AzTrials
AzTrials

Pancreatic CancerAI-LDCT-PCNCT07117045

Artificial Intelligence-powered Low-Dose Computed Tomography for Screening of Pancreatic Cancer

An observational study of Pancreatic Cancer and Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasm, run by Changhai Hospital at 5 sites in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with early diagnosis crucial for improving survival. Due to the absence of effective screening methods, most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Diagnostic Evaluation for Positive AI Findings
How many people
400,000 participants
Where
5 sitesChina
Study dates
15 Aug 2025to 30 Dec 2032
Phase
Observational

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study population includes asymptomatic individuals aged 50 years and above who have undergone routine low-dose chest CT (LDCT) scans at health check-up centers. Eligible participants must provide written informed consent and be willing to attend all scheduled follow-up visits. Exclusion criteria include a previous history of pancreatic cancer, abdominal inflammation or diagnosis of acute pancreatitis within 6 months, poor image quality due to ascites, pancreatic trauma, thoracic/abdominal surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy, and research subjects unable to complete follow-up due to physical or other reasons.

Who may be able to join

  • Age 50 years and above.
  • Voluntary signing of informed consent.
  • Completion of LDCT examination.

Who cannot join

  • Previous history of pancreatic cancer.
  • Abdominal inflammation or diagnosis of acute pancreatitis within 6 months.
  • Poor image quality due to ascites, pancreatic trauma, thoracic/abdominal surgery, radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
  • Research subjects unable to complete follow-up due to physical or other reasons.

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Wang Bei Lei, M.D. contact

13774238083

lilly_wang@126.com

Guo Shi Wei, M.D. contact

18621500666

gestwa@163.com

5 sites in 1 country

China5 sites, 5 recruiting
  • Jiaxing University Affiliated Second Hospital

    Jiaxing, Zhejiang, 314000

    Shen Yi Jue, M.D., 13605835645, dr.syj@163.com

    Recruiting
  • Ningbo University Affiliated People's Hospital

    Ningbo, Zhejiang, 315100

    Zhu Ke Lei, M.D., 13566636272, dr.zkl@163.com

    Recruiting
  • Meinian Onehealth Healthcare Holdings Co., Ltd

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200072

    Qin Jianzeng Dr, M.D., 13602746909, qinjianzeng@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Ruici Medical Examination Institution

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200126

    Wang Liucheng Dr, M.D., 18601790221, wangliucheng@126.com

    Recruiting
  • Changhai Hospital

    Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, 200433

    Wang Bei Lei, M.D., 13774238083, lilly_wang@126.com

    Guo Shi Wei, M.D., 18621500666, gestwa@163.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) has a poor prognosis, with early diagnosis crucial for improving survival. Due to the absence of effective screening methods, most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. The population undergoing low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening significantly overlaps with those at high risk for PDAC; however, traditional imaging methods have limited sensitivity for detecting pancreatic lesions. This study utilizes the Pancreatic Cancer Detection with Artificial Intelligence (PANDA) system to enhance LDCT for pancreatic cancer screening in a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort. PANDA will analyze LDCT images, followed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT) reassessment of abnormal interpretations. Based on MDT evaluation, individuals will be recalled for further examination, placed under a personalized follow-up plan, or monitored for at least one year. The primary outcomes include pancreatic cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, consensus rate, and recall rate, while secondary outcomes focus on early-stage cancers, resectable tumors, and safety indicators such as false positive rates and unnecessary procedures. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of AI-assisted LDCT for PDAC detection, providing a practical solution for improving public health and enhancing early diagnostic capabilities.

Read the detailed description

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an extremely aggressive cancer with a dismal 5-year survival rate of just 13%. The key to improving outcomes lies in early detection, as patients diagnosed at an early stage (IA) can achieve an 80% 5-year survival. However, current screening methods are limited, focusing only on high-risk populations and lacking effectiveness for the general public due to the cancer's relatively low incidence and high false-positive risks.

Contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT), the primary imaging modality, faces barriers for widespread implementation due to its invasiveness, high costs, and need for contrast agents. In this context, low-dose CT (LDCT) emerges as a promising alternative, having demonstrated success in lung cancer screening by reducing radiation exposure. Retrospective analysis revealed that one-third of pancreatic abnormalities were missed during routine LDCT interpretations, suggesting the untapped potential of LDCT-based pancreatic lesion screening.

Breakthroughs in AI have transformed medical imaging. Our PANDA (pancreatic cancer detection with artifcial intelligence) system excels at pancreatic cancer detection, utilizing innovative registration techniques and a cascaded deep learning framework (UNet+Max-Deeplab) for comprehensive lesion analysis. Validated across 10 centers (6,239 patients), PANDA outperformed radiologists. Real-world testing (20,530 cases) demonstrated remarkable accuracy: 92.9% sensitivity and 99.9% specificity, maintaining 92.2% sensitivity even for small T1 tumors. On LDCT, PANDA achieved 0.979 AUC without protocol modifications, confirming "LDCT+AI" as a viable screening approach.

China's health check-up environment presents three key advantages: First, LDCT delivers just 1/4-1/5 the radiation of standard abdominal CT, staying within ICRP safety guidelines (<3mSv). Second, LDCT offers superior cost-effectiveness compared to CE-CT by eliminating contrast agent expenses. Third, China's extensive annual health check-up infrastructure provides an unparalleled foundation for widespread implementation.

In the study, we will conduct a prospective, multicenter, observational cohort design targeting a health check-up population, utilizing the PANDA system to enhance LDCT for pancreatic cancer screening. Initially, PANDA analyzes the LDCT images of participants and provides interpretation results. Subsequently, a multidisciplinary team (MDT) will re-evaluate the cases with positive AI findings (including PDAC, pancreatic precursor lesions and benign lesion) and determine whether to recall the individuals: (1) Suspected PDAC and pancreatic precursor lesions are referred for hospital examination with diagnostic results collected; (2) Benign lesion cases receive personalized monitoring until endpoint events or study end; (3) Cases with positive AI findings but MDT-confirmed normal pancreatic issues receive at least one year of follow-up. If any abnormal results arise, management will transition to either plan (1) or (2). The primary outcome measures include pancreatic cancer detection rate, positive predictive value, consensus rate, and recall rate. Secondary outcome measures include the proportion of early-stage pancreatic cancers and resectable tumors. Safety indicators include the false positive rate, the proportion of unnecessary invasive procedures, and the proportion of unnecessary surgeries.

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of AI-powered LDCT in detecting pancreatic cancer within a health check-up population, offering a practical solution to improve public health and early diagnosis for pancreatic cancer.

Being tested
Diagnostic Evaluation for Positive AI Findings
Keywords
Screening, Early Diagnosis, Pancreatic Cancer, Artificial Intelligence, Computed Tomography
Medical subject headings
Pancreatic Neoplasms, Disease

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Diagnostic Evaluation for Positive AI FindingsDiagnostic test

    MDT will review positive AI findings (including PDAC, pancreatic precursor lesions and benign lesion) cases to determine next steps: (1) Suspected PDAC and pancreatic precursor lesions are referred for hospital examination with diagnostic results collected; (2) Benign lesion cases receive personalized monitoring until endpoint events or study end; (3) Cases with positive AI findings but MDT-confirmed normal pancreatic issues receive at least one year of follow-up. If any abnormal results arise, management will transition to either plan (1) or (2).

Study groups in NCT07117045
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
AI-powered LDCT (LDCT+AI)Participants will undergo annual screening with the LDCT+AI system.
Receives: Diagnostic Test: Diagnostic Evaluation for Positive AI Findings

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pancreatic cancer detection rate

    The proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment confirmed as pancreatic cancer or precancerous lesions among the total screened population

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Positive predictive value

    The proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment confirmed as pancreatic cancer or precancerous lesions among all individuals with abnormal AI assessment

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Consensus rate

    The proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment deemed suspicious for pancreatic cancer or precancerous lesions by MDT requiring recall among the total screened population.

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Recall rate

    The proportion of individuals actually recalled among the total screened population.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Early-stage pancreatic cancer proportion

    The proportion of individuals with abnormal AI assessment confirmed as early-stage pancreatic cancer among the total number of confirmed pancreatic cancer cases.

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Resectable pancreatic cancer proportion

    The proportion of individuals with surgically resectable pancreatic cancer among the total number of confirmed pancreatic cancer cases.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Aug 2025
  2. Study start15 Aug 2025 (estimated)
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2030 (estimated)
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2032 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
400,000 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07117045
Sponsor's protocol ID
AI-LDCT-PC
Other IDs
202401063, 202440208, 2025AAA031146
Acronym
AI-LDCT-PC
Status last verified
Jan 2025
First submitted
5 Aug 2025
Last updated
12 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Cao K, Xia Y, Yao J, Han X, Lambert L, Zhang T, Tang W, Jin G, Jiang H, Fang X, Nogues I, Li X, Guo W, Wang Y, Fang W, Qiu M, Hou Y, Kovarnik T, Vocka M, Lu Y, Chen Y, Chen X, Liu Z, Zhou J, Xie C, Zhang R, Lu H, Hager GD, Yuille AL, Lu L, Shao C, Shi Y, Zhang Q, Liang T, Zhang L, Lu J. Large-scale pancreatic cancer detection via non-contrast CT and deep learning. Nat Med. 2023 Dec;29(12):3033-3043. doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02640-w. Epub 2023 Nov 20.

    PubMed 37985692
  • Mizrahi JD, Surana R, Valle JW, Shroff RT. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):2008-2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0.

    PubMed 32593337
  • Pereira SP, Oldfield L, Ney A, Hart PA, Keane MG, Pandol SJ, Li D, Greenhalf W, Jeon CY, Koay EJ, Almario CV, Halloran C, Lennon AM, Costello E. Early detection of pancreatic cancer. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020 Jul;5(7):698-710. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(19)30416-9. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

    PubMed 32135127
  • Attiyeh MA, Chakraborty J, Doussot A, Langdon-Embry L, Mainarich S, Gonen M, Balachandran VP, D'Angelica MI, DeMatteo RP, Jarnagin WR, Kingham TP, Allen PJ, Simpson AL, Do RK. Survival Prediction in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Quantitative Computed Tomography Image Analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Apr;25(4):1034-1042. doi: 10.1245/s10434-017-6323-3. Epub 2018 Jan 29.

    PubMed 29380093
  • Ardila D, Kiraly AP, Bharadwaj S, Choi B, Reicher JJ, Peng L, Tse D, Etemadi M, Ye W, Corrado G, Naidich DP, Shetty S. End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography. Nat Med. 2019 Jun;25(6):954-961. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x. Epub 2019 May 20.

    PubMed 31110349
  • Wood LD, Canto MI, Jaffee EM, Simeone DM. Pancreatic Cancer: Pathogenesis, Screening, Diagnosis, and Treatment. Gastroenterology. 2022 Aug;163(2):386-402.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.03.056. Epub 2022 Apr 7.

    PubMed 35398344
  • Singhi AD, Koay EJ, Chari ST, Maitra A. Early Detection of Pancreatic Cancer: Opportunities and Challenges. Gastroenterology. 2019 May;156(7):2024-2040. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.01.259. Epub 2019 Feb 2.

    PubMed 30721664
  • Chu LC, Park S, Kawamoto S, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Shen W, Zhu Z, Xia Y, Xie L, Liu F, Yu Q, Fouladi DF, Shayesteh S, Zinreich E, Graves JS, Horton KM, Yuille AL, Hruban RH, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Fishman EK. Application of Deep Learning to Pancreatic Cancer Detection: Lessons Learned From Our Initial Experience. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019 Sep;16(9 Pt B):1338-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.05.034. No abstract available.

    PubMed 31492412
  • Gros L, Yip R, Zhu Y, Li P, Paksashvili N, Sun Q, Yankelevitz DF, Henschke CI. GI cancer mortality in participants in low dose CT screening for lung cancer with a focus on pancreatic cancer. Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 2;14(1):29851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-76322-z.

    PubMed 39617764

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in