Popliteal Sciatic Nerve BlockNCT07134608
Comparing Classical Approach and Crosswise Approach to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
A study testing Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 ml in people with Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
Trial summary
Sensory and motor innervation below the knee is provided mainly by the popliteal-sciatic nerve except for a variable area of the medial leg supplied by the saphenous nerve. Regional anaesthesia and analgesia for below knee surgery are frequently provided by blocking the popliteal sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
- What is being tested?
- Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 ml
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 80 participants
- Where
- 1 siteMalaysia
- Study dates
- 1 Nov 2023to 30 Nov 2024
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- planned for either elective or non-elective unilateral below-knee surgery at HUKM
- patients aged 18 years and older and classified as physical status I, II, or III as dictated by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)
Who cannot join
- included pregnant patients, those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m², contraindicated to peripheral nerve block (such as existing nerve injury to the limb intended for surgery), patient refusal, severe coagulopathy, local anaesthetic (LA) allergy, active infection at the intended block site, patients unable to provide a pain score using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS)
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Malaysia1 site
Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz
Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur, 56000
About this study
Official title: Classical Popliteal Sciatic Block Versus Crosswise Approach for Popliteal Sciatic (CAPS) Block in Below Knee Surgery:A Randomised Control Trial
Sensory and motor innervation below the knee is provided mainly by the popliteal-sciatic nerve except for a variable area of the medial leg supplied by the saphenous nerve. Regional anaesthesia and analgesia for below knee surgery are frequently provided by blocking the popliteal sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Popliteal sciatic block was first introduced around the 1970s and has emerged as a popular technique for below knee surgery despite other types of lower limb peripheral nerve block. This is contributed because popliteal fossa offers a superficial and accessible location for nerve blockade. This anatomical feature simplifies the procedure and may reduce the risk of complications such as vascular puncture or nerve injury.
Analgesia provided by the popliteal sciatic block lasts significantly longer than with ankle blocks. One of the reasons is administration of local anaesthetic agent at the popliteal fossa allows it to bathe the sciatic nerve before it bifurcates into the tibial and common peroneal nerves, leading to a more extensive and prolonged nerve blockade. Besides the sciatic nerve at the popliteal level is encased in a common epineural sheath, which can facilitate the spread of the anaesthetic and prolong its effect. The popliteal sciatic block can be performed as a single-shot technique or as a continuous infusion via a catheter The success rate of popliteal sciatic block is dependent on several variables, including the operator's skill, patient considerations, and surgical variables.
This study comparing between 2 approaches of popliteal sciatic nerve ie: classical approach and relatively new approach that is crosswise approach of popliteal sciatic nerve (CAPS) block.
- Conditions
- Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
- Being tested
- Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 ml
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 mlProcedure or surgery
Different position while blocking the popliteal sciatic nerve block
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Classical Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block | Active comparator | Patients turned to the right or left lateral decubitus position, depending on which lower limb was planned for operation (i.e., right lateral decubitus if the operation was on the left lower limb and vice-versa). A pillow was placed between the lower limbs to facilitate block access and patient comfort. The classical popliteal sciatic block was done using a ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear or low-frequency curvilinear probe placed 5-6 cm cranial to the popliteal fossa crease while identifying the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve. Skin infiltration with 5 ml of lignocaine 2% was performed using a 23G,followed by in-plane introduction of an 80 mm 22G block needle, aiming to penetrate the sciatic nerve sheath at the level of bifurcation, with placement confirmed using a nerve stimulator. After confirming negative aspiration for blood, 20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% was injected, and the spread of LA within the sheath was confirmed by ultrasound. Receives: Procedure: Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 ml |
| Crosswise Approach to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve (CAPS block) | Active comparator | Patients in remained in the supine position. The CAPS block was performed using a similar Sonosite SII® ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear or low-frequency curvilinear probe placed lateral to the thigh, 5-6 cm cranial to the popliteal fossa crease, while identifying the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve into the tibial and common peroneal nerves. Thereafter, the block proceeded similarly to patients in Group A, with 5 ml of lignocaine 2% for skin infiltration, in-plane introduction of the block needle aiming to penetrate the sciatic nerve sheath at the level of bifurcation and placement confirmed with a nerve stimulator, followed by injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% after confirming negative aspiration for blood. The spread of LA within the sheath was confirmed by ultrasound. Receives: Procedure: Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 ml |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain score during positioning and block performance
Using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS),ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable.
Measured: Time from positioning and block performance until completion of block (preoperative).
Secondary outcomes (5)
Fentanyl consumption
Aliquots of intravenous (IV) fentanyl (25-50 micrograms) were given if the patient experienced pain with a VNRS ≥4 during positioning or block performance.
Measured: On operative day until post operative day 1
Onset of block
Adequacy of the block was assessed at 5-minute intervals based on the loss of pain sensation to pin prick with a 23G (B. Braun®) needle in the distribution of the popliteal sciatic nerve (measure in minutes).
Measured: Immediately after block completion until 30 minutes after.
Failure rate
Persistent pain sensation after 30 minutes over popliteal sciatic nerve distribution
Measured: 30 minutes after block completion
Patient's satisfaction
Patient satisfaction with the block was assessed using a five-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 2 = dissatisfied, 3 = neutral, 4 = satisfied, 5 = very satisfied).
Measured: One day after procedure.
Complications
Such as hematoma, L.A toxicity, or persistent numbness/weakness lasting more than 24 hours.
Measured: On operative day until post operative day 1
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Aug 2025
- Study start1 Nov 2023
- Primary completion30 Nov 2024
- Study completion30 Nov 2024
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Popliteal Sciatic Nerve BlockStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- National University of Malaysia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134608
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- JEPUKM-JEP-2023-973
- Status last verified
- May 2025
- First submitted
- 21 Mar 2025
- Last updated
- 21 Aug 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Aug 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Classical Popliteal Sciatic Block Versus Crosswise Approach for Popliteal Sciatic (CAPS) Block in Below Knee Surgery:A Randomised Control Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134608
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- JEPUKM-JEP-2023-973
- Conditions
- Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 80 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- National University of MalaysiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Nov 2023 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 30 Nov 2024 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Nov 2024 (actual)
- First posted
- 21 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Sensory and motor innervation below the knee is provided mainly by the popliteal-sciatic nerve except for a variable area of the medial leg supplied by the saphenous nerve. Regional anaesthesia and analgesia for below knee surgery are frequently provided by blocking the popliteal sciatic nerve in the popliteal fossa. Popliteal sciatic block was first introduced around the 1970s and has emerged as a popular technique for below knee surgery despite other types of lower limb peripheral nerve block. This is contributed because popliteal fossa offers a superficial and accessible location for nerve blockade. This anatomical feature simplifies the procedure and may reduce the risk of complications such as vascular puncture or nerve injury.
Analgesia provided by the popliteal sciatic block lasts significantly longer than with ankle blocks. One of the reasons is administration of local anaesthetic agent at the popliteal fossa allows it to bathe the sciatic nerve before it bifurcates into the tibial and common peroneal nerves, leading to a more extensive and prolonged nerve blockade. Besides the sciatic nerve at the popliteal level is encased in a common epineural sheath, which can facilitate the spread of the anaesthetic and prolong its effect. The popliteal sciatic block can be performed as a single-shot technique or as a continuous infusion via a catheter The success rate of popliteal sciatic block is dependent on several variables, including the operator's skill, patient considerations, and surgical variables.
This study comparing between 2 approaches of popliteal sciatic nerve ie: classical approach and relatively new approach that is crosswise approach of popliteal sciatic nerve (CAPS) block.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Classical Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block | Active comparator | Procedure: Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 mlPatients turned to the right or left lateral decubitus position, depending on which lower limb was planned for operation (i.e., right lateral decubitus if the operation was on the left lower limb and vice-versa). A pillow was placed between the lower limbs to facilitate block access and patient comfort. The classical popliteal sciatic block was done using a ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear or low-frequency curvilinear probe placed 5-6 cm cranial to the popliteal fossa crease while identifying the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve. Skin infiltration with 5 ml of lignocaine 2% was performed using a 23G,followed by in-plane introduction of an 80 mm 22G block needle, aiming to penetrate the sciatic nerve sheath at the level of bifurcation, with placement confirmed using a nerve stimulator. After confirming negative aspiration for blood, 20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% was injected, and the spread of LA within the sheath was confirmed by ultrasound. |
| Crosswise Approach to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve (CAPS block) | Active comparator | Procedure: Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 mlPatients in remained in the supine position. The CAPS block was performed using a similar Sonosite SII® ultrasound machine with a high-frequency linear or low-frequency curvilinear probe placed lateral to the thigh, 5-6 cm cranial to the popliteal fossa crease, while identifying the bifurcation of the sciatic nerve into the tibial and common peroneal nerves. Thereafter, the block proceeded similarly to patients in Group A, with 5 ml of lignocaine 2% for skin infiltration, in-plane introduction of the block needle aiming to penetrate the sciatic nerve sheath at the level of bifurcation and placement confirmed with a nerve stimulator, followed by injection of 20 ml of Ropivacaine 0.5% after confirming negative aspiration for blood. The spread of LA within the sheath was confirmed by ultrasound. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- planned for either elective or non-elective unilateral below-knee surgery at HUKM
- patients aged 18 years and older and classified as physical status I, II, or III as dictated by the American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- included pregnant patients, those with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m², contraindicated to peripheral nerve block (such as existing nerve injury to the limb intended for surgery), patient refusal, severe coagulopathy, local anaesthetic (LA) allergy, active infection at the intended block site, patients unable to provide a pain score using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 mlDifferent position while blocking the popliteal sciatic nerve block | Procedure or surgery | Classical Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block, Crosswise Approach to Popliteal Sciatic Nerve (CAPS block) |
Primary outcome
Pain score during positioning and block performance
Time frame: Time from positioning and block performance until completion of block (preoperative).
Using verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS),ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 = no pain and 10 = the worst pain imaginable.
5 secondary outcomes
Fentanyl consumption
Time frame: On operative day until post operative day 1
Onset of block
Time frame: Immediately after block completion until 30 minutes after.
Failure rate
Time frame: 30 minutes after block completion
Patient's satisfaction
Time frame: One day after procedure.
Complications
Time frame: On operative day until post operative day 1
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Aug 2025.
Related trials for Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
Recruiting
Combined Popliteal and Adductor Canal Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia in Children With Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral Palsy, Postoperative Pain
Recruiting
Bupivacaine-Lidocaine vs Bupivacaine for Ultrasound-Guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
Lower Extremity, Nerve Block
Recruiting
Simulation-based Training for Ultrasound-guided Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block
Feedback
RecruitingObservational study
Assessing the Enhanced Precision: The Value of Impedance in Ultrasound-Guided Nerve Blocks (Axillary, Interscalene, Popliteal Sciatic), an Exploratory Prospective Observational Study
Impedance, Axillary Nerve Block
RecruitingPhase 2
Sciatic Nerve Block With ALX006 in Subjects Undergoing Bunionectomy
Hallux Valgus, Bunionectomy
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Popliteal Plexus Block with 20 ml in people with Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Block, run by National University of Malaysia at 1 site in Malaysia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Aug 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Malaysia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain score during positioning and block performance (time frame: Time from positioning and block performance until completion of block (preoperative).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Aug 2025.