AzTrials
AzTrials

Primary Dysmenorrhea (PD)METPD-25NCT07058480

Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Chain Training for Menstrual Pain in Primary Dysmenorrhea (METPD-25)

A study testing Combined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic Stabilization Training, Interferential current therapy (ICT) and Deep Friction Massage (DFM) in people with Primary Dysmenorrhea (PD), run by Shanjiao Luo at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This prospective clinical trial evaluates the effects of a non-pharmacological intervention combining muscle energy technique (MET) and myofascial chain (MFC)-based pelvic stabilization training in women with primary dysmenorrhea (PD). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 45 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Primary Dysmenorrhea (PD)
What is being tested?
Combined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic Stabilization Training, Interferential current therapy (ICT) and Deep Friction Massage (DFM)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
15 Dec 2024to 31 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 45 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Females aged 18-45 years
  • Regular menstrual cycles
  • Clinically diagnosed with primary dysmenorrhea
  • Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score ≥ 4 during menstruation for at least six consecutive months
  • Radiographic evidence of pelvic tilt, sacral slope deviation, or frontal pelvic asymmetry

Who cannot join

  • Secondary dysmenorrhea or diagnosed gynecological pathologies (e.g., endometriosis, ovarian cysts)
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Current use of hormonal contraceptives or hormone therapy
  • Ongoing or recent physical therapy targeting the pelvis
  • History of pelvic or spinal surgery
  • Congenital or structural musculoskeletal disorders affecting the lumbopelvic region

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Shenzhen JianAn Hospital

    Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Combined Muscle Energy Technique and Myofascial Chain Stabilization Reduces Menstrual Pain and Improves Pelvic Alignment in Women With Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Prospective Study

This prospective clinical trial evaluates the effects of a non-pharmacological intervention combining muscle energy technique (MET) and myofascial chain (MFC)-based pelvic stabilization training in women with primary dysmenorrhea (PD). The study aims to determine whether this combined approach can improve pelvic alignment, reduce menstrual pain, and enhance static balance. Participants are assigned to either an experimental group receiving MET + MFC-based training or a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy. Outcomes include radiographic pelvic parameters, pain intensity, and balance performance.

Read the detailed description

Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is a common gynecological condition characterized by cyclic lower abdominal pain without an identifiable organic cause. Biomechanical factors such as pelvic misalignment and myofascial imbalance are increasingly recognized as contributing to the persistence and severity of PD.

This prospective non-randomized controlled trial investigates whether a combined intervention of muscle energy technique (MET) and myofascial chain (MFC)-based pelvic stabilization training can improve pelvic structure and reduce clinical symptoms in women with PD. Participants are women aged 18-45 years with moderate-to-severe PD and radiographic evidence of pelvic misalignment. They are assigned to one of two groups:

Experimental group: MET plus MFC-based core stabilization exercises. Control group: Interferential current therapy and deep friction massage. Interventions are administered three times per week for four weeks. The primary outcomes include changes in pelvic sagittal parameters (pelvic tilt, sacral slope, pelvic incidence), pelvic symmetry, menstrual pain (measured by VAS), and static balance (eyes-closed single-leg stance). Assessments are conducted at baseline, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks post-intervention.

The study aims to explore whether biomechanical correction of pelvic alignment contributes to pain modulation and functional improvement in women with PD, providing a basis for non-pharmacological rehabilitation strategies.

Being tested
Combined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic Stabilization Training, Interferential current therapy (ICT), Deep Friction Massage (DFM)
Keywords
Pelvic Girdle Dysfunction, Muscle Energy Technique, Pelvic Stabilization Training, Pelvic Alignment

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Combined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic Stabilization TrainingBehavioural

    This intervention consisted of a combination of Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for iliac and sacral dysfunctions (20 minutes per session) and myofascial chain-based pelvic stabilization training (including curl-ups, planks, and anti-rotation exercises; 30 minutes per session), targeting pelvic alignment and neuromuscular control. Sessions were conducted 3 times per week, 50 minutes per session, for 4 consecutive weeks.

  • Interferential current therapy (ICT)Device

    Interferential current therapy (ICT) was applied to the lumbar (lower back), sacroiliac, and iliac crest regions, 3 sessions per week, 20 minutes per session, for 4 weeks.

  • Deep Friction Massage (DFM)Behavioural

    Deep friction massage was administered to the lumbar, sacroiliac, and iliac crest regions for 30 minutes per session, 3 sessions per week, for 4 weeks.

Study groups in NCT07058480
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Combined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic StabilizationExperimentalParticipants receive Muscle Energy Technique (MET) for iliac dysfunction and sacral torsion, plus myofascial chain-based pelvic stabilization training (curl-ups, planks, anti-rotation). 3 sessions/week, 50 minutes/session, for 4 weeks.
Receives: Behavioral: Combined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic Stabilization Training
Interferential current therapy (ICT) and Deep Friction Massage (DFM)Active comparatorParticipants receive medium- and low-frequency electrotherapy and deep friction massage targeting the lumbar (lower back), sacroiliac, and iliac crest regions. 3 sessions/week, 50 minutes/session, for 4 weeks.
Receives: Device: Interferential current therapy (ICT); Behavioral: Deep Friction Massage (DFM)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in menstrual pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The primary outcome was the change in pain intensity before and after intervention, assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS,0-10). Participants rated their average menstrual pain during the most painful day of menstruation. A reduction in VAS score indicated improvement in dysmenorrhea symptoms.

    Measured: Baseline (pre-intervention), Week 4 (immediate post-intervention), and Week 12 (telephone follow-up to assess sustainability of treatment effects)

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Change in Pelvic Tilt (PT) Angle

    Change in PT (degrees) from baseline to Week 4, assessed by standardized lateral pelvic radiograph.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)

  2. Change in Sacral Slope (SS) Angle

    Change in SS (degrees) from baseline to Week 4, assessed by standardized lateral pelvic radiograph.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)

  3. Change in Pelvic Incidence (PI) Angle

    Change in PI (degrees) from baseline to Week 4, assessed by standardized lateral pelvic radiograph.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)

  4. Change in Pelvic Asymmetry Score

    Change in pelvic asymmetry assessed by frontal pelvic X-rays from baseline to Week 4. Pelvic asymmetry is determined by a composite score based on iliac crest height discrepancy, anterior/posterior innominate rotation, adduction/abduction shift, and sacral torsion.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)

  5. Change in Static Balance

    Change in single-leg stance time (seconds, eyes closed) from baseline to Week 4.

    Measured: Baseline and Week 4 (end of intervention)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Jul 2025
  2. Study start15 Dec 2024
  3. Primary completion31 Jan 2025
  4. Study completion31 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
This study adopted a prospective, two-arm parallel assignment design to compare the effects of MET combined with myofascial chain-based pelvic stabilization training versus conventional physiotherapy in women with primary dysmenorrhea.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07058480
Sponsor's protocol ID
JAH-METPD-2025-01
Acronym
METPD-25
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
23 Jun 2025
Last updated
10 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying the primary and secondary outcome results reported in the manuscript will be shared. This includes demographic information, baseline measurements, and outcome data at each time point (e.g., VAS, pelvic alignment, and balance test results). No personally identifiable information will be disclosed.

Publications

  • Gartenberg A, Nessim A, Cho W. Sacroiliac joint dysfunction: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Eur Spine J. 2021 Oct;30(10):2936-2943. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06927-9. Epub 2021 Jul 16.

    PubMed 34272605
  • Ju H, Jones M, Mishra G. The prevalence and risk factors of dysmenorrhea. Epidemiol Rev. 2014;36:104-13. doi: 10.1093/epirev/mxt009. Epub 2013 Nov 26.

    PubMed 24284871
  • Wang J, He X, Zhu C, Ding H, Feng G, Yang X, Liu L, Song Y. The relationship between spino-pelvic alignment and primary dysmenorrhea. Front Surg. 2023 Feb 8;10:1125520. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2023.1125520. eCollection 2023.

    PubMed 36843999
  • Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7(2):99-103. doi: 10.1007/s005860050038.

    PubMed 9629932

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Combined MET and MFC-Based Pelvic Stabilization Training, Interferential current therapy (ICT) and Deep Friction Massage (DFM) in people with Primary Dysmenorrhea (PD), run by Shanjiao Luo at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in menstrual pain intensity measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention), Week 4 (immediate post-intervention), and Week 12 (telephone follow-up to assess sustainability of treatment effects)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07058480, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in