Leaving Without Being Seen or TreatedNCT07134985
Pediatric Patients Who Leave the Emergency Department Without Treatment
An observational study of Leaving Without Being Seen or Treated, run by Hillel Yaffe Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
Trial summary
Research Objectives: To examine the clinical, operational, and demographic characteristics that influence the decision of patients to voluntarily leave the pediatric emergency department at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center before completing the evaluation or medical treatment. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Leaving Without Being Seen or Treated
- How many people
- 33,000 participants
- Where
- 1 siteIsrael
- Study dates
- 1 Jan 2026to 1 Dec 2027
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 17 years
- All sexes
- Child
Study population: Children aged 0-17 who arrived at the pediatric emergency department between January 2024 and December 2025.
Who may be able to join
- Children aged 0-17 who arrived at the pediatric emergency department between January 2024 and December 2025.
Who cannot join
- None
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
About this study
Research Objectives:
To examine the clinical, operational, and demographic characteristics that influence the decision of patients to voluntarily leave the pediatric emergency department at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center before completing the evaluation or medical treatment.
Read the detailed description
Patient departure from the Emergency Department (ED) before completing the medical procedure (LWBS - Left Without Being Seen or Treated) is a well-known phenomenon in emergency medicine and can be dangerous, with severe medical consequences, particularly when the patient is unaware of their condition or has not received the necessary treatment. The ED is responsible for treating urgent cases, and thus, a patient's decision to leave before completing the evaluation and/or receiving appropriate care can lead to serious consequences related to undiagnosed or improperly treated illnesses or injuries. In addition, the patient may not receive the necessary discharge instructions, which could negatively affect their health, worsen their condition, cause irreversible damage, increase the rate of repeated visits, and even pose a risk of mortality.
Numerous studies have focused on the adult population, but very few have addressed children. In pediatric EDs, the responsibility for the decision to leave the department rests with the parent or guardian, which underscores the unique importance of understanding the factors that contribute to this decision. A previous study conducted in the adult emergency department at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center found that a low triage level and long wait times were significant predictors of early departure.
Similar findings have been reported in studies conducted in the U.S. and Canada, where the impact of long wait times, ED overload, younger age, time of arrival, low urgency, and self-arrival without a referral from a physician were emphasized as contributing factors . Other studies pointed to sociodemographic variables such as nationality, gender, socioeconomic status, and previous instances of early departure as additional risk factors.
A unique study conducted among Indigenous communities in Canada highlighted factors such as feelings of discrimination, lack of trust, and poor communication with medical staff as influential in the decision of parents to leave before completing treatment [5]. Additionally, a qualitative study conducted in the U.S. using Q-methodology (a method for identifying subjective patterns of thinking by sorting statements based on agreement or relevance) found that parents left due to a lack of updates on their position in the queue, unclear information about wait times, feelings of helplessness in the face of the child's pain, or external pressures such as work or caring for other children.
Since the decision to leave in children is made by the parent and not the patient, understanding the characteristics, circumstances, and factors involved is crucial. In Israel, where the healthcare system is publicly funded and based on the National Health Insurance Law, which provides access to clinics within health funds or emergency centers, there are unique parameters that affect access to hospital care-such as referral by a physician or payment for self-referred visits. Therefore, it is likely that local, cultural, and organizational factors influence the phenomenon of early departure, and these should be examined in the pediatric context.
Due to the lack of qualitative and quantitative studies on the issue of early departure from pediatric emergency departments, both globally and particularly in Israel, there is a need to complete research aimed at filling this knowledge gap. The main reason for conducting this research is the desire to identify recurring patterns and characteristics that predict early departure, which will enable early interventions that improve service quality, reduce the risk of early departure, and decrease the medical complications resulting from it. Additionally, this study may contribute to understanding the parents' perspectives, the relationship between parents' experiences in the ED and medical decision-making, and serve as a basis for future research, training medical staff, and improving the patient and caregiver experience alike.
Research Objectives:
To examine the clinical, operational, and demographic characteristics that influence the decision of patients to voluntarily leave the pediatric emergency department at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center before completing the evaluation or medical treatment.
- Conditions
- Leaving Without Being Seen or Treated
- Being tested
- No intervention
- Keywords
- Left Without Being Seen or Treated
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
No interventionOther
No intervention
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Left Without Being Seen or Treated | The patients who left without being seen or treated Receives: Other: No intervention | |
| Discharged After Being Seen or Treated | The patients who were discharged after being seen or treated Receives: Other: No intervention |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Descreption of the population
Descreption of the population of those who left without treatment in epidemiological terms.
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Aug 2025
- Study start1 Jan 2026
- Primary completion1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Leaving Without Being Seen or TreatedStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Enrolment
- 33,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Erez Nadir, MD, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
- Investigators
- Erez Nadir, MD, Principal investigator, Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134985
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HYMC-0019-22-IL
- Status last verified
- Apr 2026
- First submitted
- 4 Aug 2025
- Last updated
- 9 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No: Parivate data can not be shared by institution rules.
Publications
Gorski JK, Arnold TS, Usiak H, Showalter CD. Crowding is the strongest predictor of left without being seen risk in a pediatric emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
PubMed 33845424Kappy B, McKinley K, Chamberlain J, Badolato GM, Podolsky RH, Bond G, Schultz TR, Isbey S. Leaving Without Being Seen From the Pediatric Emergency Department: A New Baseline. J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;65(3):e237-e249. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.05.019. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
PubMed 37659902Taylor B, Young M. Pediatric ED departmental complexity: a different approach to the concept of ED crowding. CJEM. 2022 Apr;24(3):318-324. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00261-9. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
PubMed 35146700Kennedy M, MacBean CE, Brand C, Sundararajan V, McD Taylor D. Review article: leaving the emergency department without being seen. Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Aug;20(4):306-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01103.x.
PubMed 18782204Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Stack AM. "Left without being seen": a national profile of children who leave the emergency department before evaluation. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 May 1.
PubMed 18450328
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 9 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pediatric Patients Who Leave the Emergency Department Without Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07134985
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HYMC-0019-22-IL
- Conditions
- Leaving Without Being Seen or Treated
- Keywords
- Left Without Being Seen or Treated
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 33,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Hillel Yaffe Medical CenterOther government
- Study start
- 1 Jan 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Dec 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Aug 2025 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Research Objectives:
To examine the clinical, operational, and demographic characteristics that influence the decision of patients to voluntarily leave the pediatric emergency department at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center before completing the evaluation or medical treatment.
Detailed description
Patient departure from the Emergency Department (ED) before completing the medical procedure (LWBS - Left Without Being Seen or Treated) is a well-known phenomenon in emergency medicine and can be dangerous, with severe medical consequences, particularly when the patient is unaware of their condition or has not received the necessary treatment. The ED is responsible for treating urgent cases, and thus, a patient's decision to leave before completing the evaluation and/or receiving appropriate care can lead to serious consequences related to undiagnosed or improperly treated illnesses or injuries. In addition, the patient may not receive the necessary discharge instructions, which could negatively affect their health, worsen their condition, cause irreversible damage, increase the rate of repeated visits, and even pose a risk of mortality.
Numerous studies have focused on the adult population, but very few have addressed children. In pediatric EDs, the responsibility for the decision to leave the department rests with the parent or guardian, which underscores the unique importance of understanding the factors that contribute to this decision. A previous study conducted in the adult emergency department at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center found that a low triage level and long wait times were significant predictors of early departure.
Similar findings have been reported in studies conducted in the U.S. and Canada, where the impact of long wait times, ED overload, younger age, time of arrival, low urgency, and self-arrival without a referral from a physician were emphasized as contributing factors . Other studies pointed to sociodemographic variables such as nationality, gender, socioeconomic status, and previous instances of early departure as additional risk factors.
A unique study conducted among Indigenous communities in Canada highlighted factors such as feelings of discrimination, lack of trust, and poor communication with medical staff as influential in the decision of parents to leave before completing treatment [5]. Additionally, a qualitative study conducted in the U.S. using Q-methodology (a method for identifying subjective patterns of thinking by sorting statements based on agreement or relevance) found that parents left due to a lack of updates on their position in the queue, unclear information about wait times, feelings of helplessness in the face of the child's pain, or external pressures such as work or caring for other children.
Since the decision to leave in children is made by the parent and not the patient, understanding the characteristics, circumstances, and factors involved is crucial. In Israel, where the healthcare system is publicly funded and based on the National Health Insurance Law, which provides access to clinics within health funds or emergency centers, there are unique parameters that affect access to hospital care-such as referral by a physician or payment for self-referred visits. Therefore, it is likely that local, cultural, and organizational factors influence the phenomenon of early departure, and these should be examined in the pediatric context.
Due to the lack of qualitative and quantitative studies on the issue of early departure from pediatric emergency departments, both globally and particularly in Israel, there is a need to complete research aimed at filling this knowledge gap. The main reason for conducting this research is the desire to identify recurring patterns and characteristics that predict early departure, which will enable early interventions that improve service quality, reduce the risk of early departure, and decrease the medical complications resulting from it. Additionally, this study may contribute to understanding the parents' perspectives, the relationship between parents' experiences in the ED and medical decision-making, and serve as a basis for future research, training medical staff, and improving the patient and caregiver experience alike.
Research Objectives:
To examine the clinical, operational, and demographic characteristics that influence the decision of patients to voluntarily leave the pediatric emergency department at Hillel Yaffe Medical Center before completing the evaluation or medical treatment.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Retrospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Left Without Being Seen or Treated | – | Other: No interventionThe patients who left without being seen or treated |
| Discharged After Being Seen or Treated | – | Other: No interventionThe patients who were discharged after being seen or treated |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Children aged 0-17 who arrived at the pediatric emergency department between January 2024 and December 2025.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Children aged 0-17 who arrived at the pediatric emergency department between January 2024 and December 2025.
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- None
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| No interventionNo intervention | Other | Discharged After Being Seen or Treated, Left Without Being Seen or Treated |
Primary outcome
Descreption of the population
Time frame: 1 year
Descreption of the population of those who left without treatment in epidemiological terms.
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 9 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 33845424Gorski JK, Arnold TS, Usiak H, Showalter CD. Crowding is the strongest predictor of left without being seen risk in a pediatric emergency department. Am J Emerg Med. 2021 Oct;48:73-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
- Background: PubMed 37659902Kappy B, McKinley K, Chamberlain J, Badolato GM, Podolsky RH, Bond G, Schultz TR, Isbey S. Leaving Without Being Seen From the Pediatric Emergency Department: A New Baseline. J Emerg Med. 2023 Sep;65(3):e237-e249. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.05.019. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
- Background: PubMed 35146700Taylor B, Young M. Pediatric ED departmental complexity: a different approach to the concept of ED crowding. CJEM. 2022 Apr;24(3):318-324. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00261-9. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
- Background: PubMed 18782204Kennedy M, MacBean CE, Brand C, Sundararajan V, McD Taylor D. Review article: leaving the emergency department without being seen. Emerg Med Australas. 2008 Aug;20(4):306-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2008.01103.x.
- Background: PubMed 18450328Bourgeois FT, Shannon MW, Stack AM. "Left without being seen": a national profile of children who leave the emergency department before evaluation. Ann Emerg Med. 2008 Dec;52(6):599-605. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.03.012. Epub 2008 May 1.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No. Parivate data can not be shared by institution rules.
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Erez Nadir, MD principal investigator
Hillel Yaffe Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Leaving Without Being Seen or Treated, run by Hillel Yaffe Medical Center at 1 site in Israel.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Israel. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Erez Nadir, MD (97247744375, erezn@hymc.gov.il), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Descreption of the population (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07134985, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Apr 2026.