AzTrials
AzTrials

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)NCT07045337

Enhancing the Therapeutic Effect of Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With a Hybrid Bracing Protocol

A study testing Hybrid Bracing and Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing in people with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the therapeutic effect of the Hybrid Bracing Protocol (HyBP) over the Conventional Brace in enhancing In-brace Correction (IBC) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 10 to 18 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS)
What is being tested?
Hybrid Bracing and Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
120 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2022to 31 Jul 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 10 to 18 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Females with AIS diagnosed after detailed clinical and radiological evaluation by an experienced orthopaedic surgeon and
  • having a single lumbar or thoracolumbar curve with Cobb angle between 20° - 40° and
  • age 10 years and older when bracing is prescribed and
  • Risser 0 to 2 and
  • either pre-menarchal or less than 1 year post-menarchal and
  • with no prior treatment for scoliosis

Who cannot join

  • presenting with associated musculoskeletal, neurological or other conditions possibly responsible for the curvature
  • with previous surgical or orthotic treatment or
  • physical or mental disability that prevent patients from complying with the bracing protocol

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Prince of Wales Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Enhancing the Therapeutic Effect of Bracing for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis With a Hybrid Bracing Protocol: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial investigating the therapeutic effect of the Hybrid Bracing Protocol (HyBP) over the Conventional Brace in enhancing In-brace Correction (IBC) for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis(AIS).

Read the detailed description

Scoliosis is a complex three-dimensional spinal deformity and AIS is the commonest with a high prevalence of 2-4%. If left untreated, AIS can progress resulting in significant health problems including back degeneration and negative body images.

Bracing, such as Underarm Brace(UAB) used in our center, is indicated for skeletally immature patients with Cobb angle>20°. Another bracing system is a nighttime Lateral Bending Brace(LBB) designed in a bending position opposite to the convexity of the curve thus resulting in its overcorrection. If AIS becomes severe despite bracing, ultra-major surgery is indicated aiming at bony fusion of the deformed segment with instrumentation. It is therefore important to maximize treatment effectiveness with bracing to control curve progression and to avoid the need for surgery. In-brace Correction(IBC) is the percentage reduction in Cobb angle with bracing.

Studies have reported IBC is an important determinant of brace effectiveness. For enhancement of IBC, we put forward the Hybrid Bracing Protocol(HyBP) combining the use of daytime UAB and nighttime LBB. To be best of our knowledge, HyBP has never been reported in the literature. Our pilot study on 8 patients treated with HyBP and 8 Cobb-matched historical controls treated with fulltime UAB showed very promising results with IBC of 42.1±22.0% and 22.1±14.9% in the HyBP and control group respectively. We therefore propose a formal prospective rater-blinded randomized controlled trial on 120 skeletally immature AIS female subjects with single thoracolumbar or lumbar curve newly prescribed with bracing. They are randomly allocated to the HyBP Group or the Conventional Brace Group (CB Group). The primary objective is to determine if the HyBP Group has better treatment effect in terms of In-brace Correction (IBC) when compared with the CB group at 3-month and 18-month after bracing. This is a 3-year study proposal representing the first phase of a project, to be followed by the second phase of the project when all subjects of the entire cohort will be assessed on curve outcome at time of completion of bracing and at 2 years post-bracing. This study will carry significant clinical impacts in that, if proven useful, the HyBP can be used for enhancement of treatment outcomes with bracing, thus preventing the scoliotic spine from deterioration and to avoid the need for surgery.

Being tested
Hybrid Bracing, Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing
Keywords
Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis, Bracing

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hybrid BracingOther

    Hybrid Bracing includes daytime Underarm Brace(UAB) and nighttime Lateral Bending Brace(LBB)

  • Conventional fulltime Underarm BracingOther

    Conventional group includes fulltime Underarm Brace (UAB) only.

Study groups in NCT07045337
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hybrid BracingExperimentalHybrid Bracing Protocol (HyBP) combining the use of daytime Underarm Brace (UAB) and a nighttime Lateral Bending Brace
Receives: Other: Hybrid Bracing
Conventional fulltime underarm bracing (UAB)Active comparatorConventional group uses fulltime underarm bracing (UAB)
Receives: Other: Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. In-brace Correction (IBC)

    Although bracing is considered to be useful, its effectiveness hinges on various factors one of which is the in-brace curve correction, ie In-brace Correction (IBC). IBC is defined as the percentage of Cobb angle change during an X-ray with the brace fitted on the patient.

    Measured: From date of randomization, assessed up to 2 years after bracing stopped at skeletal maturity

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Curve progression

    To determine if the HyBP has better treatment outcomes in terms of control of curve progression when compared with the conventional fulltime UAB

    Measured: From date of randomization, assessed up to 2 years after bracing stopped at skeletal maturity

  2. Quality of life questionnaires

    To determine if the HyBP has better outcomes when compared with the conventional fulltime UAB in terms of quality of life as assessed by SRS-22r, Spinal Appearance Questionnaire and the Brace Questionnaire

    Measured: From date of randomization, assessed up to 2 years after bracing stopped at skeletal maturity

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Jul 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2022
  3. Primary completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 Jul 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
120 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07045337
Sponsor's protocol ID
GRF 14119721
Other IDs
14119721
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
17 Jun 2025
Last updated
23 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Patient privacy

Publications

  • Lau AYC, Kee HM, Yang KG, Kwan ECK, Hung ALH, Lee WYW, Wong MS, Cheng JCY, Lam TP. Full-time bracing versus hybrid bracing in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2026 May 19;27(1):483. doi: 10.1186/s13063-026-09787-0.

    PubMed 42152027

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hybrid Bracing and Conventional fulltime Underarm Bracing in people with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS), run by Chinese University of Hong Kong at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

In-brace Correction (IBC) (time frame: From date of randomization, assessed up to 2 years after bracing stopped at skeletal maturity). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07045337, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in