.

    Measured: baseline

  7. Neurologist confidence in confirming the conversion to SPMS (Likert scale: 1 - not confident, 2 - slightly confident, 3 - somewhat confident, 4 - fairly confident, 5 - very confident)

    Difference between control and interventional arm in the average confidence of the neurologist in confirming conversion to SPMS at baseline.

    Measured: baseline

  8. Proportion of patients with detected smouldering or inflammatory disease components

    The difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of patients for whom smouldering or inflammatory disease components are reported by the neurologist at baseline.

    Measured: baseline

  9. Reported MRI findings at baseline

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in the number of reported MRI findings at baseline, among:

    • new FLAIR lesions
    • enlarging FLAIR lesions
    • total FLAIR lesion volume
    • T1 hypointense lesions
    • T1 hyperintense lesions (if T1-post available)
    • whole brain volume loss
    • gray matter volume loss
    • central vein sign lesions (if SWI available)
    • paramagnetic rim lesions (if SWI available)
    • (cervical) spinal cord atrophy (if assessable)

    Measured: baseline

  10. Proportion of patients with relapse associated worsening (RAW)

    The difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of patients for whom RAW disease activity or progression is reported by the neurologist at month 12 to month 24.

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  11. Proportion of patients with smouldering associated worsening (SAW)

    The difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of patients for whom SAW disease activity or progression is reported by the neurologist at month 12 to month 24.

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  12. Proportion of relapse-free participants between month 12 and month 24

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of relapse-free participants between month 12 and month 24.

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  13. Relapse rate between month 12 and month 24

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in the (baseline-adjusted) relapse rate between month 12 and month 24.

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  14. Proportion of participants with EDSS progression between month 12 and 24

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in the proportion of participants with EDSS progression

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  15. Change in clinical score Nine Hole Peg Test (9HPT) between month 12 and 24

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in clinical score 9HPT change between month 12 and 24

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  16. Change in clinical score Timed 25-Foot Walk (T25WT) between month 12 and 24

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in T25WT change between month 12 and 24

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  17. Change in clinical score Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) between month 12 and 24

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in SDMT change between month 12 and 24

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

  18. MRI findings as assessed by icobrain mr in combination with the radiologist at month 24

    Difference between control arm and interventional arm in the MRI findings as assessed by icobrain mr in combination with the radiologist from month 12 and month 24.

    Measured: month 12 - month 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jun 2025
  2. Study start9 Oct 2025
  3. Primary completion31 Aug 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Nov 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
750 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07032246
Sponsor's protocol ID
ICO-S-003
Acronym
PROCLAIM
Status last verified
Dec 2025
First submitted
2 Jun 2025
Last updated
9 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing quantitative brain MRI (icobrain mr) in people with Multiple Sclerosis and Radiologically Isolated Syndrome, run by icometrix at 6 sites in 3 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 6 sites in Germany, Italy, Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Impact of using icobrain mr on detecting (inflammatory or smouldering) disease activity (time frame: baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Dec 2025; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 3 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in