NursesAINCT07134374
Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Their Relationship With Critical Thinking Dispositions
An observational study of Nurses, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare is gaining momentum, particularly in areas such as diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. While AI offers the promise of increased efficiency and support for evidence-based care, its success depends not only on technology but also on the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Nurses
- How many people
- 294 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 20 Aug 2025to 1 Oct 2025
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Registered nurses
Who may be able to join
- Nurses who are actively working in a university hospital,
- Have at least 6 months of professional experience, and
- Are willing to participate in the research.
Who cannot join
- Refusal to Participate: Nurses who declined to participate in the study or who did not wish to sign the informed consent form.
- On Leave: Nurses who are on leave, annual leave, maternity leave, or parental leave during the conduct of the study.
- Communication Barriers: Nurses with language barriers that significantly impair their ability to read and understand the questionnaire or who are known to have severe cognitive impairments.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Turkish Ministry of Health, Adana City Training and Research Hospital
Sinop, Sinop, 57000
About this study
Official title: Investigation of the Relationship Between Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare is gaining momentum, particularly in areas such as diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. While AI offers the promise of increased efficiency and support for evidence-based care, its success depends not only on technology but also on the attitudes and cognitive skills of healthcare professionals. Nurses, who are at the center of patient care, are expected to interact with AI systems. This may require nurses to adapt to new roles and develop critical thinking skills to interpret AI outputs correctly. Despite the growing importance of these factors, no study has examined the relationship between nurses' attitudes toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies. This study, conducted among nurses at Adana City Training and Research Hospital, aims to examine this relationship and contribute to educational and professional development strategies that support the safe and effective use of AI in nursing practice.
Read the detailed description
Today's healthcare system is rapidly evolving with technological transformations, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are at the center of this transformation. AI-supported applications in many areas, from diagnosis to treatment planning, patient monitoring systems to medication management, have the potential to optimize clinical decision-making processes and increase efficiency in healthcare services. However, the effective integration of these technologies and their adoption by healthcare professionals depends not only on technical infrastructure but also on users' attitudes and cognitive competencies.
Nurses, an integral part of healthcare services, are a key professional group that will interact directly with AI technologies in patient care processes. The integration of artificial intelligence into nursing practices is manifested in various forms, such as smart patient monitoring systems, virtual nursing assistants, clinical decision support systems, and even robotic assistants. While these innovations hold the promise of reducing nurses' workloads, minimizing errors, and helping them make more evidence-based decisions, they also present a number of challenges, including the transformation of professional roles and new competency requirements. Nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence have emerged as a critical determinant factor in the successful adoption and integration of these technologies into hospital environments and daily practice. The literature suggests that healthcare workers' negative attitudes toward new technologies can slow down or even hinder adaptation processes. Conversely, positive attitudes can make nurses more open to learning, increase their willingness to adopt technology, and boost their motivation to integrate it into clinical practice.
On the other hand, critical thinking skills, one of the cornerstones of the nursing profession, refer to the ability to make correct decisions in complex clinical scenarios, implement evidence-based practices, and resolve ethical dilemmas. Although AI systems analyze large datasets to make recommendations, the human factor remains crucial in evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and patient-specific appropriateness of these recommendations. A diagnosis suggestion or treatment plan provided by an AI system should not be blindly accepted by the nurse but critically evaluated, taking into account the source and validity of the information as well as the patient's individual characteristics. For example, an AI algorithm may recommend a medication based on certain symptoms, but the nurse's critical assessment of the patient's allergy history, other drug interactions, or socioeconomic status ensures safe and effective care. In this context, critical thinking serves as a bridge to ensure that AI-supported decisions are consistent with the patient's unique needs and overall care philosophy.
A review of the existing literature indicates that there are studies that examine healthcare professionals' attitudes toward AI or their critical thinking tendencies separately. However, no studies have directly examined the potential relationship between nurses' attitudes toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies. This relationship could provide important insights into how AI should be integrated into nursing education and professional development. If nurses who exhibit positive attitudes toward AI also demonstrate higher critical thinking tendencies, this would highlight the importance of designing AI education programs that encourage critical thinking. Alternatively, if the opposite is true, different strategies may need to be developed to address how negative attitudes may influence critical thinking processes.
Nurses working in large and busy healthcare institutions such as Adana City Training and Research Hospital serve a wide patient population and encounter various technological tools. Understanding the attitudes of nurses working at this hospital toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies will contribute to the hospital's own technology integration strategies and serve as a model for similar-scale healthcare institutions in Turkey. This research will provide an evidence-based foundation for developing educational programs and curriculum updates that facilitate the adoption and safe use of AI in nursing practice. Ultimately, such information will directly contribute to improving patient care quality and strengthening professional adaptation by guiding the development of the necessary competencies for nurses to work effectively and harmoniously with AI in future healthcare systems.
- Conditions
- Nurses
- Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence, Critical Thinking, Nurses, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Decision-Making
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Registered Nurses | This cross-sectional study includes participants who are registered nurses working actively in a university hospital and who volunteered to participate in the study. The group includes nurses aged 18 and older who possess sufficient language and cognitive skills to complete the study. All participants have clinical experience. The study aims to investigate the potential relationship between attitudes toward artificial intelligence and critical thinking tendencies. No intervention is applied, and data are collected through self-report questionnaires validated for validity at a single time point. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence
This criterion is an assessment designed to determine nurses' general attitudes toward artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare services. Participants are given a validated "Attitude Toward AI Scale" and numerical scores are obtained. The minimum score on the scale is 20; the maximum score is 100. As attitude scores increase, attitudes toward artificial intelligence are interpreted as more positive.
Measured: Baseline
Critical Thinking Disposition
This criterion aims to determine nurses' propensity for critical thinking. Participants are assessed using the "Marmara Critical Thinking Propensity Scale." The minimum score on the scale is 28; the maximum score is 140. A higher score indicates a higher critical thinking tendency.The scores obtained indicate the extent to which individuals are prone to critical thinking skills; high scores indicate a stronger propensity for critical thinking.
Measured: Baseline
The Relationship Between Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence and Critical Thinking Disposition
This criterion aims to analyze whether there is a statistically significant relationship between nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence and their critical thinking tendencies. Using correlation, regression, or appropriate statistical analyses, the study evaluates whether there is a positive, negative, or insignificant relationship between the two variables. These findings may provide guidance for shaping artificial intelligence education and clinical practices.
Measured: Baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Aug 2025
- Study start20 Aug 2025
- Primary completion20 Sep 2025
- Study completion1 Oct 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for NursesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sebiha Aktaş Us, TC Erciyes University
- Investigators
- Abdullah Orhan Demirtaş, Associate Professor, Study director, Adana City Education and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134374
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Deneme
- Acronym
- AI
- Status last verified
- Nov 2025
- First submitted
- 2 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 2 Dec 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Not applicable. No individual participant data (IPD) will be shared.
Publications
Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K, Zhao J, Snowdon JL. Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):86-93. doi: 10.1111/cts.12884. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
PubMed 32961010Nashwan AJ, Cabrega JA, Othman MI, Khedr MA, Osman YM, El-Ashry AM, Naif R, Mousa AA. The evolving role of nursing informatics in the era of artificial intelligence. Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Mar;72(1):e13084. doi: 10.1111/inr.13084.
PubMed 39794874Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, Aldairem A, Alrashed M, Bin Saleh K, Badreldin HA, Al Yami MS, Al Harbi S, Albekairy AM. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.
PubMed 37740191
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Dec 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Investigation of the Relationship Between Nurses' Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence and Their Critical Thinking Dispositions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134374
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AI / Deneme
- Conditions
- Nurses
- Keywords
- Artificial Intelligence, Critical Thinking, Nurses, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Decision-Making
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 294 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- TC Erciyes UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 20 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 20 Sep 2025 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2025 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into healthcare is gaining momentum, particularly in areas such as diagnosis, treatment planning, and patient monitoring. While AI offers the promise of increased efficiency and support for evidence-based care, its success depends not only on technology but also on the attitudes and cognitive skills of healthcare professionals. Nurses, who are at the center of patient care, are expected to interact with AI systems. This may require nurses to adapt to new roles and develop critical thinking skills to interpret AI outputs correctly. Despite the growing importance of these factors, no study has examined the relationship between nurses' attitudes toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies. This study, conducted among nurses at Adana City Training and Research Hospital, aims to examine this relationship and contribute to educational and professional development strategies that support the safe and effective use of AI in nursing practice.
Detailed description
Today's healthcare system is rapidly evolving with technological transformations, and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies are at the center of this transformation. AI-supported applications in many areas, from diagnosis to treatment planning, patient monitoring systems to medication management, have the potential to optimize clinical decision-making processes and increase efficiency in healthcare services. However, the effective integration of these technologies and their adoption by healthcare professionals depends not only on technical infrastructure but also on users' attitudes and cognitive competencies.
Nurses, an integral part of healthcare services, are a key professional group that will interact directly with AI technologies in patient care processes. The integration of artificial intelligence into nursing practices is manifested in various forms, such as smart patient monitoring systems, virtual nursing assistants, clinical decision support systems, and even robotic assistants. While these innovations hold the promise of reducing nurses' workloads, minimizing errors, and helping them make more evidence-based decisions, they also present a number of challenges, including the transformation of professional roles and new competency requirements. Nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence have emerged as a critical determinant factor in the successful adoption and integration of these technologies into hospital environments and daily practice. The literature suggests that healthcare workers' negative attitudes toward new technologies can slow down or even hinder adaptation processes. Conversely, positive attitudes can make nurses more open to learning, increase their willingness to adopt technology, and boost their motivation to integrate it into clinical practice.
On the other hand, critical thinking skills, one of the cornerstones of the nursing profession, refer to the ability to make correct decisions in complex clinical scenarios, implement evidence-based practices, and resolve ethical dilemmas. Although AI systems analyze large datasets to make recommendations, the human factor remains crucial in evaluating the accuracy, reliability, and patient-specific appropriateness of these recommendations. A diagnosis suggestion or treatment plan provided by an AI system should not be blindly accepted by the nurse but critically evaluated, taking into account the source and validity of the information as well as the patient's individual characteristics. For example, an AI algorithm may recommend a medication based on certain symptoms, but the nurse's critical assessment of the patient's allergy history, other drug interactions, or socioeconomic status ensures safe and effective care. In this context, critical thinking serves as a bridge to ensure that AI-supported decisions are consistent with the patient's unique needs and overall care philosophy.
A review of the existing literature indicates that there are studies that examine healthcare professionals' attitudes toward AI or their critical thinking tendencies separately. However, no studies have directly examined the potential relationship between nurses' attitudes toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies. This relationship could provide important insights into how AI should be integrated into nursing education and professional development. If nurses who exhibit positive attitudes toward AI also demonstrate higher critical thinking tendencies, this would highlight the importance of designing AI education programs that encourage critical thinking. Alternatively, if the opposite is true, different strategies may need to be developed to address how negative attitudes may influence critical thinking processes.
Nurses working in large and busy healthcare institutions such as Adana City Training and Research Hospital serve a wide patient population and encounter various technological tools. Understanding the attitudes of nurses working at this hospital toward AI and their critical thinking tendencies will contribute to the hospital's own technology integration strategies and serve as a model for similar-scale healthcare institutions in Turkey. This research will provide an evidence-based foundation for developing educational programs and curriculum updates that facilitate the adoption and safe use of AI in nursing practice. Ultimately, such information will directly contribute to improving patient care quality and strengthening professional adaptation by guiding the development of the necessary competencies for nurses to work effectively and harmoniously with AI in future healthcare systems.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Registered Nurses | – | –This cross-sectional study includes participants who are registered nurses working actively in a university hospital and who volunteered to participate in the study. The group includes nurses aged 18 and older who possess sufficient language and cognitive skills to complete the study. All participants have clinical experience. The study aims to investigate the potential relationship between attitudes toward artificial intelligence and critical thinking tendencies. No intervention is applied, and data are collected through self-report questionnaires validated for validity at a single time point. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Registered nurses
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Nurses who are actively working in a university hospital,
- Have at least 6 months of professional experience, and
- Are willing to participate in the research.
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Refusal to Participate: Nurses who declined to participate in the study or who did not wish to sign the informed consent form.
- On Leave: Nurses who are on leave, annual leave, maternity leave, or parental leave during the conduct of the study.
- Communication Barriers: Nurses with language barriers that significantly impair their ability to read and understand the questionnaire or who are known to have severe cognitive impairments.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence
Time frame: Baseline
This criterion is an assessment designed to determine nurses' general attitudes toward artificial intelligence technologies in healthcare services. Participants are given a validated "Attitude Toward AI Scale" and numerical scores are obtained. The minimum score on the scale is 20; the maximum score is 100. As attitude scores increase, attitudes toward artificial intelligence are interpreted as more positive.
Critical Thinking Disposition
Time frame: Baseline
This criterion aims to determine nurses' propensity for critical thinking. Participants are assessed using the "Marmara Critical Thinking Propensity Scale." The minimum score on the scale is 28; the maximum score is 140. A higher score indicates a higher critical thinking tendency.The scores obtained indicate the extent to which individuals are prone to critical thinking skills; high scores indicate a stronger propensity for critical thinking.
The Relationship Between Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence and Critical Thinking Disposition
Time frame: Baseline
This criterion aims to analyze whether there is a statistically significant relationship between nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence and their critical thinking tendencies. Using correlation, regression, or appropriate statistical analyses, the study evaluates whether there is a positive, negative, or insignificant relationship between the two variables. These findings may provide guidance for shaping artificial intelligence education and clinical practices.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Dec 2025.
- Background: PubMed 32961010Johnson KB, Wei WQ, Weeraratne D, Frisse ME, Misulis K, Rhee K, Zhao J, Snowdon JL. Precision Medicine, AI, and the Future of Personalized Health Care. Clin Transl Sci. 2021 Jan;14(1):86-93. doi: 10.1111/cts.12884. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
- Background: PubMed 39794874Nashwan AJ, Cabrega JA, Othman MI, Khedr MA, Osman YM, El-Ashry AM, Naif R, Mousa AA. The evolving role of nursing informatics in the era of artificial intelligence. Int Nurs Rev. 2025 Mar;72(1):e13084. doi: 10.1111/inr.13084.
- Background: PubMed 37740191Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, Aldairem A, Alrashed M, Bin Saleh K, Badreldin HA, Al Yami MS, Al Harbi S, Albekairy AM. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023 Sep 22;23(1):689. doi: 10.1186/s12909-023-04698-z.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Not applicable. No individual participant data (IPD) will be shared.
Related trials for Nurses
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Quality ImprOvement stUdy ouTpatient Surgery rapID movE
Postoperative Recovery
RecruitingObservational study
PERCE-MUCO: Perceptions and Expectations of People With Cystic Fibrosis Regarding a Change in Treatment
Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
Not yet recruiting
Mobile-Based Resilience Intervention for Moral Injury, Compassion Fatigue, and Distress in ICU Nurses
Moral Injury
Active, not recruiting
A Nurse-Led Intervention for Fear of Progression in Advanced Cancer
Advanced Lung Carcinoma, Metastatic Malignant Female Reproductive System Neoplasm
Not yet recruiting
AI-Powered Sleep Hygiene Mentor for Adults Living With HIV
Sleep Wake Disorders, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Abdullah Orhan Demirtaş, Associate Professor study director
Adana City Education and Research Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Nurses, run by TC Erciyes University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Attitude Toward Artificial Intelligence (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07134374, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2025.