AzTrials
AzTrials

NursesAINCT07134374

Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Their Relationship With Critical Thinking Dispositions

An observational study of Nurses, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare is gaining momentum, particularly in areas such as diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. While AI offers the promise of increased efficiency and support for evidence-based care, its success depends not only on technology but also on the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Nurses
How many people
294 participants
Where
1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
Study dates
20 Aug 2025to 1 Oct 2025
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Registered nurses

Who may be able to join

  • Nurses who are actively working in a university hospital,
  • Have at least 6 months of professional experience, and
  • Are willing to participate in the research.

Who cannot join

  • Refusal to Participate: Nurses who declined to participate in the study or who did not wish to sign the informed consent form.
  • On Leave: Nurses who are on leave, annual leave, maternity leave, or parental leave during the conduct of the study.
  • Communication Barriers: Nurses with language barriers that significantly impair their ability to read and understand the questionnaire or who are known to have severe cognitive impairments.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
  • Turkish Ministry of Health, Adana City Training and Research Hospital

    Sinop, Sinop, 57000

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

Official title: Investigation of the Relationship Between Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare is gaining momentum, particularly in areas such as diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. While AI offers the promise of increased efficiency and support for evidence-based care, its success depends not only on technology but also on the attitudes and cognitive skills of healthcare professionals. Nurses, who are at the center of patient care, are expected to interact with AI systems. This may require nurses to adapt to new roles and develop critical thinking skills to interpret AI outputs correctly. Despite the growing importance of these factors, no study has examined the relationship between nurses' attitudes toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies. This study, conducted among nurses at Adana City Training and Research Hospital, aims to examine this relationship and contribute to educational and professional development strategies that support the safe and effective use of AI in nursing practice.

Read the detailed description

Today's healthcare system is rapidly evolving with technological transformations, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are at the center of this transformation. AI-supported applications in many areas, from diagnosis to treatment planning, patient monitoring systems to medication management, have the potential to optimize clinical decision-making processes and increase efficiency in healthcare services. However, the effective integration of these technologies and their adoption by healthcare professionals depends not only on technical infrastructure but also on users' attitudes and cognitive competencies.

Nurses, an integral part of healthcare services, are a key professional group that will interact directly with AI technologies in patient care processes. The integration of artificial intelligence into nursing practices is manifested in various forms, such as smart patient monitoring systems, virtual nursing assistants, clinical decision support systems, and even robotic assistants. While these innovations hold the promise of reducing nurses' workloads, minimizing errors, and helping them make more evidence-based decisions, they also present a number of challenges, including the transformation of professional roles and new competency requirements. Nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence have emerged as a critical determinant factor in the successful adoption and integration of these technologies into hospital environments and daily practice. The literature suggests that healthcare workers' negative attitudes toward new technologies can slow down or even hinder adaptation processes. Conversely, positive attitudes can make nurses more open to learning, increase their willingness to adopt technology, and boost their motivation to integrate it into clinical practice.

On the other hand, critical thinking skills, one of the cornerstones of the nursing profession, refer to the ability to make correct decisions in complex clinical scenarios, implement evidence-based practices, and resolve ethical dilemmas. Although AI systems analyze large datasets to make recommendations, the human factor remains crucial in evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and patient-specific appropriateness of these recommendations. A diagnosis suggestion or treatment plan provided by an AI system should not be blindly accepted by the nurse but critically evaluated, taking into account the source and validity of the information as well as the patient's individual characteristics. For example, an AI algorithm may recommend a medication based on certain symptoms, but the nurse's critical assessment of the patient's allergy history, other drug interactions, or socioeconomic status ensures safe and effective care. In this context, critical thinking serves as a bridge to ensure that AI-supported decisions are consistent with the patient's unique needs and overall care philosophy.

A review of the existing literature indicates that there are studies that examine healthcare professionals' attitudes toward AI or their critical thinking tendencies separately. However, no studies have directly examined the potential relationship between nurses' attitudes toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies. This relationship could provide important insights into how AI should be integrated into nursing education and professional development. If nurses who exhibit positive attitudes toward AI also demonstrate higher critical thinking tendencies, this would highlight the importance of designing AI education programs that encourage critical thinking. Alternatively, if the opposite is true, different strategies may need to be developed to address how negative attitudes may influence critical thinking processes.

Nurses working in large and busy healthcare institutions such as Adana City Training and Research Hospital serve a wide patient population and encounter various technological tools. Understanding the attitudes of nurses working at this hospital toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies will contribute to the hospital's own technology integration strategies and serve as a model for similar-scale healthcare institutions in Turkey. This research will provide an evidence-based foundation for developing educational programs and curriculum updates that facilitate the adoption and safe use of AI in nursing practice. Ultimately, such information will directly contribute to improving patient care quality and strengthening professional adaptation by guiding the development of the necessary competencies for nurses to work effectively and harmoniously with AI in future healthcare systems.

Conditions
Nurses
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, Critical Thinking, Nurses, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Decision-Making

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT07134374
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Registered NursesThis cross-sectional study includes participants who are registered nurses working actively in a university hospital and who volunteered to participate in the study. The group includes nurses aged 18 and older who possess sufficient language and cognitive skills to complete the study. All participants have clinical experience. The study aims to investigate the potential relationship between attitudes toward artificial intelligence and critical thinking tendencies. No intervention is applied, and data are collected through self-report questionnaires validated for validity at a single time point.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence

    This criterion is an assessment designed to determine nurses' general attitudes toward artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare services. Participants are given a validated "Attitude Toward AI Scale" and numerical scores are obtained. The minimum score on the scale is 20; the maximum score is 100. As attitude scores increase, attitudes toward artificial intelligence are interpreted as more positive.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Critical Thinking Disposition

    This criterion aims to determine nurses' propensity for critical thinking. Participants are assessed using the "Marmara Critical Thinking Propensity Scale." The minimum score on the scale is 28; the maximum score is 140. A higher score indicates a higher critical thinking tendency.The scores obtained indicate the extent to which individuals are prone to critical thinking skills; high scores indicate a stronger propensity for critical thinking.

    Measured: Baseline

  3. The Relationship Between Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence and Critical Thinking Disposition

    This criterion aims to analyze whether there is a statistically significant relationship between nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence and their critical thinking tendencies. Using correlation, regression, or appropriate statistical analyses, the study evaluates whether there is a positive, negative, or insignificant relationship between the two variables. These findings may provide guidance for shaping artificial intelligence education and clinical practices.

    Measured: Baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Aug 2025
  2. Study start20 Aug 2025
  3. Primary completion20 Sep 2025
  4. Study completion1 Oct 2025

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
294 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07134374
Sponsor's protocol ID
Deneme
Acronym
AI
Status last verified
Nov 2025
First submitted
2 Aug 2025
Last updated
2 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Not applicable. No individual participant data (IPD) will be shared.

Publications

  • Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K, Zhao J, Snowdon JL. Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):86-93. doi: 10.1111/cts.12884. Epub 2020 Oct 12.

    PubMed 32961010
  • Nashwan AJ, Cabrega JA, Othman MI, Khedr MA, Osman YM, El-Ashry AM, Naif R, Mousa AA. The evolving role of nursing informatics in the era of artificial intelligence. Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Mar;72(1):e13084. doi: 10.1111/inr.13084.

    PubMed 39794874
  • Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, Aldairem A, Alrashed M, Bin Saleh K, Badreldin HA, Al Yami MS, Al Harbi S, Albekairy AM. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.

    PubMed 37740191

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nurses, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07134374, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in