AzTrials
AzTrials

Selective Plasma FiltrationSPASSNCT07121647

Selective Plasmofiltration for Abdominal Septic Shock: a Clinical Ctudy

A study testing renal replacement therapy., early isolated CVVHDF. and combined extracorporeal blood purification therapy in people with Selective Plasma Filtration, run by Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Group 1: 34 patients received prolonged hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) on an emergency basis. Group 2: 35 patients received early isolated CVVHDF. Group 3: 32 patients received early combined extracorporeal detoxification (ECD) (selective plasma filtration [SPF] + CVVHDF). Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
Selective Plasma Filtration
What is being tested?
renal replacement therapy., early isolated CVVHDF. and combined extracorporeal blood purification therapy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
101 participants
Where
1 siteRussia
Study dates
15 Sep 2016to 3 Mar 2025
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Abdominal septic shock (Sepsis-3) and AKI stage 1 according to the KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) classification

Who cannot join

  • Terminal state, active bleeding, atonic coma, severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <25%), decompensated liver failure, body weight less than 20 kg, age under 18 years, pregnancy, as well as cases of septic shock without AKI.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Russia1 site
  • Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU),

    Moscow, 117513

Other trials in Russia

About this study

Official title: Selective Plasmofiltration in the Treatment of Patients With Abdominal Septic Shock: a Prospective Interventional Controlled Study

Group 1: 34 patients received prolonged hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) on an emergency basis.

Group 2: 35 patients received early isolated CVVHDF. Group 3: 32 patients received early combined extracorporeal detoxification (ECD) (selective plasma filtration [SPF] + CVVHDF).

A comparative analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters was performed.

Read the detailed description

Prospective Single-Center Interventional Study Conducted at City Clinical Hospital No. 1 Named After N.I. Pirogov, Including 101 Patients with Abdominal Septic Shock Complicated by Acute Kidney Injury

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the hospital (Protocol No. 7, dated May 31, 2016).

Inclusion Criteria: Simultaneous presence of clinical and laboratory signs of septic shock, as defined by the Sepsis-3 criteria , and clinical presentation of acute kidney injury corresponding to Stage 1 of the KDIGO classification:

Severity of organ dysfunction assessed by the SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score > 2 points, as a result of a confirmed or suspected infection focus;

The need for vasopressors to maintain a mean arterial pressure ≥65 mmHg and a serum lactate level >2 mmol/L after adequate fluid resuscitation.

Exclusion Criteria: Terminal condition, ongoing internal bleeding, atonic coma, severe heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction <25%), decompensated liver failure, body weight less than 20 kg, age <18 years, pregnant women, septic shock without acute kidney injury.

Exclusion from the Study: Patient refusal to continue participation; deviations from the study protocol.

Study Limitation: Limited availability of consumables (plasma separators) during the study period.

The study was structured into six consecutive stages:

Stage I - Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring and Scoring of Patients: Standard monitoring of hemodynamic and clinical-laboratory parameters was performed. For statistical analysis, the worst parameter recorded within 24 hours was considered. The SOFA score (daily), APACHE II score (on admission), and KDIGO classification for acute kidney injury were used to assess organ dysfunction severity. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated using the CKD-EPI 2021 formula (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) based on serum cystatin-C levels. Concentrations of cytokines (interleukin-6 [IL-6], tumor necrosis factor [TNF]), and low- and middle-molecular-weight substances (LMMWS) in serum were measured on days 1 (before the procedure), 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 of therapy.

Stage II - Comprehensive Intensive Therapy: Conducted in accordance with international guidelines for the management of sepsis and septic shock.

Stage III - Patient Group Allocation: Patients who, within 12 hours of admission to the ICU and surgical source control, could not achieve correction of acid-base balance (pH ≤ 7.2, lactate ≥ 2.0, BE ≤ -2.0) despite escalating doses of vasopressors and persistent acute kidney injury, were randomized into groups based on the timing and modality of extracorporeal detoxification (ECD). Randomization was performed using the Jamovi software (version 2.6.24) with the built-in R function. Three columns were created: the first for patient IDs (1 to 105), the second for group numbers (1 to 3), and the third for the R code: sample(rep(1:3, each = 35)). This code generated a vector with numbers from 1 to 3 (each number repeated 35 times) and shuffled them randomly. The results were exported to Excel.

Group 1: 34 patients continued to receive conservative intensive therapy until classical indications for renal replacement therapy (RRT) emerged, such as severe kidney dysfunction posing an immediate threat to life (uremia with blood urea >40 mmol/L; anuria or oliguria refractory to diuretics; serum potassium >6.5 mmol/L). RRT was performed as delayed isolated prolonged veno-venous hemodiafiltration (PVVHDF).

Group 2: 35 patients received early isolated PVVHDF in addition to standard intensive therapy.

Group 3: 32 patients received selective plasma filtration (SPF) before early isolated PVVHDF. Each patient underwent 4 SPF procedures (on days 1, 2, 3, and 5).

Stage IV - ECD Procedures: PVVHDF for all groups was performed in post-dilution mode (multiFiltrate: Fresenius Medical Care) using the "Kit-8" cartridge and AV1000S hemofilter (surface area = 1.8 m²). Blood flow rate was 150-200 mL/min. The dose of renal replacement therapy was 30-40 mL/kg/day (total effluent and ultrafiltrate volume relative to patient body weight). Ultrafiltration volume and rate were adjusted individually. PVVHDF duration ranged from 24 to 72 hours. Systemic anticoagulation was achieved with bolus unfractionated heparin: 30-50 IU/kg at the start, followed by 10-20 IU/kg/hour (500-1000 IU/hour), monitored by activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). SPF was performed using EVACLIO-EC-2C20 plasma separators (Kawasumi, Japan) in membrane plasma separation mode (multiFiltrate: Fresenius Medical Care). Perfusion rate was 120 mL/min. Plasma replacement during SPF was performed with 20% albumin solution (200 mL) in an isovolemic solution (ACCUSOL 4 K+ 5000 mL). Replacement volume ranged from 2 to 3 times the circulating plasma volume (5-10 liters). Anticoagulation: unfractionated heparin 2000 IU/hour (into the arterial segment of the circuit before the plasma separator).

Stage V - Dynamic Clinical and Laboratory Monitoring: Conducted on days 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, and 10 in the ICU.

Stage VI - Statistical Analysis: Data are presented as median and interquartile range (25th and 75th percentiles). The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to assess data normality. Non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used for intergroup comparisons. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to assess changes over time. Fisher's exact test was used for qualitative data. Logistic regression was used to assess posterior probabilities. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Spearman's rank correlation was used to assess correlations. A p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Data analysis was performed using SPSS-27.0 and Jamovi-2.6.2024 software.

Being tested
renal replacement therapy., early isolated CVVHDF., combined extracorporeal blood purification therapy
Keywords
septic shock, interleukin-6, continuous renal replacement therapy, selective plasmofiltration,
Medical subject headings
Shock, Septic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • renal replacement therapy.Procedure or surgery

    veno-venous hemodiafiltration for emergency indications (CVVHDF).

  • early isolated CVVHDF.Procedure or surgery

    early isolated CVVHDF.

  • combined extracorporeal blood purification therapyProcedure or surgery

    Patients received early combined extracorporeal blood purification therapy (EBPT) (SPF and CVVHDF).

Study groups in NCT07121647
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group 1 (n=34)OtherPatients got standard conservative therapy in accordance with the principles of the survive sepsis compain (SSC) in combination with isolated continuous veno-venous hemodiafiltration (cvvhdf), which started in the presence of absolute indications such as acidemia, hyperhydration with pulmonary edema, hyperkalemia).
Receives: Procedure: renal replacement therapy.
Group 2 (n=35)Active comparatorPatients got standard conservative therapy accordingly with SSC in combination with early isolated veno-venous hemodiafiltration started with AKI 1 stage KDIGO.
Receives: Procedure: early isolated CVVHDF.
Group 3 (n=32)ExperimentalPatients got standard conservative therapy in accordance with SSC in combination with extracorporeal blood purification therapies (EBPT) including a selective plasmafiltration in combination with cvvhdf.
Receives: Procedure: combined extracorporeal blood purification therapy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. analysis of hospital mortality

    Estimation of hospital mortality is by means Fisher's exact test.

    Measured: hospital mortality from the moment of randomization (point 0) and then on 2,4,6,8,10,12,14 and 30 days

  2. length of stay in the ICU

    Length of stay in the ICU was evaluated.

    Measured: The duration of staying in the ICU, measured from the moment of randomization (point 0) and then until the moment of transfer to the specialized department on 2,4,6,8,10,12,14 and 30 days

  3. Length of hospital stay

    Time from arriving to leaving hospital was estimated.

    Measured: differences in the duration of hospitalization measured from the moment of randomization (point 0) and then on 2,4,6,8,10,12,14 and 30 days in days of staying in the clinic

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2025
  2. Study start15 Sep 2016
  3. Primary completion20 Feb 2025
  4. Study completion3 Mar 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Patients who showed no clinical improvement within 12 hours of admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) (pH ≤ 7.2, lactate ≥ 2.0 mmol/L, base deficit ≤ -2.0 mmol/L) were randomized using a random number generator and divided into three groups: Group 1 (n=34): Patients received standard conservative therapy combined with isolated prolonged veno-venous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF), which was initiated upon the occurrence of urgent indications for renal replacement therapy (RRT), such as uremia, oliguria, and hyperkalemia. Group 2 (n=35): Patients underwent early isolated CVVHDF. Group 3 (n=32): Patients received early combined extracorporeal blood purification therapy (EBPT) (SPF and CVVHDF).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
101 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07121647
Sponsor's protocol ID
31_05_2016_№5
Other IDs
31.05.2016.5.Pirogov
Acronym
SPASS
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
10 Mar 2025
Last updated
13 Aug 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The data supporting the findings of this study will be openly available in the Figshare repository.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing renal replacement therapy., early isolated CVVHDF. and combined extracorporeal blood purification therapy in people with Selective Plasma Filtration, run by Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University at 1 site in Russia.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Russia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

analysis of hospital mortality (time frame: hospital mortality from the moment of randomization (point 0) and then on 2,4,6,8,10,12,14 and 30 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Aug 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in