AzTrials
AzTrials

Total Knee ArthroplastyNCT07092982

Comparison of Two Different Regional Anesthetic Methods in Total Knee Arthroplasty Patients

A study testing Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block and Ultrasound Guided iPACK Block in people with Total Knee Arthroplasty and Ultrasound Guided Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, run by SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Total Knee Arthroplasty patients are among the orthopedic cases that experience severe postoperative pain. In these cases, pain must be controlled. If pain is not controlled, early mobilization cannot be achieved. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
What is being tested?
Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block and Ultrasound Guided iPACK Block
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
52 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
4 Aug 2025to Jul 2026
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty
  • Patients aged 18-75
  • Patients with ASA I-II-III

Who cannot join

  • Coagulation disorders
  • Allergy to local anesthetics
  • Liver and renal failure
  • Alcohol and drug addiction
  • Cognitive dysfunction that may prevent pain assessment
  • Systemic or needle insertion site infection
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Analgesic use for more than 3 months
  • Patient refusal to participate in the study/refusal to consent
  • Presence of a hematoma, hernia, neoplasm, etc. in the area where the block will be performed
  • Pre-existing neurological deficit
  • Patients with contraindications to nerve block

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Kubilay Ekinci, MD contact

0905062671972

kubilay.ekinci@sbu.edu.tr

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site, 1 recruiting
  • SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital

    Istanbul

    Kubilay Ekinci, MD, 0905062671972, kubilay.ekinci@sbu.edu.tr

    Recruiting

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Effects of Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block With iPACK (Space Between the Popliteal Artery and the Posterior Knee Capsule) Block Combination and Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block on Postoperative Pain and Stress Response in Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total Knee Arthroplasty patients are among the orthopedic cases that experience severe postoperative pain. In these cases, pain must be controlled. If pain is not controlled, early mobilization cannot be achieved. This can result in delayed physical therapy, prolonged hospital stays, the development of nosocomial infections, and impaired cognitive function. All of these factors contribute to increased patient care costs. Multimodal analgesia methods are used to control this pain. One of these methods is peripheral nerve blocks. Peripheral nerve blocks provide pain control and reduce the likelihood of opioid use and related side effects such as nausea, vomiting, and constipation. Current studies recommend Adductor Canal Blocks and iPACK (space between the popliteal artery and the posterior knee capsule) blocks for Total Knee Arthroplasty patients. In addition, studies are also being conducted on the application of the Suprainguinal Fascia-Iliaca Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty patients. The differences in postoperative analgesic effects between these methods are a matter of interest. No study has been conducted comparing the effects of these two approaches, which are routinely applied in our clinic and comply with guidelines, on the postoperative stress response. Regional anesthesia provides adequate pain control and has a positive effect on the stress response. The investigators aim to see a similar effect in peripheral nerve blocks. Therefore, comparing the methods that mentioned will contribute to the literature. In this study, the effects of these two different approaches on postoperative stress response and analgesic efficacy will be compared in terms of patients' postoperative opioid consumption, pain at rest and with movement, time to first analgesic need and development of motor block. IL-6 and CRP values will be examined pre-operatively and post-operatively to measure the effects on the stress response.

Being tested
Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block, Ultrasound Guided iPACK Block

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca BlockProcedure or surgery

    Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, 30 ml Bupivacain %0,25

  • Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal BlockProcedure or surgery

    Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block, 15ml Bupivacain %0,25

  • Ultrasound Guided iPACK BlockProcedure or surgery

    Ultrasound Guided iPACK Block, 15ml Bupivacain %0,25

Study groups in NCT07092982
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ultrasound Guided Fascia Iliaca BlockActive comparatorSuprainguinal fascia iliaca block was applied to the patients in this group at the end of the operation.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block
Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block + iPACK BlockActive comparatorAdductor Canal Block and iPACK Block was applied to the patients in this group at the end of the operation.
Receives: Procedure: Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block; Procedure: Ultrasound Guided iPACK Block

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Cumulative opioid consumption

    Tramadol consumption will be recorded for 24 hours.

    Measured: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes (6)
  1. Numeric rating scale for pain

    Variations in the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores, both at rest and during movement, will be documented at specific time points (End of the surgery, Post-operative 6th, 12th and 24th hour). The NRS is a simple, single-dimensional tool used to assess pain intensity in adult patients. It is a numeric adaptation of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), where individuals are asked to choose an integer between 0 and 10 that best represents their pain level. A score of '0' corresponds to "no pain," while '10' indicates the "worst imaginable pain" or "pain as severe as possible.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours

  2. Time to first postoperative analgesic requirement

    The time to first postoperative analgesic requirement was recorded.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours

  3. Postoperative quadriceps muscle strength

    Muscle strength assessment will be performed using the Modified Bromage Scale. (End of the surgery, Post-operative 6th, 12th and 24th hour) Grade 0: No motor block; the patient is able to fully flex the hip and knee. Grade 1: Partial motor block; the patient is able to move the knee and foot but is unable to lift the extended leg.

    Grade 2: Nearly complete motor block; the patient is unable to flex the knee and can only move the foot.

    Grade 3: Complete motor block; the patient is unable to move the ankle or the great toe.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours

  4. Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting

    Opioid side effects were recorded.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours

  5. Quality of Recovery 15 (QoR-15)

    The influence of surgical and anesthetic interventions on perioperative quality of life and the patient's ability to return to routine daily activities will be systematically evaluated.

    QoR-15 has 15 questions. Each question is answered on a scale of 1 to 10. A higher score indicates more positive outcomes.

    Measured: 24 hours

  6. Inflammatory marker levels

    The levels of inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin-6, CRP, NLR [Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio], PLR [Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio]) will be assessed prior to surgery and at 24 hours postoperatively.

    Measured: Up to 24 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Jul 2025
  2. Study start4 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Jul 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJul 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
52 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07092982
Sponsor's protocol ID
56
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
18 Jul 2025
Last updated
6 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: All IPD that underlie results in a publication

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Ultrasound Guided Suprainguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, Ultrasound Guided Adductor Canal Block and Ultrasound Guided iPACK Block in people with Total Knee Arthroplasty and Ultrasound Guided Supra-inguinal Fascia Iliaca Block, run by SB Istanbul Education and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Kubilay Ekinci, MD (0905062671972, kubilay.ekinci@sbu.edu.tr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Cumulative opioid consumption (time frame: 24 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in