StrokeEVA3S-2NCT07054060
Endarterectomy Versus Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis - 2
A study testing carotid endarterectomy and Carotid artery stenting in people with Stroke, run by Centre Hospitalier St Anne at 1 site in France.
Trial summary
Carotid stenosis caused by atherosclerosis is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke, accounting for up to 15% of all strokes and transient ischemic attacks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in reducing stroke risk in patients with severe… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stroke
- What is being tested?
- carotid endarterectomy and Carotid artery stenting
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 600 participants
- Where
- 1 siteFrance
- Study dates
- 16 Jul 2025to 16 Mar 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient age 18 years or over
- Hemispheric or retinal transient ischemic attack or a non-disabling stroke (or retinal infarct) within 15 days before enrolment
- Stenosis of 50% to 99% in the symptomatic carotid artery (NASCET method) for whom revascularisation is decided according to guidelines
Who cannot join
- Patients unwilling or unable to participate in follow-up for whatever reason
- Preexisting disability (Modified Rankin Score ≥ 3)
- Nonatherosclerotic carotid disease
- Severe tandem lesions
- Previous revascularization of the symptomatic carotid stenosis
- History of bleeding disorder
Show all 12Show fewer
- Unstable angina
- Contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy
- Contraindication to MRI
- Life expectancy of less than 2 years
- Percutaneaous or surgical intervention within 30 days before or after the study procedure
- Stenotic lesion on arterial workup appeared as not a factor in the selection
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
DRCI DRCI contact
France1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne
Paris, 75014
David Calvet, d.calvet@ghu-paris.fr
About this study
Carotid stenosis caused by atherosclerosis is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke, accounting for up to 15% of all strokes and transient ischemic attacks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in reducing stroke risk in patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been developed as an alternative to CEA, offering several potential advantages, such as avoiding local surgical complications. However, unlike CEA, CAS has not been compared to medical therapy in RCTs for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Read the detailed description
CEA vs CAS Comparison:
Early RCTs conducted in the 2000s showed that CAS was associated with a higher risk of procedural stroke or death compared to CEA (8.9% vs 5.8%; RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.20-1.96, p=0.0006). However, CAS was found to be as effective as CEA in preventing recurrent ipsilateral strokes up to 10 years after treatment. Interestingly, an ancillary study of the ICSS trial showed that significantly more patients in the CAS group (50%) than in the CEA group (17%) had new ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), suggesting that DWI might serve as a surrogate outcome measure for future carotid intervention trials.
Data Analysis and Recent Advances:
Individual pooled data analysis of RCTs indicated that CAS could be as safe and effective as CEA in patients under 70 years old. Recent advances in CAS technology, stenting techniques, antiplatelet therapy, and pre-treatment imaging have improved the periprocedural safety of CAS. Due to its ability to treat patients soon after a stroke, CAS has become increasingly used in routine clinical practice.
Study Objectives:
The question remains whether CAS is as safe as CEA in patients with recent symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. The study's objectives are:
Primary Objective:
To assess whether carotid stenting is non-inferior to carotid endarterectomy in preventing new ischemic lesions on DWI MRI, confirmed by a core lab.
- To assess the difference between groups regarding post-intervention MRI characteristics in terms of ischemic lesion number and size, vessel occlusion and hemorrhagic transformation
- To assess differences between groups with regard to the procedural risks and efficacy (within 30 days after procedure) of
- any stroke or death
- any stroke,
- disabling or fatal stroke
- death
- transient ischemic attack
- myocardial infarction
- local complication
- cranial nerve palsy
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Being tested
- carotid endarterectomy, Carotid artery stenting
- Keywords
- CEA, CAS, stroke, Magnetic resonance imaging, Carotid Artery Stenting, Carotid Endarterectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Apraxias
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
carotid endarterectomyProcedure or surgery
Carotid endarterectomy is a surgical procedure used to reduce the risk of stroke due to carotid artery stenosis. During an endarterectomy, the surgeon opens the artery and removes the plaque.
Carotid artery stentingProcedure or surgery
Carotid artery stenting is an endovascular procedure in which a stent is deployed in the lumen of the carotid artery to treat narrowing of the carotid artery and reduce the risk of stroke.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| surgical arm | Active comparator | carotid endarterectomy Receives: Procedure: carotid endarterectomy |
| Stenting arm | Active comparator | Carotid artery stenting Receives: Procedure: Carotid artery stenting |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
DWI Lesion Detection Rate
Imaging endpoint : Proportion of patients having at least one new lesion on post-treatment Diffusion-Weigthed Imaging (DWI) MRI compared to pre-treatment DWI MRI and confirmed by a core lab.
The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.
Measured: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Secondary outcomes (15)
Profile of lesions
Imaging endpoint : Number and size of new lesions on post-treatment MRI. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.
Measured: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Vessel Occlusion Profile
Imaging endpoint : Proportion of patients having a new intracranial vessel occlusion on post-treatment MRI.
The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.
Measured: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Hemorrhage
Imaging endpoint : Hemorrhagic transformation on post-treatment MRI. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.
Measured: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Stroke/Mortality
Clinical endpoint : proportion of patients having any stroke or death during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Stroke Incidence Rate
Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having any stroke during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Severe Stroke Incidence
Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having any disabling or fatal stroke during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Mortality
Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients who died during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
TIA Incidence
Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having a Transient ischemic attack during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
MI Occurrence
Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having myocardial infarction during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Local complication
Clinical endpoint : cervical or groin or radial hematoma, infection, arteriovenous fistula at puncture site, lower-limb arterial occlusion during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Cranial Nerve Injury Events
Clinical endpoint : Proportion of patients having cranial nerve injury during periprocedural period.
Measured: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Hospitalization Duration
Healthcare endpoint : number of days the patient stayed in the hospital stay
Measured: From the date of the carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) procedure until the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Procedure Delay
Operational endpoint: number of days between the date at which the patient is randomized and the date at which the carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy) is proceeded
Measured: From the date of patient randomization until the date of carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) procedure, assessed up to 15 days
Ischemic Events
Clinical endpoint: Incidence of ischemic events among patients with confirmed new lesions on post-procedure DWI MRI (as verified by core lab assessment). The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.
Measured: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure.
Hemorrhage
Imaging endpoint : Hemorrhagic transformation on post-treatment MRI. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.
Measured: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2025
- Study start16 Jul 2025
- Primary completion16 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion16 Mar 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for StrokeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Centre Hospitalier St AnneThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier St Anne
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- David Calvet, Professor, Study director, GHU Sainte-Anne, PARISBenjamin GORY, Professor, Study director, Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceAntoine MILLON, Professor, Study director, Hospices Civils de Lyon
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07054060
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- D24-P001
- Other IDs
- PHRC-22-0121, 2024-A01377-40
- Acronym
- EVA3S-2
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 13 May 2025
- Last updated
- 24 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Endarterectomy Versus Stenting in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis - 2
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07054060
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EVA3S-2 / D24-P001
- Conditions
- Stroke
- Keywords
- CEA, CAS, stroke, Magnetic resonance imaging, Carotid Artery Stenting, Carotid Endarterectomy
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 600 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier St AnneUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Direction Générale de l'Offre de Soins
- Study start
- 16 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 16 Mar 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Carotid stenosis caused by atherosclerosis is a significant risk factor for ischemic stroke, accounting for up to 15% of all strokes and transient ischemic attacks. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have demonstrated the benefits of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in reducing stroke risk in patients with severe symptomatic carotid stenosis. Carotid artery stenting (CAS) has been developed as an alternative to CEA, offering several potential advantages, such as avoiding local surgical complications. However, unlike CEA, CAS has not been compared to medical therapy in RCTs for symptomatic carotid stenosis.
Detailed description
CEA vs CAS Comparison:
Early RCTs conducted in the 2000s showed that CAS was associated with a higher risk of procedural stroke or death compared to CEA (8.9% vs 5.8%; RR 1.53, 95% CI 1.20-1.96, p=0.0006). However, CAS was found to be as effective as CEA in preventing recurrent ipsilateral strokes up to 10 years after treatment. Interestingly, an ancillary study of the ICSS trial showed that significantly more patients in the CAS group (50%) than in the CEA group (17%) had new ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI), suggesting that DWI might serve as a surrogate outcome measure for future carotid intervention trials.
Data Analysis and Recent Advances:
Individual pooled data analysis of RCTs indicated that CAS could be as safe and effective as CEA in patients under 70 years old. Recent advances in CAS technology, stenting techniques, antiplatelet therapy, and pre-treatment imaging have improved the periprocedural safety of CAS. Due to its ability to treat patients soon after a stroke, CAS has become increasingly used in routine clinical practice.
Study Objectives:
The question remains whether CAS is as safe as CEA in patients with recent symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. The study's objectives are:
Primary Objective:
To assess whether carotid stenting is non-inferior to carotid endarterectomy in preventing new ischemic lesions on DWI MRI, confirmed by a core lab.
- To assess the difference between groups regarding post-intervention MRI characteristics in terms of ischemic lesion number and size, vessel occlusion and hemorrhagic transformation
- To assess differences between groups with regard to the procedural risks and efficacy (within 30 days after procedure) of
- any stroke or death
- any stroke,
- disabling or fatal stroke
- death
- transient ischemic attack
- myocardial infarction
- local complication
- cranial nerve palsy
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| surgical arm | Active comparator | Procedure: carotid endarterectomycarotid endarterectomy |
| Stenting arm | Active comparator | Procedure: Carotid artery stentingCarotid artery stenting |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patient age 18 years or over
- Hemispheric or retinal transient ischemic attack or a non-disabling stroke (or retinal infarct) within 15 days before enrolment
- Stenosis of 50% to 99% in the symptomatic carotid artery (NASCET method) for whom revascularisation is decided according to guidelines
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Patients unwilling or unable to participate in follow-up for whatever reason
- Preexisting disability (Modified Rankin Score ≥ 3)
- Nonatherosclerotic carotid disease
- Severe tandem lesions
- Previous revascularization of the symptomatic carotid stenosis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| carotid endarterectomyCarotid endarterectomy is a surgical procedure used to reduce the risk of stroke due to carotid artery stenosis. During an endarterectomy, the surgeon opens the artery and removes the plaque. | Procedure or surgery | surgical arm |
| Carotid artery stentingCarotid artery stenting is an endovascular procedure in which a stent is deployed in the lumen of the carotid artery to treat narrowing of the carotid artery and reduce the risk of stroke. | Procedure or surgery | Stenting arm |
Primary outcome
DWI Lesion Detection Rate
Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Imaging endpoint : Proportion of patients having at least one new lesion on post-treatment Diffusion-Weigthed Imaging (DWI) MRI compared to pre-treatment DWI MRI and confirmed by a core lab. The pre-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 3 days before procedure. The post-treatment DWI MRI will be performed within 7 days after procedure.
15 secondary outcomes
Profile of lesions
Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Vessel Occlusion Profile
Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Hemorrhage
Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure
Stroke/Mortality
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Stroke Incidence Rate
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Severe Stroke Incidence
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Mortality
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
TIA Incidence
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
MI Occurrence
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Local complication
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Cranial Nerve Injury Events
Time frame: From randomization to 30 days after procedure
Hospitalization Duration
Time frame: From the date of the carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) procedure until the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days
Procedure Delay
Time frame: From the date of patient randomization until the date of carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy (CEA) procedure, assessed up to 15 days
Ischemic Events
Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure.
Hemorrhage
Time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared.
Related trials for Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Temporal Interference Stimulation for Upper-Limb Motor Recovery in Early Subacute Stroke
Acute Ischemic Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
ELATE Study: Evaluating Large-vessel Acute Thrombectomy in Extended Time Window
Acute Ichemic Stroke
Recruiting
Web-Based Tele-Rehabilitation Using Action Observation and Mirror Therapy for Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Stroke, Upper Extremity Paresis
Recruiting
Early Motor-Cognitive Integrative Training on Cognitive and Motor Performance in Patients With Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
Subarachnoid Aneurysm Hemorrhage
Not yet recruiting
Selective Intra-Arterial Hypothermia After Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion
Acute Ischemic Stroke, Basilar Artery Occlusion
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
DRCI DRCI contact
David Calvet, Professor study director
GHU Sainte-Anne, PARIS
Benjamin GORY, Professor study director
Central Hospital, Nancy, France
Antoine MILLON, Professor study director
Hospices Civils de Lyon
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing carotid endarterectomy and Carotid artery stenting in people with Stroke, run by Centre Hospitalier St Anne at 1 site in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact David Calvet, Professor (+33145658634, d.calvet@ghu-paris.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
DWI Lesion Detection Rate (time frame: From 3 days before procedure to 7 days after procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Jul 2025.