AzTrials
AzTrials

NeuroblastomaPhase 2NEUROBLASTOTEPNCT07111117

Comparison of 18F Labeled Analog of MIBG (18F-MFBG) PET/CT and 123I-MIBG SPECT in Pediatric Patients With Neuroblastoma.

A Phase 2 study testing 18F-MFBG PET/CT imaging in people with Neuroblastoma, run by Institut Curie at 3 sites in France.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goals of the NEUROBLASTOTEP trial is to compare the diagnostics performance of a the 18F-metafluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography scan (PET/CT) compared to 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG scintigraphy (current gold standard) for imaging in neuroblastoma. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 365 days to 17 years
Conditions the study is for
Neuroblastoma
What is being tested?
18F-MFBG PET/CT imaging
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
30 participants
Where
3 sitesFrance
Study dates
1 Mar 2026to Sep 2028
Phase
Phase 2
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 365 days to 17 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with histologically proven neuroblastoma.
  • Relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma.
  • 123I-MIBG avid neuroblastoma (positive 123I-MIBG scintigraphy = showing at least one neuroblastoma lesion (either primary or metastatic) with a significant avidity for 123I-MIBG), performed within 2 weeks to 2 days prior to 18F-MFBG PET/CT.
  • No specific treatment for neuroblastoma between 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-MFBG PET/CT (PET/CT shall not delay therapeutic management.)
  • Age ≥ 365 days to < 18 years old. For children under 13 months, day of birth should be collected.
  • Weight ≥ 9 kg.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Performance Status: Lansky or Karnofsky ≥ 60%.
  • Signed written informed consent by the 2 holders of the parental authority or legal representative(s).
  • Patients covered by a health insurance system.

Who cannot join

  • Patient inability to comply with protocol requirements without general anesthesia.
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patient. If indicated, at the investigator's discretion, patients of childbearing potential should have urinary pregnancy test the day of the PET/CT procedure, prior to the MFBG administration.
  • Any treatment likely to interact with MIBG initiated/modified between scintigraphy with MIBG and PET/CT with MFBG.
  • Patient with a parent or legal representative with altered mental status or psychiatric disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude a valid informed consent

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

France3 sites
  • Institut Curie

    Paris, 75005

    Hubert Tissot, MD, +33156245990, hubert.tissot@curie.fr

  • Hôpital Armand Trousseau

    Paris, 75012

    Benedicte Jonca, MD, +33171738195, benedicte.jonca@aphp.fr

  • Gustave Roussy

    Villejuif, 94805

    Desiree Deandreis, MD, +33142116095, desiree.deandreis@gustaveroussy.fr

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Comparison of 18F Labeled Analog of MIBG (18F-MFBG) PET/CT and 123I-MIBG SPECT in Pediatric Patients With Neuroblastoma

The goals of the NEUROBLASTOTEP trial is to compare the diagnostics performance of a the 18F-metafluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography scan (PET/CT) compared to 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG scintigraphy (current gold standard) for imaging in neuroblastoma.

Read the detailed description

Neuroblastoma is one of the most common malignancies of childhood: 130 to 150 new cases are recorded each year in France. Currently, 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy (123I-MIBG scan) is considered as a gold standard in neuroblastoma for assessing metastatic extension, as well as planning and evaluating response to treatment or detecting relapse. Regretfully, 123I-MIBG scintigraphy implies many disadvantages for our patients, mainly the length of the procedure (planned on two consecutive days), length of the imaging (45-90 minutes) and the required premedication for thyroid protection.

18F-metafluorobenzylguanidine (18F-MFBG) is a new specific Positron Emission Tomography (PET) tracer providing a specific Norepinephrine transporter (NET) expressing imaging with fluor-18, a routinely available radionuclide that offers higher resolution for lesion detection and shorter acquisitions for pediatric patients, and potentially lower radiation exposure.

The NEUROBLASTOTEP trial aims at demonstrating that 18F-MFBG PET/CT diagnostic performances are at least as good as 123I-MIBG scintigraphy (current gold standard imaging radiotracer in neuroblastoma).

Conditions
Neuroblastoma
Being tested
18F-MFBG PET/CT imaging
Keywords
Neuroblastoma, PET / CT, Imaging, Radiotracer
Medical subject headings
Neuroblastoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • 18F-MFBG PET/CT imagingProcedure or surgery

    Participants will receive the 18F-MFBG tracer and undergo a PET/CT imaging.

Study groups in NCT07111117
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
18F-MFBG PET/CT imagingExperimentalParticipants will receive the 18F-MFBG tracer and undergo a PET/CT imaging.
Receives: Procedure: 18F-MFBG PET/CT imaging

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Diagnostic agreement between 18F-MFBG PET/CT (new procedure) and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy (gold standard)

    % patients in whom concordance between the 2 procedures is reached.

    Measured: The day of the PET/CT procedure

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Description of discrepancies

    In case of non-perfect agreement, the observed discrepancies will be described. Agreement between the SIOPEN and Curie scores will be estimated.

    Measured: The day of the PET/CT procedure

  2. Dosimetric comparison between the two procedures

    One-point activity concentration measurement for normal organs (lung, liver, renal parenchyma, pancreas, spleen, adrenal gland, bladder, thyroid, heart, gonadic, eyes).

    Measured: The day of the PET/CT procedure

  3. Improvement of patient management during the diagnostic procedure

    Improvement of patient management will be evaluated by a short satisfaction survey after PET procedure, using satisfaction scales. The satisfaction and feeling variables will be described for the 123I-MIBG scintigraphy and 18F-MFBG PET/CT examinations by their repartition for the qualitative variables and by their distribution

    Measured: The day of the PET/CT procedure

  4. Optimization the 18F-MFBG PET procedure (dose injected, imaging protocol)

    PET images will be acquired in list-mode to ensure multiple reconstruction for different acquisition duration, in order to determine optimal duration.

    Measured: The day of the PET/CT procedure

  5. Optimization the 18F-MFBG PET procedure (dose injected, imaging protocol)

    PET images will be acquired in list-mode to ensure multiple reconstruction for different acquisition duration, in order to determine optimal injected activity

    Measured: The day of the PET/CT procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Aug 2025
  2. Study start1 Mar 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionSep 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Model description
Neuroblastotep is a phase II, national, multicenter, prospective, interventional, open-label, non-randomized, single-arm pilot study (each patient being his own control). It is a concordance study comparing 18F-MFBG PET (= new diagnostic procedure) to 123I-MIBG scintigraphy (= gold standard) in neuroblastoma. 18F-MFBG is the radiopharmaceutical product.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
30 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07111117
Sponsor's protocol ID
IC 2021-11
Acronym
NEUROBLASTOTEP
Status last verified
Jul 2025
First submitted
10 Jan 2024
Last updated
3 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Sponsor will share de-identified data sets. Documents generated under the project will be disseminated in accordance with Institut Curie policies

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2 study testing 18F-MFBG PET/CT imaging in people with Neuroblastoma, run by Institut Curie at 3 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: opening soon, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Carole Cagnot (+33147111891, carole.cagnot@curie.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Diagnostic agreement between 18F-MFBG PET/CT (new procedure) and 123I-MIBG scintigraphy (gold standard) (time frame: The day of the PET/CT procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in