MicroteachingNCT07119853
Microteaching and Advanced Life Support Simulation: Effects on Student Satisfaction and Teamwork
A study testing Microteaching in people with Microteaching, run by Şehriban Serbest at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a microteaching-supported advanced life support simulation on students' teamwork skills and satisfaction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Microteaching
- What is being tested?
- Microteaching
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 64 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 12 May 2025to 16 May 2025
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Being a senior nursing student and willing to participate in the study.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Microteaching-Enhanced Advanced Life Support Simulation on Students' Teamwork Skills and Satisfaction: A Quantitative Study
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a microteaching-supported advanced life support simulation on students' teamwork skills and satisfaction.
- Conditions
- Microteaching
- Being tested
- Microteaching
- Keywords
- Nursing student
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MicroteachingOther
Students in the experimental group watched the "Advanced Life Support Team Dynamics Video." The video was uploaded to the university's education management system, and a student monitoring report was generated, ensuring that all students could watch it.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | The following interventions were applied to the control group; 1. Pretest: A 10-question pretest was administered before the theoretical training to assess students' knowledge levels prior to Advanced Life Support training. 2. Theoretical Training: Following the completion of the pretest, participants received "ERC 2021 Adult Advanced Life Support training" in accordance with the European Resuscitation Council 2021 guidelines in two sessions, one before and one after noon. The training duration was 2 hours. 3. Simulation Training: Five days after the theoretical training, students received simulation training. 4. Post-test, student satisfaction and self-confidence evaluation: After the simulation, students took their post-test and filled out data collection forms including the student satisfaction and self-confidence scale and the teamwork scale. |
| Microteaching | Experimental | In the experimental group, unlike the control group, simulation training was supported by microteaching.
Microteaching: Students in the experimental group watched the "Advanced Life Support Team Dynamics Video." The video was uploaded to the university's education management system, and a student monitoring report was generated, ensuring that all students could watch it. Receives: Other: Microteaching |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Teamwork level measured by Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale after simulation training
Teamwork was assessed using the Turkish version of the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHP-TS). The scale evaluates 16 aspects of team functioning, with each item rated on a 3-point scale: 0 (never), 1 (inconsistent), and 2 (consistent). Total scores range from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating better teamwork. The scale was administered immediately after the simulation-based advanced life support training supported by microteaching.
Measured: Immediately after the completion of the simulation training session.
Student satisfaction and self-confidence levels measured by the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale after simulation training
Student satisfaction and self-confidence were assessed using the Turkish version of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SSSCLS). The scale includes two subscales: Satisfaction (5 items) and Self-confidence (8 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and confidence. The scale was administered immediately after the simulation-based advanced life support training supported by microteaching.
Measured: Immediately after the simulation training session
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2025
- Study start12 May 2025
- Primary completion16 May 2025
- Study completion16 May 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for MicroteachingStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Şehriban Serbest
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Şehriban Serbest, Acibadem University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07119853
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ATADEK 2025-07/310
- Status last verified
- Aug 2025
- First submitted
- 31 Jul 2025
- Last updated
- 17 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Because I did not receive consent from the participants on this matter.
Publications
Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, Gaioso V, Moss J, Tastan S, Iyigun E, Tosun N. The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire. Contemp Nurse. 2017 Feb;53(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1282319. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
PubMed 28084900Malec JF, Torsher LC, Dunn WF, Wiegmann DA, Arnold JJ, Brown DA, Phatak V. The mayo high performance teamwork scale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills. Simul Healthc. 2007 Spring;2(1):4-10. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31802b68ee.
PubMed 19088602INACSL Standards Committee, Bowler, F., Klein, M. & Wilford, A. (2021, September). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM Professional Integrity. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.014.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Microteaching-Enhanced Advanced Life Support Simulation on Students' Teamwork Skills and Satisfaction: A Quantitative Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07119853
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ATADEK 2025-07/310
- Conditions
- Microteaching
- Keywords
- Nursing student
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 64 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Şehriban SerbestUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 12 May 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 16 May 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of a microteaching-supported advanced life support simulation on students' teamwork skills and satisfaction.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control | No intervention | –The following interventions were applied to the control group; 1. Pretest: A 10-question pretest was administered before the theoretical training to assess students' knowledge levels prior to Advanced Life Support training. 2. Theoretical Training: Following the completion of the pretest, participants received "ERC 2021 Adult Advanced Life Support training" in accordance with the European Resuscitation Council 2021 guidelines in two sessions, one before and one after noon. The training duration was 2 hours. 3. Simulation Training: Five days after the theoretical training, students received simulation training. 4. Post-test, student satisfaction and self-confidence evaluation: After the simulation, students took their post-test and filled out data collection forms including the student satisfaction and self-confidence scale and the teamwork scale. |
| Microteaching | Experimental | Other: MicroteachingIn the experimental group, unlike the control group, simulation training was supported by microteaching. Microteaching: Students in the experimental group watched the "Advanced Life Support Team Dynamics Video." The video was uploaded to the university's education management system, and a student monitoring report was generated, ensuring that all students could watch it. |
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MicroteachingStudents in the experimental group watched the "Advanced Life Support Team Dynamics Video." The video was uploaded to the university's education management system, and a student monitoring report was generated, ensuring that all students could watch it. | Other | Microteaching |
Primary outcome
Teamwork level measured by Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale after simulation training
Time frame: Immediately after the completion of the simulation training session.
Teamwork was assessed using the Turkish version of the Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHP-TS). The scale evaluates 16 aspects of team functioning, with each item rated on a 3-point scale: 0 (never), 1 (inconsistent), and 2 (consistent). Total scores range from 0 to 32, with higher scores indicating better teamwork. The scale was administered immediately after the simulation-based advanced life support training supported by microteaching.
Student satisfaction and self-confidence levels measured by the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale after simulation training
Time frame: Immediately after the simulation training session
Student satisfaction and self-confidence were assessed using the Turkish version of the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SSSCLS). The scale includes two subscales: Satisfaction (5 items) and Self-confidence (8 items). Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree to 5 = strongly agree). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction and confidence. The scale was administered immediately after the simulation-based advanced life support training supported by microteaching.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Aug 2025.
- Background: PubMed 28084900Unver V, Basak T, Watts P, Gaioso V, Moss J, Tastan S, Iyigun E, Tosun N. The reliability and validity of three questionnaires: The Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, Simulation Design Scale, and Educational Practices Questionnaire. Contemp Nurse. 2017 Feb;53(1):60-74. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2017.1282319. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
- Background: PubMed 19088602Malec JF, Torsher LC, Dunn WF, Wiegmann DA, Arnold JJ, Brown DA, Phatak V. The mayo high performance teamwork scale: reliability and validity for evaluating key crew resource management skills. Simul Healthc. 2007 Spring;2(1):4-10. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31802b68ee.
- BackgroundINACSL Standards Committee, Bowler, F., Klein, M. & Wilford, A. (2021, September). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM Professional Integrity. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 58, 45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2021.08.014.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Because I did not receive consent from the participants on this matter.
Related trials for Microteaching
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Structured Clinical Teaching on Nursing Students' Motivation, Learning Strategies, and Attitudes Toward Clinical Practice
Nursing Education
Active, not recruiting
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Pecha Kucha-Supported Microteaching Method in Nursing Process Education
Nursing Process
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Microteaching on Ventrogluteal Injection Training
Nursing Students, Intramuscular Injection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Microteaching in people with Microteaching, run by Şehriban Serbest at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Teamwork level measured by Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale after simulation training (time frame: Immediately after the completion of the simulation training session.). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07119853, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Aug 2025.