Malaria InfectionPhase 4COSAV-R21NCT07038837
Comparison of Two Strategies for Administering the R21-Matrix M Vaccine in a Context of Seasonal Malaria Transmission in Chad
A Phase 4 study testing "Synchronised" arm (intervention) in people with Malaria Infection and Malaria Vaccines, run by Epicentre at 1 site in Chad.
Trial summary
This is a two-arm, cluster-randomised, phase IV trial conducted in Chad to assess the protective efficacy and impact in real-life conditions of a new strategy for administering the R21/MM malaria vaccine, synchronized within a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, among children living in areas of high… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 6 to 59 monthsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Malaria Infection, Malaria Vaccines
- What is being tested?
- "Synchronised" arm (intervention)
- Type of treatment
- Vaccines
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 70,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChad
- Study dates
- 16 Jun 2025to Jun 2028
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 6 to 59 months
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- • Routine arm
- Aged 6 to 11 months at the time of the first R21/MM vaccination (dose 1).
- Residing in a village participating in the study and randomized to the routine arm.
- Oral consent provided by the child's parent/guardian.
- Synchronised arm
- <!-- -->
Show all 9Show fewer
- Aged 6 to 59 months at the time of the first R21/MM vaccination (dose 1) during the first 3 rounds of SMC (2025).
- Residing in a village participating in the study and randomized to the synchronized arm.
- Oral consent provided by the child's parent/guardian.
Who cannot join
- Exclusion criteria for both arms according to Chad national EPI guidelines
- Malaria vaccine is not recommended for children with known severe hypersensitivity:
- To a previous dose of a malaria vaccine
- To a previous dose of hepatitis B vaccine
- One of the components of the R21/MM vaccine
- Mild illness - including respiratory tract infections, mild diarrhoea and fever below 38.5° C - is not a contraindication to R21/MM vaccination. Malnutrition and being HIV-seropositive are also not contraindications to R21/MM vaccination.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Chad1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Medecin sans Frontières
Moïssala, Mandoul Region
Ouattara San Maurice, +235 85 15 76 18, San-Maurice.OUATTARA@epicentre.msf.org
Jessica Sayyad Hilario
About this study
Official title: Cluster Randomised Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Malaria Incidence When Implementing R21/Matrix-M Synchronized With Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention Distribution Versus R21/Matrix-M Given Routinely Through the EPI in Two Health Districts in Chad (CoSAV-R21)
This is a two-arm, cluster-randomised, phase IV trial conducted in Chad to assess the protective efficacy and impact in real-life conditions of a new strategy for administering the R21/MM malaria vaccine, synchronized within a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, among children living in areas of high seasonal malaria transmission.
In this study, a cluster is defined as the catchment area of a primary care health centre. In Chad, each catchment area is known as a 'zone of responsibility' (French: Zone de Responsibilité' [ZR]).
Read more
Twenty-six (26) of the total 27 ZRs in the districts of Moïssala and Dembo will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 4-dose (3 primary doses + 1 booster) R21/MM schedule either (1) integrated into the routine EPI vaccination program (the "Routine" control arm), or (2) synchronized with an annual seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign (the "Synchronized" intervention arm).
Malaria incidence: R21/MM effectiveness will be assessed using the incidence of biologically confirmed clinical malaria (trial primary endpoint). The incidence of clinical malaria will be determined through enhanced surveillance of malaria cases in health centres and hospitals over a 17-month period (August 2025 - December 2026).
Coverage surveys: Cross-sectional surveys (cluster sampling) will be carried out to measure R21/MM vaccine coverage, SMC coverage, coverage of other malaria prevention measures, and coverage of other EPI vaccines.
Nested case-control study: A sub-sample of children admitted to Moïssala District Hospital with severe clinical malaria will be offered the opportunity to participate in a nested case-control study designed to estimate the individual protective efficacy of R21/MM against severe malaria.
Aditionnaly, the INTEGREVAC ancillary study's objective is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of the synchronised vaccination strategy in the context of the ongoing COSAV-R21 trial, to inform policy decisions for the effective deployment of malaria vaccines in SMC implementation areas.
Methodology and planned work:
(i) A qualitative study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and group discussions with key stakeholders at the national, health facility, and community levels, including caregivers of children eligible for vaccination, in Chad, at several points during the trial. We will explore stakeholders' and beneficiaries' perceptions and experiences of the synchronised SMC vaccination strategy (trial intervention arm) compared to age-based vaccine administration under the routine immunisation programme (trial control arm), as well as considerations for implementing these strategies. Interviews with healthcare providers, including those administering R21 and SMC, and community members will assess the feasibility of implementing the integrated vaccination strategy via SMC.
(ii) An economic evaluation including a cost-effectiveness analysis and a nested equity analysis will be conducted. The economic evaluation will include a cost analysis to carefully identify and measure the additional costs associated with adding malaria vaccination to the EPI delivery platform and, separately, to the SMC delivery channel. Analysis of key cost drivers will enable us to identify potential efficiency savings, provide evidence for country funding requests (e.g., to GAVI and the Global Fund) and for the malaria vaccine strategy budgeting/planning process. Cost-effectiveness and equity analyses of each vaccine delivery strategy will provide evidence to help national programmes plan future malaria vaccine delivery and inform global guidance and on methods of delivering these vaccines, while providing valuable evidence on the real-world cost-effectiveness of malaria vaccination.
(iii) Impact modelling will estimate the costs, impact, and cost-effectiveness of scaling up the intervention approach to the whole of Chad, under different temporal and spatial scenarios.
- Conditions
- Malaria Infection, Malaria Vaccines
- Being tested
- "Synchronised" arm (intervention)
- Keywords
- Vaccine, Malaria, Implementation strategy, Children, Pediatric, synchronized, coverage, prevention, incidence, prevalence, qualitative, mixed methods, cost effectiveness, Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention
- Medical subject headings
- Malaria
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
"Synchronised" arm (intervention)Other
Vaccines received together with CPS
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| "Routine" arm (control) | No intervention | primary series (3 doses) of R21/Matrix M administered throughout the year as part of the routine Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI), followed by a single booster six months after the 3rd dose. |
| "Synchronised" arm (intervention) | Experimental | primary series (3 doses) of R21/MatrixM synchronized with a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, followed by a single booster 12 months after 1st dose was introduced. Receives: Other: "Synchronised" arm (intervention) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Malaria incidence in children who were aged 6-11 months when receiving their first dose R21/MM
To assess whether the R21/MM vaccine synchronized with SMC is non-inferior in preventing malaria (based on malaria incidence) compared to R21/MM administered as part of routine EPI in children who were aged 6-11 months when receiving their first dose R21
Measured: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Malaria incidence
Incidence of clinical malaria (biologically confirmed by RDT) in each study arm among children aged 6-59 months, irrespective of R21/MM vaccination status
Measured: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
R21/MM vaccination coverage
Proportion of children having received the appropriate number of doses for their age
Measured: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Coverage of other malaria prevention measures
SMC coverage: average number of doses received per child and proportion of children receiving 0 and 5 doses
Measured: From enrolment to month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Coverage of other malaria prevention measures
Proportion of children possessing, and proportion of children using, a long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) on the day before completing the coverage survey questionnaire
Measured: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Coverage of other EPI antigens
- Proportion of age-eligible children vaccinated against measles-1 and measles-2.
Measured: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Protective efficacy against severe malaria
Protective efficacy of vaccination with R21/MM will be measured at the individual level against severe malaria confirmed by RDT and microscopy. The protective efficacy will be calculated from the relative risk (RR) of developing severe malaria in vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Measured: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
Proportional morbidity
- Proportion of all-cause morbidity registered at health centres attributed to uncomplicated malaria
Measured: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
R21/MM safety
Frequency of reported serious adverse events (SAEs), adverse events following immunization (AEFI), Serious AEFIs and reported adverse events of special interest (AESIs) following R21/MM vaccination
Measured: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted26 Jun 2025
- Study start16 Jun 2025
- Primary completionDec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Malaria InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Model description
- Synchronization of R21 vaccination with SMC distribution
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 70,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Epicentre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Epicentre, Paris, France and Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara, Uganda, Chad Ministry of Public Health Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI), National Malaria Control Program, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Expertise France, Médecins Sans Frontières, France
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07038837
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- COSAV-R21
- Acronym
- COSAV-R21
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 15 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Cluster Randomised Non-inferiority Trial Comparing Malaria Incidence When Implementing R21/Matrix-M Synchronized With Seasonal Malaria Chemoprevention Distribution Versus R21/Matrix-M Given Routinely Through the EPI in Two Health Districts in Chad (CoSAV-R21)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07038837
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- COSAV-R21 / COSAV-R21
- Conditions
- Malaria Infection, Malaria Vaccines
- Keywords
- Vaccine, Malaria, Implementation strategy, Children, Pediatric, synchronized, coverage, prevention
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 70,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- EpicentreUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Epicentre, Paris, France and Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Mbarara, Uganda, Chad Ministry of Public Health Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI), National Malaria Control Program, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Expertise France, Médecins Sans Frontières, France
- Study start
- 16 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 26 Jun 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This is a two-arm, cluster-randomised, phase IV trial conducted in Chad to assess the protective efficacy and impact in real-life conditions of a new strategy for administering the R21/MM malaria vaccine, synchronized within a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, among children living in areas of high seasonal malaria transmission.
In this study, a cluster is defined as the catchment area of a primary care health centre. In Chad, each catchment area is known as a 'zone of responsibility' (French: Zone de Responsibilité' [ZR]).
Twenty-six (26) of the total 27 ZRs in the districts of Moïssala and Dembo will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 4-dose (3 primary doses + 1 booster) R21/MM schedule either (1) integrated into the routine EPI vaccination program (the "Routine" control arm), or (2) synchronized with an annual seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign (the "Synchronized" intervention arm).
Malaria incidence: R21/MM effectiveness will be assessed using the incidence of biologically confirmed clinical malaria (trial primary endpoint). The incidence of clinical malaria will be determined through enhanced surveillance of malaria cases in health centres and hospitals over a 17-month period (August 2025 - December 2026).
Coverage surveys: Cross-sectional surveys (cluster sampling) will be carried out to measure R21/MM vaccine coverage, SMC coverage, coverage of other malaria prevention measures, and coverage of other EPI vaccines.
Nested case-control study: A sub-sample of children admitted to Moïssala District Hospital with severe clinical malaria will be offered the opportunity to participate in a nested case-control study designed to estimate the individual protective efficacy of R21/MM against severe malaria.
Aditionnaly, the INTEGREVAC ancillary study's objective is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, acceptability and feasibility of the synchronised vaccination strategy in the context of the ongoing COSAV-R21 trial, to inform policy decisions for the effective deployment of malaria vaccines in SMC implementation areas.
Methodology and planned work:
(i) A qualitative study using in-depth interviews (IDIs) and group discussions with key stakeholders at the national, health facility, and community levels, including caregivers of children eligible for vaccination, in Chad, at several points during the trial. We will explore stakeholders' and beneficiaries' perceptions and experiences of the synchronised SMC vaccination strategy (trial intervention arm) compared to age-based vaccine administration under the routine immunisation programme (trial control arm), as well as considerations for implementing these strategies. Interviews with healthcare providers, including those administering R21 and SMC, and community members will assess the feasibility of implementing the integrated vaccination strategy via SMC.
(ii) An economic evaluation including a cost-effectiveness analysis and a nested equity analysis will be conducted. The economic evaluation will include a cost analysis to carefully identify and measure the additional costs associated with adding malaria vaccination to the EPI delivery platform and, separately, to the SMC delivery channel. Analysis of key cost drivers will enable us to identify potential efficiency savings, provide evidence for country funding requests (e.g., to GAVI and the Global Fund) and for the malaria vaccine strategy budgeting/planning process. Cost-effectiveness and equity analyses of each vaccine delivery strategy will provide evidence to help national programmes plan future malaria vaccine delivery and inform global guidance and on methods of delivering these vaccines, while providing valuable evidence on the real-world cost-effectiveness of malaria vaccination.
(iii) Impact modelling will estimate the costs, impact, and cost-effectiveness of scaling up the intervention approach to the whole of Chad, under different temporal and spatial scenarios.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Synchronization of R21 vaccination with SMC distribution
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| "Routine" arm (control) | No intervention | –primary series (3 doses) of R21/Matrix M administered throughout the year as part of the routine Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI), followed by a single booster six months after the 3rd dose. |
| "Synchronised" arm (intervention) | Experimental | Other: "Synchronised" arm (intervention)primary series (3 doses) of R21/MatrixM synchronized with a seasonal malaria chemoprevention (SMC) campaign, followed by a single booster 12 months after 1st dose was introduced. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 6 to 59 months
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- • Routine arm
- <!-- -->
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Exclusion criteria for both arms according to Chad national EPI guidelines
- To a previous dose of a malaria vaccine
- To a previous dose of hepatitis B vaccine
- One of the components of the R21/MM vaccine
- Mild illness - including respiratory tract infections, mild diarrhoea and fever below 38.5° C - is not a contraindication to R21/MM vaccination. Malnutrition and being HIV-seropositive are also not contraindications to R21/MM vaccination.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| "Synchronised" arm (intervention)Vaccines received together with CPS | Other | "Synchronised" arm (intervention) |
Primary outcome
Malaria incidence in children who were aged 6-11 months when receiving their first dose R21/MM
Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
To assess whether the R21/MM vaccine synchronized with SMC is non-inferior in preventing malaria (based on malaria incidence) compared to R21/MM administered as part of routine EPI in children who were aged 6-11 months when receiving their first dose R21
8 secondary outcomes
Malaria incidence
Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
R21/MM vaccination coverage
Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Coverage of other malaria prevention measures
Time frame: From enrolment to month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Coverage of other malaria prevention measures
Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Coverage of other EPI antigens
Time frame: from enrolment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- Dec 2026)
Protective efficacy against severe malaria
Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
Proportional morbidity
Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
R21/MM safety
Time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Apr 2026.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Malaria Infection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Trajectories and Mechanisms of Recovery From Malaria: An Observational Study
Malaria
Not yet recruiting
Positron Emission Tomography and Organ-Specific Changes in Participants Co-Enrolled in NIH Studies of Plasmodium Vivax Controlled Human Malaria Infection
Healthy Volunteer, Malaria
Recruiting
The Effects of Iron Treatment on Vaccine Immunogenicity in Kenyan Infants With Iron Deficiency
Iron Deficiencies
RecruitingObservational study
Host and Parasite Factors That Influence Susceptibility to Malaria Infection and Disease During Pregnancy and Early Childhood in Ouelessebougou and Bamako, Mali
Malaria
RecruitingPhase 1
Safety, Tolerability and Efficacy of PfSPZ-LARC2 Vaccine Against CHMI in Malaria-Naïve Adults
Malaria Falciparum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing "Synchronised" arm (intervention) in people with Malaria Infection and Malaria Vaccines, run by Epicentre at 1 site in Chad.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Chad. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Jessica SAYYAD, Dr (+331 40 21 55 55, jessica.sayyad@epicentre.msf.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Malaria incidence in children who were aged 6-11 months when receiving their first dose R21/MM (time frame: From enrollment to Month 17 (Aug 2025- december 2026)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2026.