Peri-implant Bone LossNCT07089407
Ten Year Follow up of Convergent Profile Implants
An observational study of Peri-implant Bone Loss and Peri-Implant Tissues, run by University of Cagliari at 1 site in Italy.
Trial summary
The aim of the study is to evaluate the marginal bone level (MBL) and pink aesthetic score (PES) changes on the short, medium and long-term, on a retrospective cohort of patients who received at least one "biotype implant" (DEI ITALIA SRL, Mercallo VA, Italy) with convergent transmucosal profile. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Peri-implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Tissues
- What is being tested?
- Dental implant placement
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 97 participants
- Where
- 1 siteItaly
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2023to 1 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients who received at least one implant with transmucosal convergent profile
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients aged between 18 and 75 years.
- Presence of at least one periapical radiograph taken at the time of implant placement and another at 1-2 years, 3-6 years, and 7-10 years after insertion.
- Photographic documentation for PES assessments performed at prosthetic loading and during follow-ups.
Who cannot join
- Patients with uncompensated systemic diseases (uncontrolled diabetes, severe autoimmune diseases).
- Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day).
- Incomplete clinical and radiographic documentation.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Ten-Year Follow-Up Analysis of MBL and PES Outcomes Around Convergent Transmucosal Profile Implants
The aim of the study is to evaluate the marginal bone level (MBL) and pink aesthetic score (PES) changes on the short, medium and long-term, on a retrospective cohort of patients who received at least one "biotype implant" (DEI ITALIA SRL, Mercallo VA, Italy) with convergent transmucosal profile. Ninety-seven patients with at least one periapical x-ray taken on the day of implant placement and at least one taken in the following 10 years were included for MBL analysis and 90 patients who had at least one photograph taken on the day of implant loading, and one taken in the following 10 years for PES analysis. The radiographs were divided into 4 groups: (1) implant placement; (2) 1-2 years follow-up (short-term); (3) 3-6 years follow-up (medium-term); (4) ≥7 years follow-up (long-term). Photographs were grouped similarly, except that the first group was relative to the day of prosthetic loading. MBL was measured using ImageJ software. Results were analyzed with Generalized Estimating Equations method using SPSS software, the P value was set at <0.05 for significance.
Read the detailed description
Modern implantology has evolved over the past decades toward solutions that optimize not only the functional stability of implants but also the aesthetic outcome and the preservation of hard and soft tissues. One such innovation is the *convergent transmucosal profile*, a design configuration for dental implants aimed at promoting the coronal migration of collagen fibers, reducing marginal bone loss (MBL), and improving the stability of soft tissues.
Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) is a key parameter in assessing the long-term stability of implants and is measured as a reduction in the height of the marginal bone around the implant. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES), on the other hand, qualitatively evaluates the aesthetic outcome of the peri-implant soft tissues by considering parameters such as the shape and fullness of the papilla, the contour of the soft tissues, and the color of the mucosa in relation to the prosthesis.
This retrospective study aims to evaluate, in a cohort of patients, the effectiveness of the convergent transmucosal profile of dental implants with respect to bone stability and aesthetic outcomes.
Study Aim The main objective of the study is to analyze the long-term stability of Marginal Bone Level (MBL) and the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) in a retrospective cohort of patients treated with implants featuring a convergent transmucosal profile. The study intends to identify correlations between aesthetic parameters and bone stability, also evaluating the clinical implications of this implant design.
Materials and Methods
Study Design The study will be retrospective, based on the analysis of medical records and radiographic data collected in a standardized manner. Selected patients received at least one implant with a convergent transmucosal profile and were followed for at least 10 years.
Inclusion Criteria
- Adult patients aged between 18 and 75 years.
- Presence of at least one periapical radiograph taken at the time of implant placement and another at 1-2 years, 3-6 years, and 7-10 years after insertion.
- Photographic documentation for PES assessments performed at prosthetic loading and during follow-ups.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with uncompensated systemic diseases (uncontrolled diabetes, severe autoimmune diseases).
- Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day).
- Incomplete clinical and radiographic documentation.
Description of the Convergent Transmucosal Profile The convergent transmucosal profile is characterized by a design that reduces the bulk of the implant neck near the soft tissues. This configuration promotes the coronal migration of collagen fibers, creating a biological seal that helps preserve the bone margin and support the soft tissues, thereby improving aesthetic outcomes.
Data Collection
- MBL Measurement: Marginal Bone Loss will be measured using standardized periapical radiographs, with dedicated software such as ImageJ, assessing the distance between the edge of the implant platform and the first bone contact.
- PES Evaluation: The Pink Esthetic Score will be calculated by analyzing photographic images, considering parameters such as the fullness and shape of the papillae, the contour of the soft tissues, mucosal color, and the overall aesthetic integration.
Sample Size Calculation The sample size was calculated assuming a clinically relevant difference of 0.5 mm in MBL with a standard deviation of 0.3 mm. With a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, at least 45 subjects are required. To account for possible dropouts during follow-up, the sample will be increased by 20%, bringing the minimum number to 54 patients.
Statistical Analysis Data will be analyzed using SPSS software. Continuous variables will be expressed as means and standard deviations. The data analysis will be conducted using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to manage the dependence between repeated measurements over time. The correlation between MBL and PES will be assessed using the Pearson coefficient. A p-value less than 0.05 will be considered significant.
Ethical Considerations The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All clinical and radiographic data will be anonymized to ensure patient privacy. No additional interventions are planned, and the study does not pose risks to participants.
- Conditions
- Peri-implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Tissues
- Being tested
- Dental implant placement
- Keywords
- Implants, Transmucosal profile, Marginal bone loss, Pink esthetic score
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Dental implant placementDevice
Implant site prepared through a consecutive drilling procedure in the maxilla or the mandible, implant placed.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Marginal bone level
The level of the peri-implant marginal bone measured on intraoral radiograph at various time points
Measured: 1 to 10 years after implant placement compared to baseline
Pink Esthetic Score
A scoring system that evaluates the esthetic appearance of soft tissue around dental implants based on five parameters-mesial papilla, distal papilla, curvature and level of facial mucosa, and root convexity/soft-tissue color and texture-each scored from 0 to 2, for a maximum of 10 points
Measured: from baseline (implant placement) to 10 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 Jul 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2023
- Primary completion1 Jul 2024
- Study completion1 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Peri-implant Bone LossStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 97 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Cagliari
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nicola Alberto Valente, DDS, MS, PhD, University of Cagliari
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07089407
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Biotype retro
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 20 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 28 Jul 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Jul 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ten-Year Follow-Up Analysis of MBL and PES Outcomes Around Convergent Transmucosal Profile Implants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07089407
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Biotype retro
- Conditions
- Peri-implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Tissues
- Keywords
- Implants, Transmucosal profile, Marginal bone loss, Pink esthetic score
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 97 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of CagliariUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Jul 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Jul 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the marginal bone level (MBL) and pink aesthetic score (PES) changes on the short, medium and long-term, on a retrospective cohort of patients who received at least one "biotype implant" (DEI ITALIA SRL, Mercallo VA, Italy) with convergent transmucosal profile. Ninety-seven patients with at least one periapical x-ray taken on the day of implant placement and at least one taken in the following 10 years were included for MBL analysis and 90 patients who had at least one photograph taken on the day of implant loading, and one taken in the following 10 years for PES analysis. The radiographs were divided into 4 groups: (1) implant placement; (2) 1-2 years follow-up (short-term); (3) 3-6 years follow-up (medium-term); (4) ≥7 years follow-up (long-term). Photographs were grouped similarly, except that the first group was relative to the day of prosthetic loading. MBL was measured using ImageJ software. Results were analyzed with Generalized Estimating Equations method using SPSS software, the P value was set at <0.05 for significance.
Detailed description
Modern implantology has evolved over the past decades toward solutions that optimize not only the functional stability of implants but also the aesthetic outcome and the preservation of hard and soft tissues. One such innovation is the *convergent transmucosal profile*, a design configuration for dental implants aimed at promoting the coronal migration of collagen fibers, reducing marginal bone loss (MBL), and improving the stability of soft tissues.
Marginal Bone Loss (MBL) is a key parameter in assessing the long-term stability of implants and is measured as a reduction in the height of the marginal bone around the implant. The Pink Esthetic Score (PES), on the other hand, qualitatively evaluates the aesthetic outcome of the peri-implant soft tissues by considering parameters such as the shape and fullness of the papilla, the contour of the soft tissues, and the color of the mucosa in relation to the prosthesis.
This retrospective study aims to evaluate, in a cohort of patients, the effectiveness of the convergent transmucosal profile of dental implants with respect to bone stability and aesthetic outcomes.
Study Aim The main objective of the study is to analyze the long-term stability of Marginal Bone Level (MBL) and the Pink Esthetic Score (PES) in a retrospective cohort of patients treated with implants featuring a convergent transmucosal profile. The study intends to identify correlations between aesthetic parameters and bone stability, also evaluating the clinical implications of this implant design.
Materials and Methods
Study Design The study will be retrospective, based on the analysis of medical records and radiographic data collected in a standardized manner. Selected patients received at least one implant with a convergent transmucosal profile and were followed for at least 10 years.
Inclusion Criteria
- Adult patients aged between 18 and 75 years.
- Presence of at least one periapical radiograph taken at the time of implant placement and another at 1-2 years, 3-6 years, and 7-10 years after insertion.
- Photographic documentation for PES assessments performed at prosthetic loading and during follow-ups.
Exclusion Criteria
- Patients with uncompensated systemic diseases (uncontrolled diabetes, severe autoimmune diseases).
- Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day).
- Incomplete clinical and radiographic documentation.
Description of the Convergent Transmucosal Profile The convergent transmucosal profile is characterized by a design that reduces the bulk of the implant neck near the soft tissues. This configuration promotes the coronal migration of collagen fibers, creating a biological seal that helps preserve the bone margin and support the soft tissues, thereby improving aesthetic outcomes.
Data Collection
- MBL Measurement: Marginal Bone Loss will be measured using standardized periapical radiographs, with dedicated software such as ImageJ, assessing the distance between the edge of the implant platform and the first bone contact.
- PES Evaluation: The Pink Esthetic Score will be calculated by analyzing photographic images, considering parameters such as the fullness and shape of the papillae, the contour of the soft tissues, mucosal color, and the overall aesthetic integration.
Sample Size Calculation The sample size was calculated assuming a clinically relevant difference of 0.5 mm in MBL with a standard deviation of 0.3 mm. With a significance level of 5% and a power of 80%, at least 45 subjects are required. To account for possible dropouts during follow-up, the sample will be increased by 20%, bringing the minimum number to 54 patients.
Statistical Analysis Data will be analyzed using SPSS software. Continuous variables will be expressed as means and standard deviations. The data analysis will be conducted using Generalized Estimating Equations (GEE) to manage the dependence between repeated measurements over time. The correlation between MBL and PES will be assessed using the Pearson coefficient. A p-value less than 0.05 will be considered significant.
Ethical Considerations The study will be conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All clinical and radiographic data will be anonymized to ensure patient privacy. No additional interventions are planned, and the study does not pose risks to participants.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients who received at least one implant with transmucosal convergent profile
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients aged between 18 and 75 years.
- Presence of at least one periapical radiograph taken at the time of implant placement and another at 1-2 years, 3-6 years, and 7-10 years after insertion.
- Photographic documentation for PES assessments performed at prosthetic loading and during follow-ups.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients with uncompensated systemic diseases (uncontrolled diabetes, severe autoimmune diseases).
- Heavy smokers (>10 cigarettes per day).
- Incomplete clinical and radiographic documentation.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Dental implant placementImplant site prepared through a consecutive drilling procedure in the maxilla or the mandible, implant placed. | Device | – |
Primary outcome
Marginal bone level
Time frame: 1 to 10 years after implant placement compared to baseline
The level of the peri-implant marginal bone measured on intraoral radiograph at various time points
Pink Esthetic Score
Time frame: from baseline (implant placement) to 10 years
A scoring system that evaluates the esthetic appearance of soft tissue around dental implants based on five parameters-mesial papilla, distal papilla, curvature and level of facial mucosa, and root convexity/soft-tissue color and texture-each scored from 0 to 2, for a maximum of 10 points
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Jul 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Peri-implant Bone Loss
Active, not recruiting
The Aim of the Study Will be Clinically and Radio Graphically Comparison of Two Implant Designs Used to Treat Atrophied Mandible . Implant Design Comparison Will Done for Implant Stability,Peri-implant Soft Tissue Health Changes and Bone Changes .Patients Will be Divided Randomly Into Two Group
Dental Implant Bone Loss, Peri-Implant Health
Active, not recruiting
Influence of Implant Insertion Depth on Peri-implant Bone Changes Around Short Implants
Tooth Loss, Edentulism
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diagnostic Accuracy of Large Language Models for Peri-Implant Marginal Bone Loss on Panoramic Radiographs
Peri-implantitis, Alveolar Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Access to Probing and Peri-implant Diseases
Peri-implantitis, Peri-implant Bone Loss
RecruitingObservational study
Markers of Bone Destruction and Oxidative Stress in Peri-implantitis
Periodontal Diseases, Periimplant Diseases
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Peri-implant Bone Loss and Peri-Implant Tissues, run by University of Cagliari at 1 site in Italy.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Marginal bone level (time frame: 1 to 10 years after implant placement compared to baseline). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Jul 2025.