Schizophrenia DisordersMeta-VR-AVATARNCT07091344
Cognitive and Metacognitive Evaluation in VR-Based Avatar Therapy for Psychosis
A study testing VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments in people with Schizophrenia Disorders and Treatment Resistant Hallucinations, run by Fundació Sant Joan de Déu at 1 site in Spain.
Trial summary
This study aims to evaluate the relationship between cognitive, metacognitive and social cognition variables in patients with psychosis undergoing VR-based Avatar Therapy for the treatment of auditory hallucinations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Schizophrenia Disorders, Treatment Resistant Hallucinations
- What is being tested?
- VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSpain
- Study dates
- 1 Mar 2024to 30 Dec 2026
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adults aged 18 years or older.
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder according to DSM-5 criteria.
- Experience of persistent auditory hallucinations for at least 3 months (PANSS hallucination score ≥ 3).
- Stable medication dosage for at least 4 weeks prior to recruitment.
- Fluent in the spoken language of the study site (Spanish).
- Able to provide informed consent.
- Regular psychiatric follow-up care.
Who cannot join
- Inability to identify a dominant voice for Avatar Therapy intervention.
- Intellectual disability based on medical history.
- Active substance abuse.
- Central nervous system injury or neurological disorders affecting cognitive performance.
- Severe visual impairment that precludes the use of VR technology.
- Aversion to virtual reality or prior experience of simulator sickness.
- Current suicidal ideation or risk.
- Lack of cooperation or inability to comply with study procedures.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Spain1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fundació Sant Joan de Déu - Unitat de Recerca del Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu
Barcelona, Catalonia, 08950
Susana Ochoa, PhD, +34 93 600 97 51, susana.ochoa@sjd.es
Luciana Díaz-Cutraro, PhD, +34 93 600 97 51, luciana.diaz@sjd.es
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Cognitive, Metacognitive, Social Cognition and Trauma Related-Variables in Patients With Psychosis Receiving VR-Based Avatar Therapy
This study aims to evaluate the relationship between cognitive, metacognitive and social cognition variables in patients with psychosis undergoing VR-based Avatar Therapy for the treatment of auditory hallucinations. In addition to the primary intervention, participants will be assessed using validated tools for emotion recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, neurocognition, and metacognition. The study also explores the potential role of trauma as a predisposing factor. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), intervention period (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy follow-up (week 24). By investigating these variables, this study seeks to better understand their impact on treatment outcomes and contribute to the development of personalized therapeutic approaches.
Read the detailed description
This interventional study investigates the impact of cognitive, metacognitive, and social cognition variables on the outcomes of VR-based Avatar Therapy for auditory hallucinations in patients with psychosis. Participants will be assessed at four key time points: screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), during the intervention (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy (week 24).
The intervention consists of 7 individual VR-based Avatar Therapy sessions delivered over 12 weeks. The therapy uses virtual reality to externalize and reframe distressing auditory hallucinations, helping participants develop more adaptive responses.
In addition to evaluating the therapy's effectiveness, the study incorporates validated tools to measure:
Social Cognition: Emotional recognition (Test de Reconocimiento Emocional), attributional style (AIHQ), theory of mind (Hinting Task), and social perception (SFRT-2).
Metacognition: Insight and cognitive monitoring using the BCIS and CBQ. Cognition: Neuropsychological functions, including attention, flexibility, and memory (SCIP, Stroop, TMT, and Vocabulary WAIS).
Trauma as a predisposing factor: Using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).
By examining these variables, the study aims to deepen the understanding of their influence on treatment outcomes and inform the development of personalized therapeutic approaches for psychosis.
- Being tested
- VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments
- Keywords
- VR-based Avatar Therapy, cognition, metacognition, social cognition, psychosis, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, auditory hallucinations, trauma and psychosis, emotion recognition, Personalized therapy
- Medical subject headings
- Schizophrenia, Psychotic Disorders, Hallucinations, Wounds and Injuries
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive AssessmentsBehavioural
VR-Based Avatar Therapy is a 12-week intervention designed to help patients with psychosis manage distressing auditory hallucinations. The therapy consists of 7 individual sessions using virtual reality (VR) technology to externalize the auditory hallucinations, allowing patients to interact with a computer-generated avatar representing their dominant voice.
In addition to standard therapy, participants will undergo assessments of cognition, metacognition, and social cognition to explore their impact on treatment outcomes. These assessments include measures of emotion recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, cognitive flexibility, and trauma history. Sessions are conducted using VR headsets and noise-canceling headphones to enhance immersion, and patients receive ongoing therapeutic guidance throughout the process.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments | Experimental | Participants will receive VR-based Avatar Therapy over a 12-week intervention period, consisting of 7 individual therapy sessions. This intervention is designed to externalize and reframe distressing auditory hallucinations using virtual reality.
In addition to the standard therapy, participants will undergo comprehensive assessments of cognition, metacognition, and social cognition at screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), during the intervention (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy (week 24). These measures will evaluate emotional recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, cognitive flexibility, and trauma history, aiming to explore their role in treatment outcomes. Receives: Behavioral: VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Emotion Recognition Score
Change in participants' ability to recognize basic emotions using the Faces Test. Score range: 0-20; higher scores = better emotion recognition.
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Executive Functioning Score
Change in Executive Functioning Score Executive functioning assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Outcomes include number of categories completed (0-6; higher = better) and number of perseverative errors (no fixed maximum; lower = better). The task ends when the participant completes 6 categories or after all 128 cards are placed.
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24.
Change in Attributional Style Score
Attributional style in ambiguous social situations assessed with the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ). Score range: 0-100; higher scores = greater hostile attribution/conviction.
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Theory of Mind Score
Ability to infer others' intentions measured by the Hinting Task. Score range: 0-6; higher scores = better Theory of Mind.
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Metacognition Score
Cognitive insight measured by the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS): Self-reflectiveness (0-27; higher = better) and Self-certainty (0-21; higher = worse).
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Cognitive Flexibility Score
Mental flexibility assessed with the Trail Making Test, Part B. Outcome: time in seconds (maximum 300 seconds); lower times = better performance.
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Global Cognitive Performance Score
Global cognition assessed with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP). Total score range: 0-75; higher = better cognitive performance.
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in Working Memory Score
Working memory assessed by the WAIS-IV Digit Span. Scaled score range: 1-19; higher scores = better performance.
Measured: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted29 Jul 2025
- Study start1 Mar 2024
- Primary completion30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Schizophrenia DisordersStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Model description
- The study employs a single-group pre-post interventional design with a waiting list control phase. All participants will initially undergo a 12-week waiting period (control phase) starting at screening (week 0). Baseline assessments will be conducted at week 12, followed by a 12-week intervention phase where participants receive 7 individual VR-based Avatar Therapy sessions. Post-therapy assessments will be conducted at week 24 to evaluate changes in auditory hallucinations and associated cognitive, metacognitive, and social cognition variables. This design allows for a comprehensive evaluation of both the direct effects of the intervention and the potential moderating or mediating role of the measured variables on therapeutic outcomes.
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Susana Ochoa, Fundació Sant Joan de Déu
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07091344
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PS-01-24
- Other IDs
- PS-01-24
- Acronym
- Meta-VR-AVATAR
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2025
- Last updated
- 29 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Anonymized individual participant data (IPD) will be made available upon reasonable request, after publication of primary results, and subject to approval by the research ethics committee and data protection regulations.
Publications
Corcoran R, Mercer G, Frith CD. Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: investigating "theory of mind" in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1995 Sep;17(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(95)00024-g.
PubMed 8541250Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, Stokes J, Handelsman L, Medrano M, Desmond D, Zule W. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Feb;27(2):169-90. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0.
PubMed 12615092Schmid P, Czekaj A, Frick J, Steinert T, Purdon SE, Uhlmann C. The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry (SCIP) as a routinely applied screening tool: pathology of acute psychiatric inpatients and cluster analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03508-4.
PubMed 34627191Reitan RM. Trail making test results for normal and brain-damaged children. Percept Mot Skills. 1971 Oct;33(2):575-81. doi: 10.2466/pms.1971.33.2.575. No abstract available.
PubMed 5124116Beck AT, Baruch E, Balter JM, Steer RA, Warman DM. A new instrument for measuring insight: the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):319-29. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00189-0.
PubMed 15099613Combs DR, Penn DL, Wicher M, Waldheter E. The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ): a new measure for evaluating hostile social-cognitive biases in paranoia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2007 Mar;12(2):128-43. doi: 10.1080/13546800600787854.
PubMed 17453895Brebion G, Stephan-Otto C, Cuevas-Esteban J, Usall J, Ochoa S. Impaired memory for temporal context in schizophrenia patients with hallucinations and thought disorganisation. Schizophr Res. 2020 Jun;220:225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
PubMed 32220501Lorente-Rovira E, Grasa E, Ochoa S, Corripio I, Pelaez T, Lopez-Carrilero R, Gutierrez-Gea A, Morano-Guillen M, Villagran JM, Bartels-Velthuis AA, Jenner JA, Sanjuan J. Different measures for auditory hallucinations in populations with psychosis. The Validation of the Spanish versions of the Auditory Vocal Hallucination Rating Scale (AVHRS) and the Positive and Useful Voices Inquiry (PUVI). Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed). 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):259-271. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsmen.2020.03.002.
PubMed 36513402Stephan-Otto C, Nunez C, Lombardini F, Cambra-Marti MR, Ochoa S, Senior C, Brebion G. Neurocognitive bases of self-monitoring of inner speech in hallucination prone individuals. Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):6251. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32042-4.
PubMed 37069194Diaz-Cutraro L, Garcia-Mieres H, Dimaggio G, Lysaker P, Moritz S, Ochoa S. Metacognition in psychosis: What and how do we assess it? Span J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):206-207. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 24. No abstract available.
PubMed 37716848Garety PA, Edwards CJ, Jafari H, Emsley R, Huckvale M, Rus-Calafell M, Fornells-Ambrojo M, Gumley A, Haddock G, Bucci S, McLeod HJ, McDonnell J, Clancy M, Fitzsimmons M, Ball H, Montague A, Xanidis N, Hardy A, Craig TKJ, Ward T. Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial. Nat Med. 2024 Dec;30(12):3658-3668. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
PubMed 39468363
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Cognitive, Metacognitive, Social Cognition and Trauma Related-Variables in Patients With Psychosis Receiving VR-Based Avatar Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07091344
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Meta-VR-AVATAR / PS-01-24
- Keywords
- VR-based Avatar Therapy, cognition, metacognition, social cognition, psychosis, schizophrenia spectrum disorders, auditory hallucinations, trauma and psychosis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundació Sant Joan de DéuUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Mar 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Sep 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 30 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 29 Jul 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to evaluate the relationship between cognitive, metacognitive and social cognition variables in patients with psychosis undergoing VR-based Avatar Therapy for the treatment of auditory hallucinations. In addition to the primary intervention, participants will be assessed using validated tools for emotion recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, neurocognition, and metacognition. The study also explores the potential role of trauma as a predisposing factor. Assessments will be conducted at four time points: screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), intervention period (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy follow-up (week 24). By investigating these variables, this study seeks to better understand their impact on treatment outcomes and contribute to the development of personalized therapeutic approaches.
Detailed description
This interventional study investigates the impact of cognitive, metacognitive, and social cognition variables on the outcomes of VR-based Avatar Therapy for auditory hallucinations in patients with psychosis. Participants will be assessed at four key time points: screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), during the intervention (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy (week 24).
The intervention consists of 7 individual VR-based Avatar Therapy sessions delivered over 12 weeks. The therapy uses virtual reality to externalize and reframe distressing auditory hallucinations, helping participants develop more adaptive responses.
In addition to evaluating the therapy's effectiveness, the study incorporates validated tools to measure:
Social Cognition: Emotional recognition (Test de Reconocimiento Emocional), attributional style (AIHQ), theory of mind (Hinting Task), and social perception (SFRT-2).
Metacognition: Insight and cognitive monitoring using the BCIS and CBQ. Cognition: Neuropsychological functions, including attention, flexibility, and memory (SCIP, Stroop, TMT, and Vocabulary WAIS).
Trauma as a predisposing factor: Using the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire (CTQ).
By examining these variables, the study aims to deepen the understanding of their influence on treatment outcomes and inform the development of personalized therapeutic approaches for psychosis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
- Model description
- The study employs a single-group pre-post interventional design with a waiting list control phase. All participants will initially undergo a 12-week waiting period (control phase) starting at screening (week 0). Baseline assessments will be conducted at week 12, followed by a 12-week intervention phase where participants receive 7 individual VR-based Avatar Therapy sessions. Post-therapy assessments will be conducted at week 24 to evaluate changes in auditory hallucinations and associated cognitive, metacognitive, and social cognition variables. This design allows for a comprehensive evaluation of both the direct effects of the intervention and the potential moderating or mediating role of the measured variables on therapeutic outcomes.
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments | Experimental | Behavioral: VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive AssessmentsParticipants will receive VR-based Avatar Therapy over a 12-week intervention period, consisting of 7 individual therapy sessions. This intervention is designed to externalize and reframe distressing auditory hallucinations using virtual reality. In addition to the standard therapy, participants will undergo comprehensive assessments of cognition, metacognition, and social cognition at screening (week 0), baseline (week 12), during the intervention (weeks 12-24), and post-therapy (week 24). These measures will evaluate emotional recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, cognitive flexibility, and trauma history, aiming to explore their role in treatment outcomes. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Adults aged 18 years or older.
- Diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum disorder according to DSM-5 criteria.
- Experience of persistent auditory hallucinations for at least 3 months (PANSS hallucination score ≥ 3).
- Stable medication dosage for at least 4 weeks prior to recruitment.
- Fluent in the spoken language of the study site (Spanish).
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Inability to identify a dominant voice for Avatar Therapy intervention.
- Intellectual disability based on medical history.
- Active substance abuse.
- Central nervous system injury or neurological disorders affecting cognitive performance.
- Severe visual impairment that precludes the use of VR technology.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive AssessmentsVR-Based Avatar Therapy is a 12-week intervention designed to help patients with psychosis manage distressing auditory hallucinations. The therapy consists of 7 individual sessions using virtual reality (VR) technology to externalize the auditory hallucinations, allowing patients to interact with a computer-generated avatar representing their dominant voice. In addition to standard therapy, participants will undergo assessments of cognition, metacognition, and social cognition to explore their impact on treatment outcomes. These assessments include measures of emotion recognition, attributional style, theory of mind, cognitive flexibility, and trauma history. Sessions are conducted using VR headsets and noise-canceling headphones to enhance immersion, and patients receive ongoing therapeutic guidance throughout the process. | Behavioural | VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments |
Primary outcome
Change in Emotion Recognition Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Change in participants' ability to recognize basic emotions using the Faces Test. Score range: 0-20; higher scores = better emotion recognition.
Change in Executive Functioning Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24.
Change in Executive Functioning Score Executive functioning assessed with the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). Outcomes include number of categories completed (0-6; higher = better) and number of perseverative errors (no fixed maximum; lower = better). The task ends when the participant completes 6 categories or after all 128 cards are placed.
Change in Attributional Style Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Attributional style in ambiguous social situations assessed with the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ). Score range: 0-100; higher scores = greater hostile attribution/conviction.
Change in Theory of Mind Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Ability to infer others' intentions measured by the Hinting Task. Score range: 0-6; higher scores = better Theory of Mind.
Change in Metacognition Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Cognitive insight measured by the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale (BCIS): Self-reflectiveness (0-27; higher = better) and Self-certainty (0-21; higher = worse).
Change in Cognitive Flexibility Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Mental flexibility assessed with the Trail Making Test, Part B. Outcome: time in seconds (maximum 300 seconds); lower times = better performance.
Change in Global Cognitive Performance Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Global cognition assessed with the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry (SCIP). Total score range: 0-75; higher = better cognitive performance.
Change in Working Memory Score
Time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24
Working memory assessed by the WAIS-IV Digit Span. Scaled score range: 1-19; higher scores = better performance.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 8541250Corcoran R, Mercer G, Frith CD. Schizophrenia, symptomatology and social inference: investigating "theory of mind" in people with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 1995 Sep;17(1):5-13. doi: 10.1016/0920-9964(95)00024-g.
- Background: PubMed 12615092Bernstein DP, Stein JA, Newcomb MD, Walker E, Pogge D, Ahluvalia T, Stokes J, Handelsman L, Medrano M, Desmond D, Zule W. Development and validation of a brief screening version of the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Feb;27(2):169-90. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2134(02)00541-0.
- Background: PubMed 34627191Schmid P, Czekaj A, Frick J, Steinert T, Purdon SE, Uhlmann C. The screen for cognitive impairment in psychiatry (SCIP) as a routinely applied screening tool: pathology of acute psychiatric inpatients and cluster analysis. BMC Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):494. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03508-4.
- Background: PubMed 5124116Reitan RM. Trail making test results for normal and brain-damaged children. Percept Mot Skills. 1971 Oct;33(2):575-81. doi: 10.2466/pms.1971.33.2.575. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 15099613Beck AT, Baruch E, Balter JM, Steer RA, Warman DM. A new instrument for measuring insight: the Beck Cognitive Insight Scale. Schizophr Res. 2004 Jun 1;68(2-3):319-29. doi: 10.1016/S0920-9964(03)00189-0.
- Background: PubMed 17453895Combs DR, Penn DL, Wicher M, Waldheter E. The Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire (AIHQ): a new measure for evaluating hostile social-cognitive biases in paranoia. Cogn Neuropsychiatry. 2007 Mar;12(2):128-43. doi: 10.1080/13546800600787854.
- Background: PubMed 32220501Brebion G, Stephan-Otto C, Cuevas-Esteban J, Usall J, Ochoa S. Impaired memory for temporal context in schizophrenia patients with hallucinations and thought disorganisation. Schizophr Res. 2020 Jun;220:225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.03.014. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
- Background: PubMed 36513402Lorente-Rovira E, Grasa E, Ochoa S, Corripio I, Pelaez T, Lopez-Carrilero R, Gutierrez-Gea A, Morano-Guillen M, Villagran JM, Bartels-Velthuis AA, Jenner JA, Sanjuan J. Different measures for auditory hallucinations in populations with psychosis. The Validation of the Spanish versions of the Auditory Vocal Hallucination Rating Scale (AVHRS) and the Positive and Useful Voices Inquiry (PUVI). Rev Psiquiatr Salud Ment (Engl Ed). 2022 Oct-Dec;15(4):259-271. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsmen.2020.03.002.
- Background: PubMed 37069194Stephan-Otto C, Nunez C, Lombardini F, Cambra-Marti MR, Ochoa S, Senior C, Brebion G. Neurocognitive bases of self-monitoring of inner speech in hallucination prone individuals. Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 17;13(1):6251. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32042-4.
- Background: PubMed 37716848Diaz-Cutraro L, Garcia-Mieres H, Dimaggio G, Lysaker P, Moritz S, Ochoa S. Metacognition in psychosis: What and how do we assess it? Span J Psychiatry Ment Health. 2023 Jul-Sep;16(3):206-207. doi: 10.1016/j.rpsm.2022.09.003. Epub 2022 Sep 24. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 39468363Garety PA, Edwards CJ, Jafari H, Emsley R, Huckvale M, Rus-Calafell M, Fornells-Ambrojo M, Gumley A, Haddock G, Bucci S, McLeod HJ, McDonnell J, Clancy M, Fitzsimmons M, Ball H, Montague A, Xanidis N, Hardy A, Craig TKJ, Ward T. Digital AVATAR therapy for distressing voices in psychosis: the phase 2/3 AVATAR2 trial. Nat Med. 2024 Dec;30(12):3658-3668. doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-03252-8. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Anonymized individual participant data (IPD) will be made available upon reasonable request, after publication of primary results, and subject to approval by the research ethics committee and data protection regulations.
Related trials for Schizophrenia Disorders
RecruitingPhase 2
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ublituximab in Participants With Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia
RecruitingPhase 3
Relapse Prevention Trial Evaluating KarXT Treatment in Schizophrenia
Schizophrenia
Recruiting
Magnetic Seizure Therapy for Schizophrenia - Trial
Treatment Resistant Schizophrenia, Schizophrenia
Recruiting
Developing Biomarker-Supported Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder (SSD) Prevention
Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders (SSD)
RecruitingObservational study
Sensory Profile and Early Clinical Signs of Calm Room Users
Psychotic Disorders, Personality Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing VR-Based Avatar Therapy with Cognitive and Metacognitive Assessments in people with Schizophrenia Disorders and Treatment Resistant Hallucinations, run by Fundació Sant Joan de Déu at 1 site in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Susana Ochoa, PhD (+34936406350 ext. 1253, susana.ochoa@sjd.es), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Emotion Recognition Score (time frame: Week 0, Week 12, Week 24). The study lists 8 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07091344, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Aug 2025.