AzTrials
AzTrials

Mental Health IssueNCT07129070

Just-in-Time Training for Youth Mentors

A study testing Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training via Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy and Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) implemented via usual training in people with Mental Health Issue and Depression, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study will evaluate the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel multi-level Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy (JITT-EBP) that aims to equip mentors and mentor supervisors to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs) with fidelity using methods that are sustainable in rural… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 12 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Mental Health Issue, Depression, Anxiety
What is being tested?
Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training via Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy and Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) implemented via usual training
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
204 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
18 Dec 2025to 31 May 2028
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 12 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Youth and Parent Inclusion Criteria:

  • student at a partnering rural middle school or high school
  • age 12-17
  • have English speaking/reading/writing ability at a level to participate in IPT-AST
  • youth's parent has English or Spanish-speaking/reading/writing ability at a level to participate in research activities.

Youth and Parent Exclusion Criteria:

  • moderate or severe depression (PHQ-9 > 10)
  • active suicidal ideation with a plan and/or intent, requiring higher level of care
  • Youth does not have English-speaking ability at a level to participate in IPT-AST
  • youth's parent does not have English or Spanish-speaking/reading/writing ability at a level to participate in research activities.

Mentor and Mentor Supervisor Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18 or older
  • have completed the typical mentor or mentor supervisor screening and selection process at partnering mentoring organization (including a background check)
  • are available to facilitate the program during after-school hours.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

Gracie Meyer contact

612-625-7240

meye3329@umn.edu

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • University of Minnesota

    Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455

    Gracie Meyer, 612-625-7240, meye3329@umn.edu

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Just-in-Time Training for Youth Mentors: A Strategy for Implementing Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions for Youth in Rural Communities

This study will evaluate the usability, feasibility, and acceptability of a novel multi-level Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy (JITT-EBP) that aims to equip mentors and mentor supervisors to implement evidence-based practices (EBPs) with fidelity using methods that are sustainable in rural communities. JITT-EBP integrates (a) self-directed, on-demand, online training modules for mentors and mentor supervisors, (b) synchronous evidence-based supervision strategies, and (c) an apprenticeship delivery model in which EBPs are co-led by an experienced mentor and a novice mentor, providing opportunity for in-the-moment training and support. The study will conduct a pilot hybrid type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial to evaluate the use of JITT-EBP compared to usual training for implementing mentor-delivered Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST), an evidence-based depression prevention program. 96 adolescents (age 12-17) and their parents, 8-18 mentors (depending on amount of turnover), and 4 mentor supervisors will be enrolled in the trial.

Being tested
Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training via Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy, Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) implemented via usual training
Medical subject headings
Depression, Anxiety Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training via Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategyBehavioural

    IPT-AST is a group-based EBP that aims to prevent depression and support emotional well-being by helping youth develop skills to foster healthy relationships. Youth learn about the links between feelings and interpersonal interactions, and they learn communication strategies and interpersonal problem-solving skills that they can apply to their relationships.

    JITT-EBP integrates (a) self-directed, on-demand, online training modules for mentors and mentor supervisors, (b) synchronous evidence-based supervision strategies, and (c) an apprenticeship delivery model in which EBPs are co-led by an experienced mentor and a novice mentor, providing opportunity for in-the-moment training and support.

  • Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) implemented via usual trainingBehavioural

    IPT-AST is a group-based EBP that aims to prevent depression and support emotional well-being by helping youth develop skills to foster healthy relationships. Youth learn about the links between feelings and interpersonal interactions, and they learn communication strategies and interpersonal problem-solving skills that they can apply to their relationships.

    Usual training involves (a) a one-day virtual training conducted by an IPT-AST expert prior to the beginning of the intervention, and (b) synchronous evidence-based supervision strategies.

Study groups in NCT07129070
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IPT-AST implemented via Just-In-Time Training (JITT-EBP)Active comparatorIPT-AST = Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training
Receives: Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training via Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy
IPT-AST implemented via usual trainingActive comparatorIPT-AST = Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training
Receives: Behavioral: Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) implemented via usual training

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Week 12

    Mentor and mentor supervisor report of JITT-EBP feasibility, with higher value indicating higher feasibility

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM) - Week 12

    youth, parent, mentor, and mentor supervisor report of IPT-AST acceptability, with higher value indicating higher acceptability.

    Measured: Week 12

  3. Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM) - Week 12

    Mentor and mentor supervisor report of JITT-EBP appropriateness, with higher value indicating higher appropriateness.

    Measured: Week 12

  4. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) - Week 12

    Youth and parent report of satisfaction with IPT-AST program, with , with higher value indicating more satisfaction.

    Measured: Week 12

Secondary outcomes (26)
  1. Fidelity

    IPT-AST fidelity checklist

    Measured: Week 12

  2. Cost of implementation

    Mentor Supervisor hours and hourly wages for recruitment, training, supervision, and IPT-AST delivery. IPT-AST expert hours and hourly wages for training and supervision.

    Measured: Year 2

  3. Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) - Week 6

    25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and depressed mood. Higher scores indicate higher severity.

    Measured: Week 6

  4. Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) - Week 12

    25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and depressed mood. Higher scores indicate higher severity.

    Measured: Week 12

  5. Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale-25 (RCADS-25) - Week 24

    25-item scale that measures levels of anxiety and depressed mood. Higher scores indicate higher severity.

    Measured: Week 24

  6. Conflict Behavior Questionnaire-20 (CBQ-20) - Week 6

    A higher score on the CBQ-20 indicates a greater level of conflict in parent-adolescent relationships

    Measured: Week 6

  7. Conflict Behavior Questionnaire-20 (CBQ-20) - Week 12

    A higher score on the CBQ-20 indicates a greater level of conflict in parent-adolescent relationships

    Measured: Week 12

  8. Conflict Behavior Questionnaire-20 (CBQ-20) - Week 24

    A higher score on the CBQ-20 indicates a greater level of conflict in parent-adolescent relationships

    Measured: Week 24

  9. National Survey of Children's Health Social Competence Scale (NSCH-SCS) - Week 6

    A higher score on the NSCH-SCS indicates a higher level of youth social skills, as reported by a parent.

    Measured: Week 6

  10. National Survey of Children's Health Social Competence Scale (NSCH-SCS) - Week 12

    A higher score on the NSCH-SCS indicates a higher level of youth social skills, as reported by a parent.

    Measured: Week 12

  11. National Survey of Children's Health Social Competence Scale (NSCH-SCS) - Week 24

    A higher score on the NSCH-SCS indicates a higher level of youth social skills, as reported by a parent.

    Measured: Week 24

  12. NIH Toolbox -Loneliness Ages 8-17 - Week 6

    A higher score indicates greater severity of loneliness

    Measured: Week 6

  13. NIH Toolbox -Loneliness Ages 8-17 - Week 12

    A higher score indicates greater severity of loneliness

    Measured: Week 12

  14. NIH Toolbox -Loneliness Ages 8-17 - Week 24

    A higher score indicates greater severity of loneliness

    Measured: Week 24

  15. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank - Peer Relationships - Week 6

    A higher score indicates a more positive experience in relationships with peers

    Measured: Week 6

  16. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank - Peer Relationships - Week 12

    A higher score indicates a more positive experience in relationships with peers

    Measured: Week 12

  17. PROMIS Pediatric Item Bank - Peer Relationships - Week 24

    A higher score indicates a more positive experience in relationships with peers

    Measured: Week 24

  18. NIH Toolbox - General Life Satisfaction - Week 6

    A higher score indicates more life satisfaction

    Measured: Week 6

  19. NIH Toolbox - General Life Satisfaction - Week 12

    A higher score indicates more life satisfaction

    Measured: Week 12

  20. NIH Toolbox - General Life Satisfaction - Week 24

    A higher score indicates more life satisfaction

    Measured: Week 24

  21. PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Positive Affect - Week 6

    A higher score indicates more positive affect

    Measured: Week 6

  22. PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Positive Affect - Week 12

    A higher score indicates more positive affect

    Measured: Week 12

  23. PROMIS Pediatric Short Form v1.0 - Positive Affect - Week 24

    A higher score indicates more positive affect

    Measured: Week 24

  24. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) - Week 6

    A higher score indicates higher self-esteem

    Measured: Week 6

  25. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) - Week 12

    A higher score indicates higher self-esteem

    Measured: Week 12

  26. Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) - Week 24

    A higher score indicates higher self-esteem

    Measured: Week 24

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted19 Aug 2025
  2. Study start18 Dec 2025
  3. Primary completion1 Apr 2028 (estimated)
  4. Study completion31 May 2028 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Youth, mentor supervisors, and mentors will be randomized to IPT-AST delivered via JITT-EBP or usual training. Youth will be block randomized using randomly permuted blocks of 2 and 4. Randomization for youth will be stratified by sex and level of depression symptoms (PHQ-9 \< 5 and \> 5).
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
204 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07129070
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00024848
Status last verified
Apr 2026
First submitted
22 Jul 2025
Last updated
24 Apr 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training via Just-In-Time Training (JITT) implementation strategy and Interpersonal Psychotherapy-Adolescent Skills Training (IPT-AST) implemented via usual training in people with Mental Health Issue and Depression, run by University of Minnesota at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Gracie Meyer (612-625-7240, meye3329@umn.edu), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM) - Week 12 (time frame: Week 12). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Apr 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in