Hepatocellular CarcinomaPhase 2NCT07078305
Comparing the Combination of Trastuzumab and Regorafenib With Regorafenib Monotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After First-line Treatment
A Phase 2 study testing Regorafenib and tislelizumab and Regorafenib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital.
Trial summary
At present, there is no standard treatment plan for hepatocellular carcinoma after the progress of first-line target immunotherapy. Based on the above research background, we believe that the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and multi-target inhibitors is a promising treatment option for second-line liver cancer. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- What is being tested?
- Regorafenib and tislelizumab and Regorafenib
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 134 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Aug 2025to Aug 2027
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Sign a written informed consent form;
- Age ≥ 18 years old, both male and female are eligible;
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed by organization/pathology or imaging that meets the AASLD diagnostic criteria;
- HCC that has received targeted immunotherapy in the past (regardless of whether local treatment is received or not, excluding neoadjuvant therapy), including atezolizumab+bevacizumab, sintilizumab+bevacizumab analogs, carizolizumab+apatinib, and other PD-1/L1 drugs+TKI, and whose disease progression has been confirmed by imaging;
- Child Pugh score ≤ 7;
- According to RECIST 1.1 criteria, there must be at least one measurable lesion;
Show all 18Show fewer
- ECOG PS score 0-1;
- Expected survival period greater than 12 weeks;
- The function of important organs meets the following requirements (excluding the use of any blood components and cell growth factors within 14 days):
- Blood routine:
- Neutrophils ≥ 1.5 × 109/L Platelet count ≥ 80 × 109/L Hemoglobin ≥ 90g/L;
- Liver and kidney function:
- Serum creatinine (SCr) ≤ 1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) or creatinine clearance rate ≥ 50 ml/min (Cockcroft Gault formula); Total bilirubin (TBIL) ≤ 3 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); AST or ALT levels ≤ 5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN); Urinary protein<2+; If urine protein is ≥ 2+, the 24-hour urine protein quantification must show protein ≤ 1g;
- Normal coagulation function, no active bleeding or thrombotic diseases
- International Standardization Ratio INR ≤ 1.5 × ULN;
- Partial thromboplastin time APTT ≤ 1.5 × ULN;
- Prothrombin time PT ≤ 1.5 × ULN;
- Non surgical sterilization or female patients of childbearing age are required to use a medically approved contraceptive measure (such as intrauterine device, contraceptive pill, or condom) during the study treatment period and within 3 months after the end of the study treatment period; Female patients of childbearing age who undergo non-surgical sterilization must have a negative serum or urine HCG test within 7 days prior to enrollment in the study; And it must be during non lactation period; Non surgical sterilization or male patients of childbearing age need to agree to use a medically approved contraceptive measure with their spouse during the study treatment period and within 3 months after the end of the study treatment period.
Who cannot join
- The subject has previous or concurrent malignant tumors (excluding cured skin basal cell carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ);
- It is known that the subject has a history of allergies to large molecule protein preparations, or is known to be allergic to the investigational drug or drug components;
- Within the past 6 months, there have been incidents of esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding caused by portal hypertension; Within 3 months prior to the first administration, severe (G3) varicose veins were identified through endoscopic examination; Evidence of portal hypertension (including imaging findings of splenomegaly), assessed by researchers as high-risk for bleeding
- Any life-threatening bleeding events that have occurred within the past 3 months, including the need for blood transfusion therapy, surgery or local treatment, and continuous medication therapy
- Subjects with any active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune disease (such as but not limited to: autoimmune hepatitis, interstitial pneumonia, uveitis, enteritis, hepatitis, pituitary inflammation, vasculitis, nephritis, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, those who have undergone thyroid surgery in the past cannot be included; subjects with vitiligo or complete remission of childhood asthma without any intervention in adulthood can be included; subjects with asthma requiring bronchodilators for medical intervention cannot be included);
- The subject is currently using immunosuppressants, systemic, or absorbable local hormone therapy to achieve immunosuppression (dose>10mg/day prednisone or other therapeutic hormones), and has continued to use it within 2 weeks before enrollment;
Show all 14Show fewer
- Ascites or pleural effusion with clinical symptoms that require therapeutic puncture or regular drainage (≥ 1 time/month);
- Patients with uncontrolled clinical symptoms or diseases of the heart, such as: (1) NYHA grade 2 or above heart failure, (2) unstable angina pectoris, (3) myocardial infarction within 1 year, and (4) clinically significant supraventricular or ventricular arrhythmias requiring treatment or intervention;
- The subject has an active infection or an unexplained fever greater than 38.5 degrees Celsius during the screening period or before the first administration (according to the researcher's judgment, the subject can be included if the fever is caused by the tumor);
- Patients with objective evidence of past and current history of pulmonary fibrosis, interstitial pneumonia, pneumoconiosis, radiation pneumonitis, drug-related pneumonia, severe impairment of lung function, etc;
- Subjects with congenital or acquired immune dysfunction, such as HIV infected individuals;
- Within less than 4 weeks before the study medication, or possibly during the study period, receiving a live vaccine;
- The subject is known to have a history of substance abuse, alcoholism, or drug use;
- Have received Chinese herbal medicine or traditional Chinese patent medicines and simple preparations with anti-tumor indications within 2 weeks before the first administration.
About this study
Official title: A Prospective, Single Center, Randomized, Open Label Phase II Clinical Study: Comparing the Combination of Trastuzumab and Regorafenib With Regorafenib Monotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After First-line Target Immunotherapy Treatment
At present, there is no standard treatment plan for hepatocellular carcinoma after the progress of first-line target immunotherapy. Based on the above research background, we believe that the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and multi-target inhibitors is a promising treatment option for second-line liver cancer. Our study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab monoclonal antibody combined with regorafenib compared to regorafenib monotherapy for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after previous target immunotherapy progression.
Read the detailed description
According to GLOBOCAN2020 statistics, in 2020, there were 906000 new cases and 830000 deaths of liver cancer worldwide, making it the seventh most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death. East Asia, especially China, Japan, and South Korea, is a high-risk area for liver cancer, with China accounting for approximately 50% of the world's new liver cancer cases each year. Epidemiological data show that hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the main reason for the high incidence of liver cancer in China. Liver cancer in our country is discovered late and staged late. Most patients have lost the opportunity for surgical resection when they seek medical attention, and the overall prognosis is poor. The 5-year survival rate is about 12.5%.
In recent years, immunotherapy represented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has continuously brought breakthroughs in the treatment of HCC and has gradually become the cornerstone of advanced liver cancer treatment. The global multicenter Phase III IMbrave150 clinical study compared the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab ("T+A" regimen) with sorafenib. The results showed that the overall survival was 19.2 months compared to 13.4 months (HR 0.66, p<0.001), and the progression free survival was 6.9 months compared to 4.3 months (HR 0.65, p<0.001). Compared with sorafenib, the "T+A" regimen significantly improved the overall survival and progression free survival of unresectable HCC patients. In the 194 Chinese patient population, the median OS was 24.0 months compared to 11.4 months (HR 0.53), which is consistent with global benefits. Another randomized, open label, phase II-III ORIENT-32 study showed that the combination of Sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar ("Shuangda" regimen) significantly improved patient efficacy compared to sorafenib, significantly reduced the risk of death and progression, improved ORR and quality of life, and subgroup analysis showed similar benefits. The median overall survival of the two groups was 10.4 months (HR=0.569, p<0.001), progression free survival was 4.6 months compared to 2.8 months (HR=0.565, p<0.001), ORR was 21% compared to 4%, and DCR were 72% and 64%, respectively. The combination of Shuangda and each individual drug and potential disease has known safety and good tolerability. Currently, the combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1/L1) and anti angiogenic drugs has become the standard treatment for unresectable advanced HCC. Although targeted therapy and immunotherapy have made breakthroughs in the field of liver cancer and continuously extended patient survival, first-line treatment inevitably leads to drug resistance. About 30% of patients cannot achieve objective relief due to primary drug resistance, and the median progression free survival of other patients with first-line treatment is about 4-7 months, followed by secondary drug resistance.
In the second-line treatment of advanced liver cancer, multiple immune monotherapy and anti angiogenic drug monotherapy are recommended by guidelines. The KEYNOTE-394 study enrolled second-line hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who experienced progression after treatment with sorafenib or oxaliplatin, or were intolerant to sorafenib or oxaliplatin treatment, and randomly assigned them to pembrolizumab+BSC (best supportive treatment) or placebo+BSC. The study results showed that compared with the control group, the pembrolizumab group significantly prolonged the median OS of patients (14.6 months compared to 13.0 months), HR=0.79，P=0.0180）， The 2-year OS rate of the pembrolizumab group was 34.3%, higher than the control group's 24.9%, and the long-term survival benefit was more significant. The median PFS was 2.6 months compared to 2.3 months (HR=0.74, P=0.0032, 2-year PFS rates were 11% and 0%, respectively), and the ORR was 12.7% compared to 1.3%. A global multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial of regorafenib in liver cancer patients who had previously received sorafenib treatment showed that after sorafenib treatment, regorafenib significantly reduced the risk of death and disease progression compared to the placebo control group, with a median OS of 10.6 months compared to 7.8 months (HR=0.63, P<0.0001) and a median PFS of 3.1 months compared to 1.5 months (HR=0.46, P<0.0001). However, the above clinical studies included participants who had previously received immunotherapy. In the current situation where target immunotherapy is the mainstream first-line treatment, the recommended plan for second-line treatment is still uncertain. A multicenter real-world study in the Asia Pacific region exploring the progression of first-line treatment with the A+T regimen followed by the selection of second-line system regimens. The median PFS of sorafenib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib were 2.3 months (95% CI 2.0-2.6), 4.0 months (95% CI 3.5-4.9), and 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7-5.4), respectively. The median OS of regorafenib was 6.3 months (95% CI 5.3-7.8), 8.0 months (95% CI 7.0-10.9), and 9.7 months (95% CI 5.2-NR), respectively. The median OS of regorafenib was higher than the other two TKIs. It is worth noting that choosing TKI combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) as the second-line treatment regimen resulted in higher median PFS and OS than TKI monotherapy, at 5.4 months (95% CI 3.0-8.8) and 12.6 months (95% CI 9.8-NR), respectively.
Although monotherapy immunotherapy or anti angiogenic therapy brings certain benefits to second-line HCC patients, the efficacy is far from meeting clinical needs. Based on the synergistic effect of immunotherapy and anti angiogenic therapy, the combination therapy of the two is also constantly being explored. The JVDJ study showed that the combination of Remdesizumab and Duvalimumab in the treatment of HCC with previous treatment failure had an ORR of 11%, DCR of 61%, median PFS of 4.4 months, and median OS of 10.7 months. The efficacy was better in patients with high PD-L1 expression. A retrospective multicenter study showed that the combination of xindilimab and regorafenib for second-line treatment of advanced liver cancer after first-line sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment resulted in an ORR of 24.1%, DCR of 74.1%, median PFS of 5.6 months, and median OS of 13.4 months.
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Being tested
- Regorafenib and tislelizumab, Regorafenib
- Keywords
- hepatocellular carcinoma, Regorafenib, Tislelizumab
- Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Regorafenib and tislelizumabDrug
Tislelizumab: 200mg, iv, d1, Q3W; Regorafenib: 40-120mg, po, qd, d1-21, d22-d28 discontinuation Q4W
RegorafenibDrug
Regorafenib: 40-120mg, po, qd, d1-21, d22-d28 discontinuation Q4W
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Regorafenib and tislelizumab |
| Control group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Regorafenib |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
PFS
Progression free survival
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (4)
ORR
Objective response rate
Measured: 6 months
DCR
Disease Control Rate
Measured: 6 months
OS
Overall survival
Measured: 1 year
AE
Adverse events
Measured: 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jul 2025
- Study startAug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completionAug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completionAug 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Hepatocellular CarcinomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07078305
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- E20250415
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 22 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Prospective, Single Center, Randomized, Open Label Phase II Clinical Study: Comparing the Combination of Trastuzumab and Regorafenib With Regorafenib Monotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma After First-line Target Immunotherapy Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07078305
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- E20250415
- Conditions
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma
- Keywords
- hepatocellular carcinoma, Regorafenib, Tislelizumab
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Not yet recruiting
- Enrolment
- 134 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Aug 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Aug 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
At present, there is no standard treatment plan for hepatocellular carcinoma after the progress of first-line target immunotherapy. Based on the above research background, we believe that the combination of PD-1 inhibitors and multi-target inhibitors is a promising treatment option for second-line liver cancer. Our study aims to explore the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab monoclonal antibody combined with regorafenib compared to regorafenib monotherapy for second-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after previous target immunotherapy progression.
Detailed description
According to GLOBOCAN2020 statistics, in 2020, there were 906000 new cases and 830000 deaths of liver cancer worldwide, making it the seventh most common cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death. East Asia, especially China, Japan, and South Korea, is a high-risk area for liver cancer, with China accounting for approximately 50% of the world's new liver cancer cases each year. Epidemiological data show that hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the main reason for the high incidence of liver cancer in China. Liver cancer in our country is discovered late and staged late. Most patients have lost the opportunity for surgical resection when they seek medical attention, and the overall prognosis is poor. The 5-year survival rate is about 12.5%.
In recent years, immunotherapy represented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors has continuously brought breakthroughs in the treatment of HCC and has gradually become the cornerstone of advanced liver cancer treatment. The global multicenter Phase III IMbrave150 clinical study compared the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab ("T+A" regimen) with sorafenib. The results showed that the overall survival was 19.2 months compared to 13.4 months (HR 0.66, p<0.001), and the progression free survival was 6.9 months compared to 4.3 months (HR 0.65, p<0.001). Compared with sorafenib, the "T+A" regimen significantly improved the overall survival and progression free survival of unresectable HCC patients. In the 194 Chinese patient population, the median OS was 24.0 months compared to 11.4 months (HR 0.53), which is consistent with global benefits. Another randomized, open label, phase II-III ORIENT-32 study showed that the combination of Sintilimab and bevacizumab biosimilar ("Shuangda" regimen) significantly improved patient efficacy compared to sorafenib, significantly reduced the risk of death and progression, improved ORR and quality of life, and subgroup analysis showed similar benefits. The median overall survival of the two groups was 10.4 months (HR=0.569, p<0.001), progression free survival was 4.6 months compared to 2.8 months (HR=0.565, p<0.001), ORR was 21% compared to 4%, and DCR were 72% and 64%, respectively. The combination of Shuangda and each individual drug and potential disease has known safety and good tolerability. Currently, the combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (anti-PD-1/L1) and anti angiogenic drugs has become the standard treatment for unresectable advanced HCC. Although targeted therapy and immunotherapy have made breakthroughs in the field of liver cancer and continuously extended patient survival, first-line treatment inevitably leads to drug resistance. About 30% of patients cannot achieve objective relief due to primary drug resistance, and the median progression free survival of other patients with first-line treatment is about 4-7 months, followed by secondary drug resistance.
In the second-line treatment of advanced liver cancer, multiple immune monotherapy and anti angiogenic drug monotherapy are recommended by guidelines. The KEYNOTE-394 study enrolled second-line hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who experienced progression after treatment with sorafenib or oxaliplatin, or were intolerant to sorafenib or oxaliplatin treatment, and randomly assigned them to pembrolizumab+BSC (best supportive treatment) or placebo+BSC. The study results showed that compared with the control group, the pembrolizumab group significantly prolonged the median OS of patients (14.6 months compared to 13.0 months), HR=0.79，P=0.0180）， The 2-year OS rate of the pembrolizumab group was 34.3%, higher than the control group's 24.9%, and the long-term survival benefit was more significant. The median PFS was 2.6 months compared to 2.3 months (HR=0.74, P=0.0032, 2-year PFS rates were 11% and 0%, respectively), and the ORR was 12.7% compared to 1.3%. A global multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial of regorafenib in liver cancer patients who had previously received sorafenib treatment showed that after sorafenib treatment, regorafenib significantly reduced the risk of death and disease progression compared to the placebo control group, with a median OS of 10.6 months compared to 7.8 months (HR=0.63, P<0.0001) and a median PFS of 3.1 months compared to 1.5 months (HR=0.46, P<0.0001). However, the above clinical studies included participants who had previously received immunotherapy. In the current situation where target immunotherapy is the mainstream first-line treatment, the recommended plan for second-line treatment is still uncertain. A multicenter real-world study in the Asia Pacific region exploring the progression of first-line treatment with the A+T regimen followed by the selection of second-line system regimens. The median PFS of sorafenib, lenvatinib, and regorafenib were 2.3 months (95% CI 2.0-2.6), 4.0 months (95% CI 3.5-4.9), and 3.6 months (95% CI 2.7-5.4), respectively. The median OS of regorafenib was 6.3 months (95% CI 5.3-7.8), 8.0 months (95% CI 7.0-10.9), and 9.7 months (95% CI 5.2-NR), respectively. The median OS of regorafenib was higher than the other two TKIs. It is worth noting that choosing TKI combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (IO) as the second-line treatment regimen resulted in higher median PFS and OS than TKI monotherapy, at 5.4 months (95% CI 3.0-8.8) and 12.6 months (95% CI 9.8-NR), respectively.
Although monotherapy immunotherapy or anti angiogenic therapy brings certain benefits to second-line HCC patients, the efficacy is far from meeting clinical needs. Based on the synergistic effect of immunotherapy and anti angiogenic therapy, the combination therapy of the two is also constantly being explored. The JVDJ study showed that the combination of Remdesizumab and Duvalimumab in the treatment of HCC with previous treatment failure had an ORR of 11%, DCR of 61%, median PFS of 4.4 months, and median OS of 10.7 months. The efficacy was better in patients with high PD-L1 expression. A retrospective multicenter study showed that the combination of xindilimab and regorafenib for second-line treatment of advanced liver cancer after first-line sorafenib or lenvatinib treatment resulted in an ORR of 24.1%, DCR of 74.1%, median PFS of 5.6 months, and median OS of 13.4 months.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Experimental group | Experimental | Drug: Regorafenib and tislelizumab |
| Control group | Active comparator | Drug: Regorafenib |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Sign a written informed consent form;
- Age ≥ 18 years old, both male and female are eligible;
- Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosed by organization/pathology or imaging that meets the AASLD diagnostic criteria;
- HCC that has received targeted immunotherapy in the past (regardless of whether local treatment is received or not, excluding neoadjuvant therapy), including atezolizumab+bevacizumab, sintilizumab+bevacizumab analogs, carizolizumab+apatinib, and other PD-1/L1 drugs+TKI, and whose disease progression has been confirmed by imaging;
- Child Pugh score ≤ 7;
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- The subject has previous or concurrent malignant tumors (excluding cured skin basal cell carcinoma and cervical carcinoma in situ);
- It is known that the subject has a history of allergies to large molecule protein preparations, or is known to be allergic to the investigational drug or drug components;
- Within the past 6 months, there have been incidents of esophageal or gastric variceal bleeding caused by portal hypertension; Within 3 months prior to the first administration, severe (G3) varicose veins were identified through endoscopic examination; Evidence of portal hypertension (including imaging findings of splenomegaly), assessed by researchers as high-risk for bleeding
- Any life-threatening bleeding events that have occurred within the past 3 months, including the need for blood transfusion therapy, surgery or local treatment, and continuous medication therapy
- Subjects with any active autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune disease (such as but not limited to: autoimmune hepatitis, interstitial pneumonia, uveitis, enteritis, hepatitis, pituitary inflammation, vasculitis, nephritis, hyperthyroidism, hypothyroidism, those who have undergone thyroid surgery in the past cannot be included; subjects with vitiligo or complete remission of childhood asthma without any intervention in adulthood can be included; subjects with asthma requiring bronchodilators for medical intervention cannot be included);
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Regorafenib and tislelizumabTislelizumab: 200mg, iv, d1, Q3W; Regorafenib: 40-120mg, po, qd, d1-21, d22-d28 discontinuation Q4W | Drug | Experimental group |
| RegorafenibRegorafenib: 40-120mg, po, qd, d1-21, d22-d28 discontinuation Q4W | Drug | Control group |
Primary outcome
PFS
Time frame: 1 year
Progression free survival
4 secondary outcomes
ORR
Time frame: 6 months
DCR
Time frame: 6 months
OS
Time frame: 1 year
AE
Time frame: 6 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Jul 2025.
Related trials for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
Real-world Evaluation of the HistoSonics Edison System for Treatment of Liver Tumors Across Multidisciplinary Users (BOOMBOX: Master Study)
Liver Neoplasms, Primary Liver Cancer
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1
Prospective Exploratory Study of FAPi PET/CT With Histopathology Validation in Patients With Various Cancers
Bladder Carcinoma, Cervical Carcinoma
RecruitingObservational study
A Study to Evaluate Patient-Reported Satisfaction, Effectiveness, and Safety of Atezolizumab in Participants Treated in Routine Clinical Practice
Lung Cancer, Hepatocellular Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Regorafenib and tislelizumab and Regorafenib in people with Hepatocellular Carcinoma, run by Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
PFS (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Jul 2025.