AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Stanford Type A Aortic DissectionNCT07107711

Hybrid vs. Conventional Surgery for Type A Aortic Dissection

A study testing One-Stop Hybrid Surgery and Conventional Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk in people with Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection, run by The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University at 1 site in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the clinical efficacy and short-term outcomes of one-stop hybrid surgery versus conventional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) in patients with acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection
What is being tested?
One-Stop Hybrid Surgery and Conventional Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
140 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jan 2021to 30 Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age 18-70 years.
  • Diagnosis of acute TAAD (symptom onset <72 hours) confirmed by imaging, with dissection involving the aortic arch requiring total arch replacement.
  • Relative hemodynamic stability, defined as a systolic blood pressure >90 mmHg without high-dose vasopressor support (norepinephrine >0.1 µg/kg/min).
  • Provision of informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Age >70 years.
  • Stanford type B or non-dissection pathologies.
  • Life-threatening comorbidities prohibitive of major cardiac surgery (e.g., advanced multiorgan failure from other causes, active malignancy).
  • Absolute contraindications to surgery.
  • History of previous ascending aorta or aortic arch surgery.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University

    Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: One-Stop Hybrid Versus Conventional Surgery for Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the clinical efficacy and short-term outcomes of one-stop hybrid surgery versus conventional total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (FET) in patients with acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection. The study evaluates differences in perioperative metrics, postoperative complications, 30-day survival, aortic remodeling, and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection (TAAD) is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent surgical repair. This study tests the hypothesis that a one-stop hybrid surgery protocol is superior to conventional repair. 140 patients with acute TAAD were randomized to one of two groups. The experimental group received a one-stop hybrid surgery, which combines open total arch replacement using a standard branched surgical graft with the antegrade deployment of a separate stent graft, performed under moderate hypothermia. The active comparator group underwent conventional total arch replacement using an integrated frozen elephant trunk (FET) hybrid prosthesis, performed under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest. The study's main objective is to compare key clinical outcomes between the two surgical strategies, including a primary composite endpoint of 30-day mortality, stroke, and acute kidney injury, to provide evidence on the optimal surgical approach for this high-risk population.

Being tested
One-Stop Hybrid Surgery, Conventional Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • One-Stop Hybrid SurgeryProcedure or surgery

    With the patient under moderate hypothermia (approx. 28°C) and cardiopulmonary bypass, surgeons perform a total arch replacement using a standard 4-branched graft. After the open repair is complete, a separate, distinct covered stent graft is deployed antegradely into the descending aorta through the open distal end of the arch graft. Completion angiography confirms correct placement.

  • Conventional Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant TrunkProcedure or surgery

    With the patient under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (23°C-25°C) and cardiopulmonary bypass, surgeons perform a total arch replacement using an integrated hybrid prosthesis (Frozen Elephant Trunk), which consists of a vascular graft sutured to a covered stent graft. This single device is deployed antegradely into the descending aorta, and the arch vessels are then reattached to the branches of the prosthetic graft.

Study groups in NCT07107711
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Experimental: Hybrid Group (n=70)ExperimentalPatients were randomized to undergo one-stop hybrid surgery, which included total aortic arch replacement with a standard 4-branched artificial vascular graft combined with antegrade stent grafting of the proximal descending aorta, performed in a single stage under moderate hypothermia (approx. 28°C).
Receives: Procedure: One-Stop Hybrid Surgery
Active Comparator: Conventional Group (n=70)Active comparatorPatients were randomized to undergo conventional total arch replacement using an integrated frozen elephant trunk (FET) hybrid prosthesis. The procedure was performed under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (target temperature 23°C-25°C).
Receives: Procedure: Conventional Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of 30-day Mortality, Stroke, and Acute Kidney Injury (Stage 2 or 3)

    A composite outcome measure including all-cause mortality, any new focal neurological deficit lasting >24 hours and confirmed by imaging (stroke), and acute kidney injury defined as Stage 2 or 3 by KDIGO criteria. The measure is the percentage of patients in each group who experience at least one of these events.

    Measured: Within 30 days post-procedure

Secondary outcomes (12)
  1. All-Cause Mortality at 30 Days

    The percentage of patients who died from any cause.

    Measured: Within 30 days post-procedure

  2. Incidence of Postoperative Stroke

    The percentage of patients with a new focal neurological deficit lasting >24 hours, confirmed by imaging.

    Measured: Within 30 days post-procedure

  3. Incidence of Stage ≥2 Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

    The percentage of patients developing AKI Stage 2 or 3, as defined by KDIGO criteria.

    Measured: Within 30 days post-procedure

  4. Operative Metrics

    Includes total operative time, cardiopulmonary bypass duration, and aortic cross-clamp duration. Measured in minutes or hours.

    Measured: Intraoperative

  5. Duration of Mechanical Ventilation

    The total time a patient requires mechanical ventilation support after surgery, measured in hours.

    Measured: During the postoperative hospital stay (up to 30 days post-procedure)

  6. Incidence of Other Major Postoperative Complications

    Includes pulmonary infection, severe hypoxemia, postoperative delirium (assessed via CAM-ICU), and reoperation for bleeding.

    Measured: During hospital stay (up to 30 days post-procedure)

  7. Change in Aortic Morphology Score

    Aortic remodeling assessed by a 7-parameter scoring system on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The score ranges from 0 to 16, with lower scores indicating more favorable remodeling (a better outcome).

    Measured: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure

  8. Change in Quality of Life

    Assessed using the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) summary score. The score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores indicate better quality of life (a better outcome).

    Measured: 3 Months Post-procedure

  9. Incidence of Endoleak

    Presence of any endoleak detected on follow-up MRI.

    Measured: 1 Month Post-procedure, 3 Months Post-procedure

  10. Incidence of Cardiovascular Events

    Number of patients experiencing major adverse cardiovascular events (e.g., myocardial infarction, repeat aortic intervention) during follow-up.

    Measured: Through study completion (3 months)

  11. Length of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Stay

    The total number of days a patient stays in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) following surgery.

    Measured: During the postoperative hospital stay (up to 30 days post-procedure)

  12. Total Postoperative Hospital Stay

    The total number of days from surgery until hospital discharge.

    Measured: During the postoperative hospital stay (up to 30 days post-procedure)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Aug 2025
  2. Study start1 Jan 2021
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2023
  4. Study completion30 Mar 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
140 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07107711
Sponsor's protocol ID
2020139
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
24 Jul 2025
Last updated
6 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing One-Stop Hybrid Surgery and Conventional Total Arch Replacement with Frozen Elephant Trunk in people with Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection, run by The First Hospital of Hebei Medical University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence of the Composite Endpoint of 30-day Mortality, Stroke, and Acute Kidney Injury (Stage 2 or 3) (time frame: Within 30 days post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in