Orthodontic TreatmentNCT07107100
Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients
A study testing a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth in people with Orthodontic Treatment, run by Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.
Trial summary
The placement technique of retainers in both maxillary and mandibular arches can influence the time taken for bonding the retainer in the mouth of a patient which can in turn affect the patient´s response to the procedure. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 13 to 40 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Orthodontic Treatment
- What is being tested?
- a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 sitePakistan
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2024to 21 Aug 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 13 to 40 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients aged between 18 - 40 years
- Patients who read, write and understand English language
- Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment
- Patients with good oral hygiene, with grade 1 or below on plaque and gingival indices at the time of debonding of brackets.
- All patients who will sign the informed consent form
Who cannot join
- Patients with periodontal disease
- Patients with any systemic disease
- Pregnant or nursing females
- Patients who cannot come for follow up appointments for a retainer check up
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Pakistan1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
The Aga Khan University Hospital
Karachi, Sindh, 75290
FIZZAH IKRAM, BDS, 923310243568, fizzahikram@outlook.com
FIZZAH IKRAM, BDS
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients - A Modified Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
The placement technique of retainers in both maxillary and mandibular arches can influence the time taken for bonding the retainer in the mouth of a patient which can in turn affect the patient´s response to the procedure. The different placement techniques can influence the stability of the retainer wire on teeth and the maintenance of periodontal health during the retention period. Therefore, it is essential to know which technique is better suited for placement and its influence on periodontal health so that in the future it helps clinicians save their time during placement of retainers while benefiting the patients. To our knowledge, this will be the first study both locally and internationally that will include an assessment of periodontal health, time duration of placement and stability of fixed retainer in the maxillary arch as well. Three months period is sufficient for assessment of periodontal health and failure of retainer, long term studies can be at a risk of attrition bias.
OBJECTIVES:
Read more
The objectives of this study are:
- The primary objective of this study is to compare the failure of fixed retainers, along with periodontal health and bonding time, which are bonded either through direct method or indirect method on patients undergoing orthodontic debonding through a modified split-mouth technique using mean values for plaque index, gingival index, calculus index follow up appointments over a period of three months.
- The secondary objective of the study is to assess the amount of time taken during placement of retainers via both direct and indirect bonding of fixed retainers
Read the detailed description
HYPOTHESIS:
- Null Hypothesis: There is no difference in placement technique of fixed retainers that can influence the failure of fixed retainers.
- Alternate Hypothesis: There is a 54% difference in placement technique of fixed retainers that can influence the failure of fixed retainers.
MATERIAL \& METHODS:
Study Design: A modified split-mouth randomized controlled trial Settings: Department of Surgery, Dental clinics at the Aga Khan University Hospital.
Study Duration: Minimum six months after ethical review committee (ERC) approval, two months will be used for recruitment of participants in this study.
SAMPLE SIZE:
The size of sample was measured using Open-epi software by using the findings of Gokce et al.15, keeping α as 5%, the power of study as 80% and confidence level at 95%. To calculate sample size, the investigators used the mean and standard deviation values of gingival index at one week interval (0.54 ± 0.64) and (1.02 ± 0.67) for two different bonding techniques i.e direct and indirect, of fixed retainer placement. A sample size of 30 was achieved in each group accounting for the total sample size of 60.
Sampling Technique: Non-probability consecutive sampling
Sample Selection:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 - 40 years
- Patients who read, write and understand English language
- Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment
- Patients with good oral hygiene, with grade 1 or below on plaque and gingival indices at the time of debonding of brackets.
- All patients who will sign the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with periodontal disease
- Patients with any systemic disease
- Pregnant or nursing females
- Patients who cannot come for follow up appointments for a retainer check up
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
Before the initiation of the study, ethical approval will be taken from the institutional Ethical Review Committee of AKUH. This study will be carried out as per guidelines of the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Any modifications in the protocol will be re-submitted to the ERC. The study will be conducted in compliance with regulations and a copy of the final study protocol will be submitted to ERC. All participants will be given the choice to either accept or refuse their inclusion in the study after providing them with complete detailed information. Only those patients signing the informed consent (Annexure E) will be recruited as study participants. All the data recorded of patients will remain confidential. Access will be provided to no one except the investigators. Participants' names and identities will remain undisclosed; however, data may be seen by ERC or any local regulatory body. Data will be saved for 15 years as per regulatory requirements and institutional guidelines.
Participants will be assigned to one of the two study groups using a computer-generated randomization list using a random permuted block sampling of 6. The investigators of the study will not be blinded. The recruitment of the patients will be performed by the investigator who will explain the objective, the two arms of the study and the allocation to the participants. Patients will be recruited by principal investigator Dr. Rashna and co-investigator Dr. Fizzah on the basis of the above-mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria. A proper thorough history and examination will be taken by the principal investigator and co-investigator for the purpose of appropriate recruitment of patients. Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes method will be implemented for allocation concealment, which will conceal the sequence until interventions are being assigned. Allocation of one of two retainer placement techniques will be assigned using closed sealed envelopes. Randomization will be done by closed sealed envelopes. The randomization will be performed by CTU. The study investigators and patients will not be blinded. The eligible upper and lower arches in each subject will be randomized to one of two groups at a 1:1 allocation ratio. Randomization will aid in minimizing selection bias. Envelopes must be stored in a secure place and opened one by one, only after the subject has been found eligible to be randomized.
A fixed retainer wire will be placed either through direct method or indirect method on randomely selected either of the maxillary and mandibular teeth of orthodontic patients after debonding procedure. All the measurements will be recorded by the investigator on a plaque index (Annexure A), gingival index (Annexure B) and calculus index (Annexure C).
Data will be collected on an organized study proforma (Annexures D). The patients will be recruited from the Dental clinics, AKUH. All patients who will sign the informed consent form (Annexure E) will receive detailed information regarding the study. Data will be collected at three points in time. First, at the time of placement of retainer (T-0), their periodontal health will be recorded on the chart using the plaque, calculus and gingival indices and bonding time will be recorded using a timer. At the follow-up appointments at 1 month (T-1), 3 months (T-2), retainer breakage, gingival and periodontal health findings will be assessed clinically.
Study groups:
The patients will be screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria by the investigator. Plaque will be assessed using a Community Index of Periodontal Treatment Needs (CPITN) probe before bonding at T-0, T-1, and T-2. Measurements will be taken for the plaque and gingival indices and bonding time will be assessed using a timer. Retainer failures and periodontal health will be assessed at the follow-up appointments.
Group A (Intervention): Indirect placement of retainer (first making of retainer in lab and then it´s transfer from the cast onto the teeth via silicon key.) Group B (Control): Direct placement of retainer ( no prior lab work). The participants will receive routine instructions for oral hygiene maintenance and care of the appliance verbally.
The investigator will unseal the envelope from the CTU, containing information regarding the intervention to be used on the participants based on randomization.
Retainers' management:
Routine oral hygiene maintenance and retainer management instructions will be given to each recruit. The participants will be advised to not bite from their front teeth as it may make retainer wire susceptible to breakage. In case, patient feels wire has moved, tooth has moved or wire is hindering chewing and irritating soft tissues such as tongue, gingiva, patients are advised to report to orthodontic clinics for timely repair of retainer wire.
Interim Analysis/ Stopping Rules:
Interim analysis will be run once after achievement of data collection of 50% of sample size. On the basis of results, it will be decided whether the study will be continued. In case of more than 54% significant difference in failure of fixed retainers, and significant difference in periodontal health and bonding time in two different bonding techniques of fixed retainers, the study will be stopped.
DATA ANALYSIS:
Data will be entered and analyzed in SPSS for Windows (version 23.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago). Frequencies and proportions will be reported for categorical variables such as gender. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to check the normality of the data. Descriptive statistics, such as means and standard deviations for normally distributed or median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed data will be reported for all baseline clinical factors such as age, gender, type of malocclusion, duration of retainer placement since two different methods are used. Further, gingival and periodontal health may modify/effect the survival of retainers. Repeated measures Anova will be used for the pairwise comparison at baseline, one month and two months follow up. Independent sample t-test will be used for the comparison between the two groups to compare the values between both groups at T-0, T-1, and T-2. Univariate Cox regression analysis will be used to assess the influence of factors such as age, gender, and type of malocclusion on periodontal health and retainer failures. Significant variables at univariate level will be taken to the multivariable regression. Cox proportional hazard regression will be run for survival analysis to assess the survival time of both, DB and IDB. The significance level will be kept at p ≤ 0.05 and confidence level will be kept at 95%.
Data management and confidentiality:
Confidentiality regarding patient information will be strictly followed. Except investigators nobody will have access to patient information. There will be no disclosure at any time of participants' name and identity. However, the data may be seen by ERC, or any local regulatory body for monitoring and audit purpose. As per GCP and other guidelines, data will be retained for 10 years.
Publication policy/plan:
For publication, the anonymized data will be utilized, and it could be presented in either national or worldwide forum.
Data monitoring and quality assurance:
Study PI will randomly check the data for accuracy and completeness on ongoing basis.
Ethical considerations:
Before the initiation of the study, ethical approval will be taken from the institutional Ethical Review Committee of AKUH. This study will be carried out as per guidelines of the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Any modifications in the protocol will be re-submitted to the ERC. The study will be conducted in compliance with regulations and a copy of the final study protocol will be submitted to ERC. All participants will be given the choice to either accept or refuse their inclusion in the study after providing them with complete detailed information. Only those patients signing the informed consent (Annexure E) will be recruited as study participants. All the data recorded of patients will remain confidential. Access will be provided to no one except the investigators. Participants' names and identities will remain undisclosed; however, data may be seen by ERC or any local regulatory body. Data will be saved for 10 years as per GCP and institutional guidelines.
Possible risks or benefits:
There is a risk of breakage of retainer wire. In case of retainer breakage, there can be a risk of flexible retainer wire irritating the gums and hinder chewing and for this reason patients are advised to come to dental clinics for timely repair of retainer wire.
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Treatment
- Being tested
- a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth
- Keywords
- fixed retainer, retainer breakage
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teethOther
a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| control | Other | those in which fixed retainer is placed using conventional method Receives: Other: a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth |
| Silicon Jig | Experimental | those in which fixed retainer was placed using a silicon jig Receives: Other: a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Assessment of retainer failure
using the frequency of breakage of retainer wire, we will assess retainer failure
Measured: 3 months with 3 follow ups, one at the time of placement and one at 1 month, next on 3rd month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2024
- Primary completion10 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion21 Aug 2025 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Orthodontic TreatmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rashna Hoshang Sukhia, Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07107100
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2024-9292-32612
- Other IDs
- 375
- Status last verified
- Jul 2025
- First submitted
- 12 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 6 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: In order to assess outcomes, only the retainer breakage frequency, gingival health scores on an organised proforma will be shared between principal and sub investigators
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Periodontal Health, Bonding Time and Failure Between Direct and Indirect Fixed Retainer Placement Among Orthodontic Patients - A Modified Split-mouth Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07107100
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2024-9292-32612
- Conditions
- Orthodontic Treatment
- Keywords
- fixed retainer, retainer breakage
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Aga Khan University Hospital, PakistanUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2024 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 10 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 21 Aug 2025 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The placement technique of retainers in both maxillary and mandibular arches can influence the time taken for bonding the retainer in the mouth of a patient which can in turn affect the patient´s response to the procedure. The different placement techniques can influence the stability of the retainer wire on teeth and the maintenance of periodontal health during the retention period. Therefore, it is essential to know which technique is better suited for placement and its influence on periodontal health so that in the future it helps clinicians save their time during placement of retainers while benefiting the patients. To our knowledge, this will be the first study both locally and internationally that will include an assessment of periodontal health, time duration of placement and stability of fixed retainer in the maxillary arch as well. Three months period is sufficient for assessment of periodontal health and failure of retainer, long term studies can be at a risk of attrition bias.
OBJECTIVES:
The objectives of this study are:
- The primary objective of this study is to compare the failure of fixed retainers, along with periodontal health and bonding time, which are bonded either through direct method or indirect method on patients undergoing orthodontic debonding through a modified split-mouth technique using mean values for plaque index, gingival index, calculus index follow up appointments over a period of three months.
- The secondary objective of the study is to assess the amount of time taken during placement of retainers via both direct and indirect bonding of fixed retainers
Detailed description
HYPOTHESIS:
- Null Hypothesis: There is no difference in placement technique of fixed retainers that can influence the failure of fixed retainers.
- Alternate Hypothesis: There is a 54% difference in placement technique of fixed retainers that can influence the failure of fixed retainers.
MATERIAL \& METHODS:
Study Design: A modified split-mouth randomized controlled trial Settings: Department of Surgery, Dental clinics at the Aga Khan University Hospital.
Study Duration: Minimum six months after ethical review committee (ERC) approval, two months will be used for recruitment of participants in this study.
SAMPLE SIZE:
The size of sample was measured using Open-epi software by using the findings of Gokce et al.15, keeping α as 5%, the power of study as 80% and confidence level at 95%. To calculate sample size, the investigators used the mean and standard deviation values of gingival index at one week interval (0.54 ± 0.64) and (1.02 ± 0.67) for two different bonding techniques i.e direct and indirect, of fixed retainer placement. A sample size of 30 was achieved in each group accounting for the total sample size of 60.
Sampling Technique: Non-probability consecutive sampling
Sample Selection:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients aged between 18 - 40 years
- Patients who read, write and understand English language
- Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment
- Patients with good oral hygiene, with grade 1 or below on plaque and gingival indices at the time of debonding of brackets.
- All patients who will sign the informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with periodontal disease
- Patients with any systemic disease
- Pregnant or nursing females
- Patients who cannot come for follow up appointments for a retainer check up
DATA COLLECTION PROCEDURE:
Before the initiation of the study, ethical approval will be taken from the institutional Ethical Review Committee of AKUH. This study will be carried out as per guidelines of the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Any modifications in the protocol will be re-submitted to the ERC. The study will be conducted in compliance with regulations and a copy of the final study protocol will be submitted to ERC. All participants will be given the choice to either accept or refuse their inclusion in the study after providing them with complete detailed information. Only those patients signing the informed consent (Annexure E) will be recruited as study participants. All the data recorded of patients will remain confidential. Access will be provided to no one except the investigators. Participants' names and identities will remain undisclosed; however, data may be seen by ERC or any local regulatory body. Data will be saved for 15 years as per regulatory requirements and institutional guidelines.
Participants will be assigned to one of the two study groups using a computer-generated randomization list using a random permuted block sampling of 6. The investigators of the study will not be blinded. The recruitment of the patients will be performed by the investigator who will explain the objective, the two arms of the study and the allocation to the participants. Patients will be recruited by principal investigator Dr. Rashna and co-investigator Dr. Fizzah on the basis of the above-mentioned inclusion and exclusion criteria. A proper thorough history and examination will be taken by the principal investigator and co-investigator for the purpose of appropriate recruitment of patients. Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes method will be implemented for allocation concealment, which will conceal the sequence until interventions are being assigned. Allocation of one of two retainer placement techniques will be assigned using closed sealed envelopes. Randomization will be done by closed sealed envelopes. The randomization will be performed by CTU. The study investigators and patients will not be blinded. The eligible upper and lower arches in each subject will be randomized to one of two groups at a 1:1 allocation ratio. Randomization will aid in minimizing selection bias. Envelopes must be stored in a secure place and opened one by one, only after the subject has been found eligible to be randomized.
A fixed retainer wire will be placed either through direct method or indirect method on randomely selected either of the maxillary and mandibular teeth of orthodontic patients after debonding procedure. All the measurements will be recorded by the investigator on a plaque index (Annexure A), gingival index (Annexure B) and calculus index (Annexure C).
Data will be collected on an organized study proforma (Annexures D). The patients will be recruited from the Dental clinics, AKUH. All patients who will sign the informed consent form (Annexure E) will receive detailed information regarding the study. Data will be collected at three points in time. First, at the time of placement of retainer (T-0), their periodontal health will be recorded on the chart using the plaque, calculus and gingival indices and bonding time will be recorded using a timer. At the follow-up appointments at 1 month (T-1), 3 months (T-2), retainer breakage, gingival and periodontal health findings will be assessed clinically.
Study groups:
The patients will be screened using the inclusion and exclusion criteria by the investigator. Plaque will be assessed using a Community Index of Periodontal Treatment Needs (CPITN) probe before bonding at T-0, T-1, and T-2. Measurements will be taken for the plaque and gingival indices and bonding time will be assessed using a timer. Retainer failures and periodontal health will be assessed at the follow-up appointments.
Group A (Intervention): Indirect placement of retainer (first making of retainer in lab and then it´s transfer from the cast onto the teeth via silicon key.) Group B (Control): Direct placement of retainer ( no prior lab work). The participants will receive routine instructions for oral hygiene maintenance and care of the appliance verbally.
The investigator will unseal the envelope from the CTU, containing information regarding the intervention to be used on the participants based on randomization.
Retainers' management:
Routine oral hygiene maintenance and retainer management instructions will be given to each recruit. The participants will be advised to not bite from their front teeth as it may make retainer wire susceptible to breakage. In case, patient feels wire has moved, tooth has moved or wire is hindering chewing and irritating soft tissues such as tongue, gingiva, patients are advised to report to orthodontic clinics for timely repair of retainer wire.
Interim Analysis/ Stopping Rules:
Interim analysis will be run once after achievement of data collection of 50% of sample size. On the basis of results, it will be decided whether the study will be continued. In case of more than 54% significant difference in failure of fixed retainers, and significant difference in periodontal health and bonding time in two different bonding techniques of fixed retainers, the study will be stopped.
DATA ANALYSIS:
Data will be entered and analyzed in SPSS for Windows (version 23.0, SPSS Inc. Chicago). Frequencies and proportions will be reported for categorical variables such as gender. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to check the normality of the data. Descriptive statistics, such as means and standard deviations for normally distributed or median and interquartile range (IQR) for non-normally distributed data will be reported for all baseline clinical factors such as age, gender, type of malocclusion, duration of retainer placement since two different methods are used. Further, gingival and periodontal health may modify/effect the survival of retainers. Repeated measures Anova will be used for the pairwise comparison at baseline, one month and two months follow up. Independent sample t-test will be used for the comparison between the two groups to compare the values between both groups at T-0, T-1, and T-2. Univariate Cox regression analysis will be used to assess the influence of factors such as age, gender, and type of malocclusion on periodontal health and retainer failures. Significant variables at univariate level will be taken to the multivariable regression. Cox proportional hazard regression will be run for survival analysis to assess the survival time of both, DB and IDB. The significance level will be kept at p ≤ 0.05 and confidence level will be kept at 95%.
Data management and confidentiality:
Confidentiality regarding patient information will be strictly followed. Except investigators nobody will have access to patient information. There will be no disclosure at any time of participants' name and identity. However, the data may be seen by ERC, or any local regulatory body for monitoring and audit purpose. As per GCP and other guidelines, data will be retained for 10 years.
Publication policy/plan:
For publication, the anonymized data will be utilized, and it could be presented in either national or worldwide forum.
Data monitoring and quality assurance:
Study PI will randomly check the data for accuracy and completeness on ongoing basis.
Ethical considerations:
Before the initiation of the study, ethical approval will be taken from the institutional Ethical Review Committee of AKUH. This study will be carried out as per guidelines of the World Medical Association's Declaration of Helsinki and the principles of Good Clinical Practice (GCP). Any modifications in the protocol will be re-submitted to the ERC. The study will be conducted in compliance with regulations and a copy of the final study protocol will be submitted to ERC. All participants will be given the choice to either accept or refuse their inclusion in the study after providing them with complete detailed information. Only those patients signing the informed consent (Annexure E) will be recruited as study participants. All the data recorded of patients will remain confidential. Access will be provided to no one except the investigators. Participants' names and identities will remain undisclosed; however, data may be seen by ERC or any local regulatory body. Data will be saved for 10 years as per GCP and institutional guidelines.
Possible risks or benefits:
There is a risk of breakage of retainer wire. In case of retainer breakage, there can be a risk of flexible retainer wire irritating the gums and hinder chewing and for this reason patients are advised to come to dental clinics for timely repair of retainer wire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| control | Other | Other: a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeththose in which fixed retainer is placed using conventional method |
| Silicon Jig | Experimental | Other: a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeththose in which fixed retainer was placed using a silicon jig |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 13 to 40 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients aged between 18 - 40 years
- Patients who read, write and understand English language
- Patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment
- Patients with good oral hygiene, with grade 1 or below on plaque and gingival indices at the time of debonding of brackets.
- All patients who will sign the informed consent form
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients with periodontal disease
- Patients with any systemic disease
- Pregnant or nursing females
- Patients who cannot come for follow up appointments for a retainer check up
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teetha silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth | Other | Silicon Jig, control |
Primary outcome
Assessment of retainer failure
Time frame: 3 months with 3 follow ups, one at the time of placement and one at 1 month, next on 3rd month
using the frequency of breakage of retainer wire, we will assess retainer failure
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Aug 2025.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. In order to assess outcomes, only the retainer breakage frequency, gingival health scores on an organised proforma will be shared between principal and sub investigators
Related trials for Orthodontic Treatment
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Accuracy and Time Efficiency of AI Versus Manual Segmentation in Adult Crowding Using Aligner Software
Dental Crowding
Enrolling by invitation
Discision as Acceleration Method in Canine Retraction in Orthodontics With Aligner and Fixed Appliances in Young Adults a Split Mouth Study
Bimaxillary Protrusion, Class II Div 1 Malocclusion
Not yet recruiting
Manus AI-Assisted Orthodontic Education and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Active, not recruiting
A Split-Mouth Clinical Trial Evaluating the Bond Failure Rate of a New Etch-Free Orthodontic Adhesive
Bracket Bonding, Orthodontic Treatment
Active, not recruiting
Treatment of the Mandibular Dental Crowding With and Without Corticotomy Surgery
Dental Research, Orthodontics
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing a silicon jig/key is used to place/bond fixed retainer on teeth in people with Orthodontic Treatment, run by Aga Khan University Hospital, Pakistan at 1 site in Pakistan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Pakistan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact FIZZAH IKRAM, BDS (923310243568, fizzahikram@outlook.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Assessment of retainer failure (time frame: 3 months with 3 follow ups, one at the time of placement and one at 1 month, next on 3rd month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2025.