MelasmaNCT07062120
Efficacy and Safety of 30% Salicylic Acid and 10% Nicotinamide Combined Therapy in Melasma
A study testing Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%), Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%) and Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator in people with Melasma, run by Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the synergistic effects of 30% salicylic acid (SA) chemical peels and topical 10% nicotinamide (NAM) in 56 patients with moderate-to-severe melasma. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Melasma
- What is being tested?
- Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%), Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%) and Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 56 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2021to 1 Apr 2021
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Males and nonpregnant females, aged 18-60 years old;
- Diagnosed with melasma;
- Patients with good cognitive function and normal mental status;
- Patients with good communication skills;
- Voluntary participation in the study and signing of informed consent form.
Who cannot join
- pregnancy or lactation;
- pigmentation from other causes, such as hormonal dermatitis, cosmetic dermatitis, etc;
- established allergy to SA or NAM;
- active skin infection;
- systemic diseases, such as immunodeficiency disease, diabetes, lupus erythematosus, etc;
- having facial surgery, laser treatment, or whitening products in the past three months;
- neurological or psychiatric disorders.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong Universi
Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710000
About this study
Official title: Efficacy and Safety of 30% Salicylic Acid and 10% Nicotinamide Combined Therapy in Melasma: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study
This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the synergistic effects of 30% salicylic acid (SA) chemical peels and topical 10% nicotinamide (NAM) in 56 patients with moderate-to-severe melasma. Participants were divided into four groups: placebo control, SA peels alone (every 2 weeks for 8 sessions), NAM cream alone (twice daily for 16 weeks), and combination therapy (SA+NAM). The investigators investigated the efficacy and safety of 30%SA chemical peeling combined with 10% NAM.
Read the detailed description
Background:Melasma is a common skin disease manifested as brown patches with symmetrical distribution and irregular boundaries. Chemical peeling with salicylic acid (SA) is widely used in the treatment of melasma. Nicotinamide (NAM) is a common whitening agent and has a good effect in the treatment of melasma. In the present study, the investigators investigated the efficacy and safety of 30%SA chemical peeling combined with 10% NAM.
Methods: 56 moderate-to-severe melasma patients were enrolled and randomly assigned into the control group, SA group, NAM group, and SA+NAM group. SA treatment was given at an interval of 2 weeks for 8 treatment sessions (week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14). NAM was applied twice a day for 16w. Photos, mMASI score, and skin indices (TEWL, skin hydration, melanin index, erythema index, red areas score, and UV spots score) were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,10,12, and 14 weeks. Side effects, efficacy and satisfactory scores were recorded.
Limitations: Retrospective single-center design and small sample size.
- Conditions
- Melasma
- Being tested
- Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%), Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%), Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator, Nicotinamide simulator
- Keywords
- Melasma, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, chemical peeling
- Medical subject headings
- Melanosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%)Other
The active niacinamide form of vitamin B3, NAM is routinely employed as a pigmentation-reducing agent in melasma treatment protocols
Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%)Other
Salicylic acid, a superficial chemical peel, has been widely used in treating melasma. Breakthroughs in supramolecular design have addressed its irritancy profile through engineered SA complexes with improved water dispersibility
Supramolecular salicylic acid simulatorOther
the same course of treatment in the same dosage form that does not contain salicylic acid
Nicotinamide simulatorOther
the same course of treatment in the same dosage form that does not contain nicotinamide
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 30% SSA group(SSA) | Experimental | 30% SSA treatment were with 2-week intervals for eight sessions, and the follow-up was conducted 2 weeks after the last session Receives: Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%); Other: Nicotinamide simulator |
| 10% NAM group(NAM) | Experimental | 10% NAM treatment were twice a day during the entire follow-up period Receives: Other: Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%); Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator |
| 30% SSA plus 10% NAM group (SSA+NAM) | Experimental | 30% SSA treatment were with 2-week intervals for eight sessions, and 10% NAM treatment were twice a day during the entire follow-up period Receives: Other: Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%); Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%) |
| Placebo control group (Ctrl) | Placebo comparator | received the same course of treatment in the same dosage form that does not contain SA and NAM. Receives: Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator; Other: Nicotinamide simulator |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
mMASI score
The Primary outcomes were pre-defined as mMASI score and percent change in mMASI score, which was calculated as (mMASI at baseline-mMASI after treatment)/ mMASI at baseline × 100% and was graded as recovery (≥90%), obvious improvement (60-89%), improvement (20-59%), and no improvement (<20%).
Measured: From enrollment to week 16
Secondary outcomes (6)
melanin index
Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the melanin index on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
Measured: From enrollment to week 16
The skin hydration
Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the skin hydration on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
Measured: From enrollment to week 16
transepidermal water loss
Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the transepidermal water loss on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
Measured: From enrollment to week 16
erythema index
Use non-invasive skin analyzer to measure the erythema index on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
Measured: From enrollment to week 16
Actinic damage (UV spots)
Use VISIA to measure the UV spots on the patient's facial skin at each follow-up visit.
Measured: From enrollment to week 16
patient satisfaction evaluation
Patient satisfaction was evaluated as very satisfied, satisfied, relatively satisfied and dissatisfied.
Measured: week 16
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted14 Jul 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2021
- Primary completion1 Apr 2021
- Study completion1 Apr 2021
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MelasmaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Weihui Zeng, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
- Investigators
- Weihui Zeng, Study chair, Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07062120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2021016
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 29 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 14 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Fania L, Mazzanti C, Campione E, Candi E, Abeni D, Dellambra E. Role of Nicotinamide in Genomic Stability and Skin Cancer Chemoprevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 26;20(23):5946. doi: 10.3390/ijms20235946.
PubMed 31779194Madaan P, Sikka P, Malik DS. Cosmeceutical Aptitudes of Niacinamide: A Review. Recent Adv Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2021;16(3):196-208. doi: 10.2174/2772434416666211129105629.
PubMed 34844552Searle T, Al-Niaimi F, Ali FR. The top 10 cosmeceuticals for facial hyperpigmentation. Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14095. doi: 10.1111/dth.14095. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
PubMed 32720446Spierings NMK. Melasma: A critical analysis of clinical trials investigating treatment modalities published in the past 10 years. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jun;19(6):1284-1289. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13182. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
PubMed 31603285McKesey J, Tovar-Garza A, Pandya AG. Melasma Treatment: An Evidence-Based Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Apr;21(2):173-225. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00488-w.
PubMed 31802394Kwon SH, Na JI, Choi JY, Park KC. Melasma: Updates and perspectives. Exp Dermatol. 2019 Jun;28(6):704-708. doi: 10.1111/exd.13844. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
PubMed 30422338Ogbechie-Godec OA, Elbuluk N. Melasma: an Up-to-Date Comprehensive Review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017 Sep;7(3):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0194-1. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
PubMed 28726212
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy and Safety of 30% Salicylic Acid and 10% Nicotinamide Combined Therapy in Melasma: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07062120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2021016
- Conditions
- Melasma
- Keywords
- Melasma, salicylic acid, nicotinamide, chemical peeling
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 56 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2021 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Apr 2021 (actual)
- First posted
- 14 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the synergistic effects of 30% salicylic acid (SA) chemical peels and topical 10% nicotinamide (NAM) in 56 patients with moderate-to-severe melasma. Participants were divided into four groups: placebo control, SA peels alone (every 2 weeks for 8 sessions), NAM cream alone (twice daily for 16 weeks), and combination therapy (SA+NAM). The investigators investigated the efficacy and safety of 30%SA chemical peeling combined with 10% NAM.
Detailed description
Background:Melasma is a common skin disease manifested as brown patches with symmetrical distribution and irregular boundaries. Chemical peeling with salicylic acid (SA) is widely used in the treatment of melasma. Nicotinamide (NAM) is a common whitening agent and has a good effect in the treatment of melasma. In the present study, the investigators investigated the efficacy and safety of 30%SA chemical peeling combined with 10% NAM.
Methods: 56 moderate-to-severe melasma patients were enrolled and randomly assigned into the control group, SA group, NAM group, and SA+NAM group. SA treatment was given at an interval of 2 weeks for 8 treatment sessions (week 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14). NAM was applied twice a day for 16w. Photos, mMASI score, and skin indices (TEWL, skin hydration, melanin index, erythema index, red areas score, and UV spots score) were assessed at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8,10,12, and 14 weeks. Side effects, efficacy and satisfactory scores were recorded.
Limitations: Retrospective single-center design and small sample size.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 30% SSA group(SSA) | Experimental | Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%), Other: Nicotinamide simulator30% SSA treatment were with 2-week intervals for eight sessions, and the follow-up was conducted 2 weeks after the last session |
| 10% NAM group(NAM) | Experimental | Other: Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%), Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator10% NAM treatment were twice a day during the entire follow-up period |
| 30% SSA plus 10% NAM group (SSA+NAM) | Experimental | Other: Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%), Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%)30% SSA treatment were with 2-week intervals for eight sessions, and 10% NAM treatment were twice a day during the entire follow-up period |
| Placebo control group (Ctrl) | Placebo comparator | Other: Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator, Other: Nicotinamide simulatorreceived the same course of treatment in the same dosage form that does not contain SA and NAM. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Males and nonpregnant females, aged 18-60 years old;
- Diagnosed with melasma;
- Patients with good cognitive function and normal mental status;
- Patients with good communication skills;
- Voluntary participation in the study and signing of informed consent form.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- pregnancy or lactation;
- pigmentation from other causes, such as hormonal dermatitis, cosmetic dermatitis, etc;
- established allergy to SA or NAM;
- active skin infection;
- systemic diseases, such as immunodeficiency disease, diabetes, lupus erythematosus, etc;
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%)The active niacinamide form of vitamin B3, NAM is routinely employed as a pigmentation-reducing agent in melasma treatment protocols | Other | 10% NAM group(NAM), 30% SSA plus 10% NAM group (SSA+NAM) |
| Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%)Salicylic acid, a superficial chemical peel, has been widely used in treating melasma. Breakthroughs in supramolecular design have addressed its irritancy profile through engineered SA complexes with improved water dispersibility | Other | 30% SSA group(SSA), 30% SSA plus 10% NAM group (SSA+NAM) |
| Supramolecular salicylic acid simulatorthe same course of treatment in the same dosage form that does not contain salicylic acid | Other | 10% NAM group(NAM), Placebo control group (Ctrl) |
| Nicotinamide simulatorthe same course of treatment in the same dosage form that does not contain nicotinamide | Other | 30% SSA group(SSA), Placebo control group (Ctrl) |
Primary outcome
mMASI score
Time frame: From enrollment to week 16
The Primary outcomes were pre-defined as mMASI score and percent change in mMASI score, which was calculated as (mMASI at baseline-mMASI after treatment)/ mMASI at baseline × 100% and was graded as recovery (≥90%), obvious improvement (60-89%), improvement (20-59%), and no improvement (<20%).
6 secondary outcomes
melanin index
Time frame: From enrollment to week 16
The skin hydration
Time frame: From enrollment to week 16
transepidermal water loss
Time frame: From enrollment to week 16
erythema index
Time frame: From enrollment to week 16
Actinic damage (UV spots)
Time frame: From enrollment to week 16
patient satisfaction evaluation
Time frame: week 16
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Jul 2025.
- Results publication: PubMed 31779194Fania L, Mazzanti C, Campione E, Candi E, Abeni D, Dellambra E. Role of Nicotinamide in Genomic Stability and Skin Cancer Chemoprevention. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 26;20(23):5946. doi: 10.3390/ijms20235946.
- Results publication: PubMed 34844552Madaan P, Sikka P, Malik DS. Cosmeceutical Aptitudes of Niacinamide: A Review. Recent Adv Antiinfect Drug Discov. 2021;16(3):196-208. doi: 10.2174/2772434416666211129105629.
- Results publication: PubMed 32720446Searle T, Al-Niaimi F, Ali FR. The top 10 cosmeceuticals for facial hyperpigmentation. Dermatol Ther. 2020 Nov;33(6):e14095. doi: 10.1111/dth.14095. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 31603285Spierings NMK. Melasma: A critical analysis of clinical trials investigating treatment modalities published in the past 10 years. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020 Jun;19(6):1284-1289. doi: 10.1111/jocd.13182. Epub 2019 Oct 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 31802394McKesey J, Tovar-Garza A, Pandya AG. Melasma Treatment: An Evidence-Based Review. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Apr;21(2):173-225. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00488-w.
- Results publication: PubMed 30422338Kwon SH, Na JI, Choi JY, Park KC. Melasma: Updates and perspectives. Exp Dermatol. 2019 Jun;28(6):704-708. doi: 10.1111/exd.13844. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
- Results publication: PubMed 28726212Ogbechie-Godec OA, Elbuluk N. Melasma: an Up-to-Date Comprehensive Review. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2017 Sep;7(3):305-318. doi: 10.1007/s13555-017-0194-1. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Melasma
Enrolling by invitationPhase 4
Microneedling-Assisted Metformin, Tranexamic Acid, and Modified Kligman's Formula for Melasma
Melasma (Facial Melasma)
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Efficacy and Safety of Triple-Combination Cream Plus Microneedling Along With Tranexamic Acid Versus Platelet-Rich Plasma in the Treatment of Moderate-to-Severe Melasma: A Randomized Comparative Study
Melasma (Facial Melasma)
Not yet recruiting
COMPARISON OF TOPICAL VITAMIN C VS NIACINAMIDE IN TREATMENT OF MELASMA
Melasma
Not yet recruiting
New Treatment in Melasma
Female, With
Not yet recruitingPhase 4
Baseline Dermoscopic Vascular Score and Response to Oral Tranexamic Acid in Facial Melasma
Melasma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Weihui Zeng study chair
Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nicotinamide(NAM)(10%), Supramolecular salicylic acid(SSA) (30%) and Supramolecular salicylic acid simulator in people with Melasma, run by Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
mMASI score (time frame: From enrollment to week 16). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07062120, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Jul 2025.