AzTrials
AzTrials

COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)Phase 4NCT07133880

Compare the Effects of Nebulizer Versus Inhaler Based Therapy for COPD Using Long-acting Bronchodilators

A Phase 4 study testing umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µg and Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µg in people with COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), run by University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine at 1 site in United States.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators delivered via nebulizers vs. dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in symptomatic participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC ≤ 70%) and show significant air trapping (RV ≥ 120% of… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 40 years and older
What is being tested?
umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µg and Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µg
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
5 Dec 2023to 1 Dec 2026
Phase
Phase 4

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 40 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age > 40 years
  • Either sex
  • Current smoker or past cigarette smoking history of > 10 pack-years
  • Symptoms of COPD (cough, sputum production, shortness of breath)
  • Modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) score ≥2 or CAT score ≥10 at Screening/Run-in visit
  • A PIFR > 30 at screening
  • FEV1/FVC ratio < 70% (within the past 12 months)
  • Residual volume (RV) ≥ 120% predicted (within the past 12 months

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of asthma (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Previously diagnosed atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response (heart rate > 110 bpm) or ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia) (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Acute myocardial infarction within 12 weeks of patient study registration (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Acute exacerbation of congestive heart failure (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Acute exacerbation of COPD within 8 weeks (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Recent (within 8 weeks) h/o eye surgery (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
Show all 18Show fewer
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Known diagnosis of liver cirrhosis (Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Known diagnosis of chronic renal insufficiency (defined as a previous serum creatinine > 2.5 mg/dL - Verification via medical record and/or patient report)
  • Intolerance to any of the study drugs
  • Patients receiving long-term azithromycin
  • Planned surgery requiring hospital admission within 3 months
  • Currently enrolled in a pulmonary rehabilitation program
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Pregnant or nursing women or women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, diaphragm, or subdermal implants)
  • Inability to understand instructions or comply with the study protocol
  • Participation in another investigational drug clinical trial within 30 days of patient study registration
  • Medical history can be confirmed by medical records and/or verbal confirmation from patients. However, Inclusion criteria 6 \& 7 must be verified by a previous PFT report dated within 6 months of screening

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

United States1 site, 1 recruiting
  • The University of Tennessee Graduate School of Medicine

    Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920

    Tracy Walker, Study Coordinator, 865-305-4297, twalker5@utmck.edu

    Rajiv Dhand, MD

    Recruiting

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Differentiating the Effects of Long-acting Bronchodilators Administered by Nebulizer Versus Dry Powder Inhaler in Symptomatic Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of inhaled bronchodilators delivered via nebulizers vs. dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in symptomatic participants with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) who have airflow obstruction (FEV1/FVC ≤ 70%) and show significant air trapping (RV ≥ 120% of predicted).

The investigators hypothesize that, in patients with symptomatic COPD, therapy with a long-acting anti muscarinic agent/long-acting beta agonist (LAMA/LABA) combination administered by nebulizer will improve hyperinflation (increase in inspiratory capacity and reduction in residual volume) and reduce symptoms related to COPD to a greater extent than LAMA/LABA therapy given by a DPI.

Read more

The study aims to demonstrate the following:

  1. Compare the values of inspiratory capacity (IC) and residual volume (RV) in patients receiving LAMA/LABA by DPI with those receiving LAMA/LABA by nebulizer
  2. Compare patient reported outcomes (COPD Assessment Test (CAT score), Baseline/Transition Dyspnea Index (BDI/TDI) and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) in symptomatic patients with COPD receiving LAMA/LABA by DPI with those receiving LAMA/LABA by nebulizer
Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, parallel group, double dummy, phase four, 13-week clinical trial with 1:1 allocation comparing long-acting anti-muscarinic agent (LAMA; Umeclidinium 62.5 μg once daily) and long acting beta-agonist (LABA; Vilanterol 25 μg once daily) delivered by DPI (Group A), vs a nebulized LAMA/LABA combination (revefenacin 175 μg once daily and formoterol 20 μg twice daily) (Group B) among symptomatic subjects with stable COPD.

The study begins with a screening visit and run-in period. Patients who are eligible and willing to participate will sign informed consent. They will be trained on the use of the DPI and nebulizer, as well as completion of the daily diary (symptom and medication logs) and questionnaires (CAT, BDI/TDI, SGRQ). Vital signs and a physical examination will be performed, and inspiratory flow rate will be determined using the In-Check DIAL. Medications will be adjusted to ensure clinical stability prior to randomization.

Baseline Study Visit 2 occurs within one week of the screening visit. Prior to this visit, participants must not have taken study medication within 48 hours or rescue medication within 6 hours of pulmonary function testing; otherwise, the visit will be rescheduled. At this visit, medical history, current medications, and adverse events are reviewed. Compliance with the daily diary (symptom and medication logs) is assessed, and participants must demonstrate ≥80% completion to continue. Participants complete CAT, BDI, and SGRQ questionnaires, undergo physical examination and vital sign measurement, and perform baseline pulmonary function testing in a plethysmograph. Eligible participants are then randomized 1:1 to receive either active drugs via DPI (Group A) or nebulizer (Group B), with treatment assignments generated using permuted blocks. Group A receives Anoro Ellipta DPI plus nebulized Revefenacin and Formoterol placebos, while Group B receives nebulized Revefenacin and Formoterol plus placebo DPI. The nebulizer is always administered first, followed by the DPI; Time 0 is defined as the end of DPI administration. Post-dose, vital signs and pulmonary function tests are conducted at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours. Participants also receive training on diary use, study drug/device administration, and medication compliance, and they begin the assigned treatment for 12 weeks with morning and evening doses as per group assignment.

Following Visit 2, patients will continue their assigned treatments twice daily for 12 weeks. Telephone follow-ups will occur at weeks 4 and 8 (Phone Visits 1 and 2) to monitor symptoms, adverse events, and medication adherence, with administration of additional questionnaires.

The final Study Visit 3 will take place at week 12 and will include repeat pulmonary function testing pre-dose and at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-dose, symptom questionnaires, vital signs, and adverse event assessment. Throughout the study, patients will maintain daily symptom diaries, including CAT scores.

Being tested
umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µg, Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µg, Placebo ( Revefenacin and Formoterol ), Placebo DPI
Keywords
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, COPD, Nebulizer, Dry Powder Inhaler
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µgDrug

    Also called Anoro Ellipta

    DPI Treatment

  • Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µgDrug

    Also called Yupelri, Perforomist

    Nebulizer Treatment

  • Placebo ( Revefenacin and Formoterol )Drug

    Also called Normal Saline

    Placebo Nebulizer Treatment

  • Placebo DPIDrug

    Placebo DPI Treatment

Study groups in NCT07133880
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DPI Treatment GroupActive comparatorGroup A: Receives Umeclidinium 62.5 µg and Vilanterol 25 µg via DPI and Revefenacin placebo and formoterol placebo (sterile normal saline) via nebulizer at treatment visit # 2 and will continue with assigned treatment and placebo for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: umeclidinium 62.5 µg and vilanterol 25 µg; Drug: Placebo ( Revefenacin and Formoterol )
Nebulizer Treatment GroupActive comparatorGroup B: Receives revefenacin 175 µg and formoterol 20 µg via nebulizer and placebo DPI at treatment visit # 2 and will continue with assigned treatment and placebo for 12 weeks
Receives: Drug: Revefenacin 175 µg, Formoterol 20 µg; Drug: Placebo DPI

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Difference Between the Values of Area Under the Response Curve for Inspiratory Capacity (IC)

    Difference between the values of area under the response curve for inspiratory capacity (IC) from baseline through six hours (AUC IC 0-6h) after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI OR Proportion of participants achieving improvement of >2 points in their CAT score compared to baseline OR Proportion of participants achieving reduction of 4 points in SGRQ score compared to baseline

    Measured: From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Percentage change in Residual Volume (RV) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

    Measured: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

  2. Percentage change in Total Lung Capacity (TLC) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

    Measured: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

  3. Percentage change in airway resistance (Raw) from baseline after inhalation of LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

    Measured: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

  4. Maximum percentage change in inspiratory capacity between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA combination with a nebulizer versus a DPI

    Measured: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

  5. Maximum percentage change in RV between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA combination

    Measured: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

  6. Maximum Percentage Change in Airway Resistance (Raw) between 0 and 6 hours after LAMA/LABA

    Measured: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

  7. Correlation of peak inspiratory flow rate with peak IC change from baseline

    Measured: From pre-dose (baseline measurement) to post-dose measurements at 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours during study visit 2 (Week 2) and study visit 3 (Week 12)

  8. Comparison of CAT scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

    Measured: From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

  9. Comparison of SGRQ scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

    Measured: At baseline (Visit 2, Week 2), and at study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

  10. Change in TDI in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

    Measured: Measured at Week 4 (Phone Visit 1), Week 8 (Phone Visit 2), and Week 12 (Study Visit 3)

  11. Change in CAT scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

    Measured: From baseline (Visit 2, Week 2) through study completion (Visit 3, Week 12)

  12. Change in SGRQ scores in patients receiving medications with DPI vs nebulizer

    Measured: Measured at study visit 2 at week 2 and study completion visit 3 at week 12

  13. Correlation of CAT with LF and LH change (inspiratory capacity and residual volume change) with patient-reported outcomes including the SGRQ and the TDI

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) through Study Completion (Visit 3 / Week 12)

  14. Correlation of LH with patient-reported outcomes including scores from the CAT, SGRQ and TDI

    Measured: Baseline (Visit 2) through Study Completion (Visit 3 / Week 12)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2025
  2. Study start5 Dec 2023
  3. Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator
Enrolment
72 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07133880
Sponsor's protocol ID
4889
Other IDs
Institutional Review Board
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
4 Aug 2025
Last updated
19 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in