AzTrials
AzTrials

CancerenCompassNCT07061652

Expanding the Support of Family Caregivers of Diverse Patients With Cancer and Diabetes

A study testing Survey and the resource booklet from the American Cancer Society in people with Cancer and Diabetes, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 3 sites in United States.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study investigates the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of enCompass Humana, a social support intervention for caregivers of patients with cancer and diabetes. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cancer, Diabetes
What is being tested?
Survey and the resource booklet from the American Cancer Society
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
118 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
3 Jul 2025to 27 Jan 2027
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • English-speaking.
  • Ability to provide written or verbal informed consent to participate in the study;
  • Willing and able to comply with study procedures based on the judgment of the investigator or protocol designee;
  • Be at least 18 years of age at the time of consent; and
  • Identify as an informal (unpaid) caregiver for an adult with a stage II-IV cancer AND diabetes.
  • English-speaking
Show all 14Show fewer
  • Ability to provide informed consent.
  • Be at least 18 years of age at the time of consent; and
  • Their identified caregiver is enrolled in the study
  • Diagnoses: (must have cancer and diabetes)
  • Have a cancer diagnosis for which they are being actively treated at one of the study sites
  • Have a cancer diagnosis, stage II-IV solid tumor or any hematologic malignancy
  • Receiving active cancer treatment s, not including hormonal therapy
  • Concurrent history of diabetes with need for ongoing management

Who cannot join

  • Unable to complete self-report instruments due to illiteracy, neurologic illness, inability to speak or read English, or other causes;
  • Existence of another co-morbid disease other than diabetes, which in the opinion of the investigator, prohibits participation in the protocol;
  • Participation in the intervention development phase of this intervention
  • Self-report instruments due to illiteracy, neurologic illness, inability to speak or read English, or other causes;
  • Existence of other co-morbid disease, which in the opinion of the investigator, prohibits participation in the protocol;
  • Their caregiver does not enroll in the study or withdraws consent

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • University of Vermont Cancer Center

    Burlington, Vermont, 05401

  • UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27514

  • Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study investigates the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of enCompass Humana, a social support intervention for caregivers of patients with cancer and diabetes. The enCompass program aims to improve support for these caregivers through a randomized feasibility study of a pilot-tested coaching and navigation program.

Caregiver services and system-level support are essential, but successful interventions for cancer caregivers are rarely standardized or systematically disseminated. Consequently, many programs do not reach the most underserved caregivers. Challenges to implementation include substantial clinical staff involvement, lack of dissemination and implementation information, and failure to tailor interventions to rural contexts. Despite the lack of standardized supportive interventions, national reports and legislative efforts increasingly recognize the need to support caregivers.

Read more

Caregivers reported unmet needs in all domains of social support, including instrumental help (e.g., in-home help, housekeeping), logistical and coordination support (e.g., food delivery, accompanying patients to appointments), information about illness and progression, emotional support, self-care guidance, and financial assistance (e.g., parking costs, lost wages). Caregivers show high interest in services but cited uncertainty and lack of strategies for accessing resources. Many are unaware of existing services. Interviews with oncology clinicians and healthcare administrators revealed similar findings: resources exist, but there is no system to match them with caregivers' needs.

Preliminary data suggest the intervention improves caregiver coping self-efficacy and reduces anxiety and depression in patients. With input from stakeholders, including caregivers, patients, family caregiving experts, and clinical care experts, the study team adapted the CARING application into enCompass to mitigate structural barriers and normalize support-seeking. The long-term goal is to adapt this psychosocial support program to increase self-efficacy, support-seeking, and reduce loneliness among caregivers. It is hypothesized that enCompass will build self-efficacy and coping skills, serving caregivers throughout the patient's illness and complications.

Conditions
Cancer, Diabetes
Being tested
Survey, the resource booklet from the American Cancer Society
Keywords
support application, caregivers
Medical subject headings
Neoplasms, Diabetes Mellitus

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SurveyBehavioural

    Participants will receive up to eight coaching sessions with a caregiver coach and resource materials and access to an online tool designed to help caregivers find resources.

  • the resource booklet from the American Cancer SocietyOther

    The caregiver will receive the resource booklet from the American Cancer Society.

Study groups in NCT07061652
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
caregiversExperimentalCaregivers of patients with cancer and comorbid diabetes will receive the intervention, enCompass contains two components: (1) an web-based eco-mapping tool that encourages the cognitive process of identifying, organizing, and visualizing a person's social network, and (2) a manualized, one-to-one 8-week coaching intervention to develop problem-solving skills for specific support needs. Caregivers will also receive a resource booklet from the American Cancer Society.
Receives: Behavioral: Survey
caregiverActive comparatorCaregivers of patients with cancer and comorbid diabetes will not receive the intervention.
Receives: Other: the resource booklet from the American Cancer Society

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Acceptability of the Intervention Measure (AIM)

    The AIM is a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale that measures intervention acceptability. The scale measures each statement from 1, "Completely disagree," to 5, "Completely agree." Scale items are averaged to produce a mean score. The AIM takes approximately 2 minutes to complete by caregivers.

    Measured: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Coping Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES)

    The Coping Self-Efficacy Scale is a 26-item, 10-point ordinal scale that measures caregiver coping and self-efficacy ability. Subjects are asked to self-score their confidence in each prompt on a scale from 0 (Cannot do at all) to 10 (Certain I can do).

    An overall CSES score is created by summing the item ratings (total score range, 0 - 260), with higher scores indicating greater perceived coping self-efficacy. Subjects must answer at least 80% of the scale items. For subjects missing an item or items, an individual's score for the missing item(s) is estimated by adding in their mean for the items that they answered for each item that they skipped, resulting in a "corrected sum." This measure will take approximately 7 - 10 minutes to complete by caregivers.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months

  2. Zarit Burden Assessment - Revised

    The Zarit Burden Assessment - Revised is a commonly used, 12-item self-report scale measuring caregiver burden. The Zarit Burden Assessment-Revised has excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha typically ranges from 0.83 to 0.89) and test-retest reliability (typically around 0.71). The measure typically takes 5-10 minutes to completeby caregivers.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months

  3. Duke-UNC Functional Support Questionnaire (FSSQ)

    The Duke-UNC FSSQ is an 8-item, multidimensional scale measuring perceived social support. Response items are scored from 5 ("as much as I would like") to 1 ("much less than I would like"). The scores from all eight questions are summed for a total score range of 8 to 40, with higher scores indicating higher perceived support. The Duke-UNC FSSQ has demonstrated high reliability and convergent validity. This measure will take approximately 3-5 minutes to complete by caregivers.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months

  4. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Caregivers

    The HADS is a 14-item, 4-point, self-report ordinal scale that measures depression and anxiety symptom severity. It is a well-validated and commonly used measure in both ill and healthy populations. It has two sub-scales, each with a total score range of 0 - 21, with higher scores suggesting more symptoms. Current research supports a threshold of 8 or higher as indicative of clinically significant depression or anxiety symptoms. The HADS takes approximately 3-5 minutes to complete by caregivers.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months

  5. Exit interview for Acceptability

    A subset of caregiver subjects will be asked to participate in a post-intervention, semi-structured, exit interview to further evaluate intervention acceptability.

    Measured: 6 months

  6. Karnovsky Performance Score

    The Karnovsky Performance Scale measures the functional status as it relates to cancer. The patient subject will self-report their current performance status by assessing a single item on an 8-point scale. The Karnovsky Scale takes approximately 2 minutes to complete.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months

  7. NCCN Distress Thermometer

    The NCCN Distress Thermometer is a tool developed by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) to help healthcare providers assess and manage distress in cancer patients.

    The single-item, 11-point NCCN Distress Thermometer asks subjects to rank their current level of distress on a scale from 0 (no distress) to 10 (extreme distress). This measure takes approximately 2 minutes to complete by patients.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months

  8. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Patients

    The HADS is a 14-item, 4-point, self-report ordinal scale that measures depression and anxiety symptom severity. It is a well-validated and commonly used measure in both ill and healthy populations. It has two sub-scales, each with a total score range of 0 - 21, with higher scores suggesting more symptoms. Current research supports a threshold of 8 or higher as indicative of clinically significant depression or anxiety symptoms in patient participants. The HADS takes approximately 3-5 minutes to complete by patients.

    Measured: Baseline, 8 weeks, 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Jul 2025
  2. Study start3 Jul 2025
  3. Primary completion16 Sep 2026
  4. Study completion27 Jan 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
118 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07061652
Sponsor's protocol ID
LCCC2453
Acronym
enCompass
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
20 Jun 2025
Last updated
14 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Survey and the resource booklet from the American Cancer Society in people with Cancer and Diabetes, run by UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 14 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Acceptability of the Intervention Measure (AIM) (time frame: 8 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Oct 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in