Breast Cancer ScreeningAI-BCSQNCT07075679
Screening Mammography: Single Reading by One Radiologist With AI vs. Double Reading by Two Radiologists (AI-BCSQ)
A study testing Group with AI iCAD version 3 and Group without AI in people with Breast Cancer Screening and Artificial Intelligence (AI), run by University Hospital Olomouc at 1 site in Czechia.
Trial summary
A randomized prospective study comparing the evaluation of mammography images in a breast cancer screening programme by a single radiologist with AI support versus standard double reading by two radiologists without AI support. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 45 to 69 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Breast Cancer Screening, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
- What is being tested?
- Group with AI iCAD version 3 and Group without AI
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 8,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteCzechia
- Study dates
- 6 Oct 2025to 5 Oct 2028
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 45 to 69 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- age 45-69, asymptomatic woman participating in breast cancer screening programme
Who cannot join
- clinical signs of breast disease - indication for diagnostic mammography
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Official title: Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening: Impact of AI-Assisted Single Reading by One Radiologist on Screening Quality Indicators Compared to Standard Double Reading by Two Radiologists Without AI
A randomized prospective study comparing the evaluation of mammography images in a breast cancer screening programme by a single radiologist with AI support versus standard double reading by two radiologists without AI support.
Read the detailed description
In the intervention group, the first reading of the screening mammogram will be performed by one radiologist with AI support. After this AI-assisted first reading is completed and recorded for the study, a standard second reading will be carried out by another radiologist. This ensures that the legal requirement for double reading in the breast cancer screening program is maintained.
In the control group, mammograms will be evaluated according to the current standard practice - that is, independently by two radiologists without AI support.
Participants will be divided to the two groups based on a randomization scheme that determines specific days for evaluation with AI (Group 1) and without AI (Group 2). The randomization ensures equal distribution of weekdays between the two groups to minimize bias due to variability in daily workflow, diagnostic/screening ratios, or other operational factors.
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Screening, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
- Being tested
- Group with AI iCAD version 3, Group without AI
- Keywords
- breast cancer, screening, artificial intelligence
- Medical subject headings
- Disease, Breast Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Group with AI iCAD version 3Diagnostic test
Reading mammograms by one radiologist with AI support
Group without AIDiagnostic test
Standard double reading by two radiologists without AI.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group with AI | Experimental | Asymptomatic women aged 45-69 participating in breast cancer screening programme, reading of mammograms by one radiologist with AI support. Receives: Diagnostic Test: Group with AI iCAD version 3 |
| Group without AI | Other | Asymptomatic women aged 45-69 participating in breast cancer screening programme, reading of mammograms by two radiologists without AI (current practice). Receives: Diagnostic Test: Group without AI |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Further assessment rate
The proportion of women udergoing follow-up examinations within 0-190 days after screening mammography.
Measured: up to 190 days after screening mammmography
Secondary outcomes (2)
Cancer Detection Rate
The number of cancers detected per 1,000 women screened.
Measured: up to 1 year after screening mammography
Recall Rate
The proportion of women recalled for follow-up examinations withing 1-190 days after screening mammography.
Measured: up to 190 days after screening mammography
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jul 2025
- Study start6 Oct 2025
- Primary completion5 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion5 Oct 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Breast Cancer ScreeningStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 8,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Olomouc
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07075679
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 03062025
- Other IDs
- IGA_LF_2024_022
- Acronym
- AI-BCSQ
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 2 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Larsen M, Olstad CF, Lee CI, Hovda T, Hoff SR, Martiniussen MA, Mikalsen KO, Lund-Hanssen H, Solli HS, Silberhorn M, Sulheim AO, Auensen S, Nygard JF, Hofvind S. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 May;6(3):e230375. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230375.
PubMed 38597784Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A, van Wijk Y, Woodruff H, van Soest J, Lustberg T, Roelofs E, van Elmpt W, Dekker A, Mottaghy FM, Wildberger JE, Walsh S. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
PubMed 28975929Tudos Z, Veverkova L, Baxa J, Hartmann I, Ctvrtlik F. The current and upcoming era of radiomics in phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jan;39(1):101923. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2024.101923. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
PubMed 39227277McDonald ES, Conant EF. Can AI Reduce the Harms of Screening Mammography? Radiol Artif Intell. 2023 Oct 25;5(6):e230304. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230304. eCollection 2023 Nov. No abstract available.
PubMed 38074781Letter H, Peratikos M, Toledano A, Hoffmeister J, Nishikawa R, Conant E, Shisler J, Maimone S, Diaz de Villegas H. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Preliminary Real-world Experience. J Breast Imaging. 2023 May 22;5(3):258-266. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad015.
PubMed 38416890Dahlblom V, Dustler M, Tingberg A, Zackrisson S. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3754-3765. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09316-y. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
PubMed 36502459Eisemann N, Bunk S, Mukama T, Baltus H, Elsner SA, Gomille T, Hecht G, Heywang-Kobrunner S, Rathmann R, Siegmann-Luz K, Tollner T, Vomweg TW, Leibig C, Katalinic A. Nationwide real-world implementation of AI for cancer detection in population-based mammography screening. Nat Med. 2025 Mar;31(3):917-924. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03408-6. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
PubMed 39775040Diaz O, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Sechopoulos I. Artificial Intelligence for breast cancer detection: Technology, challenges, and prospects. Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jun;175:111457. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111457. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
PubMed 38640824Lang K, Dustler M, Dahlblom V, Akesson A, Andersson I, Zackrisson S. Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1687-1692. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07165-1. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
PubMed 32876835Lang K, Josefsson V, Larsson AM, Larsson S, Hogberg C, Sartor H, Hofvind S, Andersson I, Rosso A. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Aug;24(8):936-944. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00298-X.
PubMed 37541274Dembrower K, Crippa A, Colon E, Eklund M, Strand F; ScreenTrustCAD Trial Consortium. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study. Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e703-e711. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00153-X. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
PubMed 37690911Chang YW, Ryu JK, An JK, Choi N, Park YM, Ko KH, Han K. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening in mammography (AI-STREAM): preliminary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study. Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 6;16(1):2248. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57469-3.
PubMed 40050619
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Use of Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening: Impact of AI-Assisted Single Reading by One Radiologist on Screening Quality Indicators Compared to Standard Double Reading by Two Radiologists Without AI
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07075679
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AI-BCSQ / 03062025
- Conditions
- Breast Cancer Screening, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis
- Keywords
- breast cancer, screening, artificial intelligence
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 8,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital OlomoucUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 6 Oct 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 5 Oct 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 20 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A randomized prospective study comparing the evaluation of mammography images in a breast cancer screening programme by a single radiologist with AI support versus standard double reading by two radiologists without AI support.
Detailed description
In the intervention group, the first reading of the screening mammogram will be performed by one radiologist with AI support. After this AI-assisted first reading is completed and recorded for the study, a standard second reading will be carried out by another radiologist. This ensures that the legal requirement for double reading in the breast cancer screening program is maintained.
In the control group, mammograms will be evaluated according to the current standard practice - that is, independently by two radiologists without AI support.
Participants will be divided to the two groups based on a randomization scheme that determines specific days for evaluation with AI (Group 1) and without AI (Group 2). The randomization ensures equal distribution of weekdays between the two groups to minimize bias due to variability in daily workflow, diagnostic/screening ratios, or other operational factors.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group with AI | Experimental | Diagnostic Test: Group with AI iCAD version 3Asymptomatic women aged 45-69 participating in breast cancer screening programme, reading of mammograms by one radiologist with AI support. |
| Group without AI | Other | Diagnostic Test: Group without AIAsymptomatic women aged 45-69 participating in breast cancer screening programme, reading of mammograms by two radiologists without AI (current practice). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 45 to 69 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age 45-69, asymptomatic woman participating in breast cancer screening programme
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- clinical signs of breast disease - indication for diagnostic mammography
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Group with AI iCAD version 3Reading mammograms by one radiologist with AI support | Diagnostic test | Group with AI |
| Group without AIStandard double reading by two radiologists without AI. | Diagnostic test | Group without AI |
Primary outcome
Further assessment rate
Time frame: up to 190 days after screening mammmography
The proportion of women udergoing follow-up examinations within 0-190 days after screening mammography.
2 secondary outcomes
Cancer Detection Rate
Time frame: up to 1 year after screening mammography
Recall Rate
Time frame: up to 190 days after screening mammography
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 38597784Larsen M, Olstad CF, Lee CI, Hovda T, Hoff SR, Martiniussen MA, Mikalsen KO, Lund-Hanssen H, Solli HS, Silberhorn M, Sulheim AO, Auensen S, Nygard JF, Hofvind S. Performance of an Artificial Intelligence System for Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammograms from BreastScreen Norway. Radiol Artif Intell. 2024 May;6(3):e230375. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230375.
- Results publication: PubMed 28975929Lambin P, Leijenaar RTH, Deist TM, Peerlings J, de Jong EEC, van Timmeren J, Sanduleanu S, Larue RTHM, Even AJG, Jochems A, van Wijk Y, Woodruff H, van Soest J, Lustberg T, Roelofs E, van Elmpt W, Dekker A, Mottaghy FM, Wildberger JE, Walsh S. Radiomics: the bridge between medical imaging and personalized medicine. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;14(12):749-762. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.141. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
- Results publication: PubMed 39227277Tudos Z, Veverkova L, Baxa J, Hartmann I, Ctvrtlik F. The current and upcoming era of radiomics in phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2025 Jan;39(1):101923. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2024.101923. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
- Results publication: PubMed 38074781McDonald ES, Conant EF. Can AI Reduce the Harms of Screening Mammography? Radiol Artif Intell. 2023 Oct 25;5(6):e230304. doi: 10.1148/ryai.230304. eCollection 2023 Nov. No abstract available.
- Results publication: PubMed 38416890Letter H, Peratikos M, Toledano A, Hoffmeister J, Nishikawa R, Conant E, Shisler J, Maimone S, Diaz de Villegas H. Use of Artificial Intelligence for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening: A Preliminary Real-world Experience. J Breast Imaging. 2023 May 22;5(3):258-266. doi: 10.1093/jbi/wbad015.
- Results publication: PubMed 36502459Dahlblom V, Dustler M, Tingberg A, Zackrisson S. Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of different reading strategies implementing artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2023 May;33(5):3754-3765. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09316-y. Epub 2022 Dec 11.
- Results publication: PubMed 39775040Eisemann N, Bunk S, Mukama T, Baltus H, Elsner SA, Gomille T, Hecht G, Heywang-Kobrunner S, Rathmann R, Siegmann-Luz K, Tollner T, Vomweg TW, Leibig C, Katalinic A. Nationwide real-world implementation of AI for cancer detection in population-based mammography screening. Nat Med. 2025 Mar;31(3):917-924. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03408-6. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
- Results publication: PubMed 38640824Diaz O, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, Sechopoulos I. Artificial Intelligence for breast cancer detection: Technology, challenges, and prospects. Eur J Radiol. 2024 Jun;175:111457. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111457. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
- Results publication: PubMed 32876835Lang K, Dustler M, Dahlblom V, Akesson A, Andersson I, Zackrisson S. Identifying normal mammograms in a large screening population using artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1687-1692. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07165-1. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
- Results publication: PubMed 37541274Lang K, Josefsson V, Larsson AM, Larsson S, Hogberg C, Sartor H, Hofvind S, Andersson I, Rosso A. Artificial intelligence-supported screen reading versus standard double reading in the Mammography Screening with Artificial Intelligence trial (MASAI): a clinical safety analysis of a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority, single-blinded, screening accuracy study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Aug;24(8):936-944. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00298-X.
- Results publication: PubMed 37690911Dembrower K, Crippa A, Colon E, Eklund M, Strand F; ScreenTrustCAD Trial Consortium. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in screening mammography in Sweden: a prospective, population-based, paired-reader, non-inferiority study. Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e703-e711. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00153-X. Epub 2023 Sep 8.
- Results publication: PubMed 40050619Chang YW, Ryu JK, An JK, Choi N, Park YM, Ko KH, Han K. Artificial intelligence for breast cancer screening in mammography (AI-STREAM): preliminary analysis of a prospective multicenter cohort study. Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 6;16(1):2248. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-57469-3.
- 1\. European Commission: Joint Research Centre, ECIBC at a Glance - European Commission Initiative on Breast Cancer, Publications Office of the European Union, 2023Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Breast Cancer Screening
Not yet recruiting
Effect of a Health Belief Model Based Digital Nudge Intervention on Breast Cancer Screening
Breast Cancer Screening, Breast Cancer Awareness
RecruitingPhase 2
Targeted Therapy Directed by Genetic Testing in Treating Patients With Locally Advanced or Advanced Solid Tumors, The ComboMATCH Screening Trial
Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm, Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8
RecruitingObservational study
Individuals on Hormone Therapy Breast Cancer Screening Pilot
Breast Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2
Detecting Tumor DNA in the Blood of HR+/HER2-low Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients to Find Candidates for T-DXd Therapy
Breast Cancer Metastatic, Breast Cancer Stage IV
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Advanced Ultrasound Signal Processing of Suspicious Breast Images
Breast Cancer, Breast Cyst
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Group with AI iCAD version 3 and Group without AI in people with Breast Cancer Screening and Artificial Intelligence (AI), run by University Hospital Olomouc at 1 site in Czechia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Czechia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lucia Veverkova, MD (+420603181913, lucia.veverkova@fnol.cz), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Further assessment rate (time frame: up to 190 days after screening mammmography). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07075679, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Apr 2026.