BreastfeedingNCT07067554
Breastfeeding Myths and Mothers' Motivation
An observational study of Breastfeeding and Maternal Behavior, run by Acibadem University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Breast milk is a unique and irreplaceable source of nutrition for infants, offering protection against many common childhood diseases due to its natural sterility, accessibility, and immune-boosting antibodies. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Breastfeeding, Maternal Behavior, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
- How many people
- 191 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 9 Sep 2025to 30 Jul 2026
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Mothers aged 18 or older with an infant between 0-6 months, meeting eligibility criteria and providing consent.
Who may be able to join
- Having an infant aged 0-6 months
- Having breastfed the baby at least once
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study
Who cannot join
- Having a physical or psychiatric health condition that prevents breastfeeding
- Having had a multiple (twin or more) pregnancy
- Exclusively formula-feeding the baby
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Acıbadem University
Istanbul, Ataşehir
Güzin Ünlü Suvari, Ph.D. (C), +90 ext. 2165004429
Merve Coşkun, Ph.D.
About this study
Official title: An Investigation of the Relationship Between Mothers' Susceptibility to Breastfeeding Myths and Their Motivation to Breastfeed
Breast milk is a unique and irreplaceable source of nutrition for infants, offering protection against many common childhood diseases due to its natural sterility, accessibility, and immune-boosting antibodies. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life is critical for healthy growth, development, and immune support. Despite global recommendations by WHO and UNICEF, lack of knowledge and inadequate support continue to hinder optimal breastfeeding practices.
One major barrier is the persistence of cultural myths and misconceptions, such as "colostrum should be discarded," or "infants need water after every feeding." These unfounded beliefs may reduce mothers' confidence and lead to early cessation of breastfeeding or premature introduction of complementary foods.
This study aims to examine the relationship between mothers' belief in breastfeeding myths and their motivation to breastfeed. While prior research has explored each factor individually, no known studies have analyzed their interaction.
- Medical subject headings
- Breast Feeding, Behavior
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Demographic, Birth, and Breastfeeding Characteristics of Participants
Collected using a 25-question Descriptive Information Form developed by the researchers. Includes maternal demographics, pregnancy and birth history, infant characteristics, breastfeeding status, beliefs, and motivational factors.
Measured: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)
Belief in Breastfeeding Myths
Measured using the Breastfeeding Myths Scale developed by Yılmaz Sezer et al. (2024). The scale consists of 30 items in a single dimension. Total scores range from 30 to 150, with higher scores indicating a stronger belief in breastfeeding myths. A cut-off score of 119.50 is used to distinguish between low and high levels of myth belief.
Measured: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)
Breastfeeding Motivation
Breastfeeding motivation was measured using the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale, originally developed by Kestler-Peleg et al. (2015) and adapted into Turkish by Mızrak Şahin et al. (2019). The scale consists of 24 items and assesses five subdimensions: Integrated Regulation, Intrinsic Motivation and Identified Regulation, Introjected Regulation - Social Approval, Introjected Regulation - Social Pressure, and External Regulation - Additional Benefits. Each subdimension score is calculated separately based on the mean of relevant items. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of motivation in the respective subdimension.
Measured: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jul 2025
- Study start9 Sep 2025
- Primary completion30 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Jul 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (10)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for BreastfeedingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 191 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Acibadem University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Güzin Ünlü Suvari, Acibadem University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07067554
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2025-07/276
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 19 Jun 2025
- Last updated
- 30 Sep 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared due to privacy concerns and the sensitive nature of maternal and infant health information. However, anonymized data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication of the study results.
Publications
Bulut, M., & Küçük Alemdar, D. (2021). Breastfeeding motivation in mothers of excessive crying infants: A correlation study. Early Child Development and Care, 191(9), 1417-1426. Cohen, J. (1988). Stati
Yilmaz Sezer N, Aker MN, Gonenc IM, Topuz S. Development of the Breastfeeding Myths Scale. Breastfeed Med. 2024 Jan;19(1):40-46. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2023.0200.
PubMed 38241130Mizrak Sahin B, Ozerdogan N, Ozdamar K, Gursoy E. Factors affecting breastfeeding motivation in primiparious mothers: An application of breastfeeding motivation scale based on self-determination theory. Health Care Women Int. 2019 Jun;40(6):637-652. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1526289. Epub 2019 May 29.
PubMed 31140955Kestler-Peleg M, Shamir-Dardikman M, Hermoni D, Ginzburg K. Breastfeeding motivation and Self-Determination Theory. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
PubMed 26372935Chipojola R, Chiu HY, Huda MH, Lin YM, Kuo SY. Effectiveness of theory-based educational interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103675. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
PubMed 32585447Eram, U. (2017). A review article: Myths, beliefs and malpractices relating to breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention, 6(6), 14-16.
Yildirim Goksen DF, Ozkan S. The effect of online breastfeeding education on breastfeeding motivation: A randomized controlled study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;75:e42-e48. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.12.026. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
PubMed 38182483Koura, H. (2019). Myths about breastfeeding. Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal, 17(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_47_19
Maleki A, Faghihzadeh E, Youseflu S. The Effect of Educational Intervention on Improvement of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2021 Aug 10;2021:5522229. doi: 10.1155/2021/5522229. eCollection 2021.
PubMed 34422058Marques ES, Cotta RM, Priore SE. [Myths and beliefs surrounding breastfeeding]. Cien Saude Colet. 2011 May;16(5):2461-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000500015. Portuguese.
PubMed 21655719
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Sep 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- An Investigation of the Relationship Between Mothers' Susceptibility to Breastfeeding Myths and Their Motivation to Breastfeed
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07067554
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2025-07/276
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 191 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Acibadem UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 9 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Jul 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Breast milk is a unique and irreplaceable source of nutrition for infants, offering protection against many common childhood diseases due to its natural sterility, accessibility, and immune-boosting antibodies. Exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months of life is critical for healthy growth, development, and immune support. Despite global recommendations by WHO and UNICEF, lack of knowledge and inadequate support continue to hinder optimal breastfeeding practices.
One major barrier is the persistence of cultural myths and misconceptions, such as "colostrum should be discarded," or "infants need water after every feeding." These unfounded beliefs may reduce mothers' confidence and lead to early cessation of breastfeeding or premature introduction of complementary foods.
This study aims to examine the relationship between mothers' belief in breastfeeding myths and their motivation to breastfeed. While prior research has explored each factor individually, no known studies have analyzed their interaction.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Mothers aged 18 or older with an infant between 0-6 months, meeting eligibility criteria and providing consent.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having an infant aged 0-6 months
- Having breastfed the baby at least once
- Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Having a physical or psychiatric health condition that prevents breastfeeding
- Having had a multiple (twin or more) pregnancy
- Exclusively formula-feeding the baby
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Demographic, Birth, and Breastfeeding Characteristics of Participants
Time frame: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)
Collected using a 25-question Descriptive Information Form developed by the researchers. Includes maternal demographics, pregnancy and birth history, infant characteristics, breastfeeding status, beliefs, and motivational factors.
Belief in Breastfeeding Myths
Time frame: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)
Measured using the Breastfeeding Myths Scale developed by Yılmaz Sezer et al. (2024). The scale consists of 30 items in a single dimension. Total scores range from 30 to 150, with higher scores indicating a stronger belief in breastfeeding myths. A cut-off score of 119.50 is used to distinguish between low and high levels of myth belief.
Breastfeeding Motivation
Time frame: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)
Breastfeeding motivation was measured using the Breastfeeding Motivation Scale, originally developed by Kestler-Peleg et al. (2015) and adapted into Turkish by Mızrak Şahin et al. (2019). The scale consists of 24 items and assesses five subdimensions: Integrated Regulation, Intrinsic Motivation and Identified Regulation, Introjected Regulation - Social Approval, Introjected Regulation - Social Pressure, and External Regulation - Additional Benefits. Each subdimension score is calculated separately based on the mean of relevant items. Scores range from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating higher levels of motivation in the respective subdimension.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Sep 2025.
- BackgroundBulut, M., & Küçük Alemdar, D. (2021). Breastfeeding motivation in mothers of excessive crying infants: A correlation study. Early Child Development and Care, 191(9), 1417-1426. Cohen, J. (1988). Stati
- Background: PubMed 38241130Yilmaz Sezer N, Aker MN, Gonenc IM, Topuz S. Development of the Breastfeeding Myths Scale. Breastfeed Med. 2024 Jan;19(1):40-46. doi: 10.1089/bfm.2023.0200.
- Background: PubMed 31140955Mizrak Sahin B, Ozerdogan N, Ozdamar K, Gursoy E. Factors affecting breastfeeding motivation in primiparious mothers: An application of breastfeeding motivation scale based on self-determination theory. Health Care Women Int. 2019 Jun;40(6):637-652. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2018.1526289. Epub 2019 May 29.
- Background: PubMed 26372935Kestler-Peleg M, Shamir-Dardikman M, Hermoni D, Ginzburg K. Breastfeeding motivation and Self-Determination Theory. Soc Sci Med. 2015 Nov;144:19-27. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
- Background: PubMed 32585447Chipojola R, Chiu HY, Huda MH, Lin YM, Kuo SY. Effectiveness of theory-based educational interventions on breastfeeding self-efficacy and exclusive breastfeeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020 Sep;109:103675. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103675. Epub 2020 Jun 6.
- BackgroundEram, U. (2017). A review article: Myths, beliefs and malpractices relating to breastfeeding and complementary feeding practices. International Journal of Pharmaceutical Science Invention, 6(6), 14-16.
- Background: PubMed 38182483Yildirim Goksen DF, Ozkan S. The effect of online breastfeeding education on breastfeeding motivation: A randomized controlled study. J Pediatr Nurs. 2024 Mar-Apr;75:e42-e48. doi: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.12.026. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
- BackgroundKoura, H. (2019). Myths about breastfeeding. Al-Azhar Assiut Medical Journal, 17(2), 109-113. https://doi.org/10.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_47_19
- Background: PubMed 34422058Maleki A, Faghihzadeh E, Youseflu S. The Effect of Educational Intervention on Improvement of Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obstet Gynecol Int. 2021 Aug 10;2021:5522229. doi: 10.1155/2021/5522229. eCollection 2021.
- Background: PubMed 21655719Marques ES, Cotta RM, Priore SE. [Myths and beliefs surrounding breastfeeding]. Cien Saude Colet. 2011 May;16(5):2461-8. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232011000500015. Portuguese.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Individual participant data (IPD) will not be publicly shared due to privacy concerns and the sensitive nature of maternal and infant health information. However, anonymized data may be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author after publication of the study results.
Related trials for Breastfeeding
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Exercise Training on Breastmilk Composition
Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Odevixibat Pregnancy and Lactation Surveillance Program: A Study to Evaluate the Safety of Odevixibat During Pregnancy and/or Lactation
Pregnancy Related
RecruitingObservational study
Experiences of Mothers Considering Breastfeeding Cessation: Decision-Making, Method Exploration, and Support Needs
Breastfeeding Cessation
Recruiting
Methyl Donor-Rich Diet in the Postpartum Period
Postpartum Depression (PPD), Breastfeeding
Not yet recruiting
Postpartum Care in the NICU Multi-Site Breastfeeding
Postpartum Complication, Postpartum
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Breastfeeding and Maternal Behavior, run by Acibadem University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Güzin Ünlü Suvari (+902165004429, guzin.unlu@acibadem.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Demographic, Birth, and Breastfeeding Characteristics of Participants (time frame: At baseline (one-time assessment at enrollment)). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07067554, which also lists 10 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Sep 2025.