AzTrials
AzTrials

Bipolar 1 DisorderNCT07101107

Socio-cognitive and Biological Responses to Maltreatment

An observational study of Bipolar 1 Disorder and Control Subjects, run by Medical University Innsbruck at 1 site in Austria.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The study will investigate how a history of emotional childhood maltreatment (CM) is associated with different aspects of psychological (social behaviour, empathy) and biological (brain function and structure, inflammation) health. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Bipolar 1 Disorder, Control Subjects
How many people
160 participants
Where
1 siteAustria
Study dates
20 Jul 2026to 28 Feb 2030
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: For bipolar disorder with a current diagnosis of depressive episode: Inpatient clinic of the Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology of the Medical University Innsbruck. For healthy controls: recruitment is done via public advertisements (e.g. posters, flyers, local newspaper announcements) and at the homepage of Medical University Innsbruck, Tirol Kliniken, and University of Innsbruck.

Who may be able to join

  • absence of any axis I disorder according to DSM-5 and physical illness that might interfere with participant's cognitive performance;
  • age between 18 and 65 years according to clinical group; and
  • ability to give written informed consent for MRI and study participation.

Who cannot join

  • a history of one or more diagnoses of the following DSM-5 categories: past or current moderate or severe substance dependence (303.x, 304.x, 305.x) with the exclusion of tobacco use disorder (305.1), neurodevelopmental disorders (299.x, 307.x, 314.x, 315.x, 319.x), schizophrenia spectrum and other psychotic disorders (293.x, 295.x, 297.x, 298.x), neurocognitive disorders (290.x, 292.x, 294.x, 331.x), BD-I Single Manic (296.0x), BD-I Manic (296.4x), BD-I Mixed (296.6, 296.7, 296.8, 296.9), BD-II (296.89), or comorbid Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) as assessed by Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (SCID-5-PD);
  • a current episode of illness with psychotic features (296.54);
  • a recent history of central nervous system (CNS) trauma or significant CNS trauma;
  • physical illness that might interfere with the participant's cognitive performance;
  • an autoimmune disorder or inflammatory diseases;
  • currently on anti-inflammatory drugs, cortisol or cortisol derivates;
Show all 22Show fewer
  • cardiovascular impairment with life-threatening issues;
  • electroconvulsive therapy in the last 12 months;
  • current substance abuse (except caffeine and nicotine) as assessed by DSM-5 or positive urine drug screen;
  • IQ≤70 as assessed by the Mehrfachwahl-Wortschatztest" version B (MWT-B);
  • MRI contraindications (e.g. claustrophobia, metal, electric, magnetic or mechanically driven implants); or
  • other ethical considerations (e.g. pregnancy, lactation, participants not fluent in the language of the cognitive batteries and questionnaires).
  • first degree relatives with BD, schizophrenia, or known genetically-based mitochondriopathies;
  • a history of any axis I disorder, neurological, developmental disorders, CNS trauma, or comorbid BPD.
  • physical illness that might interfere with the participants' cognitive performance;
  • an autoimmune disorder or inflammatory diseases;
  • currently on anti-inflammatory drugs, cortisol or cortisol-derivates;
  • cardiovascular impairments with life-threatening issues;
  • current substance abuse;
  • IQ≤70;
  • MRI contraindications; or
  • other ethical considerations.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Noora Tuovinen, PhD contact

+4351250483819

noora.tuovinen@i-med.ac.at

Austria1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Medical University of Innsbruck

    Innsbruck, Tyrol, 6020

    Noora Tuovinen, PhD, +4351250483819, noora.tuovinen@i-med.ac.at

    Recruiting

Other trials in Austria

About this study

Official title: Socio-cognitive and Biological Responses to Childhood Maltreatment in Individuals With Bipolar Disorder and Control Subjects

The study will investigate how a history of emotional childhood maltreatment (CM) is associated with different aspects of psychological (social behaviour, empathy) and biological (brain function and structure, inflammation) health. In fact, CM is a risk factor for many mental disorders, such as schizophrenia and autism. However, it is unclear how a history of emotional CM affects psychological and biological outcomes in bipolar disorder (BD). Therefore, this study focuses on understanding how a possible history of CM affects BD compared to control participants (CP) with no known psychiatric illness.

The aim of the project is to investigate how a history of emotional CM is associated with social cognition. The investigators will recruit 80 CP and 80 people diagnosed with BD, some of whom will have a history of CM. The investigators will assess psychological well-being (social behaviour, empathy) at two points in time at the Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology at the Medical University of Innsbruck (MUI). Additionally, as they want to understand how emotional CM affects brain function and structure, the investigators will perform magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain at the Neuroimaging Core Facility (Medical University of Innsbruck). The investigators also want to understand how biological markers in the blood (such as telomere length, inflammation) might be affected, assessed in collaboration with the Department of Psychology (Leopold-Franzens University of Innsbruck). Finally, the investigators will look at a combination of the psychological and biological tests to see if there is a link between emotional CM and health outcomes.

Read the detailed description

Although the contribution of childhood maltreatment (CM) to psychological (e.g. social cognition) and biological (e.g. neural, biomolecular) outcomes has been extensively studied, e.g. in schizophrenia and autism, its contribution to bipolar disorder (BD) and the role of different CM subtypes, multiplicity and timing remains unclear. The aim of the project is to investigate how a history of emotional CM is associated with multidimensional aspects of social cognitive, neural and biomolecular parameters.

The research questions addressed in this project are: i) How is a history of emotional CM associated with social cognition in control participants (CP) with no known psychiatric illness and in individuals diagnosed with BD? ii) How is a history of emotional CM related to biomolecular and neural parameters in CP and individuals diagnosed with BD? iii) How are biomolecular markers, neural parameters, and social cognitive skills related in individuals with a history of emotional CM? The primary aim of this study is to investigate the association of self-reported history of emotional CM with social cognition (i.e. emotion recognition, cognitive and affective empathy) in CP and in individuals diagnosed with BD, both with and without a history of CM. Additional aims are to characterize the association of history of emotional CM with neural (i.e. task-based and resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI), morphometry, white matter) MRI parameters and biomolecular markers (i.e. telomere length, mitochondrial bioenergetics and biogenesis) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and blood plasma (selected immune-response mediators).

Recruitment, clinical assessments (e.g. Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale) and blood sampling of 80 CP and 80 individuals diagnosed with BD with and without a history of CM will be performed at two timepoints at the Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics and Medical Psychology, Medical University of Innsbruck (MUI). Longitudinal MRI acquisitions will be performed at the Neuroimaging Core Facility (MUI). Clinical, MRI and biomolecular analyses will be applied, and correlations of these findings with emotional CM, multiplicity and timing will be evaluated.

The contribution of a history of emotional CM to psychological and biological outcomes in BD is unknown. This study will clarify the association between emotional CM and social cognition in BD and CP. It will study how emotional CM alters brain function and structure in regions related to social cognition. A translational approach combining MR neuroimaging with psychoneuroimmunological methods will assess neural parameters together with biomolecular markers from whole blood in relation to emotional CM and social cognition.

Keywords
childhood maltreatment, Social Cognition, empathy, Bipolar Disorder, Biomolecules, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Theory Of Mind, telomere length, mitochondria, benevolent childhood experiences, trauma, positive childhood experiences, inflammatory markers
Medical subject headings
Bipolar Disorder, Wounds and Injuries

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07101107
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Bipolar 1 disorderNot described
Control subjectsNot described

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure; MACE-X) and emotion recognition of adult faces (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test; RMET)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (as assessed by a combined score of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure [MACE-X] emotional subscales: parental verbal abuse, parental nonverbal emotional abuse, emotional neglect, peer verbal abuse) and emotion recognition (number of correctly identified emotions) as assessed by the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test adult version (RMET). RMET use expressions from images of 28 adult faces, 50% male and 50% female. The task consist of two types of trials: emotion recognition and sex judgment. In the emotion recognition trials, participants select among four adjectives the one that best describes what the person in the image is thinking or feeling. This task is sensitive to subtle emotion processing deficits since it involves the recognition of a relatively wide range of complex mental states.

    Measured: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  2. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and emotion recognition of child faces (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test; RME-C-T)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and emotion recognition (number of correctly identified emotions) as assessed the Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test child version (RME-C-T). RME-C-T uses high-quality pictures of 28 child faces. The task consist of two types of trials: emotion recognition and sex judgment. In the emotion recognition trials, participants select among four adjectives the one that best describes what the person in the image is thinking or feeling.

    Measured: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  3. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and cognitive empathy (Multifaceted Empathy Test; MET-core 2)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and cognitive empathy (number of correctly identified) as assessed by The Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET-core 2). MET-core 2 is an ecologically valid measure that allows separate assessment of cognitive and affective empathy. It consists of 40 photographs depicting people in emotionally charged situations and is designed to elicit strong emotional reactions. To assess cognitive empathy ("What is the person feeling?"), the mental states of the people in the photographs are selected from four mental state descriptors. To assess affective empathy ("How much are you feeling for the person?"), the level of empathic concern for the depicted individuals is rated on a 4-point Likert scale (from "not at all" to "very strong") for the same series of pictures.

    Measured: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  4. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and affective empathy (Multifaceted Empathy Test; MET-core 2)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and affective empathy (rating) as assessed by The Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET-core 2). MET-core 2 is an ecologically valid measure that allows separate assessment of cognitive and affective empathy. It consists of 40 photographs depicting people in emotionally charged situations and is designed to elicit strong emotional reactions. To assess cognitive empathy ("What is the person feeling?"), the mental states of the people in the photographs are selected from four mental state descriptors. To assess affective empathy ("How much are you feeling for the person?"), the level of empathic concern for the depicted individuals is rated on a 4-point Likert scale for the same series of pictures.

    Measured: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain morphometry (T1-weighted imaging)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain morphometry (T1-weighted MRI). The research hypothesis is that increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment will correlate with small limbic volumes (e.g. hippocampi, amygdala, thalamus). These changes in morphometry will be more pronounced in bipolar disorder compared to control participants.

    Measured: At enrollment (bipolar disorder with moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  2. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain responses (task-based fMRI)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain responses (task-based functional MRI). In control participant, the hypothesis is that increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment will correlate with: i) low brain responses during RMET/RME-C-T (along with correct and rapid identification of negative emotions) in social cognitive brain regions (e.g. temporoparietal junction, medial prefrontal cortex, amygdala, insula); ii) high brain responses during MET-Core 2 (along with high cognitive and affective empathy abilities). In bipolard disorder, increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment will correlate with: i) high brain responses during RMET/RME-C-T in social cognitive regions (along with incorrect and slow identification of negative emotions) ii) low brain responses during MET-Core 2 (along with low cognitive and affective empathy abilities).

    Measured: At enrollment (bipolar disorder with moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  3. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain functional connectivity (resting-state functional MRI).

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain functional connectivity (resting-state functional MRI). The hypothesis is that increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment will correlate low functional connectivity within the Theory-of-Mind (ToM) network. These changes in functional connectivity will be more pronounced in bipolar disorder compared to control participants. Both cognitive and affective ToM tasks involve the posterior temporoparietal junction, the posterior superior temporal sulcus, and the posterior cingulate cortex. While cognitive ToM involves the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), dorsal striatum, dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), and dorsomedial PFC, affective ToM involves the inferior frontal gyrus, insula, ventral striatum, amygdala, temporal poles, ACC, and medial PFC.

    Measured: At enrollment (bipolar disorder with moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  4. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain white matter values (diffusion MRI)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and brain white matter values (diffusion MRI). The hypothesis is that increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment will correlate with disruption (e.g. low fractional anisotropy values) in white matter tracts connecting social cognitive regions (e.g. superior longitudinal fasciculus, cingulum, uncinate fasciculus, corpus callosum). These changes in white matter will be more pronounced in bipolar disorder compared to control participants.

    Measured: At enrollment (bipolar disorder with moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  5. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and inflammation

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and inflammation (measured from blood samples). The hypothesis is that increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment is correlated with higher inflammation levels (e.g. CRP, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α). High levels of inflammation will be more pronounced in bipolar disorder compared to control participants.

    Measured: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  6. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and telomere length

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and telomere length (measured from blood samples). The hypothesis is that increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment is correlated with telomere shortening. Telomere shortening will be more pronounced in bipolar disorder compared to control participants.

    Measured: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  7. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and mitochondrial bioenergetics and biogenesis

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and mitochondrial bioenergetics and biogenesis (measured from blood samples). The hypothesis is that in control participants increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment is correlated with high mitochondria function (e.g. high mitochondrial respiratory activity and density as a compensatory effect of chronic stress) whereas in bipolar disorder it will correlate with impairments in mitochondria function.

    Measured: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

  8. Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and and gaze pattern (as studied with eye-tracking)

    Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale; MACE-X) and gaze pattern (as studied with eye-tracking) within the eye region during the RMET. The hypothesis is that increasing severity of a history of emotional childhood maltreatment will correlate with reduced attention to the eye region. These changes will be more pronounced in bipolar disorder compared to control participants.

    Measured: At enrollment (bipolar disorder with moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Aug 2025
  2. Study start20 Jul 2026
  3. Primary completion28 Feb 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion28 Feb 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
160 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07101107
Sponsor's protocol ID
1410/2020
Other IDs
10.55776/KLP7245424
Status last verified
Aug 2026
First submitted
10 Jul 2025
Last updated
7 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bipolar 1 Disorder and Control Subjects, run by Medical University Innsbruck at 1 site in Austria.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 22 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Austria. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Noora Tuovinen, PhD (+4351250483819, noora.tuovinen@i-med.ac.at), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Correlation between a history of emotional childhood maltreatment score (Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure; MACE-X) and emotion recognition of adult faces (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test; RMET) (time frame: In bipolar disorder, at enrollment (in moderate or severe depressed state) and at improved clinical state (response or remission) at 3-6 months after enrollment. In control participants, at enrollment and at 3-6 months after.). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in