AzTrials
AzTrials

Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric JunctionNCT07095699

Intraoperative Margin Techniques for Esophagogastric Junction Adenocarcinoma: A Controlled Study

A study testing EndoSCell System in people with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction, run by Fudan University.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the EndoScell Scanner (ES) imaging system can accurately assess tumor-free surgical margins during surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), compared with standard frozen-section pathology. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
EndoSCell System
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
314 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
15 Aug 2025to 30 Jun 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients clinically diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG):
  • Including patients with Siewert type II and III AEG; Including patients in cT1 stage (recommended esophageal resection margin distance ≥1.5cm) and cT2 and above (recommended esophageal resection margin distance ≥3cm);
  • Plan to receive surgical resection of AEG;
  • Patients voluntarily participated in this study and signed the informed consent form;

Who cannot join

  • Patients who are allergic to methylene blue and fluorescein sodium;
  • Patients with severe cardiovascular or circulatory system diseases and cannot tolerate surgery;
  • Participated in other clinical trials of research drugs or devices in the past month;
  • Unable to understand the test requirements or unable to complete the study follow-up plan;
  • Pregnant and lactating women;
  • Patients who are unable to complete follow-up due to mental illness, cognitive or emotional disorders;
  • Subjects who are considered by the researchers to be unsuitable for participating in the study.

About this study

Official title: An Exploratory, Parallel Controlled Study to Explore the Effectiveness of Intraoperative Margin Exploration Techniques for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if the EndoScell Scanner (ES) imaging system can accurately assess tumor-free surgical margins during surgery for adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG), compared with standard frozen-section pathology.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Is ES non-inferior to intraoperative frozen-section pathology in identifying positive or negative tumor margins?
  • Does ES shorten the time needed for margin assessment and reduce the number of additional tissue resections required?

Researchers will compare an ES-assisted surgical arm with a conventional frozen-section arm to see if ES improves margin accuracy, shortens operative time, and increases the rate of complete (R0) tumor removal.

Participants will

  • undergo standard AEG resection with randomized assignment to either ES or frozen-section margin checks;
  • allow collection of margin tissue samples for ES, frozen-section, and final paraffin pathology;
  • attend routine follow-up visits for up to 2 years to monitor for local recurrence.
Being tested
EndoSCell System
Keywords
AEG resection, fluorescent, microscope

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • EndoSCell SystemDevice

    EndoSCell Scaner (ES) is a new type of intraoperative cell-level fluorescence-guided imaging technology that can be used for direct and rapid intraoperative tissue cell interpretation. This technology uses a handheld cell microscope system to magnify local tissue by about 1280 times, and can perform rapid real-time scanning and imaging of in vivo or excised ex vivo tissue.

Study groups in NCT07095699
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ES groupExperimentalES-assisted surgery
Receives: Device: EndoSCell System
FS GroupNo interventionFrozen Section without ES scanning

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Accuracy

    Using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, the accuracy of ES system and frozen pathology for AEG resection margin was evaluated: Accuracy Rate = true positive + true negative/total number of samples.

    Measured: intraoperative

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Evaluation of R0 resection rate

    The proportion of surgical resection specimens without residual tumor at the resection margin using paraffin pathology as the gold standard.

    Measured: 7days after the surgery

  2. Positive margin rate

    Using paraffin pathology as the gold standard, the proportion of ES interpretation as positive but frozen pathology showing negative

    Measured: 7days after the surgery

  3. Evaluation of the actual resection margin distance during ES-assisted AEG

    Evaluation of the actual resection margin distance during ES-assisted AEG

    Measured: 7days after the surgery

  4. Evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ES technology

    Evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of ES technology

    Measured: 7days after the surgery

  5. Evaluation of the consistency between ES technique and frozen pathology

    Evaluation of the consistency between ES technique and frozen pathology

    Measured: 7days after the surgery

  6. Postoperative recurrence: evaluate the anastomotic recurrence rate at 6, 12 months, and 2 years after surgery

    Postoperative recurrence: evaluate the anastomotic recurrence rate at 6, 12 months, and 2 years after surgery

    Measured: 6, 12 months, and 2 years after surgery

  7. Evaluation of the time efficiency of ES and frozen pathology

    ES real-time interpretation time vs frozen pathology result time

    Measured: 7days after the surgery

  8. Evaluate the number of timely adjustments to the resection range due to the interpretation of ES technology;

    Evaluate the number of timely adjustments to the resection range due to the interpretation of ES technology;

    Measured: 7days after the surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted31 Jul 2025
  2. Study start15 Aug 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion31 May 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Jun 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
314 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07095699
Sponsor's protocol ID
20250308
Status last verified
Jun 2025
First submitted
23 Jul 2025
Last updated
31 Jul 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing EndoSCell System in people with Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction, run by Fudan University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Jul 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Accuracy (time frame: intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Jul 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in