HypertensionE-CHARMNCT07045363
Embedded Community-based Heart-Age Risk Education Trial in Cinese Primary Healthcare
A study testing Cognitive Intervention in people with Hypertension, run by Duke Kunshan University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a brief Heart Age-based risk education intervention embedded in routine primary care for older adults with hypertension in China. The intervention uses routine health check data to generate a personalized one-page Heart Age report, delivered by physicians during regular… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Hypertension
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Intervention
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 358 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 19 Aug 2025to 1 Sep 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged ≥60 years
- Diagnosed with hypertension
- Completed their government-funded annual health check within the past 3 months
- Scheduled for a routine follow-up consultation within the enrollment window -Able to provide informed consent-
Who cannot join
- Diagnosed dementia or severe cognitive impairment
- Terminal illness
- Participation in another clinical intervention trial
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Effectiveness of an Embedded Community-based Heart-Age Risk Education Model (E-CHARM) in Improving Cardiovascular Risk Awareness and Health Behaviors Among Older Adults With Hypertension: a Randomized Controlled Trial
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a brief Heart Age-based risk education intervention embedded in routine primary care for older adults with hypertension in China. The intervention uses routine health check data to generate a personalized one-page Heart Age report, delivered by physicians during regular follow-up visits. The trial tests whether this approach improves risk awareness and self-management behavior without disrupting clinical workflow.
Read the detailed description
This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at a community health center in Kunshan, Jiangsu, China. A total of 358 adults aged 60 years or older with hypertension were randomized 1:1 to receive either usual care or a personalized Heart Age report with a brief scripted physician explanation delivered during the routine consultation in which participants received and discussed their annual health-check results. The primary outcome is cardiovascular risk awareness at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include self-reported physical activity and dietary behaviors. Implementation outcomes, including feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and consultation burden, are assessed primarily in the intervention group. Clinical indicators, including blood pressure, glucose, lipids, and body mass index, are obtained from routine health records at approximately 12 months as exploratory outcomes.
An exploratory four-item medication-taking questionnaire based on the Morisky-Green-Levine measure (Morisky et al., 1986) was administered at baseline. Responses were coded Yes = 1 and No = 0, with higher scores indicating more non-adherent responses. The measure was previously misidentified in the registry as the MMAS-4. The planned follow-up assessment of medication adherence was subsequently discontinued, and medication adherence was not included in the effectiveness analysis.
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Being tested
- Cognitive Intervention
- Keywords
- Heart Age, Health education
- Medical subject headings
- Hypertension, Health Education
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive InterventionBehavioural
Participants in the intervention arm will receive a personalized one-page Heart Age report based on data from their government-funded annual health check. The report is delivered by trained physicians using a standardized communication script during a routine follow-up visit. The control group receives usual chronic disease care without structured risk communication.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care (Control Group) | No intervention | Participants in this arm will receive standard hypertension management as per Chinese national guidelines, including regular follow-up with primary care physicians. They will not receive a Heart Age report or structured cardiovascular risk communication. |
| Heart Age Communication (Intervention Group) | Experimental | Participants in this arm will receive a personalized Heart Age report based on their annual health check data (blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, BMI, smoking). The report will be explained by the physician during the routine follow-up visit using a standardized script. The session lasts 3-5 minutes and is integrated into existing workflow. Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk awareness
CVD risk awareness is assessed using the eight knowledge/risk-factor items from the validated Chinese version of the Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease Risk Questionnaire (ABCD-C). Each item uses a True/False/Don't Know response format and is scored 1 for a correct response and 0 for an incorrect or "Don't Know" response. Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater CVD risk awareness.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in physical activity level
Change in self-reported physical activity level, measured using an 11-level categorical scale developed for this study and adapted from the WHO Stepwise approach. Responses range from 1 (completely inactive) to 11 (vigorous activity >25 miles/week or >8 hours/week). Higher scores indicate greater physical activity level.
Measured: 3 months
Change in dietary behavior: fruit intake
Change in self-reported fruit consumption frequency, measured by the question: "On how many days per week do you usually eat fruit?" (0-7 days). Higher values indicate higher frequency of fruit intake.
Measured: 3 months
Change in dietary behavior: table salt use
Change in self-reported table salt use, measured by a single item adapted from the WHO STEPS questionnaire: "Do you usually add salt or salty condiments (e.g., soy sauce) at the table?" Responses on a 5-point scale: 1 = Always, 5 = Never. Higher scores indicate lower frequency of adding table salt.
Measured: 3 months
Implementation outcomes 1: Feasibility (intervention group only)
Measured using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), 4 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility.
Measured: 3 months
Implementation outcomes 2: Acceptability (intervention group only)
Measured using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), 4 items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = Strongly disagree, 5 = Strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater acceptability.
Measured: 3 months
Implementation outcomes 3: Fidelity (intervention group only)
Assessed using patient-reported and provider-reported delivery checks with categorical response options (e.g., explained fully, partially, not explained).
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2025
- Study start19 Aug 2025
- Primary completion1 Dec 2025
- Study completion1 Sep 2026
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HypertensionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 358 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke Kunshan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Guanzhou Wang, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07045363
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025HC064
- Acronym
- E-CHARM
- Status last verified
- Aug 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 10 Sep 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: IPD will not be made publicly available due to data protection regulations and privacy concerns under local Chinese health authority guidelines. However, de-identified aggregated data may be shared upon reasonable request for academic research purposes. Requests should be submitted to the corresponding author and will be reviewed by the study steering committee.
Publications
Wang G, Huang Y, Li B, Zuo Y, Song W, Li Y, Sun Y, Xue N, Wang Z, Wang T, Hu Z. Effectiveness and implementation of an embedded community-based heart-age risk education model (E-CHARM) in improving cardiovascular risk awareness and health behaviors among older adults with hypertension: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Apr;163:108258. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108258. Epub 2026 Feb 17.
PubMed 41713746
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Sep 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effectiveness of an Embedded Community-based Heart-Age Risk Education Model (E-CHARM) in Improving Cardiovascular Risk Awareness and Health Behaviors Among Older Adults With Hypertension: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07045363
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E-CHARM / 2025HC064
- Conditions
- Hypertension
- Keywords
- Heart Age, Health education
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 358 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke Kunshan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 19 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Sep 2026 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a brief Heart Age-based risk education intervention embedded in routine primary care for older adults with hypertension in China. The intervention uses routine health check data to generate a personalized one-page Heart Age report, delivered by physicians during regular follow-up visits. The trial tests whether this approach improves risk awareness and self-management behavior without disrupting clinical workflow.
Detailed description
This is a randomized controlled trial conducted at a community health center in Kunshan, Jiangsu, China. A total of 358 adults aged 60 years or older with hypertension were randomized 1:1 to receive either usual care or a personalized Heart Age report with a brief scripted physician explanation delivered during the routine consultation in which participants received and discussed their annual health-check results. The primary outcome is cardiovascular risk awareness at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include self-reported physical activity and dietary behaviors. Implementation outcomes, including feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and consultation burden, are assessed primarily in the intervention group. Clinical indicators, including blood pressure, glucose, lipids, and body mass index, are obtained from routine health records at approximately 12 months as exploratory outcomes.
An exploratory four-item medication-taking questionnaire based on the Morisky-Green-Levine measure (Morisky et al., 1986) was administered at baseline. Responses were coded Yes = 1 and No = 0, with higher scores indicating more non-adherent responses. The measure was previously misidentified in the registry as the MMAS-4. The planned follow-up assessment of medication adherence was subsequently discontinued, and medication adherence was not included in the effectiveness analysis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care (Control Group) | No intervention | –Participants in this arm will receive standard hypertension management as per Chinese national guidelines, including regular follow-up with primary care physicians. They will not receive a Heart Age report or structured cardiovascular risk communication. |
| Heart Age Communication (Intervention Group) | Experimental | Behavioral: Cognitive InterventionParticipants in this arm will receive a personalized Heart Age report based on their annual health check data (blood pressure, cholesterol, glucose, BMI, smoking). The report will be explained by the physician during the routine follow-up visit using a standardized script. The session lasts 3-5 minutes and is integrated into existing workflow. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Adults aged ≥60 years
- Diagnosed with hypertension
- Completed their government-funded annual health check within the past 3 months
- Scheduled for a routine follow-up consultation within the enrollment window -Able to provide informed consent-
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Diagnosed dementia or severe cognitive impairment
- Terminal illness
- Participation in another clinical intervention trial
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive InterventionParticipants in the intervention arm will receive a personalized one-page Heart Age report based on data from their government-funded annual health check. The report is delivered by trained physicians using a standardized communication script during a routine follow-up visit. The control group receives usual chronic disease care without structured risk communication. | Behavioural | Heart Age Communication (Intervention Group) |
Primary outcome
Change in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk awareness
Time frame: 3 months
CVD risk awareness is assessed using the eight knowledge/risk-factor items from the validated Chinese version of the Attitudes and Beliefs about Cardiovascular Disease Risk Questionnaire (ABCD-C). Each item uses a True/False/Don't Know response format and is scored 1 for a correct response and 0 for an incorrect or "Don't Know" response. Item scores are summed to produce a total score ranging from 0 to 8, with higher scores indicating greater CVD risk awareness.
6 secondary outcomes
Change in physical activity level
Time frame: 3 months
Change in dietary behavior: fruit intake
Time frame: 3 months
Change in dietary behavior: table salt use
Time frame: 3 months
Implementation outcomes 1: Feasibility (intervention group only)
Time frame: 3 months
Implementation outcomes 2: Acceptability (intervention group only)
Time frame: 3 months
Implementation outcomes 3: Fidelity (intervention group only)
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Sep 2026.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41713746Wang G, Huang Y, Li B, Zuo Y, Song W, Li Y, Sun Y, Xue N, Wang Z, Wang T, Hu Z. Effectiveness and implementation of an embedded community-based heart-age risk education model (E-CHARM) in improving cardiovascular risk awareness and health behaviors among older adults with hypertension: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2026 Apr;163:108258. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2026.108258. Epub 2026 Feb 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. IPD will not be made publicly available due to data protection regulations and privacy concerns under local Chinese health authority guidelines. However, de-identified aggregated data may be shared upon reasonable request for academic research purposes. Requests should be submitted to the corresponding author and will be reviewed by the study steering committee.
Related trials for Hypertension
Active, not recruiting
Digital Reinforcement of Motivational Interviewing Micro-Skills Among Primary Care Healthcare Professionals
Hypertension (Without Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus)
Recruiting
Investigating Vascular Properties of HEMI and SPG Signals in Individuals With or at Risk for Chronic Kidney Disease
Chronic Kidney Disease, Hypertension (HTN)
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
Not yet recruitingPhase 2/3
An Open-Label Extension Study to Evaluate Inhaled Treprostinil SMI in Participants With Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (PH-COPD)
Pulmonary Hypertension Associated With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Enrolling by invitation
Testing Implementation Strategies to Support Clinic Fidelity to an Outpatient Hypertension Bundle
Pregnancy Related, Hypertension
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guanzhou Wang principal investigator
Duke University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Cognitive Intervention in people with Hypertension, run by Duke Kunshan University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Sep 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk awareness (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07045363, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Sep 2026.